Gravitas Spark CrowdFunding

Tag: AI

  • Tech Sovereignty Getting Very Real

    Tech Sovereignty Getting Very Real

    Random thought – did music break the USSR? As I watched 40 year old re-runs of Live Aid last week, I found myself trying to recall the emotions and vibe at that moment in time. The Live Aid concert itself was a significant exhibition of global solidarity in raising awareness of famine in Ethiopia. In hindsight, the long-lasting impact of Live Aid on preventing famine might be questionable as global leadership values currently go AWOL on the Gaza and Sudan catastrophes. However, the sheer reach of that day’s broadcast to over 2 billion people in more than 150 countries was a display of communications tech power which has to be considered against the geopolitical backdrop of the time. Saigon had finally fallen to Communist North Vietnam only 10 years earlier, Afghanistan had been invaded by the USSR just 5 years before and Poland had recently come out of a period of martial law. Nobody felt like the USSR empire was faltering. But…. its “iron curtain” was failing to block the reality of better living elsewhere.

    In 1981 MTV, the US music video channel, launched on cable television and was syndicated to countries around the world. Global audiences were seeing music combined with video imagery celebrating freedom, democracy and the rewards of talent and endeavour. Live Aid confirmed communications technology was moving rapidly and posed a real threat to those who needed message control to stay in power. The Chernobyl nuclear disaster happened a year after Live Aid, the Berlin Wall fell 3 years later, and the USSR imploded 2 years after that. Today’s Russia is a rogue state with a GDP of barely $2 trillion, or about half the value of one US tech company, Nvidia. This stark reversal in geopolitical and commercial leadership is a reminder to the leaders of today about “network” power. My sense is that there are three particular ‘networks’ where governments are now beginning to assert sovereignty for national security reasons. I’d flag three stories in recent weeks which illustrate the point well.

    European satellite internet network company, Eutelsat, is a competitor to Elon Musk’s Starlink and is listed on the Paris and London stock exchanges. The company is raising €1.5 billion of capital funding with a sovereign twist. The French government is investing €750m and the UK is putting in €163m in exchange for shares in the company and maintaining ownership stakes of 29.65% and 10.89% respectively. However, Eutelsat’s fleet of just over 600 satellites has a lot of catch up to do. Starlink’s network has deployed more than 7,500 satellites thanks to the dizzying rocket launch timetable of sister company, SpaceX. If you were looking for one area of European urgency on tech sovereignty, then it’s probably defence. Germany is stepping up with €500 billion earmarked for defence investment, so it was no huge surprise to see Berlin-based Planet Labs win a €240m satellite services contract from the German government earlier this month. Planet Lab’s brief is to deploy its fleet of 600 next-generation Pelican satellites to deliver high-resolution SkySat imagery, and AI-enhanced surveillance tools, specifically designed for security, infrastructure monitoring, and maritime awareness. Clearly, it’s time to look up and keep an eye on a rapidly shifting space race, but don’t forget what’s under our feet.

    Earlier in this piece I kinda said that communism died in the ‘90s but the idea of centrally controlled economies is making a bit of a comeback. Bizarrely, the US is leading the charge. Again, I’m going to park the politics and walk you through a few developments in recent weeks. First, the US government via the Pentagon announced it was getting into the mining business. Yep, the Pentagon (Department of Defense) invested $400m in MP Materials, a US company which extracts and processes rare earths materials. These rare earths are the essential basic materials for the high-end magnets used in technologies from mobile phones to medical equipment to ballistic missiles. Anyway, we know the world is overly dependent on China (90% market dominance) for these rare earths/magnets and is a primary reason for the Trump TACO pause on trade tariffs with China. Clearly, critical raw material supply chains/networks are a focus of all Western governments. So, the move to back a home-grown producer with a 15% ownership stake was logical enough. However, within days Apple announced a $500m deal with MP Materials to buy magnets produced in Texas. Cue the MP Materials share price doubling within hours and you can just feel it in your bones that Apple was strong-armed by Washington into doing this deal. This is the sort of government intervention you’d expect from Beijing, but ….Washington? We live in interesting times, as the Chinese might say, but arguably there’s another network of even more importance where the Washington government is happier for China to lead.

    The electrification of the global economy is very real. The advent of AI and the enormous energy appetite of cloud-supporting data centres only adds to the pressures on electrical grid networks everywhere. The race to source power is focusing the minds of Big Tech and driving deals which could be described as “outside the box” thinking. Consider these recent deals:

     

    • Google last week agreed a $3 billion deal to modernise two hydropower plants in Pennsylvania.
    • Meta said in June that it had struck a 20-year deal with a nuclear plant in Illinois to power its data centres.
    • Microsoft is preparing to reopen a nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, the site of the most serious nuclear meltdown in US history.

     

    However, the bigger energy story is elsewhere, but with a US context. The Trump administration is actively pushing investment capital away from renewable energy solutions like solar and wind. Year-to-date in the US, more than $15 billion of clean energy projects have been cancelled. In Europe, venture capital funding of cleantech companies has nosedived by 71%. Meanwhile, China is taking a longer-term view on electrical grid networks. The numbers are absolutely staggering. China controls 80% of solar panel production and leads the world in wind turbine manufacturing. This year China will account for 74% of all solar and wind energy projects…. globally. But, it’s the electricity generating capacity numbers which truly blow the mind. Last year China added 370GW of renewable energy capacity (wind, solar, hydro) of which 277GW was solar. For context 1GW (or 1000MW) is the equivalent energy capacity of the average nuclear power station. So, on solar energy alone, China is adding the equivalent electrical capacity of five nuclear power stations to its power grid….. every week.

    The headlines might be dominated by $4 trillion companies driving the AI revolution, cloud-based software economics, chip manufacturing and data centre construction. But…. two of the three networks above focus on real basics. China’s raw materials supply chains and its electricity grid are critical to its future and geopolitical power. One can only hope it’s not an “MTV moment” for other countries playing catch up, or worse – blocking the signals of rapid change.

     

  • Big Beautiful Bull Market Or Bust?

    Big Beautiful Bull Market Or Bust?

    It has been a very good week for the accused. Vlad Putin gets free war-crime shots at defence-stymied Ukraine courtesy of ‘Whiskey Pete’ in the Pentagon, P.Diddy is acquitted on the worst RICO charges, Bibi flies to Washington without fear of arrest and the US Supreme Court gives King Donald a July 4th gift of even more freedom to ignore other judges. Oh, and Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” was passed in the US Congress. Tempted to laugh, cry or rant? Don’t. Investors need to focus on the ‘cards’ dealt and be alert to an investment environment which is increasingly looking like a “Big Beautiful Bull Market”. Despite ongoing tariff tantrums and confusion (Japan and South Korea getting their letters as I write) we should be keeping a close eye on a number of market developments.

