Gravitas Spark CrowdFunding

Author: Gravitas

  • When Words Are Definitely NOT Our Bonds…

    When Words Are Definitely NOT Our Bonds…

    There’s only one thing sicker than an Irish parrot outfit this morning. That’s the global bond market. The biggest bully of them all is sick of the nonsense. Not just the front-running of the US President’s social media posts. The Financial Times rightly flagged this week the gob-smacking scale of corruption and ‘insider’ trading going on close to the Oval Office but, in real financial terms, the pricing reactions of equity and oil markets to Trump’s Monday TACO were relatively muted. Of course, oil prices dipped below $100 earlier in the week but they’re back above $110 now. Similarly, the S&P 500 spiked for a day but it too is back slightly below Monday levels. Arguably, Trump’s words have been losing credibility since his first TACO retreat on tariffs in April last year but there’s a much more dangerous aspect to this credibility failure now. Truth has officially fled the higher echelons of US institutions and that impacts the biggest contracts of them all, United States Treasury bonds’ (or IOUs) credit worthiness with the rest of the world. Here are the headlines you’re not reading…

     

    • The yield on the US 10-year Treasury bond has deteriorated/risen by 13.5% (in yield or cost of money terms) since the Iran war began.
    • The yield on the US 20-year Treasury bond has deteriorated/risen by 11% in the same period (25 days!!).
    • The yields on US Treasuries are used to price almost everything so the average cost of a mortgage in the US is now at a 7 month high despite job creation being at a multi-year low.
    • It’s not just the cost of US assets. The global disruption caused by the Iran ‘operation’ has driven Japanese government bond yields up by 16%.
    • UK bond yields above 5% are the highest seen in 20 years.

     

    The price moves above are the ones that really count. And their message is very clear: the damage done to energy infrastructure and global supply chains is inflationary. The bond traders don’t believe a word of what is coming out of the White House and Pentagon propaganda machines. The opening up of the Strait of Hormuz is dependent on Iranian cooperation and the ability of logistics companies to commit their ships and crews to a safer and insurable environment.  At current levels of reduced shipping activity, the world is losing 11 million barrels of oil every day, as well as numerous other critical distillates like ammonia, diesel, helium, urea etc.  The key point is that bond markets do not “price” temporary cost spikes or supply squeezes. The bond market is explicitly contradicting the Trump regime and suggesting longer-term disruption. In fact, the French government have laid out the following observations:

    • 30-40% of Gulf oil refining capacity is destroyed.
    • That is the worst energy infrastructure destruction since WW2.
    • Full repairs could take 3 years.

     

    Thanks Donald. Actually, you don’t need to thank him. Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, went full North Korea at this week’s National Republican Congressional Committee fundraiser by presenting Trump with a new award. The Guardian reports:

     

    “The president has done so much for the American people and we want to honour him, in some small way, some token of our appreciation for his leadership,” said Mike Johnson, the US House speaker. “So, tonight, we have created a new award.” Johnson then introduced the “America First” award, made up of a golden eagle statue. “We could think of no better title for what that is,” said Johnson. “That’s this beautiful golden statue here – appropriate for the new golden era in America.”

     

    Idolatry and empty words. Asia might have other words right now. Latest headlines suggest crisis:

     

    Pakistan is reducing government working hours to save energy

    India is diverting gas from factories to homes

    Philippines declares a national emergency

    Japan to temporarily lift coal power plant curbs over Hormuz crisis

     

    Clearly, bond markets are looking East and not West for the true story. Indeed, it was striking how most commentators and traders earlier in the week were looking to Tehran to verify whether the US President was telling the truth about ‘negotiations’. Yes, an autocratic theocracy is now more credible than the leader of the ‘free world’.

    It’s a very strange world, but I suspect the bond market will have a very big say about how events unfold in the Middle East from here.

  • The War Of Unintended Consequences…

    The War Of Unintended Consequences…

    I know. The headline should read “LAW” but where’s the law these days? Certainly, it’s nowhere near Washington as the new Trump fund raising “squeeze” is an emailed request for cash donations in exchange for “private national security briefings” straight from the desk of The Don himself. I kid you not. Anyway, let’s get back to the war, or ‘excursion’ per the Orwellian Oval Office. Clearly, things on the Iran war front are not going to plan. My particular favourite summary of the moment is a delicious one from The Economist: “Although Donald Trump claims to have destroyed 100% of Iran’s military capabilities, the remaining 0% is wreaking havoc on the global economy.” Now, the purpose of this article is not to re-hash all the negative first-order global impacts of the war ranging from higher fuel prices, to supply chain disruption, to inflation, to reduced growth….to interest rate hikes. Yuk! None of this helps financial markets or business in the near term but I’m intrigued by some of the second-order possibilities which could emerge from an extended period of uncertainty. I’m thinking of three areas in particular:

    AI Infrastructure: The simple math of a shock to the global economy is that financial flows dramatically shift. Quickly. Extra money will be needed to meet higher energy bills, economic stress etc. That money must come from somewhere else in the system. So, one thing to consider is that the hundreds of billions Saudi Arabia , UAE, and Qatar committed to the funding of AI infrastructure projects might just be needed to rebuild energy infrastructure closer to home. Current estimates of the cost of the attack on Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG hub is up to $20 billion per annum . And the worst bit, the rebuild could take 5 years – so let’s call that $100 billion. There is a teeny weeny bit of irony here given the US tech broligarchs’ man in the big house (and ballroom) has screwed up royally. Current estimates suggest $4 trillion is needed to build data centres, processing chips, training models, memory chips and storage by 2030. A squeeze on access to that investment capital will favour the biggest balance sheets and cash flows like Google, Microsoft and Amazon. Not for the first time, I worry about OpenAI’s positioning in the middle of all this AI excitement (remember the famous FT graphic) and being attached to more than $1 trillion of AI projects. So might its bankers worry, watching its tiny balance sheet.

    Electric Revolution: There was a theory for years that Saudi Arabia was deliberately keeping the oil price lower in order to delay the electric/renewable revolution. Their thinking apparently was that if energy was cheap it would remove the urgency to seek alternatives to fossil fuels. So, with Asian buyers already paying over $170 per barrel of oil we are beginning to see some interesting developments. In a little more than 2 weeks, Chinese EV player, BYD Co, is seeing its showrooms packed with customers wanting to switch to EV models. From Bloomberg….”At a BYD Co car dealership in Manila’s financial district, demand for the Chinese company’s electric vehicles is so high that Matthew Dominique Poh said he’s seen a month’s worth of orders in just the past two weeks.”  This feels similar to the Covid-19 acceleration of remote working. Also, spare a thought for US auto manufacturers who have scaled back their EV ambitions to keep the Dearest Leader happy and have written off $55 billion of EV projects. Timing is everything they say…..Get ready for some pretty interesting EV headlines in the coming months.

