Gravitas Spark CrowdFunding

Tag: Stock Markets

  • Think Big, Think Private

    Think Big, Think Private

    Well, that wasn’t so bad. Said no US general summoned to Quantico this week by their spray-tanned hardened bosses. I actually was thinking more about September and its data-earned reputation as historically the worst month for stock markets. Scratch that. The key benchmarks for equities, the S&P 500(up 4.25% in the month) and the Nasdaq(up 5.6%), blew the hinges off investor expectations amid lots of ugly headlines. Public markets are on an absolute tear, but investors playing catch up and wondering how to get involved could be understandably wary. I’d be wary too, but in a more nuanced way. My sense is the out-sized influence and weight of big tech in public markets is troubling. Try these statistics for size…

     

    *AI chip superstar, Nvidia, at $4.6 trillion is now worth more than Apple, Saudi Aramco and the entire German stock market…combined.

    *The “Buffett Indicator” is a trusted temperature check on US stock market euphoria which tracks the ratio of total US stock market value to US GDP. Currently that metric is touching 217%, or about 70% above trend.

    *Another long-run measure of ‘value’ is the Shiller PE Ratio (CAPE) which divides the current value of US markets (S&P 500) by the earnings of its constituent companies over the previous 10 years. That metric is over 40x for the first time since the dotcom bubble of 2000.

    *Options markets are not for the faint-hearted. So, it was striking to see the September 19th expiry date attract over $5 trillion of notional option exposure. More striking was that the majority of options players (62% of S&P 500 volume) in August were seeking ultra-high risk “Zero Day” instrument exposure (expiry within 24 hours). That is seat-of-pants stuff.

    *Intel’s share price has rocketed 50% since September, Google is up 68% since April, and Tesla’s stock has doubled in the same period while making the DOGE-whisperer, Elon Musk, the world’s first half trillionaire. Yep, $500 billion.

    *Nvidia’s stock market value is now bigger than the GDP of 180 countries, including India and its 1.4 billion people.

     

    You get the ‘big tech’ picture. Now for some historical context. Remember Palm Inc and its PalmPilot?  When Palm listed as an IPO 25 years ago, it was worth more than Apple, Amazon, Google and Nvidia combined. There is a cautionary tale there, but not the key point of today’s article. The sheer intensity and speed of capital flows in the listed large cap arena is telling us there is a massive investment shift happening. However, it is possibly too late to ‘pick’ the winners in the public markets, and one could end up picking today’s Palm Inc. However, private equity and venture capital markets have been left behind by public markets. Private investment flows and deals have slowed (with the exception of AI deals) due to subdued exit, M&A, and IPO activity, further hampered by levels of geopolitical uncertainty we haven’t seen in 50 years. The critical point is that private markets are likely to ultimately benefit from the trickle-down impact of public markets hitting all-time-high valuations. I would highlight four interesting developments:

     

    1. The leveraged buy-out (LBO) of gaming giant, Electronic Arts(EA), at $55 billion is the biggest ever and beats the $45 billion KKR deal to buy TXU way back in 2007. This time the buyer consortium is led by the Saudi PIF and Silver Lake. The EA buy-out adds to a wave of M&A in Q3 which will have topped $1 trillion in total global deal volume for only the second time in history.
    2. The latest funding round of OpenAI was a sale of $6.5 billion of employee stock putting the valuation of the ChatGPT owner at $500 billion. That makes it possibly the most valuable private company in the world. For those thinking it’s just AI giddiness, it’s not the only $500 billion private opportunity…
    3. We have written before about the fast-approaching age of stablecoins. So, we were intrigued to see stablecoin platform, Tether, launch a funding round of $15-20 billion which would value the financial services player at $500 billion, overtaking the value of Bank of America(!).
    4. These are all big beasts in the private markets. What about the small guys? Well, if you thought tech(+11.6%) and the Nasdaq (+9.7%) had a great last 3 months, you might be surprised that smaller companies in the Russell 2000 index did even better (+13.5%). Note 50% of the constituent companies in that index LOSE money.

     

    Arguably, the smaller company index is the best proxy for the Spark Private world of start-up tech and smaller private equity deals. So, evidence of small company catch-up is a positive indicator. Furthermore, Spark Private investors have a real opportunity to gain exposure to the digital currency infrastructure, AI and private equity themes above in our upcoming deal pipeline. Note we are also entering EIIS ‘season’ so investors fearing they’ve missed out on public/pension opportunities will be able to use the private markets to balance out their risk budgets at highly attractive tax-assisted valuations.

    The public markets are clearly telling investors to think BIG, but valuation risks are rising rapidly. Our message is BIG too, but private as valuations (not risk) resume an upward trajectory. Watch closely, those BIG theme deals are coming very soon.

     

     

  • Have You Checked Your Pension’s American Assets Recently?

    Have You Checked Your Pension’s American Assets Recently?

    I’m nervous. This won’t win me a Nobel Peace Prize, a Pulitzer or a Green Card but it must be said. The United States is the richest, most successful and most powerful country in the world. On a global basis, we owe the United States on many levels, be it culture, sport, technology, education, medicine, defence, investment capital, tourism or friendship. Closer to home, our fortunes and miraculous recovery from a Troika bail-out are inextricably linked to US commercial supremacy. The vast majority of our pensions reflect that supremacy by holding significant amounts of US debt/bonds or stocks. EVERY pension should have exposure to US assets but risk radars are flashing red for a seismic investment shift. Behind the headlines and in the critical plumbing of the global financial system, there is increasing evidence of a global ‘exit’ from the US. That might sound odd and inevitably the counter view will cite current data which paints a record-rosy picture.

    US and global stock markets are regularly hitting record highs in recent weeks. However, the US stock markets have been clocking up vastly superior returns compared to other major bourses in the 16 years since the GFC. This outperformance of US assets has resulted in extreme levels of US weightings in global indices/benchmarks which your pensions are attempting to either track or beat. A recent Deutsche Bank research note flagged IMF data showing US equities now accounting for 67% of Bloomberg’s World Index. That’s quite the weighting for a country which represents 15% of global GDP. Go back 20 years, and the US actually accounted for a higher 19% of global GDP.  In 2005 US equities made up 51% of the same Bloomberg World Index. For context, Europe(EU) accounts for 12% of global GDP and 14% of the Bloomberg index. Of course, the big driver is technology stocks where the 6 top US tech companies are currently valued at $20 trillion, or more than the GDP of China. The AI/cloud (AI) revolution might be the more specific driver but is this hiding a bigger picture?