    The obvious pulse take on investment market health is the performance of stock markets. Irrespective of dollar weakness, the key US benchmark indices of the S&P 500 and Nasdaq hitting all-time-highs in recent days is a strong positive signal to investors. But it’s not just the headline numbers which are flashing green. There are additional promising signals in different parts of the capital markets. Many commentators believe the markets are entirely driven by AI optimism so it is no harm to see the AI chip poster child, Nvidia, regain its crown as most valuable company on the planet and gently ease its way to within 2% of a $4 trillion market value. The all-too-recent excitement about the first trillion dollar company (Apple in 2018) seems almost quaint amid such phenomenal acceleration in wealth creation. And, there’s more AI chip good news in Washington’s Big Beautiful Bill.

    There’s a quasi-arms race going on globally in AI chip manufacturing which the Biden administration spotted and supported with the CHIPS & Science Act. Trump might be happy to burn the planet (and Elon Musk!) by reversing the electrification revolution championed by Biden but…. he’s not reversing the CHIPS tax incentives. In fact, Trump’s bill has increased investment tax credits from 25% to 35% for any manufacturers building new facilities on US soil.  It’s not the only recent policy win for the industry. Last week, the US Commerce Department told leading semiconductor design software providers — including Synopsys and Siemens — that they are no longer required to obtain government licenses to conduct business in China. One can be sceptical about the true value being created by AI but there’s no doubt real money being spent by Big Tech companies like Microsoft, Amazon and Google has massive knock-on positive impacts in the global economy. Forget that old canard of “trickle down” tax reliefs for the wealthy benefitting the wider economy, but corporate incentives really do work. Indeed, if you want money to flow into the economy then it’s always good to see banks become more ambitious in their lending activities. Even better, if an entirely new bank comes along.

    Silicon Valley Bank may have failed the basics of asset-liability matching (term horizons) in 2023 but the venture funding world never really managed to fill that $218 billion gap left by the early-stage champion. Now, there are reports Musk billionaire buddy, Peter Thiel, and an investing team of tech titans have applied for a bank charter. The new bank will be called Erebor, another Tolkien reference like Anduril and Palantir, to assist the ‘innovation economy’ and companies engaged in developing cryptocurrencies, AI and next-generation defence technology. Banks don’t usually emerge in risk-off moments so there must be some confidence bubbling back into the private early-stage investing world. Of course, it’s great to see new money or new bank flows IN to riskier parts of the investment market but what about getting OUT the other side of the risk journey? More good news.

    IPO data compiled by Bloomberg shows that a slowish start to 2025 has delivered some very interesting performance figures. The weighted average performance of companies whose shares made their debut on US exchanges in 2025 was a punchy 53% compared to single digit returns year-to-date on the S&P 500. The highlights were stablecoin fintech Circle up a whopping 585% since its IPO in…. June. Not far behind, cloud computing player, Coreweave, has returned 300% since its March listing. Suddenly, but not surprisingly, it’s raining IPOs with another high profile fintech, Wealthfront, filing for IPO.  Crypto exchange, Gemini, has filed for a public listing too. Europe didn’t miss out on the IPO fun either in the first 6 months of 2025– a weighted average return of 38% for its newly listed companies is not too shabby. They are the public liquidity or exit events a market needs to see for confidence to flow into the early stage private markets and there’s early evidence of increasing optimism.

    Medtech VC funding activity had its best quarterly performance since 2022 with $4 billion invested globally in young companies (Source: Pitchbook). Meanwhile the value of VC exits hit a 3-year high in Q2 with almost $115 billion of deals completed and exits celebrated. It can be a little too easy to criticize the US these days at a political level but Europe needs to look in the mirror. This article mostly cites US capital market develoipments. For good reason. Mark Rubinstein in his excellent Net Interest newsletter titled “Ode to America” this week put it well:

     

    “European policymakers bemoan that while households in their part of the world save more than Americans, they keep a third of their assets in low-yielding deposits, compared with a tenth in the US. European pension funds allocate just 0.02% of assets to venture capital versus 2% for their US peers. And the median European venture-backed company receives around half as much funding as its US counterpart. European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde recently calculated that, if Europeans matched Americans’ appetite for capital markets, some €8 trillion currently trapped in bank deposits would be unleashed to finance transformation.”

     

    Wowzers. Eight trillion euro. Food for thought but we might need that eight trillion for other things. One can’t ignore that there is a critical part of financial markets which is not as cheery as a Republican pardon party. The half year reviews are in and the mighty US dollar is feeling the heat. A loss of purchasing power to the tune of 11% in just 6 months has not happened since Richard Nixon was President, and then he wasn’t. We might not want to draw a dreamy historical parallel but it is curious how quiet the bond market has been since the passing of the Big Beautiful Bill and its reckless debt implications. If the US dollar is pointing to a credibility issue and ultimately a US bond market BUST, it could be European savings pools which will be needed to stabilise things. The price will be a hell of a lot more than tariff tweaking and that’s not wishful thinking. Even if you’re on the beach, it’s worth following the money right now but do keep an eye on the bond market too.

     

  • Time To Think Different

    Time To Think Different

    I must confess I was very jealous. My son met Mike Bloomberg on his visit to Dublin this week, not me. Bloomberg and his eponymous data/media company have always fascinated me as a former customer, and as a financial markets observer. The Bloomberg business is still the gold standard for data analytics, trading communications and news for circa 350,000 financial market professionals who each pay $27,000 per year for the service. The company has been around since 1982 and it has made Bloomberg the owner incredibly wealthy. Uniquely so, perhaps, because it was done in private. If you check the ranks of the wealthiest people on the planet the top 10 features the usual names like Musk, Arnault, Gates, Zuckerberg, Ballmer and Ellison. However, all those names are attached to publicly listed companies which underpin their wealth. Bloomberg is still a private company, and still 88% owned by its founder.

    Think about a SaaS-type business doing circa $12 billion of revenues a year and 88% of the profits (probably 30% + margins) accruing to one person…..since 1982. Officially, Forbes Magazine ranks Mike Bloomberg in 18th place on the world’s richest list with a $105 billion fortune. I’m guessing it’s WAY more than that. But, the bigger reveal is how a private company was able to create wealth over decades without a fluctuating public share price and short-term institutional shareholders demanding it respond to dotcom revolutions, search engines, mobile internet, big data, cloud-based SaaS, credit crises and AI. Privacy gave Bloomberg time and strategic room to act in a different way to the Wall Street ‘crowd’ and its emotional baggage. Indeed, there were a few other reminders this week of how the “crowd” can miss important truths when analysis is dominated by a volatile public share price and human emotions. Remember Cisco?

    If you invested in Cisco this month 25 years ago you would have caught its peak dotcom bubble valuation before boom turned to bust. This week is the first time in 25 years you could sell those Cisco shares at a profit. Ouch. Patience and time is not just the preserve of investors in private illiquid assets. In fact, lack of liquidity can be an investor’s friend when markets are volatile. Fast forward to today and think about how many people sold stocks and bought oil on the weekend news that the US had bombed Iran’s hidden nuclear facilities. Well, the oil price is 15% off its peak price through the Iran-Israel conflict period (or “12 Day War” as named by the bomber-in-chief and Nobel Peace Prize wannabe) and actually below the trading price before hostilities even began. Oh, and the Nasdaq 100 just hit an all-time-high yesterday. For the faint-hearted, that’s a 36% gain for the largest tech stocks over two months of toddler tariffs, broken bromances, Gaza abandonment, WW3 fears, a Russian drone drubbing of its airforce and Love Island shocks. Rather than dodging a “risk-off” bullet, investors have been rewarded for not selling with strong stock market performances this week. It might not sound rational but there’s a very powerful lesson about the importance of “staying in the market”. For investors in publicly listed assets, there is an option every minute to sell and exit the market. But, there’s a cost.