    Defence: Ukraine was the wake-up call when the world’s second most powerful military power turned the Kremlin’s “3 day operation” into a battlefield quagmire which has decimated its stores of equipment and weaponry, incurred more than 1 million of its own military casualties and incredibly has now lasted longer than the Soviet Union’s WW2 conflict with Nazi Germany. Fast forward to today and we are witnessing the world’s most powerful military gain almost total superiority over Iran but now staring down the barrel (!) of a strategic disaster that “nobody ever expected” per the stable genius hurling ketchup against the walls of Mar-a-Lago. The trapping of 20% of the world’s fuel supplies in the Strait of Hormuz and the destruction of critical energy infrastructure in UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar has been achieved with drones which cost as little as $20,000 but require the US to quickly run through their stores of $2m missile air defence weapons. Astonishingly, the Pentagon is looking for an additional $200 billion of budget to fund this “excursion”. However, the bigger picture is that military strategy and economics have utterly changed. Drone warfare developed on the battlefields of Ukraine is the scary future. For some it will be opportunity. Check out the IPO this week of the Ukrainian drone software company, Swarmer, on the Nasdaq. The IPO price was $5 per share but by the close of its first day of trading the share price was $55. Just the 950% gain in one day of trading. Oh, and last year Swarmer had generated just $300,000 of revenues. The US military-industrial complex is having its “ChatGPT” moment and will soon embark on a massive drone warfare investment programme.

    Clearly, not all of the above is cheery stuff but it does feel like some ‘leaders’ in business, technology and investment are now facing very different prospects than they planned for just a few short weeks ago. And, there doesn’t seem to be a “TACO” option this time.

  • What’s The Crack…?

    What’s The Crack…?

    God bless the Taoiseach, Micheál Martin’s script writers for his St Patrick Day’s trip to Generalissimo Trump’s Oval Office. The Taoiseach might succeed in avoiding eye contact with Secretary of State, Marco Rubio’s over-sized shiny shoes chosen by the Boss (no seriously), but the usual exchange of pleasantries laced with some colloquial Irish banter could scupper the whole event. As the non-strategic ‘genius’ of trapping 20% of the planet’s oil supplies in the Strait of Hormuz begins to hurt the entire global economy, it would probably be best to avoid slipping “That’s gas!” into the chat, or “Now we’re suckin’ diesel!” or even “What’s the craic?”.  Zero craic for the Taoiseach’s advisors anyway. But, on a broader level, the Trump regime bluster is beginning to crack. Current commentariat thinking is that Trump will avoid an Iran quagmire by declaring ‘victory’ soon and flooding the media with the usual deflections and outright lies. Bizarrely, this time I wish that messaging strategy would work. However, there’s a tiny flaw in this plan. Or, as Captain Blackadder used to say to Private Baldrick, “It’s bollocks”.

    The opening of the Strait of Hormuz is in the gift of the new hardline regime in Tehran, not Washington.  Yep, that regime change thing isn’t going so well. Unless the US puts boots on the ground, there won’t be much need to crack hydrocarbons in the Persian Gulf for the foreseeable future. Oil production volumes in the region are already being wound down but the bottom line is that the global economy is ‘missing’ circa 8 million barrels of oil per day (out of approx. 100m global demand). This doesn’t sound like an earth-shattering proportion of overall demand but …..welcome to the world of commodities. Any supply/demand imbalance can lead to outsized price movements as the marginal price (most expensive barrel) sets the price for the entire market. The International Energy Agency is already describing the situation as “the largest supply disruption in history” and has released 400 million barrels from reserves. However, despite this announcement (delivery times vary) the price of oil continued to rise to over $100. That doesn’t feel like price control. And, Trumpolini can go on Fox News every night and bluster but the gas prices at the pump are the only truth for voters. It’s not the only crack in the victory messaging….

    There are other critical products which travel through the Strait of Hormuz. Seaborne diesel disruption could cause global supply to fall by up to 12%. To be clear, diesel is the most macro-sensitive oil derivative product in the global economy. Think freight, agriculture, mining and industrial activity. Then think of all those ‘always winning’ MAGA voters employed in those sectors. Also, keep an eye on headlines from India and Indonesia who are both frantically seeking new supplies of urea, ammonia and other fertilizer feedstocks. Bangladesh has already closed its universities to save fuel and now we’re talking about the guts of 2 billion people impacted by the basics of food production, education and power. However, if you thought this was just a developing world problem, let’s take a look at the very highest echelon of the financial food chain.

    I’ve always been conscious that financial fragilities and leverage can exist in the global economy for extended periods of time but ultimately something cracks. And, that crack can be far removed from the specific vulnerable market. We frequently write about the perils of depending on “other people’s money”. We have also written about the massive growth in a market known as ‘private credit’. In other words, private loans to private companies which do not come from banks. This market has grown five-fold since 2010 to $2.5 trillion globally. Remember these are loans from institutions (not banks) like Blackstone, Apollo, Ares, HPOS, Carlyle, Blue Owl etc. Of course, the explosion of AI investment spend on infrastructure has accelerated the growth of this asset class (private credit) but, as always with fast-growth lending, due diligence standards slip, risk management gets sloppy, and bang….. there’s a problem. Well, this multi-trillion dollar asset class already had two problems:

     

    1. In October 2025, two companies in the US in quick succession suddenly collapsed. Private credit instruments backing auto-parts supplier First Brands and car dealership Tricolour suffered catastrophic losses. Suddenly, risk entered the private credit equation.
    2. In January “SaaS-pocalypse” became a market driver as investors began to fear for the growth and security of once-robust software (SaaS) business models under threat from AI. This, in turn, affected perceptions of the security of loans extended to software companies. Companies like SAP and Oracle saw their share prices fall up to 50% from their highs.

     

    In recent months we have been reading smallish headlines about private credit funds experiencing “difficulties”. Guess what? Depending on “other people’s money” can be tricky when headlines cause anxiety. Yep, people who invested in these private credit funds and vehicles (SPVs) wanted to get their money back. Blue Owl was the first high profile name to suspend redemptions. Then it was Blackstone limiting investor withdrawals, followed by the Big Daddy of them all, Blackrock/HPS. Now, Morgan Stanley and Cliffwater are doing the same this week. So, that’s 6 ‘financial gates’ closing as fast as the Strait of Hormuz. You don’t need to guess what other investors in other funds are thinking. Now consider the impact of a disrupted global economy and how the traditional providers of capital to the global economy are reacting. Clearly, deal conversations with Tokyo banks, UAE sovereign wealth funds and European family offices are going to be of a very different tone to those held just a few short weeks ago.

    Listen carefully…that sucking sound is not Kash Patel, JD Vance (how quiet is he!) or Howard Lutnick simpering to the Dearest Leader’s latest delusions. Nope, that’s the sound of the global financial system experiencing geopolitical and leverage cracks simultaneously, and the beginnings of capital flows going into ‘flight to safety’ mode. Hopefully, stability will return to the Middle-East soon. We have stared down the barrel of threatened global chaos before. In fact, for 47 years senior US strategic security personnel gamed out the theory that the Iranians would never shut down the 2-mile wide Strait of Hormuz knowing that the US and their allies’ response would be too damaging. That theory is now dead because the White House moved first and apparently (based on this week’s Truth Social outbursts) had no coherent plan for after…..

