Gravitas Spark CrowdFunding

Tag: Investment

  • Strong Grounds For Optimism, And Action….

    Strong Grounds For Optimism, And Action….

    I should be terrified. Watching Netflix’s House of Dynamite was definitely disturbing. In real life, the guy with the nuclear codes is having another Canada tantrum and refusing to rule out a third presidential term. Meanwhile, financial market headlines are full of ‘bubble’ talk as Hallowe’en approaches and yet…… I’m suddenly very optimistic. It might be Hallowe’en season but there are two other ‘seasons’ in full swing which could bring significant wealth enhancement. Firstly, we are in the middle of corporate earnings results for Q3. Secondly, Irish earners will soon be looking for opportunities before year end to invest in EIIS-eligible deals to reduce their income tax costs and balance their investment portfolios. My sense is that the stars are aligning nicely for a further burst of action in the next few months. As always, companies need to lead so check out the latest developments.

    We mentioned Q3 earnings season but we didn’t mention the “Magnificent 7” superstar tech stocks dominating the financial headlines. Deliberately so. The latest ‘tot up’ of Q3 earnings reveals a much broader participation of companies in healthy earnings reports. So far, 145 companies out of the S&P 500 index have reported Q3 earnings. A whopping 84% of those companies “beat” analysts earnings forecasts which is the highest “beat” rate seen in four years (Source: Bloomberg).  Average earnings growth across the reporting companies is on track for a year-on-year acceleration of 15%. The bottom line, literally, is that operational fundamentals are very strong. Critically, this profit growth is spreading to smaller companies; the Russell 2000 index of smaller companies is clocking an even higher 2025 profit uplift of 25%. You might have to pinch yourself, then check your notes re current challenges faced by companies. Try these for starters:

     

    • Global disruption to supply chains and energy markets due to Ukraine war.
    • Relatively high interest rates since 2022.
    • Tariff and trade chaos thanks to the unstable ‘genius’ in the White House.


    In many ways these are historical known ‘unknowns’ in Rumsfeld-speak. However, the positive twist on this uncertainty is that, if companies are able to generate significant profit growth despite these challenges, then this generation of corporates must be fundamentally very robust. This opens up another possibility, a very exciting one. What if interest rates were now beginning to fall and China and the US were about to agree a trade framework? Well, there’s a 97% chance (per money markets) of the Fed cutting interest rates this week and the news from the Trump trip to Asia is positive on a China deal happening too. Dare we dream of a Ukraine breakthrough? We might ease up on the Kool-Aid there, but we do note a weekend article in The Telegraph about Putin’s fears of a coup. We will continue to dream. However, the deal junkies in the private equity world seem to be picking up on the same fundamental positivity.

    Blackstone’s COO, Jon Gray, in its Q3 results call with Wall Street analysts was certainly pointing to more activity:

     

    “Directionally healthier markets, more liquid markets, better credit markets, better IPO markets; that’s healthier for realizations….The deal dam is breaking.”

     

    Closer to home, private equity exits in Europe’s financial services have reached an all-time high with 77 deals year-to-date worth $31 billion. As we wrote last week…… Banks are SOOOO back! However, it would be a mistake to think this was frothy financial ‘engineering’. In fact, it’s more engineering than finance on a global basis. Private equity investment deals in global infrastructure have rocketed by 44% year-on-year to $25 billion. That’s the second highest total deal value seen in a decade. Clearly, there is a lot more going on than an AI revolution. In the Spark Private world of venture funding and smaller private equity deals we keep a close eye on smaller company activity benchmarks. Two caught the eye this week:

     

    • Smaller company tech equity indices in the US are up 23%…. in just 3 months.
    • Small company industrials are hitting new all-time highs and breaking out on technical charts.

     

    An environment where global trade tensions, interest rates, corporate earnings, smaller company valuations and private equity deal activity are all moving in the right direction will undoubtedly generate more deal opportunities. Pitchbook’s latest review of European private equity (PE) activity is telling:

     

    “A run of large-cap deals in Q3, buoyed by interest rate cuts and improved macro stability, saw European PE dealmaking grow to €177.1 billion (about $206.7 billion) in Q3…….37% of overall PE deal value, €66 billion, came via 19 deals worth over €1 billion—more than Q1 and Q2’s mega-deal value combined. In total, 48 mega-deals took place in Europe over the first nine months of the year. That figure is expected to approach 70 by year-end, making 2025 one of the most active years for such deals in the region on record.”

     

    So enough of the headlines, where’s the action for private investors? The key questions for many investors at this time of year are…

     

    How can I access the deal flow?

     

    Can I do it in a tax friendly manner?

     

    Spark Private can help on both fronts. More specifically, investors can quickly build a well-diversified portfolio of 7-8 companies with top-calibre teams, EIIS tax rebates and genuine structural growth opportunities in a matter of months. Now, for the action…..YOUR action.

  • Banks Are So Back!!!

    Banks Are So Back!!!

    It’s a weird world right now. I endured another episode of “The Celebrity Traitors” last night and wondered how the US version would work without offending the Kremlin ‘besties’ and reality TV cast of Mar-a-Lago. And who knew Joe Marler would out-smart Stephen Fry? Serious kudos to the rugby front row forwards fraternity. Anyway, park reality TV and let’s face market reality. Another weird one very close to home – Irish banks are now achieving 89% customer satisfaction ratings. It’s amazing what one can achieve by leaving the small business sector completely unbanked in terms of risk capital. However, it can’t be denied that banks are SO back in a global sense. And, some are really ratcheting up the risk dial. Today’s article is really a whistlestop tour of global financial sector developments which caught the eye in recent weeks.

    Let’s kick off with Blackrock Inc. It’s results season and Larry Fink’s giant asset manager recorded net inflows of investment monies in excess of $250 billion in Q3 alone. Blackrock’s current total assets under management (AUM) have just hit a record $13.5 trillion, yep trillion. You might say Blackrock is not a bank but if you look closer at those investment inflows, you’ll see private credit(lending) is a huge driver of asset growth. You’d be right in thinking that other institutions are competing or replacing banks in the financing space. That trend brings its own risks. Indeed, the IMF took the opportunity in its 6 monthly Financial Stability Report to warn about “the rapid growth of non-bank financial institutions”. Then, the EU’s Single Resolution Board (which ultimately sorts bank collapses) also warned this week of the “dire” consequences of a non-bank failure. Sounds nervy, but the financial services sector is enjoying record growth thanks to the lack of nerves among investors…

    Robinhood, the trading platform loved by meme-stock and crypto fund day-traders, has seen its share price rocket by 250% since January this year. Then check out Charles Schwab, the US broker/trading platform which started out in commercial life as a newsletter with 3,000 subscribers, and was briefly owned by Bank of America in the 1980s. I had to wipe my eyes on this one, but Schwab now holds $11.6 trillion of investor assets and has just announced its intention to offer digital currency (crypto) trading in 2026. That number was just over $4 trillion when Covid-19 struck. This growth in assets can be equated to the growth of balance sheets and collateral to be used in further investing activity. We can’t avoid mentioning AI but the infrastructure spending by cash rich tech giants is another boon for investment bankers. The latest data from research house, Gartner, is that global AI spending will be $2 trillion in 2026. Amazingly, the star of our most recent article, OpenAI, sits in the middle of $1 trillion of that spending. Needless to say, Wall Street investment banks are doing cartwheels as big tech names compete with each other to announce bigger and bigger spending plans as their share prices(and executive option pools) rocket on each headline. No wonder luxury laggard, LVMH, is seeing its share price suddenly perk up. It’s not alone.