    According JP Morgan’s always interesting Michael Cembalest, “AI related stocks have accounted for 75% of S&P 500 returns, 80% of earnings growth and 90% of capital spending growth since ChatGPT launched in November 2022.” AI is indeed the gift that keeps on giving for US markets. But there’s giving and then there’s giddy. I’m not sure if anyone can keep up with tech companies trying to out-do each other on the size of their investment spend announcements. It has clearly been noted by the tech C-Suite that, if you announce huge investment spend on chips, data centres or any AI related infrastructure, your share price and stock options go up. Microsoft says $100 billion, Google says $85 billion, Alibaba says $53 billion and Nvidia thinks they’ve a better twist. This week Nvidia promised to invest $100 billion in ChatGPT parent, Open AI. Excellent news but where’s the $100 billion going? Ah, that would be mostly going back to Nvidia whose AI chips will be used in Open AI’s data centres. Yep, readers might see the Baldrick-esque possibilities around circularity and vendors(Nvidia) financing customers like Open AI. Anyway, investors seem optimistic, for now. Moving away from AI, and the risk of over-investment, there’s a bigger worry for US corporates and their share prices.

    The S&P 500 broke another record in recent weeks. Valuations observed by investors these days seem to ignore earnings multiples (Tesla P/E of 200x anybody?) and focus on revenues. However, there’s a traditional metric, the price-to-book ratio, which compares the market value(price) of a company to net assets (total assets minus liabilities aka book value). Where the ratio exceeds 1x, the valuation of the company is capturing ‘intangibles’ like goodwill, brand and future investment/revenue acceleration. Currently, the S&P 500 is trading at a price/book of 5.3x. That’s higher than the peak of the TMT ‘bubble’ in 2000. For context, that metric dropped to 1.6x in 2009. Of course, many companies are more ‘asset-lite’ these days and enjoy higher price/book and revenue multiples. But… there is an intangible element in many US companies’ valuation which is critically important to their premium rating over competitor companies in other countries; goodwill and/or brand power. You can see the potential goodwill problem.

    I’m no Jimmy Kimmel so it’s best be straight rather than funny. Corporate America from Disney to Tesla to law firms is haemorrhaging “goodwill” and brand value. Two thirds of the global middle-class will come from India and China by 2030. Yet, right now the US assets of Chinese video platform, TikTok, are being seized/transferred to White House friendly oligarchs while India is dealing with punitive Ukraine-related tariffs (not Russia?) and a shake-down on vitally important H-1B visas for overseas technology professionals (70% of recipients are Indian). Friendly countries like South Korea are in shock after ICE raids on Hyundai’s plant in Georgia and the detainment of more than 300 Korean workers. Trump’s speech this week to the UN with “your countries are going to hell” could have been shortened to a simple message of “Go to Hell” to the rest of the world. Anecdotally, the news from Canada is a window into future “ally” consumer behaviour. Supermarket shelves are seeing a buyers boycott of many US products as car traffic across the US-Canada border craters by 34% according to latest August data. Meanwhile, corporate America and its leaders cower in silence while the Trump White House vandalises US institutions, global trade and sovereign alliances. The assault on US rule of law is captured in almost every headline emerging from Washington:

     

    Trump’s new ABC threat proves Jimmy Kimmel right – CNN

     

    Former FBI Director James Comey expected to be indicted on criminal charges – The Guardian

     

    Trump pressure on Bondi to charge political foes could backfire – NBC News

     

    US Supreme Court ruling lets Trump fire top official – BBC News

     

    The final headline featuring the Supreme Court is critical to the risk profile of the US. Investors are worried that the Supreme Court will let the Trump regime interfere with the Federal Reserve Board, the most important financial institution in the world. The Fed underpins the status of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. That credibility is under threat as the dollar’s value against a basket of major currencies has fallen by 10% this year. That ‘fallen’ bit is people selling the US dollar and buying other stuff. Like Gold. Lots of investors are liking bullion’s 40% increase in value year-to-date. I’m not so sure it’s a positive signal. I’m also watching deposits sitting in US money market accounts hit a record $7.7 trillion, treble the number just 8 years ago.

    These depositors are not the only ones not fully convinced about the US being the “hottest” country on the planet. Investors SOLD $3.8 billion of US stocks last week (Source: BofA Securities) with institutions and hedge funds the biggest sellers by far in one of the highest exit numbers seen this year. Oh, and if record US stock markets sound positive, context is everything. The whole world is up this year and OUTPERFORMING the US. The S&P World ex-US Index is up over 20% year to date compared to US equity markets up only 10%. But…it’s worse than that if you factor in US dollar weakness. Returns for overseas investors in US equities are closer to ZERO this year. To be clear, this re-rating of US assets will happen over years not weeks but commercial contracts, the law and international treaties require a high degree of confidence. Imagine how Canada and Mexico feel right now re-negotiating a deal which Trump himself shook hands on as recently as July 2020. His own deal. Investors will deal too, and consider a sea change in how the US attracts talent (H-1B, visas), investment capital (Fed, US dollar) and goodwill (premium equity ratings). Sadly, US-based investors might struggle for similar analysis in their media.

    Despite Trump railing against windmills (literally) and media bias, the awkward truth is that the wealthiest person in the world, Elon Musk, owns Twitter/X. The second wealthiest person in the world, Larry Ellison, owns Paramount(including CBS) and will now be taking over TikTok and CNN. Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post and Twitch. Mark Zuckerberg owns Facebook and Instagram. Throw in Larry Page as Google’s controlling shareholder and that looks like the top 5 richest men in the world are ALL media owners. It also looks like oligarchy. US corporate leaders should also consider another consumer shift within the borders of the US.

    Research from Moodys using Federal Reserve data shows the top 10% of earners in the US now account for 50% of all consumer spending. In the early 1990s (before Fox News) that number was closer to a third of all spend. Disney just discovered (as corporate America said zippo) that the average person felt that taking a comedian off air after government threats was plain un-American, and proceeded to cancel in massive numbers their Disney+ and Hulu subscriptions. Maybe, the 90% will push back on other White House over-reach? I’m not so sure, and that’s not good for US assets or pensions in the long run. Investment securities, after all, are contracts and the undermining of the rule of law will end in tears. Or, something less oligarchic. As my favourite bear strategist, Albert Edwards, said this week when posting the Bloomberg chart below, “When I look at this chart, I look at my calendar and just wonder when I should pencil in the next revolution..”   The chart dramatically shows consumer sentiment splitting sharply between the ‘have yachts’ and ‘have nots’…..

  • Follow The Deals…

    Follow The Deals…

    The White House has approved this article. Oh, wait. That’s just my slow-learning chatbot co-writer, Eric, getting nervous. Silly boy. He’s still being trained and doesn’t understand how the world works yet. Of course, as Disney and Jimmy Kimmel have just discovered, if you want to get a deal done in the USA these days you do need the approval of the Dear (or Expensive) Leader. Beijing watchers will know that a centrally controlled economy dictates whether M&A deals get done, or not. For Disney, it needs regulatory approval for a deal acquiring 10% of ESPN in exchange for NFL sports broadcasting rights. For Nextra who cancelled Jimmy early, it is awaiting FCC approval for its $6.2 billion merger with Tegna. This all makes worrying sense, but on a positive note I’m sensing an exciting pick-up in the wider world of M&A outside the truth-strangled US media. Let’s take a look at a few deal developments and note how they tick more than a few thematic boxes.

