Tag: Google

  • Technology Sector Serves Up Critical New Pension Risks…

    Technology Sector Serves Up Critical New Pension Risks…

    That was quick. Half the year gone already but no World War III, no AI ending humanity and no gains for all those crypto lemmings who increased the wealth of the Trump family by $1.4 billion. The Donald deftly sidestepped the crypto shake down with the reassuring deflection of a practiced mobster – “The stock market is going up…Everybody’s profiting”. Sure, Jan. Between Love Island and the upcoming weekend sports-fest one can understand people lacking a little financial focus. So, I will keep it brief today. I’d like to take a look at a number of technology sector financial milestones which have been achieved and then flag a couple of unintended consequences, and probably pension risks. First, the milestones….

     

    • Tech-heavy Nasdaq Index gained 20% in H1 vs S&P 500 up 9.5%.
    • Semiconductor/chip sector went rocketed 82% in the same 6 months (Nvidia, Broadcom, Intel etc)
    • Memory chip stocks like Sandisk, Micron, Hynix and Samsung are up a whopping 120% in H1.
    • Research house, Gartner, say AI spending will hit $2.6 TRILLION in 2026.
    • The AI hyper-scalers – Google, MSFT, Amazon and Meta – are set to spend $650 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026. 
    • The combined weight of AI-focused stocks across hyperscaling, semiconductor chips, power, hardware and software tots up to 51% of the total value of the S&P 500 index.
    • Nine major AI companies accounted for almost half of global technology borrowing, raising $122 billion in corporate bonds in a single year to fund data centres and infrastructure.

     

    So, my first observation based on these milestones is that, if your pension is tracking global/US stock markets, then there is a strong possibility you are ‘running’ a significant bet on AI without actually realising it. It’s what the pensions/wealth industry might refer to as a ‘concentration risk’. And, I think the following headlines are flagging a few other AI risks right now….

     

    • OpenAI Leans Toward waiting Until Next Year For IPO – New York Times
    • Tesla Caps Employee AI Spend At $200 Per Week After Adoption Push – The Information
    • OpenAI in early talks to give 5% stake to US government – The Guardian

     

    OpenAI, as a reminder, is attached to almost $1 trillion of AI infrastructure projects and the ‘mood music’ in the above headlines is not great. These projects have been funded by trillions of equity and debt from technology and banking partners. So, these partners must be wondering why OpenAI feels the need to grease Donald Trump’s tiny toddler fingers. I’m wondering too, but speculation gets us nowhere. Of course, the complete anti-Donald antidote is truth, numbers, facts and genuine science. So, I was intrigued to come across some excellent research by former colleagues of mine at Quant Insight. These guys use big AI computational power and principal component analysis (PCA) to strip out all the ‘noise’ attached to the pricing/trading behaviour of financial instruments in the equity, debt and FX markets. The benefit of this huge analytical undertaking is to identify the key factors/drivers of a share price or bond price in the current market environment/regime. This is what they found was driving the $10 trillion semiconductor sector ETF (SOXX) which rocketed 80% in Q2 alone….

    It turns out that the biggest external (macro) factor driving the share prices of semiconductor companies was….. lower cost of corporate borrowing. Now think about these companies involved in heavy capex manufacturing and infrastructure activities. A glance at the financial milestones above and trillions of dollars of planned investment spend means these tech companies need external funding given their own revenues and cash flow can’t keep up with the pace of investment required. This means technology companies are now borrowing which was never really a feature of these high margin/cash flow companies previously. For pension funds this ALSO means the whole AI infrastructure story is not just a stock market story. Hidden behind the headlines, there is a borrowing, credit, balance sheet story. Now, think about that 51% exposure of the S&P 500 index to AI. You think you’re getting equity and AI exposure but….. you’re also acquiring an exposure to a credit (lending) book as large as many dedicated private credit funds. Now check out the recent headlines on private credit funds.

    Actually don’t. Enjoy the weekend sport first!

  • Tales On Tour

    Tales On Tour

    Events dear boy. That was Harold Macmillan’s famous response to the query about what can cause government failure. Undoubtedly, there is significant truth attached to that guidance. However, we are currently in an era of unmatched clown-car incompetence, chronic short-termism and self-interest at the highest levels of political power. On Brexit’s 10th anniversary we are about to welcome the 7th occupant of 10 Downing Street since that embarrassing day. Who knew Ed Milliband’s scuppering of his brother David’s bid for leadership of the Labour Party would facilitate Brexit passivity and bonkers trade assumptions across the UK political spectrum? Meanwhile, the Russians are discovering Vladimir Putin is the worst military leader in Europe since Olaf the Hairy accidentally ordered 80,000 Viking helmets with the horns on the inside(thank you Blackadder). And, of course, how can we forget the failed casino, burger, vodka, sneaker, NFL, airline, crypto toddler himself….the Orange Emperor with no Hormuz close (!) babbling about reflection swamps in Washington.  Prepare for Algae-fa to be designated a single-celled terrorist organization. Despite that swampy distraction, it turns out that the Donald is going to go down in history as the worst-returning oil acquisition strategist after his Venezuela and Iran escapades (unless you have an insider trading account).  We seem to be receiving months’ worth of news in mere days so forgive me if I’m a bit event focused. But, I’m not the only one….let’s go on an events tour.

    Prediction markets are the hottest thing in the finance world right now. Regulators in the US decided companies like Kalshi and Polymarket were trading derivatives, rather than betting platforms for events from sports to elections to wars. Famously, a US Special Forces sergeant was arrested having placed a trade on Polymarket to win $400,000 on the probability of Maduro losing power in Venezuela….. just before he hopped on a Black Hawk chopper to abduct Maduro and his wife. Maduro isn’t the only one suffering right now. Sports betting companies like Paddy Power/Flutter, William Hill and Bet 365 are losing out to these new ‘events prediction’ players. Kalshi sports volumes are up 300% since the World Cup started and is now valued at $22 billion. For context, global leader Flutter/Paddy Power is currently valued at $17 billion slightly more than Polymarket’s $15 billion value underpinned by a recent $600m investment from the New York-based Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).  That’s a big bet but after a recent trip to the UK, I’m beginning to wonder about another event prediction…

    Macroeconomic strategists are currently analysing the impact of another economics-light Labour leader in Andy Burnham taking the PM reins in the UK. And lurking in the background is the crypto puppet, Nigel Farage, anticipating a general election win in a few years. At last, thanks to the excellent Sally Nugent on BBC, the ‘ordinary man’ mask is slipping off Nigel (the car crash interview is worth a watch) as are the Reform Party’s electoral hopes. However, Westminster intrigue could amount to a financial distraction. It was acutely apparent during the worst of the Iran war volatility that the UK’s sovereign debt/bonds did worse than most other major advanced economy financial assets. That’s a very worrying signal. It means the UK is considered a ‘vulnerable’ sovereign risk. So, here’s an event prediction not being discussed in the UK financial or political press right now. My personal view is that the UK’s 8th political leader (after Burnham) will be the IMF/Troika who will have to impose financial sanity on the nation. Just saying, but there’s a huge amount of evidence that the UK has failed to do very much over the last 3 decades…

    In recent weeks, both on a recent IMI panel in Dublin and at a business lunch in London, the theme of under-investment was raised as a huge factor in UK decline. It is striking that the UK has quietly lagged at the bottom of the G7 rankings by corporate spending in 24 of the last 30 years. UK investment averaged 23.7% of GDP between 1970 and 1990. But, after that it fell by a quarter, to an annual average of just 17.9%. In contrast, other major OECD economies have, on average, kept their investment levels above 20% of GDP. Back in 2024, I also had highlighted this shocking lack of long-term planning:

     

    “The Institute for Public Policy Research estimates the under-investment in business at $500 billion less than what other comparable OECD countries have invested since 2005. Public sector investment (infrastructure) was a further $200 billon below the G7 average. All in, this chronic lack of investment places the UK 27th out of 30 OECD countries.” 