    A piece of research from JP Morgan, studying the returns of the S&P 500 between 2002 and 2022, shows annualized performance(returns) of 9.4%. That’s pretty good. But…..if you missed the 10 best days your return would almost halve to 5.21%. More strikingly, 7 of those 10 best days happened within two weeks of the 10 WORST days. So, if you opt out during the bad periods of volatility you tend to lose out on the big bounces which have a huge impact on longer term performance. The uncomfortable truth is that the best days and worst days tend to occur within weeks of each other. Further angst for many, is that human emotions take over and investors flee for the exits after market turbulence. However, for investors in private assets that emotional self-destruct button is not available given there is no natural daily exit option. There is also another public market reality which leads to misleading comparisons with private asset investing.

    The accepted wisdom or orthodoxy in finance is that investing in early-stage companies has a high failure rate. The text books would suggest that failure rate is in the 70-90% range. That rightly implies that the vast majority of returns for investors in a portfolio of early-stage risky investments is delivered by a small number of investments. However, what is not mentioned in those texts or in plenty of fund investor information sheets is that portfolios of publicly listed companies have a similar story. A study conducted by Professor Hendrik Bessembinder at the Arizona State University Business School shows that just 4% of companies in the US stock markets have accounted for all of the wealth gains since 1926. Amazingly, the average cumulative return of the 29,078 common stocks listed since 1926 was a hefty 23,000% but….the median stock in that time experienced a cumulative return of NEGATIVE 7.4%. Given that’s a median number, that means more than half of all stocks have experienced negative returns. Fund manager, Bailie Gifford, has done further research on this data to identify the key performance drivers of the small number of genuine wealth creating companies. Interestingly, R&D investment was a critical driver. Now, let’s think private and different.

    Clearly, public and private markets are not so different. It’s better to be in the market ALL the time and only a small number of companies in a portfolio deliver the majority of returns. However, in order to capture that opportunity one needs to build a portfolio. It also looks like R&D is important to create a big enough competitive advantage to grow rapidly. We don’t know how much money Bloomberg invested in its famous desktop terminal over the years to effectively “own” the market but we do know he didn’t have to report profit numbers like Cisco to the market on a quarterly basis. So, if we think differently, how can we act differently?

    Well, you don’t need a Bloomberg terminal to tell you that high net worth investors are increasingly investing in private assets. Global giant private equity house, Blackstone, this week stated their belief that “Europe is in a unique position to capture more investment”. Blackstone themselves are going to invest $500 billion in Europe over the next decade. The other data point worth considering is that JP Morgan reckon the mass affluent investor market has just 2% of their portfolios allocated to alternative/private investments. So, this is not a dotcom/Cisco rush into peak investment cycles. There is real early opportunity in private assets and Spark Private can actually help kick start a portfolio very quickly. This summer Spark Private investors will be able to invest in a selection of up to seven R&D-rich medtechs, a few SaaS/software high-growth options, an exciting AI play and some really interesting infrastructure franchises.

    We now know the phrase “timing is everything” doesn’t work when trading public markets. However, we also know if you’re not in, and you’re not diversified, you can’t win. So, think different and think private. Now is an excellent time to combine private opportunity with portfolio-building deal flow.

    ** For further information on Ostoform, SymPhysis Medical, Social Voice, Digital Gait Labs, Tympany Medical, Liltoda, Array Patch or Quadrant Scientific contact us on www.sparkprivate.com

     

  • Watch Out For The New Stable Empire Build

    Watch Out For The New Stable Empire Build

    Stability wouldn’t be the word of the week. Middle East war, Indian air crash tragedy, horrific school shooting in Graz, the US Marine Corp deployed in Los Angeles and the death of America’s Mozart, Brian Wilson. But… the ground-breaking Beach Boy might also SMILE**. Tortured by mental health challenges for most of his life, his genius is rightly being recognised at a rather weird moment. Thousands of miles away from the Californian beaches which inspired a true genius, a delusional “stable genius” is marking his birthday with a military parade in Washington. The irony indeed of a wannabe emperor, without clothes or genius. However, the sharper minds out there have been busy building another type of empire….Here’s a few timely illustrations.

    Stripe kicked off the week with the $1 billion acquisition of Privy. This is Stripe’s second billion dollar acquisition in less than six months (Bridge $1.1 billion in February) in the area of stablecoins. As a quick refresher, stablecoins are digital currencies (crypto) built on blockchain technology whose value are fixed to the value of a recognized liquid security or currency. In the vast majority of cases the “stable” part of a stablecoin is the world’s chosen reserve currency, the US dollar. This means that these stablecoins can be instantly exchanged for US dollars, in most cases, at a 1:1 ratio (FX rate). However, I only use the “FX rate” terminology to assist understanding because stablecoins operate differently, and have one massive potential advantage over typical foreign exchange (FX) rates. They cut out all the intermediaries’ costs and “toll takers” that drive us all to distraction at airports when it feels like a robbery rather than a financial service has taken place. This digital capacity to cut out costs and deliver ‘frictionless’ currency services has been identified by Stripe as an enormous opportunity to “grow the GDP of the internet”, namely e-commerce. Two deals in 6 months demonstrate that strategic appetite.

    Stripe, as a global leader payments platform, bought Bridge specifically as a platform for payments in stablecoins. Bridge provides the payments infrastructure for financial services companies to issue stablecoin-linked Visa cards. So, that covers the payments bit but Stripe has moved further into stablecoin infrastructure with its Privy acquisition. As Stripe CEO, Patrick Collison put it, “Money has to reside somewhere, and Privy builds the world’s best programmable vaults. Alongside our other stablecoin work, we’re looking forward to enabling a new generation of global, internet-native financial services.” In relatively simple terms, Stripe has acquired the ability to handle stablecoin payments AND the digital wallets (vaults) needed to store those digital currencies. Note, this is not some futuristic ‘bet’. This is a very current service. Indeed, Mastercard reckon one third of Latin American consumers have already used stablecoins for purchases. And, it’s not just “Main Street” embracing stablecoins. Wall Street is buzzing this week.

    The IPO of Circle on the NYSE was 25x over-subscribed before it even began trading last week. Circle is the issuer of probably the safest and most transparent stablecoins, USDC, which is pegged 1:1 with the US dollar. By the end of its first week of trading, Circle’s share price had rocketed 378% above the IPO price to reach a valuation of $32 billion. Clearly, Wall Street’s frenzied embrace of digital currencies, wallets, payments etc could spell trouble for the traditional custodians of currency storage and movement, the banks. They are moving too.