    Now, that would be gas if it wasn’t so serious.

  • Battle For Capital Starts At Home

    Battle For Capital Starts At Home

    Investment capital does not come easy. Unless you’re Kristi Noem, the very recent US Secretary of Homeland Security. It seems Kristi had no problem accessing capital to fund a $220m personal branding campaign, a fleet of $70m luxury jets with queen-sized beds to ride around the nation and multiple photo shoots of the DHS Secretary on horseback at national monuments. Those rides – that word is doing some heavy lifting – are now over. “Generalissimo Bonespurs” bravely reached for his social media keyboard last night and fired her via Truth Social. At least it was a fate less lethal than that experienced by Kristi’s late puppy, Cricket, who was shot by “ICE Barbie” for discipline issues. No tears from Cricket, or the rest of the caring world me thinks. Anyway, I’d like to stick with investment capital and discipline.

    The screaming headlines away from the Arabian Peninsula in 2026 have been again all about AI, and the ‘space race’ to spend more and more money to build that AI future. Leaving aside the discipline or uncertainty of returns(success) on that capital spend, there is one certainty. This enormous shift of investment capital – $650 billion spend this year by MSFT, Amazon, META and Google alone – risks ‘crowding out’ other sectors desperately looking for capital to fund their own growth plans. In fact, Pitchbook data indicates funding for AI exceeded half of all VC deal value in 2025 (53% of $513 billion). However, this sector concentration phenomenon highlights a challenge for Europe. Clearly, the investment capital is out there but Europe is struggling to muster up ‘big ticket’ investment to truly dominate/gain monopoly on the global stage. Consider SAP as the only European ‘startup’ of recent decades to achieve a valuation of over €100 billion. Then think of the still privately owned SpaceX eying up a 2026 IPO with a $1.7 trillion valuation. The US is on a different planet to Europe in terms of swinging the investment capital ‘bat’. Indeed, Mario Draghi’s report on EU competitiveness way back in 2024 flagged a couple of things relevant to today’s article:

     

    • Europe needs to radically overhaul innovation. Draghi noted only 4 of the world’s top 50 tech companies were European.

     

    • His solutions included innovation in Europe’s financial markets: 5% of European GDP (or €800 billion per annum) needs to be invested in Europe’s best innovative companies, infrastructure, energy etc. This capital could be unleashed through joined-up thinking on common EU debt instruments and unlocking the vast private savings pools in Europe’s aging societies.

     

    Closer to home, the government and Tanaiste Simon Harris are promising a new savings scheme to incentivise savers to deploy some risk capital. Despite the presence of so many bold brave successful US multinational corporations in Ireland’s economy, we have become a nation fearful of risk. Possibly we have been spoiled and become risk flabby due to multi-national ‘air cover’. The €170 billion of savings sitting in Irish banking deposit accounts earning returns below the rate of inflation is a damning indictment of our national financial literacy and an exercise in mass wealth destruction. Something radical needs to happen so we will be writing further on this theme in terms of what’s possible and what we believe might work. After all, we are pretty much the only Irish free-to-access platform for investing and purchasing the shares of young fast growing companies. So, we do have a view close to the coalface and….. we also know the hurdles currently experienced by both the companies seeking investment and the institutions assessing the returns prospects of those companies. Let’s first consider how venture capital institutions, family offices and private equity houses make that returns assessment.

    One of the more thought provoking pieces I have read in the last 12 months was an article by Progress Ireland’s Sean Keyes. He used real numbers in an investment decision example to demonstrate how an Irish company when competing against other European companies (not even US ones) for investment “need to be smarter, harder working, or luckier than Europeans to achieve the same results”.  Why? Simply put, investment companies have a ‘hurdle’ or returns target which they put in all their marketing literature for their investors, partners, shareholders etc. It will be expressed as an annual rate of return over the duration term of the investment (eg 20% or 30% per annum over 5 years). However, this is NOT the same as what the investee company achieves in its own operations. Think of two companies earning profits of €1m per annum for 5 years and then selling/exiting for €10 million to a new owner. You’d be right to think that both companies delivered €15 million over the holding period of the investment. But…. that is NOT what the investment company will receive. That will depend on the tax regime of the relevant investment. Here’s where the numbers don’t look good for Ireland’s companies. We DO have a low corporation tax (15%) but other taxes significantly change the returns picture for investment companies. Consider the following:

     

    • Ireland taxes dividends at the highest rates in Europe (remember the distribution – out of company – of those €1m per annum profits)
    • Capital Gains Tax is the 4th highest in the EU (remember that €10 million exit)

     

    Clearly, the post-tax picture for investors in Irish companies compared to the exact same average EU company is lower. Therefore, an investment manager needs to know that an Irish company is going to deliver a supra-normal PRE-tax performance in order to deliver a post-tax result in line with his ‘hurdle’ requirements. The Progress Ireland article is worth a read to understand the framework calculations but for the purposes of this article (and Friday lunch deadline approaching) I would flag the two key numbers which standout. An Irish company receiving €1m of VC funding and required to beat a hurdle of 30% per annum over 5 years needs to generate€ 23.7m over the 5 years. Meanwhile, the average EU start-up receiving the same €1m VC investment only needs to deliver €11.3m over the same period. That feels like an Irish start-up needs to be roughly twice as lucky, smart and hard working than average. It also feels wrong. Not the maths, the returns hurdle implicit in any Irish start-up investment by an institutional player is way too onerous. Radical thinking is required and none of these challenges are addressed if we end up incentivising SSIA-type savings schemes which steer investment capital into publicly listed companies on global stock markets.

    We already have an incentive solution for that. It’s called a pension. So, we will return to this topic again with more on the potential solutions and the wider imperative for Europe to mobilize its vast savings’ pools. Frankly, if we and Europe don’t encourage risk-taking discipline, then we all economically end up like poor Cricket.

     

  • Things Getting Very Real….

    Things Getting Very Real….

    I know, I know we’re not supposed to throw the “F” word about lightly. But things are getting serious, and expletives aren’t even close to what I’m thinking. I’ll save those for counting freezing Freezbrury water minutes. No…my reluctant F word is  FASCISM. Possibly over-used in recent times….until now. Check out the enormous banner poster of Donald Trump which has just been hung on the outside of the headquarters of the US Justice Department (DOJ). Gobsmacking. The capture of the rule of law in the US is now almost complete. While business leaders are removed, senior foreign government officials resign in disgrace and the 8th in line to the throne of the UK is taken into police custody, Trump’s private legal firm (the DOJ) is desperately trying to deflect and pretend there are no US-based Epstein predators. Deflection tactics from the White House have now moved on to releasing files on Aliens (the non-ICE versions) and UFOs. However, the biggest ‘bread and circus’ deflection show is the 15- day countdown to conflict with Iran.