     

    Thatcherism might need to be reviewed. At least, the English football team is in better shape these days. In fact, sport is on my mind too.

    Closer to home, the return of world-class tennis to Ireland at the Dublin ATP Challenger Tour event at Elm Park opened eyes up to the possibilities of showcasing memorable sporting experiences. There is a reason why sports franchises, festival events, city-break tourism and concert tickets continue to smash valuation records. The experiential industry plays to scarcity, living in the moment and shared memories. Check out the acceleration of NBA franchise valuations from 2020 to 2025. Utah Jazz was acquired for a record $1.66 billion in 2020, but in 2025 the LA Lakers were bought for a new record franchise value of $10 billion. That’s a 6x shift in asset values. So, just as Big Tech companies have become bigger than sovereign states (and borders), it feels like sport will be a border-less global platform. Indeed, the recent reports about an ice hockey franchise coming to a Dublin home (in Cherrywood) and a brand new stadium could be flagging some very interesting long-term thinking? Follow that puck, and reach for the stars….literally.

    One can marvel or guffaw at SpaceX’s peak post-IPO valuation near $3 trillion, but there are big lessons for Europe. Global business in many communications and technology sectors is dominated by quasi-monopolies. That global monopolistic ‘north star’ for start-up founders in the US seems to be a cultural differentiator. Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia and Meta dominate their sub-sectors and have benefitted from the massive depth of US capital markets prepared to back global domination. We should, of course, celebrate the recent $3.6 billion exit by the founders of Fin/Intercom. But, at a strategic level, Europe needs to mobilize all its financial innovation and resources to plot the building of trillion dollar global champions over the coming years. So, on a positive note for both Europe and the UK, I’m looking at one huge sector still fragmented and missing the economies of scale which digital dominance can deliver. I’m thinking banking where London is still a major financial centre combining centuries of financial experience, stable common law, a concentration of necessary skillsets and….rapid  innovation.

    The UK is the second biggest fintech hub on the planet behind only the United States. In 2025 UK fintechs raised $3.6 billion across 534 separate deals, more deals than the next five European countries combined. Also, London is home to Revolut, now worth around $75 billion and  the most valuable private tech company in Europe. In fact, 8 of the top 10 fintechs in Europe come from the UK. It’s entirely possible London will produce Europe’s first trillion dollar financial services company. Ironically, with my monopoly/north star thinking cap on, the much-maligned fragmentation of Europe’s banking market could help the growth of a new trillion dollar financial franchise. Currently, Europe is home to over 9,000 banking entities. That’s not sustainable, but we might have to wait for events dear boy.

  • Watch Big Leadership Changes…

    Watch Big Leadership Changes…

    We do need heroes. As Irish rugby lost one this week (F.S. RIP), I was reminded of those dark days in the 1970s and 1980s and the importance of uplifting heroes at a time when Ireland needed leadership and inspiration. Regular readers of this weekly piece will know I have been very concerned about leadership on a global level for quite some time. The challenges of the breakdown of world order, AI, Ukraine, Gaza/Lebanon, climate change and the success of misinformation at the expense of truth, are crying out for leaders. At times, the challenges feel overwhelming. However, we can still be inspired and encouraged. Think back to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24th February 2022. The consensus view was that Ukraine would be conquered in a matter of  days. As the conflict moves into its 5th year and surpasses even the duration of WW2 for the former Soviet Union, all is utterly changed. And, Europe might have a genuine hero.

    The 82nd anniversary of the pivotal D-Day “Operation Overlord” landings of World War II were celebrated this weekend. Melvin Hurwitz, 99 years old and one of the last surviving veterans of the Omaha Beach landing, was back there again. As was Ukraine’s President Zelensky. Melvin took the opportunity to pull Zelensky close to him and the stage microphones picked up the veteran’s words – “You’re the saviour of the people. You’re my hero”. Zelensky quickly responded, “No, no. You saved Europe. You are our hero”. Classy stuff. Two men, who both know the value and ideals of defeating totalitarian aggression. Meanwhile, a criminal grifter in Washington presides over the East Wing of the White House lying in ruins and the South Lawn playing host to a UFC fighting cage. Institutional vandalism on full display. Trump is not alone in being exposed by true heroes. Vladimir Putin woke up last Friday morning for his “Davos-for-Dictators” world economic forum to see the host city, St Petersburg, 1,100 kms from Ukraine, buzzed by drones and rocked by explosions at fuel/energy and Baltic Fleet military facilities. Incredible. Four years ago, drone “technology” amounted to grenades dropped through tank turret hatches from quadcopters purchased at Circuit City. This year Ukraine will manufacture 4 million drones of dizzying long-range and short-range capabilities.

    Arguably, Friday 5th June 2026 might well have been D-Day (drone day) for Vladimir Putin. Ukraine is  ‘winning’ this war. Russian supply chains and oil refining assets are being decimated, and military casualties at more than 1,000 per day are exceeding the numbers of replacement troops being rushed to the front lines. The Ukrainians are now destroying Russian battlefield positions without using any ground troops, just unmanned ground vehicles and watchful lethal drones in the skies. At a fraction of the cost of the annual $1 trillion US defence budget, Ukraine has changed ‘war gaming’ assumptions and possibly revealed the obsolescence of large portions of modern military weaponry and delivery equipment. Ukraine is not the only European technology leader receiving attention this week.

    Nvidia might capture the financial market headlines with its AI semiconductor chip dominance. However, it is interesting to read an increasing number of stories about AI chip competition and efforts by Big Tech like Google and Microsoft to customize their own AI chips. Let’s just say monopolistic 75%-80% gross margins enjoyed by Nvidia might not be a long-term sure thing. In fact, the entire AI chip ecosystem has a number of monopoly-like players. What about the equipment essential for every leading-edge chip manufacturing facility? Well, the standout monopolistic player in extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines is a Dutch company. ASML, based in Veldhoven, was only founded in 1984, but has just become Europe’s most valuable company with a market capitalisation of more than $600 billion. Its customers are global, Chinese, TSMC, Apple suppliers, Intel, Hynix, Samsung etc. The mention of the last two companies is deliberate. Both these Korean manufacturers of memory chips for AI are considered ‘essential’ and have earned $1 trillion valuations. My sense is that ASML (and its relatively small 53% gross margins) is even more critical for the AI chip ecosystem…..so Europe might soon have its first trillion dollar 1980s ‘baby’.