    French banking giant, Societe Generale, announced this week plans to launch a publicly tradable dollar-backed stablecoin. Societe Generale is the first major bank to enter the stablecoin market and has named its new digital currency “USD CoinVertible”. Meanwhile, in the US, Congress is poised to pass legislation to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins. Bank of America could launch a stablecoin, its CEO said earlier this year, and some other large banks are also considering issuing a joint stablecoin. The banks won’t be alone.

    The world’s two biggest retailers, Amazon and Walmart, are looking into issuing their own stablecoins for US customers to use at checkout instead of credit or debit cards, the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday. The WSJ article suggested other big companies, including Expedia and some airlines, are also considering the move. The motive is simple and relates to my earlier explainer. Costs. Stablecoins are hugely attractive digital innovations to process payments quickly and potentially save corporations billions of dollars in swipe fees that they pay every year to credit card companies, banks, and fintech startups like Toast and Square. Businesses forked out over $172 billion in US transaction fees in 2023, a near 50% increase from before the pandemic, as more customers went contactless. Even Washington is taking notice, and is moving legislation with, again, a teeny weeny bit of irony….

    The US Congress is due to vote on a bill known as the GENIUS Act (the other crypto legislation due is the STABLE Act, I kid you not)  which would give private companies a blueprint for issuing their own stablecoins. That vote could be as soon as Monday, and rely on a body politic flushed with the narcissistic joy of watching a military parade on the streets of Washington DC – an exercise once the autocratic preserve of the Kremlin, Beijing or Pyongyang. It’s a strange new world, but there is still real genius and opportunity out there.  Watch that stablecoin empire build….

     

    **Brian Wilson and the Beach Boys began recording their album, Smile, in 1966. Brian was convinced it would be his masterpiece. Struggles with mental health intervened, and delayed the release of the album until almost 40 years later. TIME magazine described its ultimate arrival as “rapturously received” and ranked it as one of the ten best comeback albums of all time.

     

     

     

  • Three Winning Hidden Trends

    Three Winning Hidden Trends

    I was tempted. The “buddy breakup” in Washington between the Taco Toddler and the Ketamine Kid is fabulous writing material. But, no. The real risk these days is being distracted by America’s slide towards lawless autocracy and missing something bigger. Eighty one years ago on a June 5th morning President Roosevelt brought good news to the American people and its allies. Rome had been liberated by Allied troops – “The first of the Axis capitals is now in our hands.” Little did Roosevelt’s audience know that later that day paratroopers would be dropped into northern France ahead of 7,000 ships landing on the D-Day beaches of Normandy on June 6th. Fast forward to that anniversary today, and there are winning opportunities again being potentially obscured by Washington broadcasts. Indeed, it’s possible you may have missed some striking data updates to three huge investment trends this week. Let’s dive in.

    Last month at its annual Stripe Sessions conference, CEO Patrick Collison identified the “gale-force tailwinds” of AI and stablecoins. The first tailwind trend won’t be a surprise to any readers of our AI article last week but it was intriguing to hear Collison say, “Stablecoins are the underdog everyone’s sleeping on.”  He also had an interesting take on the macro “noise” and uncertainty prevalent in today’s business world – “when new technologies collide with a turbulent economy, the technology tends to win”. That seems a prescient call this week when we briefly touch on AI and reflect on its chip champion, Nvidia, revealing its latest quarterly results. Despite tariff disruption of its China business, Nvidia beat Wall Street analyst expectations and regained its status as the world’s most valuable company. Thanks to a 50% surge is its share price over the last 8 weeks, Jensen Huang’s chip behemoth is worth $3.4 trillion. The latest data point on stablecoins was also quite eye-catching.

    Not long ago Circle Internet Group was saved by the US government when Washington guaranteed deposits at the collapsing Silicon Valley Bank(SVB). Circle as an issuer of dollar-backed stablecoins was the top dollar depositor customer at SVB. However, this week the newsflow was way more optimistic as Circle waited to IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. Reports suggested investor interest was massive and the listing was 25x over-subscribed. Not surprisingly, with more buyers than sellers, Circle’s share price surged 168% on its first day of trading to a valuation just shy of $17 billion. It’s difficult not to conclude that stablecoins have “arrived” and investors are excited by Collison’s own description of stablecoins’ “real world utility in regular business”. In fact Stripe confirmed stablecoin issuance has increased by 39% year-on-year while “demand for borderless financial services go through the roof….at a growth rate which eclipses anything we’ve seen before in Stripe”. Ok, that’s two winning trends. The last one won’t surprise but the numbers might.

    Private equity (PE) and its billionaire leaders could be doubting their love-in with the Taco Toddler but they are not the only PE-related cohort in doubting mode. PE investors are quietly wondering how private equity houses are going to deploy the $1.2 trillion of ‘dry powder’ which is currently sitting on the side-lines and hurting overall return on investment (ROI) figures. A quarter of that massive total has been available for the last 4 years (Source: Bain &Co). However, there is no doubting our mantra “the future is private” when you consider private equity now controls a record 29,000 companies worth more than $3.6 trillion.  But, there are cyclical challenges. Higher interest rates, reduced IPO activity and M&A paralysis (execs can’t Taco trade those deals) don’t help valuations or exits so it’s worth noting global PE fundraising has declined for 5 straight quarters. Global PE raises in Q1 were down 33% per Pitchbook/Bloomberg reports but that cycle might be about to shift. The Wall Street Journal this week reported that the software-focused PE giant, Thoma Bravo, has just raised a staggering $34.4 billion which is the biggest funding round since the start of 2024.

    As a final thought, one must be mindful that as investment funds become bigger and bigger their opportunity pool shrinks due to size and liquidity constraints. On the other hand, as the ECB cuts interest rates, Ireland GDP growth hits almost 10%, German equities touch all-time highs and Trumpolini begs President Xi for a trade détente, it is arguably a particularly good time for investors to think small, and think private. So, if you want to build a private asset portfolio quickly, Spark Private can certainly help with a very exciting summer EIIS** pipeline of PhD-packed medtech innovations, real-time AI applications, 3-year infrastructure exits and super-growth software stories. Do not be distracted. Check out www.sparkprivate.com  and, as my old boss used to say, “They ain’t door numbers, they move !!”.

    ** EIIS tax rebates of 35-50% on your 2025 personal income tax.

     

  • AI…AI…AI…AI…I Just Don’t Know

    AI…AI…AI…AI…I Just Don’t Know

    I’m going to have to up my game. Not just tennis. As a frequenter of the occasional business discussion panel, this week threw up a very different type of panelist. The Dublin Tech Summit at the RDS hosted a panel discussion on AI which featured contributions from a meta-human avatar created by AI, named Anja. Quite unnerving in a way. If it had been a horse on the panel, I don’t think it would have unsettled me more. Mind you, the no-clothes Emperor Taco Trump guy can’t be far away from appointing a horse to the Senate soon. Anyway, I digress as humans do. Back to AI, and I was thinking it would be no harm to highlight a few significant AI datapoints and developments which have caught my eye in recent weeks. First, the data.