    I am struck by how complacent current geopolitical risk thinking is right now, and what desperate measures Tehran’s murderous regime might take to strike a blow against the US and its allies in the region including Israel.  Any regime which murders 20,000 of its protesting citizens in a matter of days is capable of awful stuff. So, it concerns me that the emotionally stunted “Admiral Bonespurs” in the Orange House and his War Secretary, “Whiskey Pete”, in the Pentagon will be the key decision makers if US forces take larger casualties than expected. We are into very unpredictable territory now. However, Iran is not the only risk reality creeping up on us.

    The financial markets have been focused on the carnage wrought on software company share prices year-to-date. Valuation destruction has been close to $2 trillion as the latest Wall Street thinking is that AI will blow up software business models. It even has its own event taxonomy – “SaaSpocalypse”. The basic premise is that companies will build their own workflow, HR, process applications etc. in-house with increasingly powerful AI coding tools. Thus, software companies could face growth and competition challenges which in turn impacts valuation/sales multiples framing that growth. In fact, this invasion of artificial digital expertise is in danger of commoditizing software. Ironically, there has been a complete reversal of the valuation hierarchy between hardware and software. In tech terms, things are getting very real. Real stuff like memory chips(DRAM) and logic chips (GPUs) are perceived as supply constrained and ditching their historic ‘commodity-type’ characteristics. The best illustration of this shift in investor perceptions is the stunning statistic that 89% of semiconductor companies’ (real stuff) share prices are flying (trading above 200 day moving average) while precisely ZERO software company (digital bits) share prices are exhibiting any technical strength(evidence of buying). However, we are in danger of focusing on the trading trends of financial markets while missing the bigger AI picture. Technology insiders are becoming more nervous about the power of AI without adequate guardrails…

    It’s difficult to get away from Anthropic’s founder, Dario Amodei, confidently predicting a world where AI systems would be “better than almost all humans at almost everything” within 2 years. Implicit in this forecast is the rapid realisation by the rest of us that AI systems are soon going to be coding their own optimised functions. If you’re thinking Terminator and Skynet you wouldn’t be far wrong and we’ll definitely need more than Arnold this time. As the global geopolitical balance shifts towards lawless autocracy and fascist ‘might over right’, we seem as a species particularly ill-equipped for what’s to come. Amodei himself describes the challenge:

     

    “Humanity is about to be handed almost unimaginable power, and it is deeply unclear whether our social, political, and technological systems possess the maturity to wield it.”

     

    It feels like a moment of AI truth is approaching. If I were to strike an optimistic note, I’d be encouraged reality is beginning to break through to the public consciousness on a number of fronts. This could bring a very welcome return to valuing credibility, data and honesty. Populists beware and feast your eyes on these beauties:

     

    Brexit: The UK’s Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) has estimated the various costs of Brexit at 6-8% of GDP, £100 billion per year of structural economic losses, 4% productivity loss and 15% lower trade volumes.

    US Manufacturing: All the trade shakedowns, foreign investment ‘promises’ and noise about making America  manufacture again (Oh Mama!) resulted in 2025 manufacturing/factory construction spend actually FALLING by 7%. Oh, and the US has lost 70,000 manufacturing jobs since tariff ‘Liberation Day’ last April.

    US Trade: Just in…. the US trade deficit remained a stubborn $900 billion in 2025. That’s a microscopic 0.2% reduction in the deficit despite all the ‘winning’ and tariff chaos trumpeted by Agent Orange. And now for more breaking ‘winning’ news…. The Supreme Court of the United States has reportedly ruled, in a 6–3 decision, that tariffs imposed by Donald Trump were illegal. The ruling could leave the U.S. facing more than $150 billion in potential tariff refunds.

    That final datapoint of almost zero deficit reduction is just embarrassing. But it gets better. Shockingly, to nobody outside the US, other countries trading with the US are smarter than Howard “Nutlick” and his Commerce Department lackeys. The US trade deficit with Taiwan is now bigger than that with China. The last time that happened was in 1992!! It seems like the rubber is meeting the road for quite a few of these populist distractions. Indeed the final irony, 250 years after the US gained its independence, might be that the epic downfall of a British prince reveals the true colours and deceptions of a ‘King’ in Washington…..

  • Software Is Eating Your Pension….

    Software Is Eating Your Pension….

    Is it time to rip up our favoured playbooks? No, I’m not trying to steer Andy Farrell after that first half ‘traffic cone’ tackling effort in Paris. Nor will I hold out any hope of Britain’s Labour Party saving its government from the existential fallout of ignoring its own “Prince of Darkness” links to Epstein. Sir Keir Starmer’s premiership is already “dead in the water” but I will stick with the trading theme. Long-time political commentators are rightly appalled that Peter Mandelson tipped off Jeffrey Epstein and his elite rolodex/assets about a €500 billion bailout of the euro currency during the Greek debt crisis. The €500 billion number is huge in its own right but the derivative opportunities in banking debt, currencies, bond markets etc at the time were in the trillions and available for exploitation by Epstein & Co without any obvious trace. So, following on from last week’s article, we promised to dig deeper into the huge AI numbers hitting our screens. Actually, we won’t. Instead, we will focus on a related huge number with potentially massive knock-on/derivative investment implications.

    For me, the big number this week is the $1 trillion of value wiped from software stocks (and their SaaS subscription/business models) in just 6 days of trading. Of course, this is directly connected to the threat of AI and some developments, in particular, from the Anthropic/Claude suite of products which are making massive strides in assisting coders and companies to develop/manage their own work processes. Software, of course, is the incumbent go-to solution for companies seeking to optimise work processes and engagement with their customers. Indeed, the venture capital guru, Marc Andreessen, in 2011 was moved to say  “software is eating the world”. From Netflix to Uber to Amazon, digital subscriptions gave companies and consumers access to technology-optimised services. As AI invades the digital opportunity, software is possibly no longer the ‘always’ solution on the Boardroom table. In fact, software could be on the displacement menu itself. The twin threats of AI are summarised well by Business Insider:

     

    “First, if employees get more efficient using AI tools, companies may not need to buy as many business software subscriptions. That would dent the growth of “seats” or how many subscriptions software companies sell. Each employee has a seat, so if there’s no new hiring, growth stalls.

     The second threat is more existential. If AI tools and AI agents get good enough, companies could replace the software they use entirely and instead rely on new AI-powered workflows. And with AI coding tools showing big improvements lately, companies could even develop their own software, without needing to buy it from established vendors.”