    Investment banking blue chips like JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs all posted record equity trading activity and revenues. The Daily Upside summed up the joy across the wealth and brokerage spectrum:

     

    “Results from other financial firms this week also showed that clients from scrappy retail traders to high-net-worth jetsetters are hankering for equities and investments. Wealth units at Bank of America  (revenue up 19% year over year to $1.3 billion), Goldman Sachs (up 17% to $4.4 billion), Morgan Stanley (up 13% to $8.2 billion) and more notched high marks. Customer assets at Schwab competitor Interactive Brokers rose 40% to $757.5 billion, and daily trades there rose 47% to $3.86 million.” 

     

    But it is a weird world. The crypto universe cratered last weekend as Bitcoin elevator-shafted investors with a 20% drop in price from $126,000 to $105,000. Then gold keeps marching remorselessly to $5,000/oz in $100 clips. There is a sense that different cohorts of investors are buying different assets but there’s enough liquidity (investment flow) to drive EVERYTHING upwards. It was striking to see in Schwab’s record inflows that Gen Z and Millenial investors accounted for a third each of new accounts being set up and looking for equity exposure mainly. Meanwhile in California, there’s a new bank coming. Erebor is a new crypto-focused bank which received federal approval this week. The excellent Morning Brew newsletter reports:

     

    “The new venture will offer traditional and crypto-oriented banking to upstart tech companies and the ultrawealthy, according to its charter application and approval letter. It needs another stamp of approval from more federal officials before operations can commence, but road bumps are unlikely under President Trump’s crypto-friendly administration.”

     

    Before you think it’s all crypto and AI out there, keep an eye on more familiar moves. Goldman Sachs has done an interesting deal buying Industry Ventures for nearly $1 billion. Small beer you might think, but Industry Ventures is in the venture capital ecosystem with $7 billion of VC assets bought from other VCs (known as secondaries). Clearly, Goldman is taking a view on more VC deals/exits happening and should be a boost for the start-up world. Oh, and JP Morgan are going to put $10 billion to work in nationally important industries and supply chains. In fact JP Morgan sees itself involved or banking $1.5 trillion of projects in the coming years. Here’s what those deals might look like…

    Meta/Facebook has just sealed a $30 billion private capital deal to finance its Hyperion data centre build in rural Louisiana. Here’s the kicker – Meta retains only 20% ownership. Morgan Stanley has arranged $27 billion of debt and $2.5 billion of equity in a special purpose vehicle (SPV). Yip, that’s a more than 10:1 debt-equity structure. Welcome to the world of superhero collateral in the form of AI infrastructure. This is the largest private capital deal ever but expect many more over the next few years. Of course, there are concerns.

    FT headlines this week highlighted poorly structured loans (read opaque dodgy) going wallop and hitting US regional banks’ share prices badly. Also, volatility in financial markets is picking up. However, the key drivers of global investment activity are big tech firms, private capital, sovereign funds etc and they have trillions of cash and collateral to deploy. This is not quite TMT era when the major players, telcos and media, were already swamped with debt. Returns on investment will obviously be the metric to watch in the future but arguably we are a few years away yet from getting visibility on AI’s payback. So get ready for more deals, more AI and more financial services profit joy. You’d almost be tempted to get exposure to these big structural trends. Well….. keep your eyes peeled next week as Spark Private will have a very interesting deal for you with a strong blend of alternative assets, financial services and AI baked into the offer.

    We are SOOOO back.

  • Virtuous Circle Or Circle Of P..AI..N?

    Virtuous Circle Or Circle Of P..AI..N?

    I’m getting flashbacks. Not good ones. Financial ‘engineering’ was a feature of the world’s last two financial crises. In the TMT bubble collapse, Enron used its stock as collateral in long-term contracts or asset sales which were described as “circular hedging transactions”. The goal or impression sought was to mitigate risk but ultimately all risk was really tied to the Enron share price. In the credit crisis of 2008/2009, new ways of packaging property debt with a bewildering array of acronyms (CLO, CMO, RMBS etc) were supposed to insulate risk within different tranches. Until, they didn’t.

    Now, I’m reading about new ways to finance the AI boom and, again, the risks keep coming back to a very narrow collateral pool. The word “circular” is back and one name keeps cropping up; OpenAI. My newsfeed has been bombarded with multiple graphics from Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs and The Financial Times (see below) illustrating this circularity accompanied by headlines stating that OpenAI is at the centre of a $1 trillion AI infrastructure spending boom. And, I thought they were just building a chatbot (ChatGPT).

     

     

     

    Here’s a few things you might have missed about OpenAI….

     

    A recent funding round valued OpenAI at $500 billion, the world’s most valuable private company, but….

     

    It generates NO cash. Latest figures for H1 2025 reveal revenues of $4.3 billion while incurring a net loss of $13.5 billion. Yep, it’s losing more than 3 dollars for every dollar of sales it generates.

     

    OpenAI has signed up to $1 trillion of deals with the likes of Oracle ($300 billion), Nvidia ($100 billion), AMD ($80 billion) and Coreweave ($22 billion). The Stargate project alone is a $500 billion infrastructure project.

     

    OpenAI’s core product, ChatGPT, has built a weekly user base of 800 million people.

     

    Now, let’s return to the deals. I’m not sure the graphics of circularity really capture what’s going on. In recent weeks the world’s most valuable company, Nvidia, announced a $100 billion investment in OpenAI. In return, OpenAI will buy Nvidia’s graphic chips (GPUs) as it builds out its data centre infrastructure. You can see the circular vendor-financing risk in that deal. However, in the last 24 hours OpenAI has announced a further deal with Nividia rival chip maker, AMD. I’m going to lean on Bloomberg’s excellent Matt Levine in imagining the language of current deal negotiations with the loss-making OpenAI.

     

    OpenAI: We would like six gigawatts worth of your chips to do inference.

    AMD: Terrific. That will be $78 billion. How would you like to pay? 

    OpenAI: Well, we were thinking that we would announce the deal, and that would add $78 billion to the value of your company, which should cover it.  

    AMD: …

    OpenAI: …

    AMD: No I’m pretty sure you have to pay for the chips.  