    The Stargate data centre project backed by OpenAI, Japan’s Softbank, Oracle and Nvidia and to be built in the UAE is estimated to eventually have the capacity to consume 5GW of power, For context, that’s the power consumption equivalent of the entire island of Ireland. And, Ireland would already be considered a global leader in terms of data centre capacity as a proportion of the total energy grid, about 21%. Clearly, AI and its critical data centre/cloud infrastructure is moving at pace to meet expected future AI usage demand. The pulse-take on AI investment pace has been chip-maker, Nvidia, who reported quarterly results this week. Revenues for Nvidia (despite Trump China tariffs/blocks) are still growing at almost 70% but this doesn’t quite capture the scale of growth. Two years ago, at the time of ChatGPT’s launch, quarterly revenues at Nvidia were $6 billion. Now, they are at $44 billion. Furthermore, Nvidia plans to invest $500 billion to build AI infrastructure in the US. Note, things have also moved on from  ChatGPT and other Gen AI tools (like Gemini and Claude) as the drivers of AI investment. The big move now is to “Agentic AI” or “AI Agency”.

    Agentic AI is not a pilot or learning model wanting users to test its knowledge. No, this is the real “doing” stuff which companies are now paying to integrate in their work flows. According to CB Insights research, enterprise AI and copilots will generate $13 billion of revenues by the end of 2025 across a variety of activities from sales to coding to customer service. That’s a growth rate of 155% year-on-year and a wake-up call for most companies; the reality is that their competitors are likely deploying AI to dramatically improve productivity and costs. One wouldn’t want to be in the spectator seats for too long and it’s not just a corporate caution. At a sovereign level, Dubai has offered all its citizens free access to the premium ChatGPT Plus service which normally costs $20 per month. The digital information race is truly ‘on’ but there’s also a hardware story emerging.

    OpenAI has just acquired  Jony Ive’s AI hardware start-up, Io Products. The former Apple key man, whose design credits include the iPhone and iPad, will now lead design at OpenAI as the company pushes deeper into hardware. The move highlights a trend of VC-backed companies buying one another amid a shifting tech landscape and a hunger for talent. However, it is worth noting that this is the largest private-to-private acquisition ever at $6.4 billion. Indeed, over 40% (7) of all-time $1B+ private-to-private acquisitions have happened in just the last year. OpenAI, Databricks, and Stripe have each spent over 15% of their total funding to date on acquisitions in the last 2 years. Don’t forget Anja too. Venture capital investment in humanoid robots are estimated to double this year to over $2 billion per CB Insights data. Then consider that there are 660 million people in Asia (average age 27) using digital companions. That disturbing little gem came from anthropologist, Dr Lollie Mancey, in a recent RTE interview and….. I just don’t know. I’m not alone.

    The fascinating story of Irish recycling software company, AMCS, and its $2 billion wealth creation story was told by its founder, Jimmy Martin, at the Renatus/Fitzgerald Power “Real Deal” SME conference in Goffs this week. When asked about AI, he wisely declined to predict the future but did make one very interesting and more definitive point. As a hugely successful observer of ‘margin’ in industry ecosystems, Martin was quick to identify the monopolistic power of the big 3 cloud infrastructure players, Microsoft, Amazon and Google. For me, the unanswered question of who will be the winner(s) will focus on the following :

     

    1. The manufacturers of the critical semiconductor chips
    2. The owners of data centre infrastructure
    3. The providers of energy/power capacity
    4. Sovereign/digital alignment (China, Europe or US).

     

    I really don’t know, particularly the geopolitical/sovereign and energy/power questions. However, I do think it interesting that in recent days companies exposed to the nuclear power industry have seen big share price moves. Not coincidentally, the US and a number of European countries have been embracing a nuclear industry revival at the same time. Plenty to ponder, not all of it comfortable. Isn’t that right, Anja?

  • Tech Up And Smell The Coffee

    Tech Up And Smell The Coffee

    Japan is the number one coffee-to-go consumer in the world. It wasn’t always so. For 12 centuries the Japanese were a tea-drinking nation while a stigma attached to coffee and its miniscule 1% market penetration. Early commercial attempts to expand coffee consumption in the 1970s were a disaster. Contrast that with today where Japan’s best-in-world urban centres are served by a massive coffee culture. In fact, 48% of all coffee consumption is coffee to-go beating the likes of the US (45%), Australia (23%) and UK(17%) to global top spot. What happened? Well, Nestle spent a fortune in the 1970s and failed. Then, they hired a child psychologist. Nestle knew the existing tea culture (ceremonies, 90% domestic presence etc) was in the national DNA so they ignored the adult consumer and focused on youth tastes. Literally taste. They didn’t sell coffee.

    Nestle sold coffee flavoured candy, then snacks, then ice-cream. Of course, kids grew to love the flavour. By the 1980s vending machines and canned coffee were everywhere. In the ‘90s, when I was living in Tokyo, the marketing push had entered “genki drink” territory  associating nostalgic childhood flavour with increased productivity and professional success. Fast forward to today and the 30-year re-wiring of Japan’s taste buds has created a coffee market worth $12 billion consuming 7 billion cups annually (Source: Statista). So, as my Bullet train races away from Hiroshima, I can’t help thinking about generational shifts and how advanced technology (A-bomb) was part of a nation’s destruction but was adopted by subsequent generations to lead its future. Japan might be considered conservative but there is a boldness attached to their use of technology. World-leading in fact.

    Japan might be considered a strange leader-location for cryptocurrency payment/usage given its reputation as a cash-preferring economy. Wrong. Most of my trip payments here have been done on my phone but there’s more to report. In a number of retailers I have seen iris-scanning orbs supporting the Worldcoin crypto ecosystem set up by Sam Altman (OpenAI founder). For me, the big evolution to come in crypto/blockchain is payments ie the ‘currency’ actually being used. To date, the emphasis has been on cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as stores of value or investment instruments. Interestingly, there is a strong piece of Japanese DNA which lends itself to the use of tokens instead of cash. Ever heard of Pachinko? Here’s what we wrote about it back in 2023…

     

    “Ever heard of Pachinko? If not, this game’s annual revenues might surprise. Estimated annual revenues of $200 billion are more than ten times those of the NFL! Pachinko is a ball game too but it’s a vertical pinball game played in Japanese gaming arcades. Players twist wheels to steer descending small steel balls into cups which trigger a prize-winning payout of more balls which, in turn, can be exchanged for cash or small prizes. Gambling for cash is illegal in Japan but this low-stakes, low-strategy game exploits a legal loophole and is 30 times bigger than the annual gambling revenue of Las Vegas, as well as twice the size of Japan’s export car industry.”

     

    The key point is that entire Japanese generations have grown up exchanging prizes/tokens for cash. Not surprisingly, I note that Japan’s three biggest banks – Mitsubishi UFJ, Mizuho and Sumitomo Mitsui – plan to integrate stablecoins, blockchain and digital ID into their use of the SWIFT cross-border payment platform. My suspicion is that Japan is going to lead on payments which is the ultimate route to crypto commercial penetration. And, they culturally ‘get’ tokenisation, as well as providing Bitcoin with its pseudonymous founder name, Satoshi Nakamoto. So, if you smell Japanese opportunity, it might not just be you. It could be a robot. Seriously.