     

    There are plenty of analysts and observers who disagree with the gloomy interpretation of AI’s eventual impact on software companies like SAP, Salesforce, Adobe, Figma and HubSpot. However, these company share prices falling by 30-40% in just one month, is telling us the ‘fear’ is real. The $1 trillion of value evaporation in less than a week is not an earth-shattering number given some individual companies are valued in the trillions alone. But… perhaps looking at the software value obliteration in isolation is misguided. The commentariat might think software fears are ‘overdone’ but, if you have a pension, this might be the less scary of TWO outcomes. The first is that software stocks growth and valuations are hit severely by AI replacement. However, there’s a second set of updated numbers/data to take a look at. While the software sector was being hammered, the AI/Cloud giants were announcing quarterly results. Interestingly, their earnings and sales growth numbers were pretty much ignored as the market focused on just one number; capital expenditure spend on AI infrastructure and development. Last week Facebook promised $135 billion of INVESTMENT in 2026 which equates to their total sales in 2023. Microsoft told us their number was circa $105 billion. This week it was Google and Amazon’s respective turns to talk the AI ‘space race’…

    Google, perceived as the AI leader these days, told the market it would spend a cool $185 billion. That equates to its total revenues in 2020(!). Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos seems happy to test out the theory that “Democracy Dies in Darkness” at the investment-starved Washington Post, as his primary wealth creation vehicle, Amazon, announces a planned $200 billion capex spend for 2026. So, the Big 4 are up for a $625 billion investment splurge this year and probably every year for the foreseeable future. That looks like a bet of $3 trillion to $5 trillion on AI, and I’m just wondering what the ‘risk’ calculations could be? I chose the ‘space race’ phrasing earlier deliberately. It feels like the prospect of AI failure for these companies is existential in terms of economic power and analogous to the geopolitical calculations at the height of the Cold War in the 1960s. Well, the historians would probably agree that Reagan’s “Star Wars”  broke the Soviet empire. It’s too early to tell who will ‘break’ in the AI race but software is in the crosshairs right now. However, the sense that big tech including software is ‘going for broke’ introduces a very new risk for financial markets.

    The beauty of software and SaaS business models is recurring revenues, huge scalability at minimal incremental cost, 80-90% margins and enormous cash flow generation. The end result can be seen in the massive spending plans of Big Tech; these companies’ balance sheets were sitting on enormous cash piles (or equivalent liquidity). Simply put, these were the most robust (credit risk) companies on the planet. Pension funds, family offices, sovereign wealth funds and Swiss bank accounts loved the security/risk safety attached to loans and bonds issued by tech/software companies. These instruments were considered “defensive”. Now, not so much.

    Stock/equities markets (as my former boss Terry Smith used to point out to me) occupy 28 of the 30 pages of the Financial Times. But, the last two pages covering debt, currencies, commodities etc are much more significant for financial markets. Now the bonds and loans associated with big technology companies are receiving intense scrutiny (and investor selling) as they each seek to out-spend their cash and balance sheet credibility. This has incredibly important implications for your pension. The credibility of the United States and global technology stocks are being reviewed for their ‘risk safety’. Some serious investment institutions are already acting and re-positioning. This doesn’t mean just selling. What investors are buying at the moment is telling too. Here’s a few data snippets to alert you to what is happening right now….

     

    *Software sector selling activity is the worst since 2008

    *Software valuations – forward price/earnings multiples of 20x – are now at levels (low) not seen since 2014.  

    *Now the buying: defensive consumer staples companies (Nestle, Mondelez, Heinz etc) have been up 1% on consecutive days while technology sector companies fell 1% on the same days. That divergence of performance has not happened since ….2000.

    *The same consumer staples stocks are experiencing buying intensity (“RSI” for the technicians) not seen since 1995. Other indicators (DMA 200 day) are 4.2 standard deviations above average.

     

    It looks like people are buying ordinary stuff; petfood, protein, household goods, chocolate….. really boring but real. We have written before that investors are flocking to atoms (real) and hedging/selling their risk with bits(digital code). One suspects the meltdown in crypto land (Bitcoin at $65,000, down over 50% from its highs) is also partly driven by digital ‘fear’. So, for those keeping an eye on the headlines and their pensions, you might want to check with your advisors on three areas:

     

    1. Pension exposure to technology (software or AI spend). It could be as high as 30% of your portfolio.
    2. Pension exposure to defensive real stuff. It could be as low as 5% of your portfolio.
    3. Pension exposure to the USA. It could be as high as 70% but there is currently a lawless armed militia running around the country, a Supreme Court in dereliction of its duty, international grift on an epic scale and the real threat of mid-term election suspension.

     

    The advisors won’t have all the answers but it should be on ALL pension radars. This period of history offers mind-boggling opportunity but we must be also aware that there is an unusual confluence of technology ambition/confidence and global political leadership operating in an environment where traditional values and rules are being disregarded. Hopefully, rules-based leadership will return soon but here’s a warning from Andrew Ross Sorkin’s book, 1929:

     

    “It’s a haunting elegy for a fractured era, a timeless reminder that progress is fragile, choices have repercussions, and the flaws embedded in the human condition are ours to confront”

     

    Might be time to make better choices and confront those flaws (including White House ape videos)….

  • A Wave Of Huge Numbers And New Thoughts

    A Wave Of Huge Numbers And New Thoughts

    Freezbrury waters are imminent, but I sense things are actually hotting up. I’m also conscious it’s Friday before a bank holiday weekend so will keep it light. Let’s just highlight a few significant datapoints from the tsunami of numbers bombarding our screens this week. Then, next week we might dive deeper. Not quite as low as Cruella “Reformed” Braverman, Commandant Greg “Himmler coat” Bovino, Stephen “Peewee German” Miller, or Kristi “ICE Barbie” Noem who definitely fall into wannabe Waffen SS territory. There’s something deliciously ironic about a world which has embarked on an artificial intelligence (AI) space race while “Trump Is Making America Stupider” per The Bulwark newsletter headline. Maybe the bots won’t need to be that good? Anyway, that possibility doesn’t seem to be stalling spending by global technology giants on AI… for now.

    My favourite AI datapoints this week come from Microsoft, Meta, Sandisk, OpenAI and ElevenLabs. Given these numbers are like an assault on the senses I think it’s best to present them in bullet form:

     

    • Microsoft’s fiscal Q2 update this week showed its cloud/AI order backlog rocketing by 110% to $625 billion. But, that wasn’t the show stopper or the share price killer (down 10% overnight). A whopping 45% of that backlog ($281 billion) was linked to one private start-up company, OpenAI.

     

    • Meta/Facebook also announced a huge number, but not a future revenue one. Its planned capital spending on AI infrastructure and development this year will be $135 billion. For context, as recently as 2023 Meta did not even generate this much money as its entire year’s REVENUES (not profits).

     

    • Lesser-known memory chip player, Sandisk, was the S&P 500’s best performing stock last year (+577%) as a beneficiary of investors’ search for AI ‘picks and shovels’. That story continues and is a reminder not to quit on your winners. Sandisk’s quarterly update this week beat expectations with 600% earnings growth and another 25% jump in the share price in after-hours trading. So far this year, the Sandisk share price is up 127%. Yep, just January.

     

    • In start-up land ElevenLabs is the hot AI Voice tool backed by Sequoia. It’s not just a hot investment, it’s a hot career choice. Only 0.018% of 180,000 job applicants in a 6 -month period get a job. As the brilliant VC commentator and fund manager, Harry Stebbings, pointed out, you are 200x more likely to get into Harvard.