    A is for AI and we just can’t avoid it. The good news is that the AI ‘space race’ is spilling over into the wider tech world and is not just a ‘Magnificent 7’ phenomenon. Last week we touched on “forgotten” Oracle flagging a $450 billion contract backlog for its AI cloud business. This week it’s struggling chip manufacturer, Intel, receiving the AI love. Fresh from accepting an “invite” from the US government (not China) to take a 10% ownership stake, Intel has just received a $5 billion investment from chip superstar Nvidia in exchange for approximately 4% of the company. Intel’s share pricy duly rocketed 22% in a matter of hours for its best day since… 1987. Back in 2011, Marc Andreessen wrote “software is eating the world”. More recently, we have flagged a significant shift in technology – hardware is hot. AI has focused minds on chips and cloud infrastructure with the most valuable company in the world now a hardware company (ahead of software beast Microsoft). In fact, 5 of the 10 most valuable companies on the planet are technology hardware players. Interestingly, human beings seem to be benefitting from this shift too. Again, Nvidia is splashing the cash.

    We have previously written about the acqui-hire trend; the strategic acquisition of scarce knowledge/skills by buying out early stage start-ups. Enfabrica, its CEO and a handful of its employees have just had $900m waved in front of them to join Jensen Huang and Nvidia. The Enfabrica team’s key IP is the ability to connect more than 100,000 GPUs(AI chips) together.  Oh to be an AI guru, as Meta, Google and Amazon hunt the globe for unique talents and knowledge. The attraction of hiring individuals (not acquiring start-ups) for the acquiror is the avoidance of regulatory scrutiny. The biggest deal of this genre so far was Meta’s $14.3 billion purchase of a 49% stake (dodging control/regulatory process) in Scale AI, its founder Alexandr Wang and his colleagues. Of course, all this talent and  hardware needs electricity to power research, manufacturing and cloud hosting.

    So, it was interesting to see private equity giant, Blackstone, acquire Pennsylvania’s Hill Top natural gas power plant for close to $1 billion. This follows Blackstone’s July announcement that it would invest $25 billion in Pennsylvania to build out its energy and digital infrastructure for the AI revolution. Yep, $25 billion. Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s xAI vehicle has purchased an entire power plant overseas and is shipping it to Memphis where xAI plans to build a data centre hosting 1 million GPUs. Blackstone and other private equity players are clearly taking a view that electricity grid infrastructure is critical to any digital/AI ambitions. Blackstone has been particularly busy with an August announcement of the $11.5 billion purchase of New Mexico’s largest utility, TXNM Energy. So, this focus on electricity infrastructure assets raises a further question, possibly opportunity. We know electric power is critical to the AI revolution but there’s another critical component to the digital world – basic materials. The investment community is correctly focusing on the physical assets of the manufacturing and power generation sectors but the most basic manifestation of infrastructure assets is raw materials. The Chinese have bullied the Expensive Leader on tariffs thanks to control of rare earths supplies but what about other critical metals? Let’s see.

    Silver and gold prices have both recently hit new highs with precious metals funds (ETFs) posting 47% returns year-to-date. But keep your eyes on the global electrification prize. Copper is the critical metal for electricity conduction in transmission grids, renewable power projects and electric vehicles (EVs). So, check out the biggest mining deal in ages. Anglo American is planning to merge with Canadian copper play, Teck Resources, in a $70 billion deal. Given EVs use up to 4 times more copper than traditional cars and wind farms consume 10 times more copper than gas-fired plants, it’s not a surprise to see this deal happen. However, what is surprising is that the GLOBAL publicly quoted mining sector is valued at just over $1.4 trillion. That doesn’t even cover the increase in value of just one tech company, Nvidia, in the past… 6 months! The most valuable US mining company, Southern Copper, is worth $87 billion. For context, note Larry Ellison’s personal wealth increased by $100 billion in just one epic trading session for Oracle on September 9th. Not for the first time in recent giddy weeks, it feels like something doesn’t quite add up. For illustration, the top 6 US tech companies are now valued at a combined $20 trillion, more than the GDP of China. And yet, each of these 6 companies is utterly dependent on rare earths, basic metals etc. to build semiconductor chips or their precious cloud-hosting data centres. I reference China deliberately.

    Not only did China take the long view on the critical role of rare earths in the modern digital economy, they also ‘got’ electricity. In 2010 they finally caught up with the US in terms of electricity generation. But….. today the Chinese electricity generation capacity stands at 2.5x the USA. We read a lot about tech ‘sovereignty’ these days but critical mineral ‘sovereignty’ could be the next frontier of the AI race. Already, the US Department of Defense has taken a 15% ($400m) stake in rare earths mining company, MP Materials. Surely, private equity and its mounting pile of investment  ‘dry powder’ sitting idle will start to look at the mining sector? We shall see, but it must be encouraged by the US Department of Defense taking time out of bravely bombing Venezuelan fishing boats to secure mining resources. Whoops, Eric is getting nervous again…. Best I stop now before I’m Kimmeled, and best you follow those deals.

     

  • Back To School For A Monster Theme…

    Back To School For A Monster Theme…

    I’m running out of expletives. It’s a sort of “FOMO” thing which rules out obsessing on Labour’s implosion or the Epstein “hoax” which mysteriously keeps removing only British citizens from high profile roles. No, the headlines driving my heightened state of anxiety are derived from a familiar theme. However, it’s a theme which is now hitting warp speed. We have previously written that the best pulse-take of the monster AI trend was tracking the “picks and shovels” of AI/cloud infrastructure rather than the “gems” of digital intelligent progression. Well, this week is turning into a “biggie” for the AI infrastructure theme. I’d highlight three key developments and a few other snippets. So, here goes….

    The creation of start-up billion dollar ‘unicorns’ has hardly any scarcity value these days. Maybe, we should think in trillions. Step forward almost 50-years old Oracle. Who knew Larry Ellison’s database software business would rack up a trillion dollar enterprise value at the beginning of this week? Probably nobody. Even the Wall Street analysts paid to follow every line of the Oracle business and financial model were truly shocked by the big reveal in Oracle’s quarterly update. In fact, earnings results were slightly shy of expectations. But, the share price proceeded to rocket 40%. Why? The future contract work backlog in its cloud(AI) infrastructure business grew 359% to $455 billion. I mentioned “warp speed” earlier so here’s what caught the eye. Oracle’s cloud revenues from Amazon, Google and Microsoft grew by 1,500% but the entire division this year is annualising revenues of circa $10 billion. That number will be $144 billion by 2030. Welcome to trickle-down AI economics. Oracle was barely mentioned in AI giddiness a year ago, now its owner is the richest man in the world. Oracle is not the only AI ‘unknown’ making waves.