    Yep, our digital world has been built on two digits: 0 and 1. So, how can a robot smell? Japanese robotics company, Ainos, has installed its AI Nose in a humanoid robot built by another Japanese robotics player, Ugo. The collaboration introduces a new class of robots that can perceive the world not just through sight and sound, but also through smell, enabling them to make more intuitive and intelligent decisions that will transform industries, public health, and everyday life. The new robot combines a high-precision gas sensor array, real-time signal processing, and advanced AI algorithms to identify and digitize a wide range of scents, turning them into unique “Smell IDs.” Clearly, this is big news for life sciences precision manufacturing, elder care, gas safety etc. Again, it should not be a surprise that Japan is leading in robotics.

    Japan dominates the global robotics market with a 40% share of global exports. No fear of AI here. Of course, given the demographics of a shrinking workforce, it has become a social necessity as Japan turns to robots to care for its elderly population. Like crypto and blockchain payments (vs investment), robots are the natural next step for AI adoption. Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang, is on record as saying that the “ChatGPT moment for robotics is coming…. I can’t imagine a better country to lead robotics AI revolution than Japan. This country loves robots”. Japan also has buckets of engineering talent. Almost 50% of global industrial robots are made by 3 Japanese giants – Fanuc, Yaskawa and Nachi-Fujikoshi. But….Nvidia knows these AI powered robots will need advanced semiconductor chips. Japan might have the latest manufacturing answer in a world where tariffs, supply chains, China decoupling and Taiwan are an increasing source of business worry. So, Japan is going technology “bold” and fearless again.

    Build it and they will come is a tried and failed tech commercialisation strategy. However, Japan is making a $67 billion bet on its semiconductor chip industry without securing any customers yet. Specifically, the Japanese government has passed legislation to allow it to invest in chip manufacturing start-up, Rapidus. The homegrown chip maker is due to produce the smallest chips in history (2 nanometer size for improved performance, density and efficiency) in its Hokkaido-based facility, backed by $27 billion of investment from heavyweight Japanese corporates like Sony and Toyota plus a design collaboration with IBM. In fact, IBM has made very clear that Japan as a next-generation chip manufacturer is “good for the world” given the global economy’s dependence on Taiwan and China for chips. The first chips are due to be produced from the Hokkaido plant in July (rumoured to be for Broadcom) and the latest reports suggest Apple and Google are in talks with Rapidus too. Watch carefully as this would be a massive chip comeback for Japan. On a broader level, Japan Inc can look forward to a re-assessment by global business as a stable supply chain partner with a healthy respect for international trade agreements. Who knew healthy democracy would be a business winner in 2025….? But, we do know health is big.

    Japan is already a leader in the $6 trillion wellness industry with its outsized presence in the personal care/beauty, healthy food/nutrition, wellness tourism and spa infrastructure sectors. However, one senses demographics, AI and robotics will combine to significantly increase Japan’s investment focus in the medtech sector. Typically, European and Irish medtechs have looked to the US for product market entry and venture funding. That will continue, but watch out for an increasing Japanese investment profile. We are often asked by Spark medtech investors “where will the exit come from?”. Well, Japan might need to be added to the list. Indeed, Digital Gait Labs (currently raising funds through Spark) tick those AI, wellness and elder-care boxes very nicely. As for Japan’s investment power, there are a few things you need to know.

    Japan is effectively the biggest creditor or banker to the world. There’s a reason why the Japanese can actually buy more coffee to-go than America and…. intimidate its President. Japan is hugely wealthy. The Japanese population holds a whopping $14 trillion in financial assets, or almost 5x the GDP of France. More strikingly, half of these assets are in cash or deposit accounts. That’s almost 50% of the EU GDP waiting to be used…… possibly by the next less-conservative generation. For me, this is the generational “coffee” wealth moment to start showing opportunities to Mrs Watanabe and her children. And, there’s an early leader.

    We recently wrote about ChatGPT/AI company, OpenAI’s funding round being the biggest public(IPO) or private raise in history. What we didn’t mention was that the lead investor was Japan’s Softbank who have committed $30 billion to the AI trailblazer. Softbank is an investment holding company led by Masayoshi Son whose career has been chronicled by ex-FT editor, Lionel Barber. The book is a fascinating read and the title, Gambling Man, hints at the highs of Alibaba, DoorDash, Uber and Slack as winners but also the losers like WeWork. However, the tagline of the book title tells us more –  “the world’s greatest disruptor.” I strongly believe Son has planted the “risk seed” in this generation of Japanese investors like Nestle did in the ‘70s with coffee. Japan has got “the taste” of private early-stage equity. Now, the rest of us need to show them candy with the same “unicorn” taste as Son has pursued. No psychologist is needed this time, just on the ground observation. Then action. We need to tech up, and show up.

     

  • Truly A Moron

    Truly A Moron

    We are into the name-calling phase of global trade policy. The “Stable Genius” Party told us to “reject the evidence of your eyes or ears” or even the ten trillion dollars of capital destruction. But, enough is enough. Or, so thinks DOGE-whisperer Elon Musk. The focus of his ire is the White House driver of Donald Trump’s trade tariff policies, Peter Navarro. Now, Peter is an interesting chap. He first came to my attention with a series of books featuring hard line views on China and US trade deficits generally.  He then served in the Trump 1.0 administration of 2016-2020 when his “fringe” economist status acquired an unusual qualification. Well, weird. It turns out the globally reputed economist, Ron Vara, quoted in many of Peter’s books was a fictional figure. Indeed, Ron Vara was not just supportive of Peter’s bonkers economics but also an anagram of his own name. No, seriously.

    So, who’s surprised to read the Navarro tariff calculations are the work of a ChatGPT output which the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute (AEI) think could be out by a factor of four times(400%)? It’s a bit late now but Musk has just described Navarro as “dumber than a sack of bricks” and “truly a moron”.  You’ll note my view that Musk is too late to undo the damage of the Mad Orange King and the Ron Vara school of economics. In fact, it’s not actually my view.  Policy uncertainty paralyses business activity and the scores are coming in fast….

     

    *Larry Fink, CEO of the largest asset manager on the planet, BlackRock Inc, with $10 trillion reasons to care says “Most CEOs I talk to would say we are probably in a recession right now.”

    *Jamie Dimon, CEO of the most valuable bank on the planet, JP Morgan, in his annual letter to shareholders delivered a blunt warning – “The recent tariffs will likely increase inflation and are causing many to consider a greater probability of a recession.”