     

    • Back to OpenAI. Yes, people worry about that famous FT graphic and OpenAI as the potential AI investment “weakest link”. However, the capital cavalry could be on its way. Latest chat is that OpenAI plans to IPO in Q4 2026 with a raise of $100 billion on a valuation close to $1 trillion. For historical context, the previous biggest IPO raise in history was $26 billion by Saudi Aramco.

     

     

    There’s now a bigger qualitative exploration of the AI theme due, given the pretty scary comments from OpenAI rival, Anthropic, CEO founder Daro Amodei. He reckons we are moving towards “AI systems that will be better than almost all humans, at almost all tasks….by 2026, 2027.” Check out the videos on social media showing how the likes of Moltbook and Clawd are blowing people’s minds with the power of their agentic capabilities.  Here’s a few other mind-blowing datapoints in a variety of areas where regular readers will know I have been thematically focused.

    Opportunity outside USA: We talked about real things (atoms) versus digital code (bits) previously. So, see how Brazil’s real asset-rich stock market has clocked 14% gains in January alone. However, the genuine head-rocker outside US stocks is the latest earnings growth  estimates for South Korea’s stock market. Goldman’s reckon earnings growth for the entire blue chip Kospi Index will be 75% in 2026. Note most of that earnings growth will come from two companies who are critically plugged into the supply squeeze for memory chips (RAM, DRAMs, thank you Mam) – Samsung and SK Hynix. Amazingly, South Korea’s stock market is now worth more than Germany’s DAX index ($3.25 trillion).

    Automation/Power Infrastructure: It’s not a huge surprise software stocks (SaaS) like SAP are being hurt by AI speculation, investment capital shifts. However, we should note the recent overtaking of SAP as the highest valued German company by Siemens. Its key three divisions? Automation processing, power/grid systems and transport infrastructure. Note none of the famous German auto stocks feature in this table-topping race.

    Electric Vehicles: Europe hit an inflexion point in recent weeks. Latest data shows EVs as a percentage of new car sales overtook traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) powered vehicles. Looks like ICE on two levels this week faces an existential threat. Thinking of not nice people, it was amusing to see Tesla post a 61% decline in profits in its results this week. Who knew, apart from Ryanair’s Michael O’Leary, that idiotic interfering in other people’s business (politics and privacy too) can be brand destructive…?

    Last thought, and this merits a much bigger discussion. The problems for Tesla might result in a $3 trillion mega-merger/pivot of SpaceX, Xitter, xAI and Tesla, but also subtly highlights the scale of manufacturing dominance exerted by China in the electrification race. While Trump focuses on Bruce Springsteen, White House ballrooms, Melania movies and Venezuelan oil grift, the Chinese are stealing a march on the US in so many technologies. Oh, and the Chinese consumer might be coming back. Apple just told us it had its greatest ever quarter in The Middle Kingdom. A 38% jump in China sales blew the hinges off all the ‘expert’ analyst expectations.

    Lots to think about over the weekend and well done to all who invested in Social Voice before its dramatic funding close; a great illustration of investor ‘social listening’  in the venture world of little gems.

  • Keep Your Eyes On The Prize, Not the ICE…

    Keep Your Eyes On The Prize, Not the ICE…

    I know, I know…. we’ve all heard enough of “big piece of ice”, “ICE”, “Iceland”, “hundreds of feet of ice”, “not on the frontlines” etc. And…best not mention the threat to the icy “G” spot (thousands of miles from Melania) which has ‘ruptured’ the rules-based world order. Anyway, it’s Friday and the past week felt like months before closing with the ‘bigliest’ TACO ever at Davos. Not the food version, but the geopolitical clown car currently posing as the leader-for-life of the autocrats anonymous therapy  group, The Board of Peace. Entry fee is a billion, leave your moral compass at the door. Parody is dead, but for investors not quite exhausted by awful, there are genuine investment prizes out there and they are developing nicely despite the Davos noise. The White House brown shirts in ICE might ask you not to believe your eyes and ears in Minneapolis, but for the next 3-4 minutes, just read and believe….

    Smaller companies are doing very well in 2026 on public markets. In fact, the smaller company US equities index, the Russell 2000, has beaten the blue chip S&P 500 index for the 14th consecutive day. That’s the best relative (small vs large) winning streak seen in markets since 1996. So, despite the headlines confidence in markets is actually pretty high. A more esoteric check on confidence can be found in the way bigger (than equities) bond/debt markets. Confidence in high quality company bonds is measured by the gap(extra cost) between US risk-free government bond yields (Treasuries) and the yields of the bonds(debt instruments) issued by companies themselves. The larger the gap(the “spread”), the larger the uncertainty of investors. So, check out current spreads of just 0.71% which are the lowest demanded by investors since 1998. In other words, investor confidence is riding high. That means many investment themes remain intact.

    Best performing US large company stock last year? Good ol’ Sandisk. Yep, it delivered 577% returns to investors in 2025 alone. Its run continues. Sandisk has just clocked another 110% return in January…That’s a 1,300% return in less than one year and a reminder that the ‘picks and shovels’ of AI infrastructure are still hot, hot, hot. Not long ago Sandisk was a stodgy old memory card company (think USB thumb drives) but memory chips have became a major supply bottleneck for AI development. Generative AI models like Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude need ever-increasing ‘context’ as reference data. Or, as we used to call it, memory. An interesting part of this story is Sandisk’s partnership with Japanese manufacturer, Kioxia, whose multi-decade expertise in manufacturing is delivering a significant cost advantage. There will be more Japan surprise cost/value stories this year but it’s no surprise to Gravitas readers of our “Japan Series” of articles in 2025. Take-private buyout deals in Japan hit a record $40 billion in 2025. Now, think about Japan household savings storing up $14 trillion of firepower which equates to more than three times its GDP. However, there’s another Japan story which is worth watching too…

    We keep writing about the bullying power of global bond markets. One of the biggest is Japan’s government bond market (JGBs). Last week witnessed Japanese government bond yields (cost of money) rising to levels not seen since the 1990s. That is a worry because Japan has a lot of debt (but also a lot of savings). However, there is a bright spot in this rising bond yield story. Ordinarily, inflation is a bad thing, particularly for bonds. But… in Japan, monetary authorities and successive frustrated governments have spent decades trying to generate inflation to encourage spending NOW, and not years in the future. Of course, bond yields can’t be let run out of control but if managed/balanced carefully, there will be many more buyout deals, venture capital growth and M&A in the Land of the Rising Sums….of investment capital. The bond yield spike is not just a Japanese phenomenon.

    US monetary authorities have been cutting interest rates since 2024 but bond yields (and mortgage rates) remain stubbornly high. In this instance investors are worried about Fed independence, tariff chaos and the vaporising of the rule of law in Washington. Somebody might have to explain to Agent Orange that bonds and debt instruments are financial contracts. Then again, that never meant much to him or his poor bankers in Manhattan during the ‘90s. However, this inflation uncertainty can be a good thing for particular parts of the investment markets. In particular, you will hear more about real assets. Atoms rather than bits. Anyone seen the silver price this week? Yep, $100 here we come.  Or check out Brazil. It makes and owns lots of real things in the agricultural, mineral and materials spaces. Brazil’s stock market is already up 10% year-to-date while US and European markets are sitting on more restrained returns of 1-2%.