    Anyone heard of Nebius? No, me neither until this week but I do remember its former Russian search/e-commerce platform, Yandex. Anyway, Russian sanctions forced a sale of the Russian assets leaving Nebius as an Amsterdam-listed company specializing in cloud computing (GPU) infrastructure. This week Microsoft signed an agreement worth up to $19.4 billion for Nebius in exchange for 5 years’ access to its GPU datacentre infrastructure in Vineland, New Jersey. Nebius’ market value before that news was less than $15 billion. Not surprisingly, the share price has roared 50% higher and the company is now seeking to raise $3 billion in fresh funds to accelerate its growth plans. This was not the only Dutch tech/AI zinger story this week…..

    Eindhoven-based ASML is the world’s dominant player in critical lithography technology used in chip manufacturing equipment. A single machine can contain up to 100,000 parts and cost $300-400 million. Clearly, semiconductor chips and AI are thematically closely connected. But investing in an AI start-up caught ASML analysts on the hop. ASML has just invested $1.5 billion in French AI player, Mistral, for a circa 11% stake valuing Mistral at close to $14 billion. Remember, Mistral raised $385m in late 2023 with a $2 billion valuation and early investor support from BNP Paribas, AndreessenHorowitz, Lightspeed Ventures and telecoms entrepreneur, Xavier Niel. Less than 2 years later, the Mistral valuation is racing towards a 7-8x return for those early investors. Apart from being an example of multi-layer AI investment activity, the deal is being hailed as a boost to Europe’s AI and semiconductor chip sovereignty.  And maybe I’m not the only one feeling a bit FOMO….

    It seems Ireland’s Taoiseach, Micheál Martin, has been thinking ‘sovereign’ too and looking at France’s early initiatives in funding AI startups. The Business Post has reported that Martin has sought the help of Eir owner, Xavier Neil (see above), in establishing an AI/tech incubator modelled on his highly successful Station F start-up campus. There might be good reason why Ireland needs to increase the pace of its AI and start-up readiness. I thought the next few little snippets should be focusing minds in Government buildings and elsewhere:

     

    Private investing: The UK debt market is worrying many, but on a more positive note it was interesting to see Hargreaves Lansdowne and Schroders join forces to offer UK retail investors the opportunity to add private assets to their pension pots. Note to Irish government – start-ups need investor incentives first, then campuses.

     

    Consumer behaviour: Wildfire Systems’ 2025 Consumer Shopping Trends Report shows 61% of consumers are now using generative AI tools like ChatGPT as a tool for deal-hunting.

     

    Company growth speeds: Stripe’s Indexing the AI Economy report shows AI companies reaching $1m annual recurring revenues (ARR) 4 months faster than even the fastest growing SaaS/software companies. And… AI companies reaching $5m revenues are reaching that milestone 3x faster.

     

    I feel my back-to-school mantra should read:    The future is private, AI and fast. Very fast.

     

     

  • Are We Watching The Wrong Bear…?

    Are We Watching The Wrong Bear…?

    I am worried now. And, I’m not talking bear markets. Not yet. I’m not even talking about the Russian bear heading for the Alaskan Trump TV-fest. Of course, Europe should be worried about the Dear Orange Leader trading Ukrainian sovereign territory with his Putin pal but this summit feels more and more like a photo op with minimal progress. Another chance for the Donald to host, and hallucinate. Even the Kennedy Centre Awards for the Performing Arts have been threatened with a Trump MC slot. Bill Kristol of The Bulwark amusingly described Trump as claiming “his aides had wept, pleaded, besought him to host the awards personally” with reluctant success.

     

    “I’ve been asked to host—I said, ‘I’m the president of the United States! Are you folks asking me to do that?’” Trump said. “‘Sir, you’ll get much higher ratings.’ I said, ‘I don’t care, I’m the president of the United States. I won’t do it.’ They said, ‘Please.’ And then Susie Wiles said, ‘Sir, I would like you to host,’ I said, ‘OK, I’ll do it.’”

     

    Grown men crying again. The former reality TV star can’t resist the cameras or weepy stories but he’s certainly showing a  curious resistance in one aspect of his gyrating global trade war. China was the original bipartisan focus of US trade deficit ire. Now, not so much. China trade tariffs are now lower than those smacked onto many US allies. In fact, Trump has once more delayed the imposition of escalating 100% + tariffs on China by 90 days. Global trade watchers and geopolitical risk analysts have been left scratching their heads. Apart from China tariff leniency, other developments indicate a shifting Trump focus. Here are three moves which are causing most confusion:

     

    1. Check out US Treasury Secretary Bessent describing to an incredulous Fox TV host, Larry Kudlow, the intention of the US to “appropriate” funds from allies in Europe, UAE and Japan to be invested in their trillions at the whim of the US government. Incredible stuff.
    2. Pity poor Switzerland. They are, as a friendly ally nation, currently topping the global tariff league tables with draconian 39% rates, higher even than China.
    3. After decades of US diplomatic efforts to woo India, the White House now seems determined to provoke the Modi government with tariffs because of their purchases of Russian oil. Never mind that China is in far bigger sanction infringement territory with its oil purchases, and weapons parts supplies.

     

    It has not escaped the notice of most risk analysts that China must be very happy with how things are playing out. Arguably, they might even be encouraged. That’s not good news for Taiwan which sits in Beijing’s crosshairs for ultimate political annexation or military invasion. The bear to watch, in my view, is the China panda bear. We are already seeing the US and Trump caving on rare earths/critical mineral supplies and even the export of high-end AI chips in exchange for a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD Chinese revenues. Yep, if that sounds like the actions of a Politburo centrally-controlled economy, you’d be very close to the exact definition of same. However, there’s a real danger the US is slipping in the ‘imitation’ stakes of competing in many key technologies.

    We already know China controls close to 90% of electric battery cell production. Its dominance of the entire battery ecosystem from raw materials to processing capacity to battery components looks unassailable. Batteries might not be the only technology of our future racing to Chinese dominance. Research from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) shows that China is now leading the way in 57 out of the 64 technologies assessed by its Critical Technology Tracker, which has been updated to cover the last 20 years. The tracker measures a country’s performance based on the high-impact research it produces, specifically looking at the number of publications its institutions released in the top ten percent of cited papers in that specific field. The data studied was from a range of fields, like AI, cyber, defence, and robotics.

    Yep, even AI might not be the US lead technology you thought it was. Perhaps, looking at share prices and massive AI infrastructure spend by Big Tech might not be the best indicator of future leadership. The WIPO Patent report tracking generative AI patents filed in the period 2014-2023 showed China filed 6x more patents than the US, or 70% of the global total. This feels like a very focused busy China, not quite a playful low-energy panda. Recent visitors to China speak to warp-speed adoption of autonomous transport, delivery, digital currencies, robotics and digital services. Then consider our recent article flagging solar power capacity being built at a rate equivalent to 5 nuclear power stations…..per week!  It’s all about power, political and physical. It’s a language Trump understands, and one wonders has he decided it’s a battle he won’t win? If so, there’s one more focus for the panda.