    OpenAI: Why?

    AMD: I dunno, just seems wrong not to

    OpenAI: Okay. Why don’t we pay you cash for the value of the chips, and you give us back stock, and when we announce the deal the stock will go up and we’ll get our $78 billion back.

    AMD: Yeah I guess that works though I feel like we should get some of the value?

    OpenAI: Okay you can have half. You give us stock worth like $35 billion and you keep the rest.

     

    Levine is spot on. It has been bothering me for weeks now. CEOs in the tech world have spotted that a company’s share price goes up on the announcement of huge spending plans (not profits). In extremis, one could route the “value” of the share price gain to a cash-strapped customer like OpenAI. Funnily enough, AMD’s share price rocketed 35% on the OpenAI deal news adding $60 billion to its market value. And, so the merry go round continues. Sure enough, Nvidia, has responded to the behind-the-back dealing of OpenAI with rival AMD by announcing a $2 billion investment in OpenAI rival, xAI, owned by Elon Musk. The total funding round for xAI will be $20 billion but there’s a few extra ‘engineering’ twists. The $20 billion ($7.5 billion equity, $12.5 billion debt) is going into a special purpose vehicle (SPV – remember them?) which will buy GPU chips for xAI’s Memphis Colossus 2 data centre. The SPV, in turn, will rent out the GPU chips for 5 years, with the debt backed by the chips rather than the company. Hmmmm. The rent and SPV details should raise alarm bells.

    The attraction of constructs like rent, leases and special vehicles is that it increases the complexity of an organization and also makes it more difficult to track the true returns (or not) of a company. Rent and leases are considered off-balance sheet items ie they don’t show up as DEBT on the balance sheet. To complete the circle, I’m reading about Oracle today and its astonishing $380 billion in revenue it will generate by renting out its cloud servers to OpenAI and other AI developers over the next 5 years. Oracle can’t afford a rent default. It is not cash rich like Google or Microsoft. In fact, its debt-equity ratio is a whopping 520%. Michael Cembalest at JP Morgan put it rather well…

     

    “Oracle’s stock jumped by 25% after being promised $60 billion a year from OpenAI, an amount of money OpenAI doesn’t earn yet, to provide cloud computing facilities that Oracle hasn’t built yet, and which will require 4.5 GW of power (the equivalent of 2.25 Hoover Dams or four nuclear plants), as well as increased borrowing by Oracle whose debt to equity ratio is already 500% compared to 50% for Amazon, 30% for Microsoft and even less at Meta and Google. In other words, the tech capital cycle may be about to change.”

     

    Change, yes. But some things never change in credit or investment cycles. OpenAI might be at the centre of a $1 trillion investment revolution driving stock prices ever higher. But, ultimately “other people’s money” will make its presence felt. Bloomberg is reporting that the amount of debt tied to AI has ballooned to $1.2 trillion. This makes AI the largest segment(14%) of the investment-grade market, surpassing US banks. That means more eyes and scrutiny on the circular world of AI. Bluntly, if a problem emerges it won’t be seen in the stock markets first. It will be in the bond markets with its army of credit analysts. As a final thought, and given the scrutiny applied to the track records of key entities in investment ecosystems, what must credit analysts think of OpenAI?

     

    • As recently as 2023, the OpenAI CEO, Sam Altman, was fired, then re-hired.
    • OpenAI co-founder, Elon Musk, is now a bitter and richer rival.
    • The company is a strange governance hybrid with control residing in a non-profit Board.
    • OpenAI and early backer, Microsoft, have been in dispute over their partnership terms.
    • CEO Sam Altman was quoted this week in FT saying becoming profitable was “not in my top-10 concerns”
    • Recent $100 billion investor in OpenAI, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, was not told about the deal with rival, AMD.

     

    None of the above makes OpenAI a bad credit. But, with trillions of dollars of investment capital on the line any loss of confidence in OpenAI could spiral rapidly into a whole new circle of “engineering” PAIN.

  • Think Big, Think Private

    Think Big, Think Private

    Well, that wasn’t so bad. Said no US general summoned to Quantico this week by their spray-tanned hardened bosses. I actually was thinking more about September and its data-earned reputation as historically the worst month for stock markets. Scratch that. The key benchmarks for equities, the S&P 500(up 4.25% in the month) and the Nasdaq(up 5.6%), blew the hinges off investor expectations amid lots of ugly headlines. Public markets are on an absolute tear, but investors playing catch up and wondering how to get involved could be understandably wary. I’d be wary too, but in a more nuanced way. My sense is the out-sized influence and weight of big tech in public markets is troubling. Try these statistics for size…

     

    *AI chip superstar, Nvidia, at $4.6 trillion is now worth more than Apple, Saudi Aramco and the entire German stock market…combined.

    *The “Buffett Indicator” is a trusted temperature check on US stock market euphoria which tracks the ratio of total US stock market value to US GDP. Currently that metric is touching 217%, or about 70% above trend.

    *Another long-run measure of ‘value’ is the Shiller PE Ratio (CAPE) which divides the current value of US markets (S&P 500) by the earnings of its constituent companies over the previous 10 years. That metric is over 40x for the first time since the dotcom bubble of 2000.

    *Options markets are not for the faint-hearted. So, it was striking to see the September 19th expiry date attract over $5 trillion of notional option exposure. More striking was that the majority of options players (62% of S&P 500 volume) in August were seeking ultra-high risk “Zero Day” instrument exposure (expiry within 24 hours). That is seat-of-pants stuff.

    *Intel’s share price has rocketed 50% since September, Google is up 68% since April, and Tesla’s stock has doubled in the same period while making the DOGE-whisperer, Elon Musk, the world’s first half trillionaire. Yep, $500 billion.

    *Nvidia’s stock market value is now bigger than the GDP of 180 countries, including India and its 1.4 billion people.

     

    You get the ‘big tech’ picture. Now for some historical context. Remember Palm Inc and its PalmPilot?  When Palm listed as an IPO 25 years ago, it was worth more than Apple, Amazon, Google and Nvidia combined. There is a cautionary tale there, but not the key point of today’s article. The sheer intensity and speed of capital flows in the listed large cap arena is telling us there is a massive investment shift happening. However, it is possibly too late to ‘pick’ the winners in the public markets, and one could end up picking today’s Palm Inc. However, private equity and venture capital markets have been left behind by public markets. Private investment flows and deals have slowed (with the exception of AI deals) due to subdued exit, M&A, and IPO activity, further hampered by levels of geopolitical uncertainty we haven’t seen in 50 years. The critical point is that private markets are likely to ultimately benefit from the trickle-down impact of public markets hitting all-time-high valuations. I would highlight four interesting developments:

     

    1. The leveraged buy-out (LBO) of gaming giant, Electronic Arts(EA), at $55 billion is the biggest ever and beats the $45 billion KKR deal to buy TXU way back in 2007. This time the buyer consortium is led by the Saudi PIF and Silver Lake. The EA buy-out adds to a wave of M&A in Q3 which will have topped $1 trillion in total global deal volume for only the second time in history.
    2. The latest funding round of OpenAI was a sale of $6.5 billion of employee stock putting the valuation of the ChatGPT owner at $500 billion. That makes it possibly the most valuable private company in the world. For those thinking it’s just AI giddiness, it’s not the only $500 billion private opportunity…
    3. We have written before about the fast-approaching age of stablecoins. So, we were intrigued to see stablecoin platform, Tether, launch a funding round of $15-20 billion which would value the financial services player at $500 billion, overtaking the value of Bank of America(!).
    4. These are all big beasts in the private markets. What about the small guys? Well, if you thought tech(+11.6%) and the Nasdaq (+9.7%) had a great last 3 months, you might be surprised that smaller companies in the Russell 2000 index did even better (+13.5%). Note 50% of the constituent companies in that index LOSE money.