    These are not new themes. Really this article is a reminder, despite the bewildering headlines and global ‘rupture’ (do read Canadian PM Mark Carney’s Davos speech), that investment and economic stories continue to develop along the same trajectories experienced in 2025. Indeed, to use Carney’s words, if there is a new theme/story, it is to look at the ‘middle powers’, not the autocratic gorillas, and explore opportunity in the likes of Japan, Brazil and ….. a Europe which finally stood down a bully with some not-so-subtle assistance from those law-loving global bond markets.

  • Don’t Get Angry, Get Ready….

    Don’t Get Angry, Get Ready….

    I was right. The first of my predictions for 2026 was spectacularly on the money. Sadly, it won’t make any of us wealthier given its focus on noise rather than direction. To refresh memories, the final words in my last article, Themes and Dreams For 2026, were as follows: “I’ve a feeling I won’t be short of writing material in 2026.” Little did I know there would be a year’s worth of material in just the first 10 days of 2026. Where do we start?

    The US is celebrating its 250th birthday by re-branding as an exploration company with an army (hat tip George Carlin) as Venezuela is ‘acquired’ and ‘takeover bids’ are lined up for the Panama Canal and Greenland. Back at HQ, the Boss re-asserts control of executive salaries and cash flows in the company’s defence supply divisions while promising a 50% expansion of investment ($1 trillion to $1.5 trillion) in its Business Development unit, previously known as the Department of War, and before that, as the Department of Defense. Meanwhile, the company’s traffic stop management division has secured immunity from regulatory or criminal oversight of its shoot-to-kill (or stop) policy on a nationwide basis, not just in Minneapolis. Of course, none of these revolutionary business initiatives can happen without funding. The company’s Treasury unit has set up overseas bank accounts to deposit proceeds of its newly acquired Venezuelan oil unit. In the interests of tax efficiency these bank accounts will be overseen directly by the Boss, and will not be consolidated in the parent company accounts. But, of course. However, US Inc is not the only company turning to oil….

    It is probably more accurate to say some companies are breaking with a seismic global shift to electric power. Again, it’s American-sourced exceptionalism. This week General Motors (GM) has followed Ford and abandoned its move in to electric vehicles (EV). These recent investment write-offs amount to $7 billion and $19 billion respectively which will hurt. But… that might not be the end of the pain. The train, or car, has already left the station. The Electric Age, per the superb Noah Smith, is here with 25% of cars purchased in 2025 of the EV variety. In many Asian and a few European countries that penetration rate is through the 40-50% level. China leads the world in the entire EV technology stack and have focused their attentions on battery production, manufacturing scale and grid expansion (solar). Fewer moving/motor parts, efficiency and superior performance are the current and long-term edge for EVs which will kill the internal combustion engine (ICE). Writer’s note: Be careful how you say or ‘weaponise’ that acronym these days.  All is political these days rather than factual which highlights why the US is making a fatal error on oil over electric. Noah Smith writes:

     

    The main reason America is missing the EV transition is that we’ve insisted on thinking of EVs in terms of climate — as a “green” technology whose purpose is to save the environment, rather than a superior technology whose purpose is to save you time and money. Trump canceled EV subsidies because he associates them with the environmental movement and the political left.

     

    It’s not just electric vehicles(EVs) experiencing their electric break-through moment. EVs share the same components as drones, trains, cameras, phones …..and robots. Just this week at the massive CES 2026 conference in Las Vegas, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang didn’t even blink when asked how long it would take for humanoid robots to match human-level ability. “This year”, he said. Guess what – those robots run on many of the exact same components which go inte EVs. Think batteries, power/motor electronics, sensors, software…..and AI. Clearly, in the AI piece of the assembly package, the US is perceived as the global leader. However, even AI and its support infrastructure is inextricably tied to electric power. And, before you say “but, but, but… the Venezuela oil reserves”, get ready for more non-delivery from the “stable genius” back at HQ. Venezuela currently produces less than a million barrels of oil per day. It’s like a rounding error of less than 1% of global oil production. Yes, that production level can grow but please note the lack of announcements from US oil company executives about investment plans and potential commercial negotiations with Venezuela’s 5,000 plus generals and regional warlords. While the Department of War was planning ‘business development’ in Latin America, China built more solar power capacity than the rest of the world combined in 2025. For perspective, that additional solar capacity of 380GW built in 2025 equates to 5x China’s total existing nuclear capacity (58 plants). Get ready or get digging on two fronts.

    First, we have written a lot in 2025 about the asynchronous explosion of excitement and revenue projections for the AI world and the mining sector. At certain times in 2025 one AI company, Nvidia, was worth 4 times more than the entire publicly listed mining sector. Get ready for a change. Gold, silver, platinum and copper prices have soared which has finally juiced the risk spirits of mining sector executives. We said the sector needed a big deal. Well, global giants Glencore and Rio Tinto are talking a megadeal again with a copper focus (yep, all that electricity) and a $260 billion valuation. Metals of course in earlier times were the basis for currency. In time, central banks became the back-stop or guarantor of currency but we might have to dig again.

    The global reserve currency, the US Dollar, lost almost 10% of its value in 2025. In isolation, this is not unprecedented. In fact, the Trump regime are quite keen on a softer dollar and lower interest rates for trade deficit and investment reasons. However, we must get ready for a further assault on institutional independence in the US. The current Fed Chair, Jerome Powell, is due to leave his post in May this year. The new appointee (apparently already decided by the Boss) will be expected to cut interest rates dramatically to keep Trump happy. However, the potential unintended consequence of this action in the context of a $40 trillion US national debt is loss of credibility for the Fed and its ability to prudently manage that debt, and the currency. Hopefully, the bond markets are more effective than Russian or Chinese radar systems in spotting and thwarting that assault on Fed and dollar credibility. A final word on markets and pensions.

    Those of you reading your pension updates/reviews for 2025 might be underwhelmed by the performance. Before you get angry, I would recommend a read of Terry Smith’s own review of his $20 billion fund which underperformed in 2025. As always, my former boss writes superbly and highlights some key factors driving investment markets these days. Terry always sticks to the basics and this might well be a theme for 2026. The thoughts above should ready minds for investment opportunities in electrification, real assets, financials, mining and assets located outside the exploitation company, US Inc, formerly known as the United States of America…..

  • Themes And Dreams For 2026

    Themes And Dreams For 2026

    This won’t help my US visa application any time soon. However, it is possible to be on the right side of history and seek investment opportunity too. History may record that 2025 was a dark year of barbarity in Gaza, criminal meat-grinder slaughter in Ukraine, trade tariff chaos, war crimes in Venezuelan waters and full strategic capture of US national security policy by the Kremlin. And, yet I’m hopeful. I will leave it to more mainstream outlets to review 2025. Instead, I’d like to take a look at a number of 2026 investment themes – new and old and not AI – which are developing in potentially unexpected ways. Many, in a good way.  Let’s take a look at the data and start to dream….