    Taiwan historically has enjoyed the security protection of the US and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region. Right now, nobody is sure that will continue. China will also be hugely encouraged by the former gameshow host’s preference for transactional relationships, rather than principles or loyalty. Meanwhile, the general risk view in Asia is that we should be very concerned. We missed Ukraine. Dare we miss Taiwan….?

     

  • Are We Ready For Another Banking B-AI-L Out?

    Are We Ready For Another Banking B-AI-L Out?

    Domestic business and investing titan, Dermot Desmond, upset the orthodoxy this week. Ireland’s 500-year plan to build the Metrolink might be cut short, even ended. Desmond suggested the €12 billion urban rail project due to start in 2028 could be a white elephant project superseded by AI and autonomous-driving vehicles. Any bets on the kilometres per annum build speed on this 18 kilometre ‘monster’? Actually, don’t bother. Reflect on China’s average motor expressway construction build of circa 8,000 kilometres per year. Then think about the UK adding barely 65 miles of motorway over the past ….decade. Given the Irish public service obsession with tracking the UK National Health Service or UK Housing/Planning as benchmarks, one shudders to think what our ‘ambition’ could deliver in over-spend and century-shifting deadlines. On a more positive note, AI could be one of the tools which could dig us out of our transport infrastructure black hole.  A bit early to call that one you might say, but I’m beginning to think another crucial economic sector which gets its fair share of criticism is enjoying the halo AI effect. Don’t bank on it but the banking sector is suddenly looking interesting….

    The ”animal spirits” of Wall Street and record financial market highs always help the banking sector. Indeed Wall Street’s banks have just finished reporting quarterly results where trading revenues clocked a whopping $34 billion in Q2, up 17% on the previous year. Yes, the phenomenal gains in AI-focused stocks like Nvidia and Microsoft inflate bank trading revenues and drive increased investment activity but there’s more going on. You might have read about meme-stocks and unheard of companies in the US smaller cap markets (Russell 3000) tripling their share prices since April; 33 companies at the last count and only 5 actually making profits. But, banks as meme-stocks? Really? Well check out the Financial Times headline this week:

    “European banks get their meme-stock moment”

    Not even US banks, but European ones tracking an economic bloc getting its tummy tickled on tariffs by the Fiddler on The Roof of the White House. Can’t wait for the South Park treatment on that one, but back to the FT and European banks. When French banks like Societe Generale see their share prices increase by more than 100% year-to-date then my “spidey sense” tells me this is not about mundane cyclical banking drivers like trading revenues, interest rates or the shape of the bond yield curve. The aggregate European bank sector is up a whopping 40% in 2025 and there could be an (infra)structural driver of this story. Think back to our earlier sniping about Ireland’s struggles on transport infrastructure. Banks have struggled with unwieldy data and service infrastructures which have been a nightmare to upgrade to modern customer expectations. As we have written many times on these pages, the banks sit on some of the richest consumer data on the planet. Critical information on individual and institutional funding, spending and income patterns are in the possession of the banks. What if that data could be mobilised in a far more efficient way using AI and its agentic tools? Like Dermot Desmond’s thinking, could AI allow banks to skip an infrastructure bottleneck? It is early days but let’s take a look at a company you’ve probably never heard about before.

    Palantir Technologies might be named after a Tolkien crystal ball but it looks like its future might be right now, thanks to AI. The Denver-based company has been around since 2003 and specializes in software to analyze or “mine” data. Its early customers were government departments seeking assistance with unwieldy datasets and looking for actionable information. In particular, it gained traction with security/police departments searching for surveillance and predictive intelligence solutions. Sound familiar, or creepy? Park that thought and think banking. Then consider Palantir only just hit quarterly revenue run rates of $1 billion in its most recent results. However, that was enough to make it one of the 20 most valuable companies in America. Stock market investors think it’s worth $440 billion which is bigger than the mighty healthcare player, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its 138,000 employees. Yes, if you were wondering if the valuation of Palantir was looking a bit punchy, you’d be correct. Annualized revenues of just over $4 billion (vs J&J’s $85 billion) means the Palantir valuation multiple is currently 110x current revenues. The excitement and valuation is driven by two recurring messages whenever Palantir is mentioned:

     

    1. AI is accelerating the monetization of data infrastructure
    2. AI is reshaping enterprise software and Palantir is uniquely positioned

     

    Palantir is expanding beyond government into commercial sectors like healthcare, finance and energy. The first thing that should strike readers about government and these three specific sectors is that they have enormous customer/user bases. This is the banking sector clue, and possibly its infrastructure B-AI-L out. AI will very likely remove the need for “transition” projects to upgrade data infrastructure and provide banking organizations with valuable action prompts which might even be carried out by AI-agents/bots. That’s a business model ‘Hail Mary’ for the bank sector and Wall Street’s banking analysts are doing something unusual too.

    Typically, bank analysts stick close together and move their recommendations in tandem with their competitor analysts at the other investment banks. Remember, “nobody gets fired if we are all wrong” is an established career strategy for the average analyst. This also means that share price targets set by analysts move in relatively small increments so as not to spook the herd or attract excessive attention to their analysis or models (usually flawed as with all human forecasting exercises). So, I was checking a few market analytics dashboards today and spotted the following:

    KeyBanc target price moved UP from $60 to $100

    RBC Capital  target price moved UP from $63 to $97

    Raymond James target price moved UP from $79 to $95

    Believe me, 25%-65% banking share price target upgrades are not the done thing on Wall Street when TACO Trumpolini is threatening the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank on interest rate policy.  So, this is yet another sector to add to your list where the two letter response to any share price move query can be “AI”. However, at a structural level, you don’t need a Tolkien crystal ball to know that technology can transform the commercial prospects of a country or sector saddled with a perceived long-term ‘challenge’. I’m old enough to remember the gloomsters telling us Ireland was destined to perpetual under-development because we had no energy resources and could never compete in manufacturing/building things. Who knew? Maybe, the leaders who finally gave up on Ford in 1984 after welcoming and watching Apple begin manufacturing in Cork in 1980…..

     

  • Tech Sovereignty Getting Very Real

    Tech Sovereignty Getting Very Real

    Random thought – did music break the USSR? As I watched 40 year old re-runs of Live Aid last week, I found myself trying to recall the emotions and vibe at that moment in time. The Live Aid concert itself was a significant exhibition of global solidarity in raising awareness of famine in Ethiopia. In hindsight, the long-lasting impact of Live Aid on preventing famine might be questionable as global leadership values currently go AWOL on the Gaza and Sudan catastrophes. However, the sheer reach of that day’s broadcast to over 2 billion people in more than 150 countries was a display of communications tech power which has to be considered against the geopolitical backdrop of the time. Saigon had finally fallen to Communist North Vietnam only 10 years earlier, Afghanistan had been invaded by the USSR just 5 years before and Poland had recently come out of a period of martial law. Nobody felt like the USSR empire was faltering. But…. its “iron curtain” was failing to block the reality of better living elsewhere.