    Sticking with European leadership, but at a sovereign level, Germany is fast losing stature. The failure to secure the ‘slam dunk’ certainty of a rotating seat on the UN Security Council reflects Germany’s abdication of leadership on anything from Ukraine to Gaza to China. The fact that relatively small European powers like Austria and Portugal were trusted more by voting nations to bring leadership to the UN has caused national introspection, and fury. And, the next European piece of leadership news won’t ease Teutonic tantrums. Germany’s perennial European rival, France, has just secured a whopping €75 billion investment commitment from Japan’s Softbank to focus its European data centre building efforts in the Gallic nation. Despite Macron’s domestic unpopularity, it does feel like France, with AI wonder-kid Mistral in the innovation vanguard, is stealing a European march in the global AI race.  Of course, not all wonder-kids grow up to deliver.

    My final thought on leadership change is in the crypto world. Bitcoin is now off 50% from its all-time highs, and one recent development hints at further trouble ahead. One of the key cheerleaders of the Bitcoin revolution has been Michael Saylor and his publicly listed MicroStrategy vehicle. Saylor’s vehicle has been a perma-buyer of Bitcoin since 2020. This dogged purchasing strategy has accumulated almost 850,000 Bitcoins which equates to 4% of total Bitcoin supply. But, last week the MicroStrategy vehicle tried to sell ….. 32 Bitcoins. Yes, thirty two at a value of just $2.5 million (circa $75,000 price). And the crypto market puked. Bitcoin has dropped below $60,000 and MicroStrategy’s share price is 78% off its all-time highs. Saylor’s strategy is now sitting on nearly $12 billion of unrealized losses. And, I’ve seen him explain and try to give comfort to investors in US TV interviews. It wasn’t pretty, or in any way financially logical. As the Strait of Hormuz continues to be strangled in non-negotiation by the “Art of The Deal” self-promoter, we should be wary of cheerleaders. They usually don’t turn out to be heroes.

  • Ten WOW Moments This Week

    Ten WOW Moments This Week

    I feel good. Maybe it’s an Arsenal triumph thing? Ok, I won’t go there but I do think we need to absorb some astonishing other developments this week. Dare I say it, even Republicans are astonished by their own crime family in the White House. Currently, Republican politicians are fleeing Washington to avoid precarious Capitol Hill votes, press scrutiny and global ridicule as the world digests the single most corrupt action by any US President in history. The phrasing I use is almost Trumpian but deserved this time. A self-dealing ‘settlement’ between the Trump family and the US government (via its IRS taxation department) is truly one for the ages. The establishment of a $1.776 billion ‘slush fund’ to spend on anyone the Donald wants, as well as a full waiver on Trump family tax audits in perpetuity is finally generating senior GOP leader outrage….and rebellion. This is ‘end of days’ stuff only missing a Caligula-like attempt to appoint a loyal horse (or Eric) to the Senate. However, the real WOW stuff is to be found elsewhere. Join me on a quick whistlestop tour of developments which have genuinely earned their superlatives.

    • The $5 trillion AI chip superstar stock, Nvidia, reported quarterly earnings this week. Again, as the most analysed company on the planet, the company managed to exceed revenue and earnings forecasts in the quarter, and then increased its guidance for the following quarter way ahead of the estimates in dozens of analyst spreadsheets. But, the real wow bit was Nvidia’s CFO forecasting global AI spend of $4 trillion PER YEAR by 2030.

     

    • IPO markets have been sleepy in recent years but get ready for a very hot IPO summer. SpaceX, Open AI and Anthropic are expected to list on US stock exchanges with a combined valuation of $3.5 trillion. For context, that equates to the GDP of France! More crucially, IPO exits means investment capital is freed up to be re-invested in the next SpaceX or Google. For illustration, Founders Fund, Valor Equity Partners, and Sequoia are set for over $100B, $60B, and $20B windfalls respectively from SpaceX alone in the biggest VC exit ever.

     

    • Ukraine rarely gets the headlines these days but something’s up. Vladimir Putin is increasingly paranoid about his personal safety as Russian advances in Ukraine stall or go into reverse. Losses are now approaching Vietnam war (57,000 US deaths) levels every 6 weeks. Meanwhile, deep-strike capabilities of Ukrainian drones into the Russian motherland are reaching targets 1,500 kilometres away. Military and infrastructure targets are being picked off at will by Ukrainian drones and there are emerging reports of large parts of Russia’s road network littered with destroyed military equipment. This writer’s personal view is that Putin’s removal and Ukraine peace could be the summer wow geopolitical moment.

     

    • The UAE’s announcement to transform healthcare, public services and federal operations with AI — including deploying Agentic AI across 50% of government services and training 80,000 employees in AI technologies — feels like a significant inflection point. The commitment to train 80,000 public service employees is particularly noteworthy.

     

    • The structural tailwind of generational wealth transfer continues to be under-estimated, particularly by those convinced 5 times a year that financial asset markets are going to crash. In Europe alone, €3.5 trillion of wealth will shift into new hands by 2030. That means new relationships and new wealth tools. So, please DO pay attention to this enormous structural trend and possibly take a look at NestiFi which is raising funds with Spark right now.

     

    • The biggest stock market move this week was not actually the US, despite Nvidia’s best efforts. Actually, it was South Korea’s KOSPI index which rocketed 8% in one trading session adding more than $400 billion of value to the market. The reason for the move was Samsung’s last minute deal with its worker unions, an agreement to pay a $26 billion AI bonus to employees. Wow. However, don’t forget Samsung is now a trillion dollar company and accounts for 30% of South Korea’s stock market value.

     

    • Not all news in Asia is good news. One can’t help feeling an untethered Japanese bond market could cause the global economy some real pain. Japan’s bonds are selling off in ways not seen since 1999. The current yield on Japan’s 30-year debt instruments is 4.2% (yields rise as prices fall). Watch this very carefully.

     

    • Bond and debt prices rising globally are the critical risk factor right now but the M&A market is showing continued confidence that debt markets will settle down. For illustration, the electric utility merger deal in the US between NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy is a $67 billion whopper bet, and biggest ever seen in the sector. Again, AI and its insatiable demand for power is driving deals in the sector.

     

    • As the Strait of Hormuz focuses minds on supply chains and logistics, there was a double reminder of two big trends from Japan. Logistics is a ‘hot’ sector for private equity, as is Japan. So, it was interesting $4.6B Japan-listed logistics firm NIKKON Holdings is exploring going private, with Bain Capital, Warburg Pincus, and Blackstone seen as potential bidders. That’s a helpful tailwind for our own portfolio name, Net Feasa, which has just this week teamed up with network giant, Ericsson, to deliver 5G IoT connectivity on container ships. Watch that connectivity trend too – Ericsson’s share price is up 44% and Nokia’s has rocketed 145% year-to-date. Wowzers.

     

    • Finally, as Europe prepares a €25 billion IPO of its tank manufacturer, KNDS, with 80% ownership by French and German government… it’s worth thinking about other traditional areas of German engineering prowess. The AI data centre race for power is driving massive demand for grid/transformer equipment and you should check out Siemens’ latest margins in this activity. Margins(EBITDA) in recent years have more than trebled from 5% to 18%. The old economy and real assets can still wow.