    Global Trade: Dare we return to Brexit. Anybody see the UK paying over €600m to re-join the EU’s Erasmus student exchange programme? Don’t worry. We are not going to re-visit Brexit but we are going to cite this as an example of slow-moving sanity repairing self-inflicted harm. Similarly, the “America First” tariff policies in Washington are now beginning to reveal some awkward truths. The mighty US dollar has slipped by 9-10% against other major currencies, US equities (+15%) have underperformed global equities (+29%) and the US manufacturing sector has been losing jobs for 7 months consecutively. Oh, and China, the original bipartisan focus of US trading ire, has just seen its trade surplus exceed $1 trillion for the first time in history. So much winning. What are the chances of US trade policy moving away from tariffs? Well, the polling for US mid-term elections in 2026 is looking pretty bleak for incumbent Republicans. And, the spectacular Vanity Fair quotes (more of them later) from Trump chief-of-staff, Susan Wiles, are prompting Washington insider speculation of a policy re-set or ‘cry for help’ from within the White House. To be clear, nobody sane thinks Wiles (in 11 recorded interviews with Vanity Fair) was unaware of the likely end result.  Bank on that. So…..

    Financials: If you’ve been dazzled by AI you might have missed the massive performance of financial stocks this year.  Financials in the US (+20%) have outperformed technology (+18%) but check out UK banks being tortured by a chaotic Labour government. The FTSE All-Share Banks index is up just the 56%!! In Europe the Euro Stoxx Banks index has clocked a 76% increase in value year-to-date. Meanwhile, Europe’s fintech banking star, Revolut, has completed its second funding round since August. The latest round was eye-catching for the $75 billion valuation achieved (vs $48 billion in August) and the backing of Nvidia’s venture capital arm. That’s a 56% increase in value in just a few months. More importantly, healthy performance in banks and financials usually reflects overall confidence in the global economic cycle despite the dark headlines. Bluntly, banks feel the fear first. It’s not there. In fact, the latest Bank of America investment survey shows investor sentiment at its strongest since 2021. And, that confidence might be showing up in strange places…

    Europe: There appears to be a growing view that Europe has been shocked into taking responsibility for its destiny on the geopolitical stage. The loss of the US as a reliable ally – outlined in the recently published National Security Strategy 2025 – means Europe must back its own. All the way. It was striking to read recently that in Europe, over the past 50 years, just 14 companies started from scratch ended up with valuations over $10 billion. In the US that number is 241!  German defence company, Rheinmetall AG, at €70 billion is now worth more than BMW, VW or Mercedes. Its value has appreciated 15x since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine. Unsurprisingly, Franco-German defence company, KNDS, is eying a €25 billion IPO in Amsterdam in 2026. Furthermore, conditions of ‘war’ have historically driven innovation. So, when the head of the UK’s MI6 intelligence services and its chief of defence staff both warn in the same week of the need “to be ready to fight”, we should expect a massive step up in investment in Europe across the board, to strengthen not just defence but energy grids, communications, technology, supply chains etc. Europe’s prompt for action might be scary but there might be a surprise further east….

    Geopolitics: Europe is still reeling from the stunning geopolitical alignment of Russia and the US sealed with the Kremlin’s approval of Washington’s National Security Strategy “as largely consistent with our vision”. Read that twice, watch the party of Ronald Reagan spin in its grave (yep it’s dead) and remember those famous Russo-proverbial words borrowed by Reagan…. “trust, but verify”. Then think about who is really driving the Ukraine peace talks. In recent weeks we have seen oil hit 5 year lows, the Russian economy battle rampant inflation, the Russian central bank selling its gold reserves and Europe moving to seize ‘indefinitely’ $200 billion of Moscow’s foreign reserve assets. If I were to offer a contrarian view on current peace talks, or even dream, I’d say Russia and Putin has more problems than we think. Furthermore, the unseemly haste of Trump’s agents, Witkoff and Kushner, to rush Ukraine into a Russian-written deal has a ‘frantic’ feel about it. Just a thought, or dream.  Of course, these are not the only deals which could light up 2026 in an unexpected way….

    Private Exits: The IPO pipeline of 2026 could break all sorts of records. Databricks has just completed a $3 billion Series L funding at a $134 billion valuation – yep that’s an “L”. We hear it so often now, but the private market really needs some big exits. OpenAI could be up for a $500 billion IPO. ByteDance ($480 billion) and Anthropic AI ($180 billion) are also on the blocks, as is Stripe with a $100 billion promise. I’m loath to mention the biggest of the lot, SpaceX, which is targeting a whopping $1.5 trillion 2026 valuation and thus pushing its owner Elon Musk in to trillionaire territory. Unless……

    Electric Vehicles: Ford might be grabbing the headlines this week with a monumental $19 billion walk away write-down of its electric vehicle (EV) projects. And, people worry about AI infrastructure over-spend? As China continues to accelerate away from the EV pack in its global dominance of the EV manufacturing ecosystem, whither Elon Musk’s Tesla? First, one can’t miss the opportunity to re-print Trump chief of staff Susan Wiles’s marvellous Vanity Fair assessment of Musk this week among others in this “only the best” Trump inner circle/cabinet. The New York Times summary is best:

     

    Trump’s White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles describes Trump as an “alcoholic’s personality”, JD Vance as a “conspiracy theorist for a decade” and Elon Musk as “an avowed ketamine user” and an “odd, odd duck” in an interview with Vanity Fair

     

    Hmmm. An odd, odd duck. Tesla might just be reaping the DOGE or DUCK whisperer whirlwind. Tesla currently is valued at $1.5 trillion with a price/earnings valuation of 327x. Yep, 327x – I might raid the ketamine jar too. You’d expect Tesla to be growing, right? Well, the ducks are lining up. November sales for Tesla were the lowest seen since 2022. The brand destruction by Musk’s dive in to right wing politics has been epic. In Europe not a single country achieved sales of more than 750 units, except France. If it walks like a duck, tweets like a duck…….we can only dream.

    Old Economy: Surprisingly, 5 of the “Magnificent 7” tech stocks have under-performed the AI-giddy market this year. In fact, the original perceived AI ‘loser’, Google, has been the stellar performer, up 56% year to date. Now, it might be worth taking another look at other ‘losers’. Defence and banking  stocks are already back in vogue, but in ‘war-like’ conditions the basics become critical too. So, it’s possibly no great surprise that the Basic Materials sector in the US has clocked the best sector performance by far, up 33%. As the race to electrify the global economy accelerates, critical minerals, precious metals and mining stocks stand to benefit from urgency, security and scarcity. Gold is up 65% year-to-date, silver has more than doubled and platinum is up 117%. Keep an eye on Mr Copper too with a 34% uplift in 2025.

    Plenty to think about above, and possibly dream too. What a year! I’ve a feeling I won’t be short of writing material in 2026.

    That’s nearly it folks for 2025. Thanks for reading and the words of encouragement along the way.