    In 1981 MTV, the US music video channel, launched on cable television and was syndicated to countries around the world. Global audiences were seeing music combined with video imagery celebrating freedom, democracy and the rewards of talent and endeavour. Live Aid confirmed communications technology was moving rapidly and posed a real threat to those who needed message control to stay in power. The Chernobyl nuclear disaster happened a year after Live Aid, the Berlin Wall fell 3 years later, and the USSR imploded 2 years after that. Today’s Russia is a rogue state with a GDP of barely $2 trillion, or about half the value of one US tech company, Nvidia. This stark reversal in geopolitical and commercial leadership is a reminder to the leaders of today about “network” power. My sense is that there are three particular ‘networks’ where governments are now beginning to assert sovereignty for national security reasons. I’d flag three stories in recent weeks which illustrate the point well.

    European satellite internet network company, Eutelsat, is a competitor to Elon Musk’s Starlink and is listed on the Paris and London stock exchanges. The company is raising €1.5 billion of capital funding with a sovereign twist. The French government is investing €750m and the UK is putting in €163m in exchange for shares in the company and maintaining ownership stakes of 29.65% and 10.89% respectively. However, Eutelsat’s fleet of just over 600 satellites has a lot of catch up to do. Starlink’s network has deployed more than 7,500 satellites thanks to the dizzying rocket launch timetable of sister company, SpaceX. If you were looking for one area of European urgency on tech sovereignty, then it’s probably defence. Germany is stepping up with €500 billion earmarked for defence investment, so it was no huge surprise to see Berlin-based Planet Labs win a €240m satellite services contract from the German government earlier this month. Planet Lab’s brief is to deploy its fleet of 600 next-generation Pelican satellites to deliver high-resolution SkySat imagery, and AI-enhanced surveillance tools, specifically designed for security, infrastructure monitoring, and maritime awareness. Clearly, it’s time to look up and keep an eye on a rapidly shifting space race, but don’t forget what’s under our feet.

    Earlier in this piece I kinda said that communism died in the ‘90s but the idea of centrally controlled economies is making a bit of a comeback. Bizarrely, the US is leading the charge. Again, I’m going to park the politics and walk you through a few developments in recent weeks. First, the US government via the Pentagon announced it was getting into the mining business. Yep, the Pentagon (Department of Defense) invested $400m in MP Materials, a US company which extracts and processes rare earths materials. These rare earths are the essential basic materials for the high-end magnets used in technologies from mobile phones to medical equipment to ballistic missiles. Anyway, we know the world is overly dependent on China (90% market dominance) for these rare earths/magnets and is a primary reason for the Trump TACO pause on trade tariffs with China. Clearly, critical raw material supply chains/networks are a focus of all Western governments. So, the move to back a home-grown producer with a 15% ownership stake was logical enough. However, within days Apple announced a $500m deal with MP Materials to buy magnets produced in Texas. Cue the MP Materials share price doubling within hours and you can just feel it in your bones that Apple was strong-armed by Washington into doing this deal. This is the sort of government intervention you’d expect from Beijing, but ….Washington? We live in interesting times, as the Chinese might say, but arguably there’s another network of even more importance where the Washington government is happier for China to lead.

    The electrification of the global economy is very real. The advent of AI and the enormous energy appetite of cloud-supporting data centres only adds to the pressures on electrical grid networks everywhere. The race to source power is focusing the minds of Big Tech and driving deals which could be described as “outside the box” thinking. Consider these recent deals:

     

    • Google last week agreed a $3 billion deal to modernise two hydropower plants in Pennsylvania.
    • Meta said in June that it had struck a 20-year deal with a nuclear plant in Illinois to power its data centres.
    • Microsoft is preparing to reopen a nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, the site of the most serious nuclear meltdown in US history.

     

    However, the bigger energy story is elsewhere, but with a US context. The Trump administration is actively pushing investment capital away from renewable energy solutions like solar and wind. Year-to-date in the US, more than $15 billion of clean energy projects have been cancelled. In Europe, venture capital funding of cleantech companies has nosedived by 71%. Meanwhile, China is taking a longer-term view on electrical grid networks. The numbers are absolutely staggering. China controls 80% of solar panel production and leads the world in wind turbine manufacturing. This year China will account for 74% of all solar and wind energy projects…. globally. But, it’s the electricity generating capacity numbers which truly blow the mind. Last year China added 370GW of renewable energy capacity (wind, solar, hydro) of which 277GW was solar. For context 1GW (or 1000MW) is the equivalent energy capacity of the average nuclear power station. So, on solar energy alone, China is adding the equivalent electrical capacity of five nuclear power stations to its power grid….. every week.

    The headlines might be dominated by $4 trillion companies driving the AI revolution, cloud-based software economics, chip manufacturing and data centre construction. But…. two of the three networks above focus on real basics. China’s raw materials supply chains and its electricity grid are critical to its future and geopolitical power. One can only hope it’s not an “MTV moment” for other countries playing catch up, or worse – blocking the signals of rapid change.

     

  • Time To Think Different

    Time To Think Different

    I must confess I was very jealous. My son met Mike Bloomberg on his visit to Dublin this week, not me. Bloomberg and his eponymous data/media company have always fascinated me as a former customer, and as a financial markets observer. The Bloomberg business is still the gold standard for data analytics, trading communications and news for circa 350,000 financial market professionals who each pay $27,000 per year for the service. The company has been around since 1982 and it has made Bloomberg the owner incredibly wealthy. Uniquely so, perhaps, because it was done in private. If you check the ranks of the wealthiest people on the planet the top 10 features the usual names like Musk, Arnault, Gates, Zuckerberg, Ballmer and Ellison. However, all those names are attached to publicly listed companies which underpin their wealth. Bloomberg is still a private company, and still 88% owned by its founder.

    Think about a SaaS-type business doing circa $12 billion of revenues a year and 88% of the profits (probably 30% + margins) accruing to one person…..since 1982. Officially, Forbes Magazine ranks Mike Bloomberg in 18th place on the world’s richest list with a $105 billion fortune. I’m guessing it’s WAY more than that. But, the bigger reveal is how a private company was able to create wealth over decades without a fluctuating public share price and short-term institutional shareholders demanding it respond to dotcom revolutions, search engines, mobile internet, big data, cloud-based SaaS, credit crises and AI. Privacy gave Bloomberg time and strategic room to act in a different way to the Wall Street ‘crowd’ and its emotional baggage. Indeed, there were a few other reminders this week of how the “crowd” can miss important truths when analysis is dominated by a volatile public share price and human emotions. Remember Cisco?