     

    All of the above are big themes to keep an eye on, but now it’s time to dream. Can Leinster follow Arsenal with another long-awaited triumph?    That would be WOW too…..

  • Google Growth, Giddiness and Gullibility…

    Google Growth, Giddiness and Gullibility…

    Deep breaths…I’m searching for expletives. Google has not only become briefly the most valuable company on the planet last week, it also has its own eponymous verb. Now I’m wondering will there one day be a verb “Farage”? Could someone ‘farage’ a nation? Not quite damage or ravage, more like persuade a country to screw itself repeatedly. I’m staring at the screens over the last few days and gasping at the fact that millions of UK voters are trusting dear Nigel (again) and his Thai-based crypto billionaire backers to lead them to the “sunlit uplands” which escaped them on Brexit. Anyway, back to Google and another prediction which has ended up going horribly wrong. Remember how the commentariat gurus confidently predicted AI was going to destroy Google because of its dependence on search? Well, the reality today is far sunnier…

    Google’s AI focused cloud business delivered $20 billion of revenues in its last quarter. That number is astonishingly growing at 63% year-on-year and surpassed the expectations of all herd-like analysts on Wall Street. As mentioned earlier, Google last week briefly passed Nvidia as the world’s most valuable company at almost $5 trillion. Incredibly, 38% of that value, or $1.3 trillion, was added in April alone. Growth is still being rewarded, despite the simultaneous chaos caused by the strangulation of the global economy’s critical energy supply route in the Persian Gulf. This tug-of-war between positive and negative macro drivers is both scary and fascinating to long-time market watchers. Clearly, as stock markets hit all-time highs, the AI growth story is winning the battle for investors’ mindset. Indeed, the S&P 500 in the midst of strategic White House chaos has managed to add $10 TRILLION in value in the past month. It’s not just sentiment and valuations on the rise. The fundamentals look pretty good too.

    The year-on-year earnings growth (yep, that income thing after sales) for the median S&P 500 company in Q1 hit a double-digit 12% pace (Source: Deutsche Bank). The average across all 500 companies actually reached a monster 25% growth rate. That pace of fundamental profit growth hasn’t been seen in at least 4 years and has nothing to do with a pandemic recovery or other macro rebound. Fundamentals like income and earnings matter for the more risk-averse investors. So, it was encouraging to see US high-yield bonds perform strongly in April, European M&A volume at its highest since 2007 and the European bond market just had its busiest day ever.  Yes, people are concerned about supply/demand imbalances in the AI infrastructure world but, if anything, demand is running ahead of capacity. Check out the deal just done by Anthropic and SpaceX. This is all about Anthropic’s urgent need for compute power to meet demand. For illustration, Anthropic had planned for 10x revenue and usage growth in the first quarter of this year. In fact, the growth has been closer to 80x……. yep 80x, not 8x. Euphoric stuff, but it’s time for a word of caution.

    Confidence and rising expectations are great for driving valuations higher. However, this also brings over-confidence and speculation. Arguably, the gullible are in danger of being sucked into the wrong ‘opportunities’. Two outstanding examples of over-confidence and gullibility working in tandem appeared on my screens this week. First, the original meme-stock, GameStop, which gathered a huge retail investor following from online communities like Reddit and Mashable, announced a $56 billion bid for the much larger company, eBay. However, no matter how many times GameStop CEO, Ryan Cohen, awkwardly told his CNBC interviewers the financing was “half cash, half stock”, nobody sane could make the numbers add up. At best, GameStop equity valued at $11 billion, plus $9 billion cash in the bank, plus an offer of $20 billion of financing from Toronto Dominion was still going to be $15-20 billion short of the asking price. Nuts stuff which probably won’t end well. However, you don’t have to wait to find out with Fermi Inc.

    Fermi Inc listed publicly (IPO) as recently as October 2025 with a valuation of about $19 billion. Fermi was riding the coat tails of the AI infrastructure-chasing-energy theme. Its solution was a promise to supply 17 gigawatts of nuclear-powered AI infrastructure….with zero revenues and zero clients. In the subsequent months the CEO and CFO have both departed, and the company still has not signed a single customer. Unsurprisingly, gullible investors have taken serious pain. The Fermi Inc share price has imploded by 85% wiping $16 billion from the IPO valuation. Customers and market traction remain a critical consideration for sensible investors and thankfully there are investment themes out there which are showing encouraging form. Here’s two worth watching.

    Amazon’s cloud business, AWS, was built around its first, best customer, Amazon’s e-commerce business. Now Amazon is launching Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS). And guess what? Amazon itself will be this logistics business’s first and best customer again. This allows Amazon to invest massively in infrastructure to challenge the incumbents, UPS, FedEx etc.  Regular readers will know we have strong positive views on the logistics infrastructure space and have recently raised money for OOHPod. Now, think how Amazon invented cloud computing before it was “hot”. This writer believes logistics infrastructure in the coming years will attract lots of investment capital and… customers. Check out Bloomberg’s view:

     

    “The world’s largest online retailer on Monday announced Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS), offering other companies access to its “full portfolio” of supply-chain and distribution offerings. The service largely consolidates a package of existing products — air and ocean freight, trucking and last-mile delivery — into a new suite it says companies like Procter & Gamble Co. and 3M Co. are already using.”

     

    Not bad, P&G and 3M on the customer roster already. Of course, our angle in logistics infrastructure is more deals and more M&A. So, it was interesting to catch another positive signal on M&A activity in recent days. It looks like Chicago’s boutique investment bank, Lincoln International, is looking to go for IPO in 2026. This will be the first boutique investment bank to go public since Perella Weinberg in 2021, and is enjoying a 31% income growth tailwind from 2025. Of course, the perkier M&A environment has helped. Data from Pitchbook would seem to confirm same…

     

    “2025 was a record-setting year for global M&A activity, with both deal value and volume shattering the previous highs set in 2021. PitchBook data tracked 50,810 transactions last year—the first time deal count has ever surpassed 50,000; and combined deal value hit nearly $5 trillion, up 37% from the prior year. In its filing, Lincoln contends that the growth of private capital will create a “larger and more durable M&A fee pool,” particularly for sponsor-led deals.”

     

    Again, we have written frequently about the structural shifts in finance and fintech investment. The opportunities to leverage technology in financial services are enormous, and particularly for small disruptors. The standout number for me in April was the trading revenue achieved by a firm unknown to most. Jane Street is a financial trading firm with 3,500 personnel and a lot of technology. In the last 12 months Jane Street generated $39.6 billion in trading revenues. JP Morgan with 316,000 employees did $35.8 billion; Goldman Sachs and its 46,000 superstars did $31.1 billion. The average revenue per employee at Jane Street was an incredible $11 million. Technology and trillions of dollars of investment capital flows can be a phenomenal combination. So, it is timely that Spark Private investors in the coming weeks will be shown two excellent fintech platform prospects. The beach can wait….