     

    Arguably, the smaller company index is the best proxy for the Spark Private world of start-up tech and smaller private equity deals. So, evidence of small company catch-up is a positive indicator. Furthermore, Spark Private investors have a real opportunity to gain exposure to the digital currency infrastructure, AI and private equity themes above in our upcoming deal pipeline. Note we are also entering EIIS ‘season’ so investors fearing they’ve missed out on public/pension opportunities will be able to use the private markets to balance out their risk budgets at highly attractive tax-assisted valuations.

    The public markets are clearly telling investors to think BIG, but valuation risks are rising rapidly. Our message is BIG too, but private as valuations (not risk) resume an upward trajectory. Watch closely, those BIG theme deals are coming very soon.

     

     

  • Have You Checked Your Pension’s American Assets Recently?

    Have You Checked Your Pension’s American Assets Recently?

    I’m nervous. This won’t win me a Nobel Peace Prize, a Pulitzer or a Green Card but it must be said. The United States is the richest, most successful and most powerful country in the world. On a global basis, we owe the United States on many levels, be it culture, sport, technology, education, medicine, defence, investment capital, tourism or friendship. Closer to home, our fortunes and miraculous recovery from a Troika bail-out are inextricably linked to US commercial supremacy. The vast majority of our pensions reflect that supremacy by holding significant amounts of US debt/bonds or stocks. EVERY pension should have exposure to US assets but risk radars are flashing red for a seismic investment shift. Behind the headlines and in the critical plumbing of the global financial system, there is increasing evidence of a global ‘exit’ from the US. That might sound odd and inevitably the counter view will cite current data which paints a record-rosy picture.

    US and global stock markets are regularly hitting record highs in recent weeks. However, the US stock markets have been clocking up vastly superior returns compared to other major bourses in the 16 years since the GFC. This outperformance of US assets has resulted in extreme levels of US weightings in global indices/benchmarks which your pensions are attempting to either track or beat. A recent Deutsche Bank research note flagged IMF data showing US equities now accounting for 67% of Bloomberg’s World Index. That’s quite the weighting for a country which represents 15% of global GDP. Go back 20 years, and the US actually accounted for a higher 19% of global GDP.  In 2005 US equities made up 51% of the same Bloomberg World Index. For context, Europe(EU) accounts for 12% of global GDP and 14% of the Bloomberg index. Of course, the big driver is technology stocks where the 6 top US tech companies are currently valued at $20 trillion, or more than the GDP of China. The AI/cloud (AI) revolution might be the more specific driver but is this hiding a bigger picture?

    According JP Morgan’s always interesting Michael Cembalest, “AI related stocks have accounted for 75% of S&P 500 returns, 80% of earnings growth and 90% of capital spending growth since ChatGPT launched in November 2022.” AI is indeed the gift that keeps on giving for US markets. But there’s giving and then there’s giddy. I’m not sure if anyone can keep up with tech companies trying to out-do each other on the size of their investment spend announcements. It has clearly been noted by the tech C-Suite that, if you announce huge investment spend on chips, data centres or any AI related infrastructure, your share price and stock options go up. Microsoft says $100 billion, Google says $85 billion, Alibaba says $53 billion and Nvidia thinks they’ve a better twist. This week Nvidia promised to invest $100 billion in ChatGPT parent, Open AI. Excellent news but where’s the $100 billion going? Ah, that would be mostly going back to Nvidia whose AI chips will be used in Open AI’s data centres. Yep, readers might see the Baldrick-esque possibilities around circularity and vendors(Nvidia) financing customers like Open AI. Anyway, investors seem optimistic, for now. Moving away from AI, and the risk of over-investment, there’s a bigger worry for US corporates and their share prices.

    The S&P 500 broke another record in recent weeks. Valuations observed by investors these days seem to ignore earnings multiples (Tesla P/E of 200x anybody?) and focus on revenues. However, there’s a traditional metric, the price-to-book ratio, which compares the market value(price) of a company to net assets (total assets minus liabilities aka book value). Where the ratio exceeds 1x, the valuation of the company is capturing ‘intangibles’ like goodwill, brand and future investment/revenue acceleration. Currently, the S&P 500 is trading at a price/book of 5.3x. That’s higher than the peak of the TMT ‘bubble’ in 2000. For context, that metric dropped to 1.6x in 2009. Of course, many companies are more ‘asset-lite’ these days and enjoy higher price/book and revenue multiples. But… there is an intangible element in many US companies’ valuation which is critically important to their premium rating over competitor companies in other countries; goodwill and/or brand power. You can see the potential goodwill problem.

    I’m no Jimmy Kimmel so it’s best be straight rather than funny. Corporate America from Disney to Tesla to law firms is haemorrhaging “goodwill” and brand value. Two thirds of the global middle-class will come from India and China by 2030. Yet, right now the US assets of Chinese video platform, TikTok, are being seized/transferred to White House friendly oligarchs while India is dealing with punitive Ukraine-related tariffs (not Russia?) and a shake-down on vitally important H-1B visas for overseas technology professionals (70% of recipients are Indian). Friendly countries like South Korea are in shock after ICE raids on Hyundai’s plant in Georgia and the detainment of more than 300 Korean workers. Trump’s speech this week to the UN with “your countries are going to hell” could have been shortened to a simple message of “Go to Hell” to the rest of the world. Anecdotally, the news from Canada is a window into future “ally” consumer behaviour. Supermarket shelves are seeing a buyers boycott of many US products as car traffic across the US-Canada border craters by 34% according to latest August data. Meanwhile, corporate America and its leaders cower in silence while the Trump White House vandalises US institutions, global trade and sovereign alliances. The assault on US rule of law is captured in almost every headline emerging from Washington:

     

    Trump’s new ABC threat proves Jimmy Kimmel right – CNN

     

    Former FBI Director James Comey expected to be indicted on criminal charges – The Guardian

     

    Trump pressure on Bondi to charge political foes could backfire – NBC News

     

    US Supreme Court ruling lets Trump fire top official – BBC News

     

    The final headline featuring the Supreme Court is critical to the risk profile of the US. Investors are worried that the Supreme Court will let the Trump regime interfere with the Federal Reserve Board, the most important financial institution in the world. The Fed underpins the status of the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency. That credibility is under threat as the dollar’s value against a basket of major currencies has fallen by 10% this year. That ‘fallen’ bit is people selling the US dollar and buying other stuff. Like Gold. Lots of investors are liking bullion’s 40% increase in value year-to-date. I’m not so sure it’s a positive signal. I’m also watching deposits sitting in US money market accounts hit a record $7.7 trillion, treble the number just 8 years ago.