    *Airline share prices are traditionally viewed as early warning signals of trouble ahead. So, when you see Delta, American and United stocks drop 35-45% this year we should pay attention. Larry Fink is anyway – “Airlines and air traffic are a canary in the coal mine. Right now the canary is sick”

     

    Cheery stuff. However, these are US-focused observations. We have been here before and we should remind ourselves that capital markets can be quite effective in taming policy tyranny. Ask Liz Truss. Then check bond markets. Interestingly, if bond markets “believed” recession was imminent then bond yields(rates) would not be rising like they are right now. US 10 year Treasury yields have jumped from 3.87% to 4.52% in the past two trading sessions. This is highly unusual bond behaviour when equity markets are so volatile or declining. In fact, it’s the all-powerful bond market questioning the credibility of US institutions. Hence, you’ll soon be hearing Trump whining about the Fed lowering interest rates but, again, not quite understanding bond markets. Other markets are behaving in a more orthodox manner but could also upset the tariff toddler.

    You might have noticed that Trump has refused the pre-‘Liberation Day’ EU offer of zero tariffs on industrial goods. Trump and his team are now switching focus to “non-tariff trade barriers” and demanding the EU buy $350 billion of energy to balance out trade deficits. The White House is rapidly losing the faith of its fossil-fuel friends who are staring down the barrel of $50 spot prices for oil. Ahead of inauguration, the reversal of Biden’s signature IRA act and decarbonisation/cleantech investment incentives sounded good to the oil barons but they didn’t plan on Trumpolini playing Texas Hold ‘Em with every trading partner in the world …..at the same time. And, don’t forget the Kremlin and its war economy is acutely oil price sensitive too.

    Cryptocurrencies and their broligarch fan boys are also going to be a bit tetchy apart from “car assembler” Musk. Bitcoin is down 17% year-to-date with cryptocurrency ETFs (funds) suffering their third consecutive month of outflows. In fact, the big picture worry for all cryptocurrency evangelists is that on current pricing history evidence Bitcoin appears to have morphed into a tracking instrument for the tech-heavy Nasdaq equity index. It’s supposed to be a currency, as a quick reminder.  Go check the charts and then wonder how long before the broligarchs put pressure on Trump to move the markets into risk-on crypto-friendly mode. We will wait but private markets won’t stand still. In fact, big global structural themes (outside trade) will continue to play out in private. Just this week we spotted these three deals amid all the screaming red ticker-chyrons and panic headlines:

     

    • Faster research: San Francisco-based Rescale provides AI-powered R&D simulation software and has raised $115m from investors including Nvidia.
    • Content generation: Another Californian start-up with Spanish founders, Krea, uses generative AI for image content generation and design. They have just raised $83m from investors including Bain Capital.
    • Payment infrastructure: Juspay, an Indian payment infrastructure start-up has raised $60m from institutions including Kedaara Capital.

     

    Humanity and innovation will keep moving forward irrespective of the headlines. Public markets gyrating violently are the real-time expression of capital flows, fears and policy paralysis but, in private, both in Washington and in private markets we can be far more optimistic. Nothing crystal clear right now but the waters will still be blue ahead…

  • Three Pictures Of Opportunity From A Changing World Order

    Three Pictures Of Opportunity From A Changing World Order

    It is difficult to avoid pictures of the St Patrick’s Day sex-pest parade at the White House but I can assure you it is well worth the effort. Clearly, the rule of law and the world order is enduring a seismic shakedown but it would be a mistake to assume all is lost. Hidden behind the disbelieving headlines and festive mug-shots there are a number of alternative pictures really worth thinking about. Hedge fund billionaire, Ray Dalio, wrote The Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail  as recently as 2021 and used five centuries of history to show how nation success depends on cycles much like business. So, I have been struck by three investment trends whose emergence could be attributed to these long-run cycle shifts. The first cycle journey actually starts with cars…..

     

    The mighty Volkswagen AG (VW) of Wolfsburg was founded in 1937 in the midst of another seismic geopolitical shift and 80 years later in 2017 became the world’s largest automotive manufacturer by global sales. In 2021 VW reached its peak market value of €155 billion but the Ukraine war, rocketing energy prices and electric vehicle (EV) competition has wiped almost €100 billion from that valuation since then. In fact, this week the even-older arms and military vehicle manufacturer, Rheinmetall AG, surpassed VW in market value. In reality this is a 10-year story rather than a 135-year history. As recently as 2014, Rheinmetall’s 125-years of manufacturing ammunition, missiles and military transport vehicles had built a total franchise value of just €1.3 billion. The invasion of Crimea by Russia in the same year was the “butterfly wing flap” moment as the company’s valuation over the following 10 years increased exponentially to deliver a 48x return to any far-sighted Kremlin watching investors. The picture below is a graphic reminder of the defence sector resurgence opportunity and the industrial shift away from the internal combustion engine (ICE):

     

     

     

    Of course, Germany is not the only country impacted by geopolitical change. Plenty of Trump apologist commentators seem to believe “Agent Orange” is playing 4D chess and seeking an alliance with Putin to take on the growing threat of China. Well, how’s that going? About as well as Trump’s ‘day one’ defeat of inflation or the $5 trillion evaporation of the US stock markets driven by a tech-heavy “Magnificent 7” meltdown. In contrast to US investors, the Chinese are enjoying a 40% rise year-to-date for their tech sector stocks and a healthy almost-20% gain for the broader Hang Seng Index. Ironically, it’s a Chinese AI company called Butterfly Effect which is creating possibly even greater waves than the DeepSeek cost ‘shock” back in January. Butterfly’s AI digital assistant, Manus, is more powerful than DeepSeek and has automated up to 50 tasks from buying a property in New York to editing a podcast. There have also been big Chinese breakthroughs in recent weeks in quantum computing and robotics adding to a stark picture below (Source: Bloomberg) – a whopping 40% outperformance by the Chinese tech sector over the US tech sector since Trump took office in January.

     

     

     

     

    If it feels like US Big Tech is in relative retreat then the latest data from VC research house, Pitchbook, makes for interesting reading. Big Tech is playing a less prominent role in the US start-up M&A market due to regulatory pressures but big corporates seem to have been replaced by start-ups themselves as acquirors. More specifically, in 2024 more than one third of start-up acquisitions were made by VC-backed start-ups. This highlights the emergence of a new buyer profile and exit route for start-ups; VC-backed ‘unicorns’ with significant cash reserves and an appetite for growth. Indeed, Pitchbook analysts put this rather well:

     

    “Amid the trend toward ‘profitability’, it is important to remember that growth remains essential and serves as a key motivating factor for these buyers…..The high number of VC-backed companies also creates numerous opportunities for consolidation. While acquisitions by VC-backed companies may not often dominate the headlines, they are becoming an important aspect of the venture capital liquidity narrative. ”

     

    The chart below (Source: Pitchbook) shows start-ups accounting for just 20% of M&A by value as recently as 2018. So, the move above 33% today seems significant…

     

     

     

    In summary, the pictures above should be viewed as opportunities happening in real time while we are distracted by tawdry turmoil and photo-ops in Washington. More importantly, we should start to think about geopolitics as the driver of not just nation cycles, but also business cycles and new long-run structural trends.

     

  • What Returns Can Investors Expect In A Private World?

    What Returns Can Investors Expect In A Private World?