  • The Truth Can Hurt ….. Investment

    The Truth Can Hurt ….. Investment

    Forty years ago this week, reactor 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant exploded. The human and monetary costs were in the thousands and hundreds of billions respectively. More difficult to quantify was Chernobyl’s contribution to the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, I did re-watch the excellent HBO series Chernobyl in recent days and was struck by a non-monetary factor which might resonate for those currently enduring daily White House appeals to ignore our eyes and ears. The words of Professor Valery Legasov of Moscow State University in the opening scene of Chernobyl seem almost prescient  –  “What is the cost of lies? It’s not that we’ll mistake them for the truth. The real danger is that if we hear enough lies, then we no longer recognize the truth at all.”  For the USSR, the truth of technological decline, an obsolete economic model, and the inability of centralised power to deal with the complexity of a more connected global economy was easy to see. But fatally, not recognized. Fast forward to today, and we could be in similar TRUTH territory….

    Don’t worry, we won’t go down any conspiracy theory rabbit holes. So, no need to wonder why a would-be assassin might gain access without security challenge to the Washington Hilton and within one floor of almost the entire Trump regime senior leadership at Saturday’s annual White House Correspondents dinner. If the current head of the FBI is nicknamed “J. Edgar Boozer” then the truth is closer to incompetence than conspiracy. Similarly, but with far greater global economic impact, if Germany’s normally cautious Chancellor Merz is saying that the US has “no clear exit strategy” and is being “humiliated” by Iran, then the truth is that the US does not really “hold all the cards” or the keys to “Schrödinger’s Strait” of Hormuz. The consequences are plain to see as oil prices soar past $110 per barrel again and OPEC’s number 3 producer, UAE, just left the cartel after 59 years of membership.

    Clearly, the old world order alliances from NATO to OPEC are fragmenting. And, that’s before anyone dares to mention the eye-catching new Pew (March 2026) poll showing 60% of Americans now view Israel unfavourably — up from 42% in 2022. That’s almost as bad a swing as Trump’s voter approval on dealing with inflation shifting to a net MINUS 40, and national Consumer Sentiment surveys (Michigan/Ipsos) diving to the lowest levels seen since 1978. And yet….

    There’s a danger we have been distracted and miss other truths. Watch what people do, not what they feel. For example US consumer sentiment might be plummeting but US retail sales are running ‘hot’ at 7.7% year-on-year growth, the fastest growth pace seen since 2022. Meanwhile, fossil fuels and Strait of Hormuz blockades (unless you’re a Russian oligarch’s yacht – I know…Russia, Russia, Russia) might be dominating the gloomy headlines but there’s more positive long-term developments accelerating at speed. If you have been unable to copy or track Baron Trump’s oil trading strategies or share the Fox Business congratulations of Maria Bartiromo on Eric Trump’s new $24 million contract with the Pentagon(yup), then there’s good news and bad news. The bad news is you’re not making millions on risk-free trading or commerce, but the good news is you won’t need a fitting for an orange jump suit. However, away from the fossil fuel supply crisis, check out the following quiet developments which could hurt your investment portfolio if you miss them…

     

    • In 2025, for the first time in history, clean power met every single unit of new global electricity demand.
    • Renewable energy sources (33.8%) officially crushed coal (33.0%) for the first time in 100 years.
    • Electric vehicle (EV) sales in emerging markets have surged 80%.
    • In Europe, EV sales soared 51% in March while EV sales smash through 25% of the total global market.
    • Chinese company, CATL, just unveiled a battery with a 1,500km range that charges in 6 minutes
    • China exports of batteries, EVs and solar cells were up 34%, 53%, 80% respectively last month.

     

    A quick glance at the last two developments might suggest another uncomfortable truth; China is winning this global electrification ‘war’ and arguably is the winner of the Persian Gulf one too. However, there’s clearly only one country, USA, winning the global race for AI investment capital right now. The AI chip superstar stock, Nvidia, has just clocked up another $1.25 trillion increase in market value in less than 4 weeks. Nvidia’s current market capitalisation of $5.25 TRILLION is just shy of the entire value of Germany’s GDP and surpassed by only those of China and the USA itself. Google and Nvidia’s combined market value is now over $10 trillion.

    AI is acting like a ‘death star’ for other investment sectors as it sucks up huge amounts of investment dollars. In Q1 of this year software stocks collapsed 29% from their highs while 81% of all venture capital funding ($265 billion out of $330 billion) went to AI start-ups, with 65% of that going to just 4 companies (Source: Pitchbook). You’ll keep hearing and reading that word “concentration” and how investment capital is racing into ever narrower niches within technology. However, it might be worth keeping a mix of old and new names on the investment radar. Here’s two to watch:

    NEW: Anthropic, the parent of my new best work friend this week, Claude, is apparently trading in private markets right now at a $1 trillion valuation. Of course, it does help valuations if your annualised revenue jumps from $9 billion to $30 billion….in just 3 months.

    OLD: Samsung, the unwieldy Korean conglomerate of TV, phone and memory chip manufacture, is going to be the most profitable company in the world by 2027. Bloomberg reckon Samsung will edge out Nvidia for top spot with a whopping operating profit of $330 billion. Yep, good old memory chips (DRAM, NAND etc) are needed by Claude, Gemini and all the other agentic chatbots to remember you (and your prompts).

    So, that’s all good for now. But, let’s get back to the Truth thing. And, we’re not talking about AI chatbot hallucinations, or even Trumpolini’s Jesus delusions. It’s much more basic than that. In the middle of all this AI euphoria sits the company who kicked things off with ChatGPT, Open AI, and its CEO, Sam Altman. This week we heard OpenAI are behind on planned revenues and new subscriber growth targets. These things happen in fast growing tech stories, but OpenAI is attached to $1.2 trillion of AI infrastructure deals where OpenAI’s commitment is $600 billion despite current annual cash burn of…… $17 billion. Furthermore, OpenAI does not have a huge balance sheet like Google, Microsoft or Amazon. So, credibility and confidence matters. And, I’m concerned.

    Altman’s career history per various in-depth media articles (the New Yorker one is best) is littered with massive commercial relationship breakdowns and a common theme. Loss of trust. Phrases like “profound mistrust”, “lack of candour”, “consistent pattern of lying” and “deceptive and chaotic behaviour” are used to describe the CEO of a company seeking to publicly list (IPO) in New York this year with a valuation of more than $800 billion. This week Altman faces Elon Musk in court for a $150 billion lawsuit brought by the latter regarding governance at OpenAI. Let’s just say the potential damage to Altman’s credibility could have ‘nuclear’ consequences for the AI financial ecosystem. Watch carefully and remember the fragility of the Open AI balance sheet in the context of its trillion dollar commitments. Then think of Chernobyl and Valery Legasov’s most powerful words which we have cited before on these pages…

    “Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later that debt is paid”

  • The War Of Unintended Consequences…

    The War Of Unintended Consequences…

    I know. The headline should read “LAW” but where’s the law these days? Certainly, it’s nowhere near Washington as the new Trump fund raising “squeeze” is an emailed request for cash donations in exchange for “private national security briefings” straight from the desk of The Don himself. I kid you not. Anyway, let’s get back to the war, or ‘excursion’ per the Orwellian Oval Office. Clearly, things on the Iran war front are not going to plan. My particular favourite summary of the moment is a delicious one from The Economist: “Although Donald Trump claims to have destroyed 100% of Iran’s military capabilities, the remaining 0% is wreaking havoc on the global economy.” Now, the purpose of this article is not to re-hash all the negative first-order global impacts of the war ranging from higher fuel prices, to supply chain disruption, to inflation, to reduced growth….to interest rate hikes. Yuk! None of this helps financial markets or business in the near term but I’m intrigued by some of the second-order possibilities which could emerge from an extended period of uncertainty. I’m thinking of three areas in particular:

    AI Infrastructure: The simple math of a shock to the global economy is that financial flows dramatically shift. Quickly. Extra money will be needed to meet higher energy bills, economic stress etc. That money must come from somewhere else in the system. So, one thing to consider is that the hundreds of billions Saudi Arabia , UAE, and Qatar committed to the funding of AI infrastructure projects might just be needed to rebuild energy infrastructure closer to home. Current estimates of the cost of the attack on Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG hub is up to $20 billion per annum . And the worst bit, the rebuild could take 5 years – so let’s call that $100 billion. There is a teeny weeny bit of irony here given the US tech broligarchs’ man in the big house (and ballroom) has screwed up royally. Current estimates suggest $4 trillion is needed to build data centres, processing chips, training models, memory chips and storage by 2030. A squeeze on access to that investment capital will favour the biggest balance sheets and cash flows like Google, Microsoft and Amazon. Not for the first time, I worry about OpenAI’s positioning in the middle of all this AI excitement (remember the famous FT graphic) and being attached to more than $1 trillion of AI projects. So might its bankers worry, watching its tiny balance sheet.

    Electric Revolution: There was a theory for years that Saudi Arabia was deliberately keeping the oil price lower in order to delay the electric/renewable revolution. Their thinking apparently was that if energy was cheap it would remove the urgency to seek alternatives to fossil fuels. So, with Asian buyers already paying over $170 per barrel of oil we are beginning to see some interesting developments. In a little more than 2 weeks, Chinese EV player, BYD Co, is seeing its showrooms packed with customers wanting to switch to EV models. From Bloomberg….”At a BYD Co car dealership in Manila’s financial district, demand for the Chinese company’s electric vehicles is so high that Matthew Dominique Poh said he’s seen a month’s worth of orders in just the past two weeks.”  This feels similar to the Covid-19 acceleration of remote working. Also, spare a thought for US auto manufacturers who have scaled back their EV ambitions to keep the Dearest Leader happy and have written off $55 billion of EV projects. Timing is everything they say…..Get ready for some pretty interesting EV headlines in the coming months.

    Defence: Ukraine was the wake-up call when the world’s second most powerful military power turned the Kremlin’s “3 day operation” into a battlefield quagmire which has decimated its stores of equipment and weaponry, incurred more than 1 million of its own military casualties and incredibly has now lasted longer than the Soviet Union’s WW2 conflict with Nazi Germany. Fast forward to today and we are witnessing the world’s most powerful military gain almost total superiority over Iran but now staring down the barrel (!) of a strategic disaster that “nobody ever expected” per the stable genius hurling ketchup against the walls of Mar-a-Lago. The trapping of 20% of the world’s fuel supplies in the Strait of Hormuz and the destruction of critical energy infrastructure in UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar has been achieved with drones which cost as little as $20,000 but require the US to quickly run through their stores of $2m missile air defence weapons. Astonishingly, the Pentagon is looking for an additional $200 billion of budget to fund this “excursion”. However, the bigger picture is that military strategy and economics have utterly changed. Drone warfare developed on the battlefields of Ukraine is the scary future. For some it will be opportunity. Check out the IPO this week of the Ukrainian drone software company, Swarmer, on the Nasdaq. The IPO price was $5 per share but by the close of its first day of trading the share price was $55. Just the 950% gain in one day of trading. Oh, and last year Swarmer had generated just $300,000 of revenues. The US military-industrial complex is having its “ChatGPT” moment and will soon embark on a massive drone warfare investment programme.

    Clearly, not all of the above is cheery stuff but it does feel like some ‘leaders’ in business, technology and investment are now facing very different prospects than they planned for just a few short weeks ago. And, there doesn’t seem to be a “TACO” option this time.

  • Software Is Eating Your Pension….

    Software Is Eating Your Pension….

    Is it time to rip up our favoured playbooks? No, I’m not trying to steer Andy Farrell after that first half ‘traffic cone’ tackling effort in Paris. Nor will I hold out any hope of Britain’s Labour Party saving its government from the existential fallout of ignoring its own “Prince of Darkness” links to Epstein. Sir Keir Starmer’s premiership is already “dead in the water” but I will stick with the trading theme. Long-time political commentators are rightly appalled that Peter Mandelson tipped off Jeffrey Epstein and his elite rolodex/assets about a €500 billion bailout of the euro currency during the Greek debt crisis. The €500 billion number is huge in its own right but the derivative opportunities in banking debt, currencies, bond markets etc at the time were in the trillions and available for exploitation by Epstein & Co without any obvious trace. So, following on from last week’s article, we promised to dig deeper into the huge AI numbers hitting our screens. Actually, we won’t. Instead, we will focus on a related huge number with potentially massive knock-on/derivative investment implications.

    For me, the big number this week is the $1 trillion of value wiped from software stocks (and their SaaS subscription/business models) in just 6 days of trading. Of course, this is directly connected to the threat of AI and some developments, in particular, from the Anthropic/Claude suite of products which are making massive strides in assisting coders and companies to develop/manage their own work processes. Software, of course, is the incumbent go-to solution for companies seeking to optimise work processes and engagement with their customers. Indeed, the venture capital guru, Marc Andreessen, in 2011 was moved to say  “software is eating the world”. From Netflix to Uber to Amazon, digital subscriptions gave companies and consumers access to technology-optimised services. As AI invades the digital opportunity, software is possibly no longer the ‘always’ solution on the Boardroom table. In fact, software could be on the displacement menu itself. The twin threats of AI are summarised well by Business Insider:

     

    “First, if employees get more efficient using AI tools, companies may not need to buy as many business software subscriptions. That would dent the growth of “seats” or how many subscriptions software companies sell. Each employee has a seat, so if there’s no new hiring, growth stalls.

     The second threat is more existential. If AI tools and AI agents get good enough, companies could replace the software they use entirely and instead rely on new AI-powered workflows. And with AI coding tools showing big improvements lately, companies could even develop their own software, without needing to buy it from established vendors.”