    These depositors are not the only ones not fully convinced about the US being the “hottest” country on the planet. Investors SOLD $3.8 billion of US stocks last week (Source: BofA Securities) with institutions and hedge funds the biggest sellers by far in one of the highest exit numbers seen this year. Oh, and if record US stock markets sound positive, context is everything. The whole world is up this year and OUTPERFORMING the US. The S&P World ex-US Index is up over 20% year to date compared to US equity markets up only 10%. But…it’s worse than that if you factor in US dollar weakness. Returns for overseas investors in US equities are closer to ZERO this year. To be clear, this re-rating of US assets will happen over years not weeks but commercial contracts, the law and international treaties require a high degree of confidence. Imagine how Canada and Mexico feel right now re-negotiating a deal which Trump himself shook hands on as recently as July 2020. His own deal. Investors will deal too, and consider a sea change in how the US attracts talent (H-1B, visas), investment capital (Fed, US dollar) and goodwill (premium equity ratings). Sadly, US-based investors might struggle for similar analysis in their media.

    Despite Trump railing against windmills (literally) and media bias, the awkward truth is that the wealthiest person in the world, Elon Musk, owns Twitter/X. The second wealthiest person in the world, Larry Ellison, owns Paramount(including CBS) and will now be taking over TikTok and CNN. Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post and Twitch. Mark Zuckerberg owns Facebook and Instagram. Throw in Larry Page as Google’s controlling shareholder and that looks like the top 5 richest men in the world are ALL media owners. It also looks like oligarchy. US corporate leaders should also consider another consumer shift within the borders of the US.

    Research from Moodys using Federal Reserve data shows the top 10% of earners in the US now account for 50% of all consumer spending. In the early 1990s (before Fox News) that number was closer to a third of all spend. Disney just discovered (as corporate America said zippo) that the average person felt that taking a comedian off air after government threats was plain un-American, and proceeded to cancel in massive numbers their Disney+ and Hulu subscriptions. Maybe, the 90% will push back on other White House over-reach? I’m not so sure, and that’s not good for US assets or pensions in the long run. Investment securities, after all, are contracts and the undermining of the rule of law will end in tears. Or, something less oligarchic. As my favourite bear strategist, Albert Edwards, said this week when posting the Bloomberg chart below, “When I look at this chart, I look at my calendar and just wonder when I should pencil in the next revolution..”   The chart dramatically shows consumer sentiment splitting sharply between the ‘have yachts’ and ‘have nots’…..

  • Follow The Deals…

    Follow The Deals…

    The White House has approved this article. Oh, wait. That’s just my slow-learning chatbot co-writer, Eric, getting nervous. Silly boy. He’s still being trained and doesn’t understand how the world works yet. Of course, as Disney and Jimmy Kimmel have just discovered, if you want to get a deal done in the USA these days you do need the approval of the Dear (or Expensive) Leader. Beijing watchers will know that a centrally controlled economy dictates whether M&A deals get done, or not. For Disney, it needs regulatory approval for a deal acquiring 10% of ESPN in exchange for NFL sports broadcasting rights. For Nextra who cancelled Jimmy early, it is awaiting FCC approval for its $6.2 billion merger with Tegna. This all makes worrying sense, but on a positive note I’m sensing an exciting pick-up in the wider world of M&A outside the truth-strangled US media. Let’s take a look at a few deal developments and note how they tick more than a few thematic boxes.

    A is for AI and we just can’t avoid it. The good news is that the AI ‘space race’ is spilling over into the wider tech world and is not just a ‘Magnificent 7’ phenomenon. Last week we touched on “forgotten” Oracle flagging a $450 billion contract backlog for its AI cloud business. This week it’s struggling chip manufacturer, Intel, receiving the AI love. Fresh from accepting an “invite” from the US government (not China) to take a 10% ownership stake, Intel has just received a $5 billion investment from chip superstar Nvidia in exchange for approximately 4% of the company. Intel’s share pricy duly rocketed 22% in a matter of hours for its best day since… 1987. Back in 2011, Marc Andreessen wrote “software is eating the world”. More recently, we have flagged a significant shift in technology – hardware is hot. AI has focused minds on chips and cloud infrastructure with the most valuable company in the world now a hardware company (ahead of software beast Microsoft). In fact, 5 of the 10 most valuable companies on the planet are technology hardware players. Interestingly, human beings seem to be benefitting from this shift too. Again, Nvidia is splashing the cash.

    We have previously written about the acqui-hire trend; the strategic acquisition of scarce knowledge/skills by buying out early stage start-ups. Enfabrica, its CEO and a handful of its employees have just had $900m waved in front of them to join Jensen Huang and Nvidia. The Enfabrica team’s key IP is the ability to connect more than 100,000 GPUs(AI chips) together.  Oh to be an AI guru, as Meta, Google and Amazon hunt the globe for unique talents and knowledge. The attraction of hiring individuals (not acquiring start-ups) for the acquiror is the avoidance of regulatory scrutiny. The biggest deal of this genre so far was Meta’s $14.3 billion purchase of a 49% stake (dodging control/regulatory process) in Scale AI, its founder Alexandr Wang and his colleagues. Of course, all this talent and  hardware needs electricity to power research, manufacturing and cloud hosting.

    So, it was interesting to see private equity giant, Blackstone, acquire Pennsylvania’s Hill Top natural gas power plant for close to $1 billion. This follows Blackstone’s July announcement that it would invest $25 billion in Pennsylvania to build out its energy and digital infrastructure for the AI revolution. Yep, $25 billion. Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s xAI vehicle has purchased an entire power plant overseas and is shipping it to Memphis where xAI plans to build a data centre hosting 1 million GPUs. Blackstone and other private equity players are clearly taking a view that electricity grid infrastructure is critical to any digital/AI ambitions. Blackstone has been particularly busy with an August announcement of the $11.5 billion purchase of New Mexico’s largest utility, TXNM Energy. So, this focus on electricity infrastructure assets raises a further question, possibly opportunity. We know electric power is critical to the AI revolution but there’s another critical component to the digital world – basic materials. The investment community is correctly focusing on the physical assets of the manufacturing and power generation sectors but the most basic manifestation of infrastructure assets is raw materials. The Chinese have bullied the Expensive Leader on tariffs thanks to control of rare earths supplies but what about other critical metals? Let’s see.