    If you invested in Cisco this month 25 years ago you would have caught its peak dotcom bubble valuation before boom turned to bust. This week is the first time in 25 years you could sell those Cisco shares at a profit. Ouch. Patience and time is not just the preserve of investors in private illiquid assets. In fact, lack of liquidity can be an investor’s friend when markets are volatile. Fast forward to today and think about how many people sold stocks and bought oil on the weekend news that the US had bombed Iran’s hidden nuclear facilities. Well, the oil price is 15% off its peak price through the Iran-Israel conflict period (or “12 Day War” as named by the bomber-in-chief and Nobel Peace Prize wannabe) and actually below the trading price before hostilities even began. Oh, and the Nasdaq 100 just hit an all-time-high yesterday. For the faint-hearted, that’s a 36% gain for the largest tech stocks over two months of toddler tariffs, broken bromances, Gaza abandonment, WW3 fears, a Russian drone drubbing of its airforce and Love Island shocks. Rather than dodging a “risk-off” bullet, investors have been rewarded for not selling with strong stock market performances this week. It might not sound rational but there’s a very powerful lesson about the importance of “staying in the market”. For investors in publicly listed assets, there is an option every minute to sell and exit the market. But, there’s a cost.

    A piece of research from JP Morgan, studying the returns of the S&P 500 between 2002 and 2022, shows annualized performance(returns) of 9.4%. That’s pretty good. But…..if you missed the 10 best days your return would almost halve to 5.21%. More strikingly, 7 of those 10 best days happened within two weeks of the 10 WORST days. So, if you opt out during the bad periods of volatility you tend to lose out on the big bounces which have a huge impact on longer term performance. The uncomfortable truth is that the best days and worst days tend to occur within weeks of each other. Further angst for many, is that human emotions take over and investors flee for the exits after market turbulence. However, for investors in private assets that emotional self-destruct button is not available given there is no natural daily exit option. There is also another public market reality which leads to misleading comparisons with private asset investing.

    The accepted wisdom or orthodoxy in finance is that investing in early-stage companies has a high failure rate. The text books would suggest that failure rate is in the 70-90% range. That rightly implies that the vast majority of returns for investors in a portfolio of early-stage risky investments is delivered by a small number of investments. However, what is not mentioned in those texts or in plenty of fund investor information sheets is that portfolios of publicly listed companies have a similar story. A study conducted by Professor Hendrik Bessembinder at the Arizona State University Business School shows that just 4% of companies in the US stock markets have accounted for all of the wealth gains since 1926. Amazingly, the average cumulative return of the 29,078 common stocks listed since 1926 was a hefty 23,000% but….the median stock in that time experienced a cumulative return of NEGATIVE 7.4%. Given that’s a median number, that means more than half of all stocks have experienced negative returns. Fund manager, Bailie Gifford, has done further research on this data to identify the key performance drivers of the small number of genuine wealth creating companies. Interestingly, R&D investment was a critical driver. Now, let’s think private and different.

    Clearly, public and private markets are not so different. It’s better to be in the market ALL the time and only a small number of companies in a portfolio deliver the majority of returns. However, in order to capture that opportunity one needs to build a portfolio. It also looks like R&D is important to create a big enough competitive advantage to grow rapidly. We don’t know how much money Bloomberg invested in its famous desktop terminal over the years to effectively “own” the market but we do know he didn’t have to report profit numbers like Cisco to the market on a quarterly basis. So, if we think differently, how can we act differently?

    Well, you don’t need a Bloomberg terminal to tell you that high net worth investors are increasingly investing in private assets. Global giant private equity house, Blackstone, this week stated their belief that “Europe is in a unique position to capture more investment”. Blackstone themselves are going to invest $500 billion in Europe over the next decade. The other data point worth considering is that JP Morgan reckon the mass affluent investor market has just 2% of their portfolios allocated to alternative/private investments. So, this is not a dotcom/Cisco rush into peak investment cycles. There is real early opportunity in private assets and Spark Private can actually help kick start a portfolio very quickly. This summer Spark Private investors will be able to invest in a selection of up to seven R&D-rich medtechs, a few SaaS/software high-growth options, an exciting AI play and some really interesting infrastructure franchises.

    We now know the phrase “timing is everything” doesn’t work when trading public markets. However, we also know if you’re not in, and you’re not diversified, you can’t win. So, think different and think private. Now is an excellent time to combine private opportunity with portfolio-building deal flow.

    ** For further information on Ostoform, SymPhysis Medical, Social Voice, Digital Gait Labs, Tympany Medical, Liltoda, Array Patch or Quadrant Scientific contact us on www.sparkprivate.com

     

  • Three Winning Hidden Trends

    Three Winning Hidden Trends

    I was tempted. The “buddy breakup” in Washington between the Taco Toddler and the Ketamine Kid is fabulous writing material. But, no. The real risk these days is being distracted by America’s slide towards lawless autocracy and missing something bigger. Eighty one years ago on a June 5th morning President Roosevelt brought good news to the American people and its allies. Rome had been liberated by Allied troops – “The first of the Axis capitals is now in our hands.” Little did Roosevelt’s audience know that later that day paratroopers would be dropped into northern France ahead of 7,000 ships landing on the D-Day beaches of Normandy on June 6th. Fast forward to that anniversary today, and there are winning opportunities again being potentially obscured by Washington broadcasts. Indeed, it’s possible you may have missed some striking data updates to three huge investment trends this week. Let’s dive in.

    Last month at its annual Stripe Sessions conference, CEO Patrick Collison identified the “gale-force tailwinds” of AI and stablecoins. The first tailwind trend won’t be a surprise to any readers of our AI article last week but it was intriguing to hear Collison say, “Stablecoins are the underdog everyone’s sleeping on.”  He also had an interesting take on the macro “noise” and uncertainty prevalent in today’s business world – “when new technologies collide with a turbulent economy, the technology tends to win”. That seems a prescient call this week when we briefly touch on AI and reflect on its chip champion, Nvidia, revealing its latest quarterly results. Despite tariff disruption of its China business, Nvidia beat Wall Street analyst expectations and regained its status as the world’s most valuable company. Thanks to a 50% surge is its share price over the last 8 weeks, Jensen Huang’s chip behemoth is worth $3.4 trillion. The latest data point on stablecoins was also quite eye-catching.