     

    There are plenty of analysts and observers who disagree with the gloomy interpretation of AI’s eventual impact on software companies like SAP, Salesforce, Adobe, Figma and HubSpot. However, these company share prices falling by 30-40% in just one month, is telling us the ‘fear’ is real. The $1 trillion of value evaporation in less than a week is not an earth-shattering number given some individual companies are valued in the trillions alone. But… perhaps looking at the software value obliteration in isolation is misguided. The commentariat might think software fears are ‘overdone’ but, if you have a pension, this might be the less scary of TWO outcomes. The first is that software stocks growth and valuations are hit severely by AI replacement. However, there’s a second set of updated numbers/data to take a look at. While the software sector was being hammered, the AI/Cloud giants were announcing quarterly results. Interestingly, their earnings and sales growth numbers were pretty much ignored as the market focused on just one number; capital expenditure spend on AI infrastructure and development. Last week Facebook promised $135 billion of INVESTMENT in 2026 which equates to their total sales in 2023. Microsoft told us their number was circa $105 billion. This week it was Google and Amazon’s respective turns to talk the AI ‘space race’…

    Google, perceived as the AI leader these days, told the market it would spend a cool $185 billion. That equates to its total revenues in 2020(!). Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos seems happy to test out the theory that “Democracy Dies in Darkness” at the investment-starved Washington Post, as his primary wealth creation vehicle, Amazon, announces a planned $200 billion capex spend for 2026. So, the Big 4 are up for a $625 billion investment splurge this year and probably every year for the foreseeable future. That looks like a bet of $3 trillion to $5 trillion on AI, and I’m just wondering what the ‘risk’ calculations could be? I chose the ‘space race’ phrasing earlier deliberately. It feels like the prospect of AI failure for these companies is existential in terms of economic power and analogous to the geopolitical calculations at the height of the Cold War in the 1960s. Well, the historians would probably agree that Reagan’s “Star Wars”  broke the Soviet empire. It’s too early to tell who will ‘break’ in the AI race but software is in the crosshairs right now. However, the sense that big tech including software is ‘going for broke’ introduces a very new risk for financial markets.

    The beauty of software and SaaS business models is recurring revenues, huge scalability at minimal incremental cost, 80-90% margins and enormous cash flow generation. The end result can be seen in the massive spending plans of Big Tech; these companies’ balance sheets were sitting on enormous cash piles (or equivalent liquidity). Simply put, these were the most robust (credit risk) companies on the planet. Pension funds, family offices, sovereign wealth funds and Swiss bank accounts loved the security/risk safety attached to loans and bonds issued by tech/software companies. These instruments were considered “defensive”. Now, not so much.

    Stock/equities markets (as my former boss Terry Smith used to point out to me) occupy 28 of the 30 pages of the Financial Times. But, the last two pages covering debt, currencies, commodities etc are much more significant for financial markets. Now the bonds and loans associated with big technology companies are receiving intense scrutiny (and investor selling) as they each seek to out-spend their cash and balance sheet credibility. This has incredibly important implications for your pension. The credibility of the United States and global technology stocks are being reviewed for their ‘risk safety’. Some serious investment institutions are already acting and re-positioning. This doesn’t mean just selling. What investors are buying at the moment is telling too. Here’s a few data snippets to alert you to what is happening right now….

     

    *Software sector selling activity is the worst since 2008

    *Software valuations – forward price/earnings multiples of 20x – are now at levels (low) not seen since 2014.  

    *Now the buying: defensive consumer staples companies (Nestle, Mondelez, Heinz etc) have been up 1% on consecutive days while technology sector companies fell 1% on the same days. That divergence of performance has not happened since ….2000.

    *The same consumer staples stocks are experiencing buying intensity (“RSI” for the technicians) not seen since 1995. Other indicators (DMA 200 day) are 4.2 standard deviations above average.

     

    It looks like people are buying ordinary stuff; petfood, protein, household goods, chocolate….. really boring but real. We have written before that investors are flocking to atoms (real) and hedging/selling their risk with bits(digital code). One suspects the meltdown in crypto land (Bitcoin at $65,000, down over 50% from its highs) is also partly driven by digital ‘fear’. So, for those keeping an eye on the headlines and their pensions, you might want to check with your advisors on three areas:

     

    1. Pension exposure to technology (software or AI spend). It could be as high as 30% of your portfolio.
    2. Pension exposure to defensive real stuff. It could be as low as 5% of your portfolio.
    3. Pension exposure to the USA. It could be as high as 70% but there is currently a lawless armed militia running around the country, a Supreme Court in dereliction of its duty, international grift on an epic scale and the real threat of mid-term election suspension.

     

    The advisors won’t have all the answers but it should be on ALL pension radars. This period of history offers mind-boggling opportunity but we must be also aware that there is an unusual confluence of technology ambition/confidence and global political leadership operating in an environment where traditional values and rules are being disregarded. Hopefully, rules-based leadership will return soon but here’s a warning from Andrew Ross Sorkin’s book, 1929:

     

    “It’s a haunting elegy for a fractured era, a timeless reminder that progress is fragile, choices have repercussions, and the flaws embedded in the human condition are ours to confront”

     

    Might be time to make better choices and confront those flaws (including White House ape videos)….

  • Is This The End….?

    Is This The End….?

    Let’s start with the easy one. I’m A Celeb 2025 is almost finished. The more tricky version of this headline question might relate to the Epstein files or even the filing of war crimes charges in The Hague against US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth. Not any time soon me thinks. We could ask Sleepy Don but he might become angry – about the sleepy bit, not the war crimes or paedophilia. Actually, the question most asked in recent weeks is about the end of the AI boom. I asked my own excellent AI ‘friend’ Claude (courtesy of Anthropic) about ‘bubble’ mentions in the media and even he agreed in his remarkably comprehensive market summaries of public and private markets that the AI bubble question is occupying investors’ minds. Mine, not so much. More on Claude later, but first a historical perspective. The last technology boom in 2000 did indeed end in a bust but generalisations on technology can be misleading.

    Back in 2000 we should remind ourselves of the telecoms companies racking up massive debt obligations to acquire mobile spectrum licences and build out fibre/internet networks. Then there were the infrastructure suppliers like Ericsson, Nortel and Cisco dependent on those telecoms, internet and wireless expansion projects. Then the projects stopped. A possible over-simplification by this writer, but a combination of over-build and debt pressures slowed activity and cratered the valuations (growth expectations) of the leading infrastructure players. For illustration, Cisco was trading on a price/earnings multiple of 200x in late 1999. Twenty five years later the Cisco share price has finally recovered to within touching distance of its $80 high in 2000. However, one must make a distinction between the infrastructure plays and the tools/applications which were built on those over-priced networks….

    The Nokia phone in my year 2000 pocket didn’t end up ruling the world but Apple and the mobile internet did. Similarly, Google was just 2 years old at the time and wouldn’t IPO until 4 years later, the same year as TheFacebook Inc was born. Mobile networks enabled commerce (Amazon) and communities (social media platforms) to flourish and generate enormous wealth. Readers might be now detecting a similar pattern with AI. The race for computing power (in 2000 it was networks) is an infrastructure story but investors must not lose sight of the applications of AI and the business models possible (Amazon was an online book store once). The tools like Claude, ChatGPT and Sora are really only in their infancy. The infrastructure story is driven by GPU/TPU chips (Nvidia), cloud computing, hyper-scale data centres and energy. And it’s possibly infrastructure again where risks are building. The CEO of IBM, Arvind Krishna, in recent days put some numbers on those risks.