    Silver and gold prices have both recently hit new highs with precious metals funds (ETFs) posting 47% returns year-to-date. But keep your eyes on the global electrification prize. Copper is the critical metal for electricity conduction in transmission grids, renewable power projects and electric vehicles (EVs). So, check out the biggest mining deal in ages. Anglo American is planning to merge with Canadian copper play, Teck Resources, in a $70 billion deal. Given EVs use up to 4 times more copper than traditional cars and wind farms consume 10 times more copper than gas-fired plants, it’s not a surprise to see this deal happen. However, what is surprising is that the GLOBAL publicly quoted mining sector is valued at just over $1.4 trillion. That doesn’t even cover the increase in value of just one tech company, Nvidia, in the past… 6 months! The most valuable US mining company, Southern Copper, is worth $87 billion. For context, note Larry Ellison’s personal wealth increased by $100 billion in just one epic trading session for Oracle on September 9th. Not for the first time in recent giddy weeks, it feels like something doesn’t quite add up. For illustration, the top 6 US tech companies are now valued at a combined $20 trillion, more than the GDP of China. And yet, each of these 6 companies is utterly dependent on rare earths, basic metals etc. to build semiconductor chips or their precious cloud-hosting data centres. I reference China deliberately.

    Not only did China take the long view on the critical role of rare earths in the modern digital economy, they also ‘got’ electricity. In 2010 they finally caught up with the US in terms of electricity generation. But….. today the Chinese electricity generation capacity stands at 2.5x the USA. We read a lot about tech ‘sovereignty’ these days but critical mineral ‘sovereignty’ could be the next frontier of the AI race. Already, the US Department of Defense has taken a 15% ($400m) stake in rare earths mining company, MP Materials. Surely, private equity and its mounting pile of investment  ‘dry powder’ sitting idle will start to look at the mining sector? We shall see, but it must be encouraged by the US Department of Defense taking time out of bravely bombing Venezuelan fishing boats to secure mining resources. Whoops, Eric is getting nervous again…. Best I stop now before I’m Kimmeled, and best you follow those deals.

     

  • Back To School For A Monster Theme…

    Back To School For A Monster Theme…

    I’m running out of expletives. It’s a sort of “FOMO” thing which rules out obsessing on Labour’s implosion or the Epstein “hoax” which mysteriously keeps removing only British citizens from high profile roles. No, the headlines driving my heightened state of anxiety are derived from a familiar theme. However, it’s a theme which is now hitting warp speed. We have previously written that the best pulse-take of the monster AI trend was tracking the “picks and shovels” of AI/cloud infrastructure rather than the “gems” of digital intelligent progression. Well, this week is turning into a “biggie” for the AI infrastructure theme. I’d highlight three key developments and a few other snippets. So, here goes….

    The creation of start-up billion dollar ‘unicorns’ has hardly any scarcity value these days. Maybe, we should think in trillions. Step forward almost 50-years old Oracle. Who knew Larry Ellison’s database software business would rack up a trillion dollar enterprise value at the beginning of this week? Probably nobody. Even the Wall Street analysts paid to follow every line of the Oracle business and financial model were truly shocked by the big reveal in Oracle’s quarterly update. In fact, earnings results were slightly shy of expectations. But, the share price proceeded to rocket 40%. Why? The future contract work backlog in its cloud(AI) infrastructure business grew 359% to $455 billion. I mentioned “warp speed” earlier so here’s what caught the eye. Oracle’s cloud revenues from Amazon, Google and Microsoft grew by 1,500% but the entire division this year is annualising revenues of circa $10 billion. That number will be $144 billion by 2030. Welcome to trickle-down AI economics. Oracle was barely mentioned in AI giddiness a year ago, now its owner is the richest man in the world. Oracle is not the only AI ‘unknown’ making waves.

    Anyone heard of Nebius? No, me neither until this week but I do remember its former Russian search/e-commerce platform, Yandex. Anyway, Russian sanctions forced a sale of the Russian assets leaving Nebius as an Amsterdam-listed company specializing in cloud computing (GPU) infrastructure. This week Microsoft signed an agreement worth up to $19.4 billion for Nebius in exchange for 5 years’ access to its GPU datacentre infrastructure in Vineland, New Jersey. Nebius’ market value before that news was less than $15 billion. Not surprisingly, the share price has roared 50% higher and the company is now seeking to raise $3 billion in fresh funds to accelerate its growth plans. This was not the only Dutch tech/AI zinger story this week…..

    Eindhoven-based ASML is the world’s dominant player in critical lithography technology used in chip manufacturing equipment. A single machine can contain up to 100,000 parts and cost $300-400 million. Clearly, semiconductor chips and AI are thematically closely connected. But investing in an AI start-up caught ASML analysts on the hop. ASML has just invested $1.5 billion in French AI player, Mistral, for a circa 11% stake valuing Mistral at close to $14 billion. Remember, Mistral raised $385m in late 2023 with a $2 billion valuation and early investor support from BNP Paribas, AndreessenHorowitz, Lightspeed Ventures and telecoms entrepreneur, Xavier Niel. Less than 2 years later, the Mistral valuation is racing towards a 7-8x return for those early investors. Apart from being an example of multi-layer AI investment activity, the deal is being hailed as a boost to Europe’s AI and semiconductor chip sovereignty.  And maybe I’m not the only one feeling a bit FOMO….

    It seems Ireland’s Taoiseach, Micheál Martin, has been thinking ‘sovereign’ too and looking at France’s early initiatives in funding AI startups. The Business Post has reported that Martin has sought the help of Eir owner, Xavier Neil (see above), in establishing an AI/tech incubator modelled on his highly successful Station F start-up campus. There might be good reason why Ireland needs to increase the pace of its AI and start-up readiness. I thought the next few little snippets should be focusing minds in Government buildings and elsewhere:

     

    Private investing: The UK debt market is worrying many, but on a more positive note it was interesting to see Hargreaves Lansdowne and Schroders join forces to offer UK retail investors the opportunity to add private assets to their pension pots. Note to Irish government – start-ups need investor incentives first, then campuses.

     

    Consumer behaviour: Wildfire Systems’ 2025 Consumer Shopping Trends Report shows 61% of consumers are now using generative AI tools like ChatGPT as a tool for deal-hunting.

     

    Company growth speeds: Stripe’s Indexing the AI Economy report shows AI companies reaching $1m annual recurring revenues (ARR) 4 months faster than even the fastest growing SaaS/software companies. And… AI companies reaching $5m revenues are reaching that milestone 3x faster.

     

    I feel my back-to-school mantra should read:    The future is private, AI and fast. Very fast.