    Not long ago Circle Internet Group was saved by the US government when Washington guaranteed deposits at the collapsing Silicon Valley Bank(SVB). Circle as an issuer of dollar-backed stablecoins was the top dollar depositor customer at SVB. However, this week the newsflow was way more optimistic as Circle waited to IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. Reports suggested investor interest was massive and the listing was 25x over-subscribed. Not surprisingly, with more buyers than sellers, Circle’s share price surged 168% on its first day of trading to a valuation just shy of $17 billion. It’s difficult not to conclude that stablecoins have “arrived” and investors are excited by Collison’s own description of stablecoins’ “real world utility in regular business”. In fact Stripe confirmed stablecoin issuance has increased by 39% year-on-year while “demand for borderless financial services go through the roof….at a growth rate which eclipses anything we’ve seen before in Stripe”. Ok, that’s two winning trends. The last one won’t surprise but the numbers might.

    Private equity (PE) and its billionaire leaders could be doubting their love-in with the Taco Toddler but they are not the only PE-related cohort in doubting mode. PE investors are quietly wondering how private equity houses are going to deploy the $1.2 trillion of ‘dry powder’ which is currently sitting on the side-lines and hurting overall return on investment (ROI) figures. A quarter of that massive total has been available for the last 4 years (Source: Bain &Co). However, there is no doubting our mantra “the future is private” when you consider private equity now controls a record 29,000 companies worth more than $3.6 trillion.  But, there are cyclical challenges. Higher interest rates, reduced IPO activity and M&A paralysis (execs can’t Taco trade those deals) don’t help valuations or exits so it’s worth noting global PE fundraising has declined for 5 straight quarters. Global PE raises in Q1 were down 33% per Pitchbook/Bloomberg reports but that cycle might be about to shift. The Wall Street Journal this week reported that the software-focused PE giant, Thoma Bravo, has just raised a staggering $34.4 billion which is the biggest funding round since the start of 2024.

    As a final thought, one must be mindful that as investment funds become bigger and bigger their opportunity pool shrinks due to size and liquidity constraints. On the other hand, as the ECB cuts interest rates, Ireland GDP growth hits almost 10%, German equities touch all-time highs and Trumpolini begs President Xi for a trade détente, it is arguably a particularly good time for investors to think small, and think private. So, if you want to build a private asset portfolio quickly, Spark Private can certainly help with a very exciting summer EIIS** pipeline of PhD-packed medtech innovations, real-time AI applications, 3-year infrastructure exits and super-growth software stories. Do not be distracted. Check out www.sparkprivate.com  and, as my old boss used to say, “They ain’t door numbers, they move !!”.

    ** EIIS tax rebates of 35-50% on your 2025 personal income tax.

     

  • AI…AI…AI…AI…I Just Don’t Know

    AI…AI…AI…AI…I Just Don’t Know

    I’m going to have to up my game. Not just tennis. As a frequenter of the occasional business discussion panel, this week threw up a very different type of panelist. The Dublin Tech Summit at the RDS hosted a panel discussion on AI which featured contributions from a meta-human avatar created by AI, named Anja. Quite unnerving in a way. If it had been a horse on the panel, I don’t think it would have unsettled me more. Mind you, the no-clothes Emperor Taco Trump guy can’t be far away from appointing a horse to the Senate soon. Anyway, I digress as humans do. Back to AI, and I was thinking it would be no harm to highlight a few significant AI datapoints and developments which have caught my eye in recent weeks. First, the data.

    The Stargate data centre project backed by OpenAI, Japan’s Softbank, Oracle and Nvidia and to be built in the UAE is estimated to eventually have the capacity to consume 5GW of power, For context, that’s the power consumption equivalent of the entire island of Ireland. And, Ireland would already be considered a global leader in terms of data centre capacity as a proportion of the total energy grid, about 21%. Clearly, AI and its critical data centre/cloud infrastructure is moving at pace to meet expected future AI usage demand. The pulse-take on AI investment pace has been chip-maker, Nvidia, who reported quarterly results this week. Revenues for Nvidia (despite Trump China tariffs/blocks) are still growing at almost 70% but this doesn’t quite capture the scale of growth. Two years ago, at the time of ChatGPT’s launch, quarterly revenues at Nvidia were $6 billion. Now, they are at $44 billion. Furthermore, Nvidia plans to invest $500 billion to build AI infrastructure in the US. Note, things have also moved on from  ChatGPT and other Gen AI tools (like Gemini and Claude) as the drivers of AI investment. The big move now is to “Agentic AI” or “AI Agency”.

    Agentic AI is not a pilot or learning model wanting users to test its knowledge. No, this is the real “doing” stuff which companies are now paying to integrate in their work flows. According to CB Insights research, enterprise AI and copilots will generate $13 billion of revenues by the end of 2025 across a variety of activities from sales to coding to customer service. That’s a growth rate of 155% year-on-year and a wake-up call for most companies; the reality is that their competitors are likely deploying AI to dramatically improve productivity and costs. One wouldn’t want to be in the spectator seats for too long and it’s not just a corporate caution. At a sovereign level, Dubai has offered all its citizens free access to the premium ChatGPT Plus service which normally costs $20 per month. The digital information race is truly ‘on’ but there’s also a hardware story emerging.

    OpenAI has just acquired  Jony Ive’s AI hardware start-up, Io Products. The former Apple key man, whose design credits include the iPhone and iPad, will now lead design at OpenAI as the company pushes deeper into hardware. The move highlights a trend of VC-backed companies buying one another amid a shifting tech landscape and a hunger for talent. However, it is worth noting that this is the largest private-to-private acquisition ever at $6.4 billion. Indeed, over 40% (7) of all-time $1B+ private-to-private acquisitions have happened in just the last year. OpenAI, Databricks, and Stripe have each spent over 15% of their total funding to date on acquisitions in the last 2 years. Don’t forget Anja too. Venture capital investment in humanoid robots are estimated to double this year to over $2 billion per CB Insights data. Then consider that there are 660 million people in Asia (average age 27) using digital companions. That disturbing little gem came from anthropologist, Dr Lollie Mancey, in a recent RTE interview and….. I just don’t know. I’m not alone.

    The fascinating story of Irish recycling software company, AMCS, and its $2 billion wealth creation story was told by its founder, Jimmy Martin, at the Renatus/Fitzgerald Power “Real Deal” SME conference in Goffs this week. When asked about AI, he wisely declined to predict the future but did make one very interesting and more definitive point. As a hugely successful observer of ‘margin’ in industry ecosystems, Martin was quick to identify the monopolistic power of the big 3 cloud infrastructure players, Microsoft, Amazon and Google. For me, the unanswered question of who will be the winner(s) will focus on the following :

     

    1. The manufacturers of the critical semiconductor chips
    2. The owners of data centre infrastructure
    3. The providers of energy/power capacity
    4. Sovereign/digital alignment (China, Europe or US).

     

    I really don’t know, particularly the geopolitical/sovereign and energy/power questions. However, I do think it interesting that in recent days companies exposed to the nuclear power industry have seen big share price moves. Not coincidentally, the US and a number of European countries have been embracing a nuclear industry revival at the same time. Plenty to ponder, not all of it comfortable. Isn’t that right, Anja?