    Krishna cited a data centre power consumption estimate of 100 GW which at current costs would mean an $8 trillion capital expenditure in the next few years. Now, for the wet blanket of capital reality. That ginormous $8 trillion spend would need to earn profits of $800 billion just to pay the interest/cost of that capital. Yep, that’s stretchy but get ready for the other reality. This infrastructure isn’t piping, fibre, railways or copper which lasts for decades and is depreciated gently over time. The chips which currently power Nvidia’s $5 trillion valuation and sit inside all these data centres could become technologically obsolete within 5 years. Arguably, at current innovation/evolution rates that timeline is too optimistic. Imagine having to replace all your chips every 3 years… ? That should make creditors to these huge data centre projects a little queasy.  The International Financing Review summarized the massive acceleration in borrowing as follows:

     

    An unprecedented splurge from companies at the forefront of the AI boom that has left banks and investors potentially on the hook for billions. Alphabet, Amazon, Blue Owl Capital, Broadcom, Oracle and Meta have between them issued US$120bn of corporate bonds since September – and are raising another US$38bn in the loan market. The debt binge shows no sign of abating, with JP Morgan predicting US$300bn of bond issuance next year – and US$1.5trn by the end of 2030. Another US$2.3trn could be raised in equity, structured finance and private capital markets over the next five years, as hyper-scalers tap every available pocket of capital to finance the US$5.3trn of investments into AI they are expected to make”

     

    Before everyone runs for the hills, we need to be mindful of some very positive starting points. These technology giants tapping the debt markets in most cases are swimming in cash, have dominant market positions and are generating prodigious annual cash flows of almost $700 billion. These are not the fragile telecom balance sheets of the TMT bust in 2000. Of course, OpenAI, sits in the middle of that famous Financial Times graphic showing $1.2 trillion of data centre projects. In my personal view, OpenAI is the weakest link but that could take years to play out. The harsh truth for all investors is that we don’t really know who will win the foundational large-language-model (LLM) race. Google’s Gemini 3.0 seems to be winning this month and did anyone notice Google share price is up 67% year-to-date? Yep, and my Claude’s parent company, Anthropic, is looking to IPO at a $350 billion valuation. These are very early days. Just ask Nvidia. Actually, don’t. They are saying nice things about almost everyone because all are prospective customers. But….. as always watch what a company does, not what it says.

    Nvidia made a $2 billion investment in chip designer, Synopsys, this week. This is just the latest move by Nvidia in what can only be described as a deal spree. In 2025 alone the company has backed 77 equity investments in start-ups, as well as making 5 outright acquisitions (Source: CB Insights). Let’s just say it looks like Nvidia is hedging its AI ‘winner’ bets. Indeed, the ‘AI infrastructure’ bubble fears run the risk of missing the true lessons of the TMT bubble bust of 2000. ChatGPT might be today’s Nokia but the monthly user statistics tell another ‘mobile’ story. ChatGPT is used by 800 million people each month. Gemini is fast catching up with 650 million devotees and Microsoft’s Co-pilot has 200 million monthly users. The market, business or individual, is already converted. That’s the true investor opportunity.

    Meanwhile, there’s a bigger story brewing at the other side of the world. Arguably, we really do need to see that story end very soon. More next week on why troubles in Japan’s bond market REALLY scare me……

  • Big Deals And Big Themes To Watch….

    Big Deals And Big Themes To Watch….

    Been a tough week. And that Epstein dog hasn’t even barked yet. Anyway, let’s not dwell on the ‘what ifs’, let’s focus on more positive action. In particular, activity in the M&A and funding worlds, which should be taken as generally upbeat pulse-takes for individual investors. These deals also reflect the key structural drivers for the rapidly changing global economy. Change, you say? Well, Germany has had an engineering/capital goods trade surplus with China for decades. Not anymore. China in 2025 is now running a surplus with Germany. Oh, and nobody in the Oval Office will tell the Donald…. but “America First” has caused US equities to underperform overseas equities for only the third time in a decade. I know, whoodathunk amid all the giddy AI headlines? Interestingly, the deals I’m seeing in recent days also have a non-US focus.

    Infrastructure is still a huge magnet for investment capital. Blackrock’s Global Infrastructure Partners vehicle has swooped in Spain to acquire the Digital & Energy unit of domestic construction giant, ACS. Yep, that’s a data centre and AI play with a whopping $27 billion price tag. Sticking with AI, and back in the US, Mira Murati’s Thinking Machine Labs is currently doing a funding round with valuation in the $50 billion region. In its last funding round in July (checks notes, yes) that valuation was $12 billion. Not to be outdone, Elon Musk’s xAI is raising $15 billion at a $200 billion valuation. So, I think we can safely say AI and the US are still leading the giddy stuff. Elsewhere, the deals are more fundamental. Try energy.

    Private equity monster, Carlyle, is exploring an acquisition of Russian oil giant Lukoil’s global assets valued at almost $22 billion. Meanwhile, Spain’s energy champion, Repsol, is considering a reverse merger of its $19 billion upstream unit with potential partners including US energy producer APA. In addition, Google has signed a deal with French oil giant, TotalEnergies, to buy 1.5 terawatt hours (TWh) of solar electricity over the next 15 years in Ohio. That’s enough power to run the entire state of California for 10 days. Again, data centres are the key driver for the energy land-grab, be it fossil-fuel or renewable. However, as Spark closes out a lightning-quick raise of €1.5m for the impressive AuriGen Medical team, we should not forget demographics and the hugely significant structural growth in healthcare opportunities(check out our May 2025 series of articles on Japan).

    Pfizer has acquired weight-loss start-up, Metsera, in a $10 billion all-cash deal. Then the rebuffed original buyer of Metsera, Novo Nordisk, went to the debt markets to finance the $5.2 billion purchase of US biotech Akero Therapeutics. The sense of a deal ‘cluster’ in pharma-land was further heightened by Merck’s likely acquisition of another biotech, Cidara Therapeutics, in a $3.3 billion deal. Like the Metsera deal, the bidding war for Cidara was intense too. So, things are looking pretty healthy in health M&A. As for the unhealthy world…. we continue to watch ‘Whiskey Pete’ deploy US Navy assets off Venezuela.

    If ever there was a classic ‘wag the dog’ distraction mission this might be the one. Particularly, given both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in emails from 2011, sound mystified about the “dog (Trump) that hasn’t barked” in the criminal investigation under way at that time. Venezuela is yet another prompt for all sovereign nations and the investment world to be thinking defence. Some aren’t just thinking. Valor Equity Partners have led a chunky $510m funding round for a counter-drone radar start-up, Chaos Industries, at a $4.5 billion valuation. Also, watch out for Germany’s Quantum Systems which manufactures interceptor drones which can climb 4 kilometres in 30 seconds(!). Last heard on the street, they were raising $150m at a $3 billion valuation.

    All of the above sectors, bar health, position power sources and storage as key elements in competitive advantage. Note infrastructure and power are closely linked. The best positioned infrastructure assets will be those which bring energy/cost efficiencies in a world where AI is gobbling up more and more electricity, possibly at the expense of everyday consumers and traditional businesses. There is a reason why 40% of e-commerce deliveries in Europe are now done in out-of-home (OOH) parcel lockers. It makes sense for both the primary carriers (DHL,UPS, FedEx etc) and the consumer to make ‘the last mile’ more efficient. At Spark Private, we also think OOHPod makes a load of sense with lots of exit opportunities (and founder exit track-record) and great infrastructure positioning. In all of the above deals, everyone is trying to take the lead in positioning in the market. It can feel good too when it’s good for the world. In fact, I can still remember seeing a much-loved guy on his cool new electric bike just 5 years ago, and thinking to myself how happy he looked. I will keep that thought always…..

                  W.H. RIP.