     

     

  • Who’s Really Losing Power…?

    Who’s Really Losing Power…?

    We sorta knew didn’t we? The Donald really doesn’t ever want to leave power. National Guard troops might be armed and patrolling the streets of Washington DC but we might be missing an even bigger power move. No, neither I nor the South Park writing team are contemplating a horse being appointed as a Senator, or JD Vance as President or Eric Trump …. replacing the horse. Parody and Caligula’s legacy are safe, for now. However, if you’re a fossil fuel investor things are looking anything but safe despite the Orwellian data-denial of the Dear Orange Leader. Let’s start with a few ground truths.

     

    *Oil prices have fallen in three of the last four weeks and are now in the low $60s per barrel pricing region which is close to a 4-year low.

    *Bloomberg recently reported that global oil markets are on track for a record surplus next year as demand growth slows and supplies keep growing [Source: International Energy Agency(IEA)]

    *IEA data shows oil inventories will accumulate next year at a rate of 2.96 million barrels a day, surpassing even the average build-up during the pandemic year of 2020

    *World oil demand this year and next is growing at less than half the pace seen in 2023.

    *But what about “Drill, Baby, Drill” ? Maybe not so much. US drilling activity continued to fall in early August as the oil rig count fell to 539, near its lowest since Dec 2021.

     

    No wonder Texas is trying to re-draw and gerrymander voting districts 5 years early. Texans are unlikely to fall for Fox News fealty to the Dear Leader, but they will be bombarded with untruths. That’s just a no-fact of life in politics these days. However, the strategic problem for the US in this energy leadership crisis is that climate crisis denial has directly impacted investment in renewable energy projects. The facts are stark. The Financial Times has reported a whopping $19 billion worth of projects have been cancelled this year alone. In fact, cancellation rates on all renewable projects are up over 2,000%.

    The most recent cancellation was a biggie in Rhode Island. An off-shore wind project 80% completed by Danish company, Ørsted, was halted by the Department of the Interior citing “concerns related to the protection of national security interests”.  That project would have powered 350,000 homes in Connecticut and Rhode Island. Meanwhile, the rest of the world is rapidly shifting focus away from fossil fuel projects. The graphic below is from the Visual Capitalist team using IEA data and compares global investment from the years 2015 and 2025 (estimated). Renewable energy investment projects have more than doubled to $780 billion and overtaken oil project investment which has shrunk from over $800 billion to $543 billion. Interestingly, electricity grid, storage and efficiency projects are now forecast to reach close to $800 billion in 2025.

     

     

    The slippage of oil, gas and coal in the investment rankings is clear to see in the chart above. A seismic power shift is already happening and it is worth keeping an eye on the headlines and developments listed below. Arguably, the current White House administration, rather than bolstering “national security” is handing the energy keys of the future to more far-sighted leaders elsewhere. Check out these data points:

    In July, China’s single month electricity usage exceeded 1 trillion kw/hours. That’s more than Japan uses in a whole year. Of this total, 25% was generated by wind and solar energy sources.

    In April 2025, China’s solar generation of 95 TWh was larger than the TOTAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND of all but two countries in the same month.

    For the first time in history, despite soaring electricity usage, CO2 emissions in China are falling.

    The UK in Q2 granted planning for 16.1 GW of renewable energy capacity. That’s up 195% on last year.

    Renewables in the UK for the first time in 2024 supplied over 50% of the nation’s electricity over the entire year. Renewables and nuclear energy combined, accounted for 65% electricity generation in the world’s 5th biggest economy.

    In Pakistan, over the last two years private individuals have imported solar panels which equate to 68% of the entire national public grid!

    India’s solar PV manufacturing capacity has increased 50x in 10 years from 2GW to 100GW.

    In May this year, 68% of Germany’s net public electricity was generated from renewable sources.

    The electric vehicle (EV) revolution is not just happening in wealthy economies. 76% of new passenger cars sold in Nepal are electric. In Ethiopia that number is 60%.

    EV sales in Europe took 29% market share in June 2025. The share in Sweden is 65% while China moves in to the tipping point of more than 50% of sales being electric.

     

    The future is fast becoming electric, powered by renewable energy sources. One wouldn’t want to be on the wrong side of history, or your previously loyal customers. Ask Elon Musk and his European sales and marketing team. And…. if you want history to be a guide as to how power can shift slowly, then suddenly,  maybe don’t go to a US museum. Apparently, the Dear Leader doesn’t want US museums like the Smithsonian to raise awareness “too much of the past”, but rather “focus on the future”. Yep museums shouldn’t do history too much. Go figure.

    I’m going to stick my neck out here and risk future US visa issues but ……..it feels like the US energy future is not in good hands, just tiny ones clinging to the wrong power.

  • Are We Watching The Wrong Bear…?

    Are We Watching The Wrong Bear…?

    I am worried now. And, I’m not talking bear markets. Not yet. I’m not even talking about the Russian bear heading for the Alaskan Trump TV-fest. Of course, Europe should be worried about the Dear Orange Leader trading Ukrainian sovereign territory with his Putin pal but this summit feels more and more like a photo op with minimal progress. Another chance for the Donald to host, and hallucinate. Even the Kennedy Centre Awards for the Performing Arts have been threatened with a Trump MC slot. Bill Kristol of The Bulwark amusingly described Trump as claiming “his aides had wept, pleaded, besought him to host the awards personally” with reluctant success.

     

    “I’ve been asked to host—I said, ‘I’m the president of the United States! Are you folks asking me to do that?’” Trump said. “‘Sir, you’ll get much higher ratings.’ I said, ‘I don’t care, I’m the president of the United States. I won’t do it.’ They said, ‘Please.’ And then Susie Wiles said, ‘Sir, I would like you to host,’ I said, ‘OK, I’ll do it.’”

     

    Grown men crying again. The former reality TV star can’t resist the cameras or weepy stories but he’s certainly showing a  curious resistance in one aspect of his gyrating global trade war. China was the original bipartisan focus of US trade deficit ire. Now, not so much. China trade tariffs are now lower than those smacked onto many US allies. In fact, Trump has once more delayed the imposition of escalating 100% + tariffs on China by 90 days. Global trade watchers and geopolitical risk analysts have been left scratching their heads. Apart from China tariff leniency, other developments indicate a shifting Trump focus. Here are three moves which are causing most confusion:

     

    1. Check out US Treasury Secretary Bessent describing to an incredulous Fox TV host, Larry Kudlow, the intention of the US to “appropriate” funds from allies in Europe, UAE and Japan to be invested in their trillions at the whim of the US government. Incredible stuff.
    2. Pity poor Switzerland. They are, as a friendly ally nation, currently topping the global tariff league tables with draconian 39% rates, higher even than China.
    3. After decades of US diplomatic efforts to woo India, the White House now seems determined to provoke the Modi government with tariffs because of their purchases of Russian oil. Never mind that China is in far bigger sanction infringement territory with its oil purchases, and weapons parts supplies.