    Well, I can’t promise you a future with a beachfront property in “Gaza Lago”. In fact, in the world of investing there are no guaranteed returns. As promised in our recent Private Portfolio Thoughts newsletter, I wanted to address expectations as to what long-run returns a private investor should be looking for in a portfolio of private assets.  First, let’s take a look at ‘industry standard’ expectations based on global historic data compiled by research house, Pitchbook. Of course, these are just averages and no doubt are ‘skewed’ by supra-normal returns for a small number of successful funds in each asset class. However, the table below gives an approximate guide to expectations over various time horizons and types of investment.

     

    The Spark focus is probably towards the top of this table summarising 5-year and 10-year returns for private equity (PE) and early-stage investing through venture capital (VC). However, if we strip out debt and real asset products the double-digit (%) performance picture is pretty similar across the board for private assets. The annual rates of return (IRR) implied by the performance of these private assets (in aggregate) are 13.4% over 5-years and 12.5% over 10-years.

    Let’s be more conservative and suggest that portfolios of private assets after 10 years SHOULD have grown in value at a rate of 12%. In real terms (and compounding those rates of return) that equates to an initial investment of €10,000 growing to €31,000 over 10 years. For context, a fund with publicly listed equities would be expected (by financial planners) to generate 7% returns per annum and thus turn €10,000 into €19,600. Of course, the extra return earned by the private asset portfolios is the compensation required by investors for the higher risk exposure(reduced liquidity, business failure) compared to the shares of large established businesses trading every day. These return numbers (based on history) can be described as “hurdle” rates which investors are expecting to match or beat in order to justify putting their capital at risk over long periods of time. So, let’s apply some hurdles to our world of very young companies (VC) and small businesses (private equity).

    We know that the industry standard in more mature private capital investment strategies is looking to turn €10,000 into something north of €30,000 over 10 years. We might describe this as an expectation to generate 3x your initial investment amount. Arguably, for higher risk investments in our earlier-stage world, investors could expect/demand an even higher return for their portfolios. If investors wanted 4x returns or €40,000 after 10 years that equates to a 15% annual return which is what private equity strategies have achieved(see table). So, that expectation is not unreasonable. But…. how realistic is it in a high risk portfolio of mainly early-stage business failure? We should touch on the key ‘push backs’ we get from investors who are wary of investing in start-up businesses or smaller private equity deals. The following are the most common perceived wisdoms….

     

    “80-90% of start-ups fail”

    “ Exits are more difficult as IPO markets for smaller companies have struggled”

    “I can just buy publicly listed equities and earn similar returns”

     

    There is an element of historic truth to all these statements but I’m going to use the most dangerous words in the investing lexicon by stating “this time it’s different”. First, the history of start-up failure should take into account the characteristics of older vintages of businesses. Let’s think about old economy businesses investing heavily in premises, equipment, overseas expansion facilities, logistics etc. These are, in most cases, “sunk costs” in capital-heavy businesses. Inevitably, if the business gets into trouble these ‘assets’ are not just worthless but can have an actual negative value due to ongoing liabilities/leases, maintenance costs, security, insurance etc. Now, think about many of today’s “asset light” businesses leveraging digital infrastructure and building value through the experience of the founders/team, the data gathered by the business and the development of relationships with clients and partners.

    These businesses don’t have the same level of sunk costs/liabilities (as old economy businesses) which can swamp the value of the operational “franchise”. Instead, the value within a business which might not be meeting growth targets can be recognised by a third party and lead to another form of exit which doesn’t involve liquidation. In the Spark portfolio we have seen a number of businesses acquired by third parties in the same sector in exchange for shares in the acquiring company. These shares clearly have a value and also change the traditional calculations around start-up failure.

    In the world of debt/credit one of the key financial terms/metrics is historic “recovery value”. In main street terms, this is the typical expected percentage of the debt which can be recovered when a business fails in a particular sector. You will see such sector recovery data displayed as a percentage of the debt ie 20 cents, 30 cents in the dollar. So, in the world of start-ups there is normally no debt and the equity in the business is a complete ZERO in the case of struggle or failure. But, now that’s not quite the case. If an acquiring business is offering a share exchange then the “recovery value” could by 20-50% of the original investment. And, the reason for ‘value’ being found in the business is the experience of the acquired team, the database and client relationships. This is happening on a far bigger scale elsewhere.

    Ever heard of the term ‘acqui-hiring”? This refers to a situation in which a company acquires another company primarily for its talented team or employees, rather than its products, technology, or other assets. In an acqui-hire, the acquiring company may not be interested in continuing the acquired company’s business or product, but rather wants to bring the talent into its own organization. Now, here’s another bit of jargon monoxide…. ever heard of CVC? Well, you know what venture capital (VC) does but there’s a subset of the VC ecosystem called Corporate Venture Capital(CVC). This form of VC funding is in reality larger corporations investing in smaller businesses whose franchises/technology could ultimately be relevant and value-creating for the parent company.

    So, you might think Sequoia, Index Ventures, Tiger Global and Andreessen Horowitz are the kings of VC investing. Now, think again. Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Nvidia are hugely active in the VC funding space. As an illustration, Nvidia deployed $1 billion in 50 VC funding rounds in 2024 alone. Furthermore, Google has acquired a whopping 222 start-ups over the years, and in 2023 the “Magnificent 7” tech stocks participated in 208 VC deals. So, the IPO market might not be as start-up friendly as in the past but Big Tech certainly is stepping up to the plate as a new and highly active exit event option.

    Of course, there will always be those investors who believe they can earn approximately similar returns to private asset strategies by choosing a selection of publicly listed companies. Yep, the likes of Domino’s Pizza, Paddy Power, Apple and Nvidia tick those boxes but there’s also an assumption investors will avoid the temptation of selling while on the multi-decade rocket ride. However, the more significant point is about business failure. Think it’s only start-ups?  Sixty years ago the average life-span of a company in the S&P 500 was over 50 years. Today, it’s less than 15 years! By 2027, almost 75% of companies who were quoted in the S&P 500 in 2016 will have disappeared (Source: McKinsey). Not for the first time, I’d suggest it’s worth a read of the excellent The Future is Faster Than You Think to grasp how fast business and technology leadership is changing.

    We can’t forecast the future. However, we should recognise that the world of start-ups today has changed dramatically. As a final illustration, start-up funding was traditionally populated by a majority of consumer-focused businesses – think retail, textiles, manufacturing, food, fashion etc.  The term “B2C” would be used to describe these business-to-consumer companies. Well, that’s changed too. Certainly, for Spark. A whopping 70% of funding deals completed by Spark have been business-to-business (B2B) opportunities. It should also be noted that our vetting process turns away approximately nine in every ten opportunities. Arguably, we are selecting the top decile of quality in the opportunity universe. No doubt we will get it wrong along the way, but this is still a robust risk starting point. And, it’s not the only starting point…

    The purpose of this article is to set the scene for a follow-up piece on how these structural shifts can impact the average private portfolio and future expectations using sample portfolios and outcomes. But always remember…. if I could truly forecast the future, “Gaza Lago” might personally have an entirely different meaning and location.