     

    It has not escaped the notice of most risk analysts that China must be very happy with how things are playing out. Arguably, they might even be encouraged. That’s not good news for Taiwan which sits in Beijing’s crosshairs for ultimate political annexation or military invasion. The bear to watch, in my view, is the China panda bear. We are already seeing the US and Trump caving on rare earths/critical mineral supplies and even the export of high-end AI chips in exchange for a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD Chinese revenues. Yep, if that sounds like the actions of a Politburo centrally-controlled economy, you’d be very close to the exact definition of same. However, there’s a real danger the US is slipping in the ‘imitation’ stakes of competing in many key technologies.

    We already know China controls close to 90% of electric battery cell production. Its dominance of the entire battery ecosystem from raw materials to processing capacity to battery components looks unassailable. Batteries might not be the only technology of our future racing to Chinese dominance. Research from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) shows that China is now leading the way in 57 out of the 64 technologies assessed by its Critical Technology Tracker, which has been updated to cover the last 20 years. The tracker measures a country’s performance based on the high-impact research it produces, specifically looking at the number of publications its institutions released in the top ten percent of cited papers in that specific field. The data studied was from a range of fields, like AI, cyber, defence, and robotics.

    Yep, even AI might not be the US lead technology you thought it was. Perhaps, looking at share prices and massive AI infrastructure spend by Big Tech might not be the best indicator of future leadership. The WIPO Patent report tracking generative AI patents filed in the period 2014-2023 showed China filed 6x more patents than the US, or 70% of the global total. This feels like a very focused busy China, not quite a playful low-energy panda. Recent visitors to China speak to warp-speed adoption of autonomous transport, delivery, digital currencies, robotics and digital services. Then consider our recent article flagging solar power capacity being built at a rate equivalent to 5 nuclear power stations…..per week!  It’s all about power, political and physical. It’s a language Trump understands, and one wonders has he decided it’s a battle he won’t win? If so, there’s one more focus for the panda.

    Taiwan historically has enjoyed the security protection of the US and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region. Right now, nobody is sure that will continue. China will also be hugely encouraged by the former gameshow host’s preference for transactional relationships, rather than principles or loyalty. Meanwhile, the general risk view in Asia is that we should be very concerned. We missed Ukraine. Dare we miss Taiwan….?

     

  • Are We Ready For Another Banking B-AI-L Out?

    Are We Ready For Another Banking B-AI-L Out?

    Domestic business and investing titan, Dermot Desmond, upset the orthodoxy this week. Ireland’s 500-year plan to build the Metrolink might be cut short, even ended. Desmond suggested the €12 billion urban rail project due to start in 2028 could be a white elephant project superseded by AI and autonomous-driving vehicles. Any bets on the kilometres per annum build speed on this 18 kilometre ‘monster’? Actually, don’t bother. Reflect on China’s average motor expressway construction build of circa 8,000 kilometres per year. Then think about the UK adding barely 65 miles of motorway over the past ….decade. Given the Irish public service obsession with tracking the UK National Health Service or UK Housing/Planning as benchmarks, one shudders to think what our ‘ambition’ could deliver in over-spend and century-shifting deadlines. On a more positive note, AI could be one of the tools which could dig us out of our transport infrastructure black hole.  A bit early to call that one you might say, but I’m beginning to think another crucial economic sector which gets its fair share of criticism is enjoying the halo AI effect. Don’t bank on it but the banking sector is suddenly looking interesting….

    The ”animal spirits” of Wall Street and record financial market highs always help the banking sector. Indeed Wall Street’s banks have just finished reporting quarterly results where trading revenues clocked a whopping $34 billion in Q2, up 17% on the previous year. Yes, the phenomenal gains in AI-focused stocks like Nvidia and Microsoft inflate bank trading revenues and drive increased investment activity but there’s more going on. You might have read about meme-stocks and unheard of companies in the US smaller cap markets (Russell 3000) tripling their share prices since April; 33 companies at the last count and only 5 actually making profits. But, banks as meme-stocks? Really? Well check out the Financial Times headline this week:

    “European banks get their meme-stock moment”

    Not even US banks, but European ones tracking an economic bloc getting its tummy tickled on tariffs by the Fiddler on The Roof of the White House. Can’t wait for the South Park treatment on that one, but back to the FT and European banks. When French banks like Societe Generale see their share prices increase by more than 100% year-to-date then my “spidey sense” tells me this is not about mundane cyclical banking drivers like trading revenues, interest rates or the shape of the bond yield curve. The aggregate European bank sector is up a whopping 40% in 2025 and there could be an (infra)structural driver of this story. Think back to our earlier sniping about Ireland’s struggles on transport infrastructure. Banks have struggled with unwieldy data and service infrastructures which have been a nightmare to upgrade to modern customer expectations. As we have written many times on these pages, the banks sit on some of the richest consumer data on the planet. Critical information on individual and institutional funding, spending and income patterns are in the possession of the banks. What if that data could be mobilised in a far more efficient way using AI and its agentic tools? Like Dermot Desmond’s thinking, could AI allow banks to skip an infrastructure bottleneck? It is early days but let’s take a look at a company you’ve probably never heard about before.

    Palantir Technologies might be named after a Tolkien crystal ball but it looks like its future might be right now, thanks to AI. The Denver-based company has been around since 2003 and specializes in software to analyze or “mine” data. Its early customers were government departments seeking assistance with unwieldy datasets and looking for actionable information. In particular, it gained traction with security/police departments searching for surveillance and predictive intelligence solutions. Sound familiar, or creepy? Park that thought and think banking. Then consider Palantir only just hit quarterly revenue run rates of $1 billion in its most recent results. However, that was enough to make it one of the 20 most valuable companies in America. Stock market investors think it’s worth $440 billion which is bigger than the mighty healthcare player, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its 138,000 employees. Yes, if you were wondering if the valuation of Palantir was looking a bit punchy, you’d be correct. Annualized revenues of just over $4 billion (vs J&J’s $85 billion) means the Palantir valuation multiple is currently 110x current revenues. The excitement and valuation is driven by two recurring messages whenever Palantir is mentioned:

     

    1. AI is accelerating the monetization of data infrastructure
    2. AI is reshaping enterprise software and Palantir is uniquely positioned

     

    Palantir is expanding beyond government into commercial sectors like healthcare, finance and energy. The first thing that should strike readers about government and these three specific sectors is that they have enormous customer/user bases. This is the banking sector clue, and possibly its infrastructure B-AI-L out. AI will very likely remove the need for “transition” projects to upgrade data infrastructure and provide banking organizations with valuable action prompts which might even be carried out by AI-agents/bots. That’s a business model ‘Hail Mary’ for the bank sector and Wall Street’s banking analysts are doing something unusual too.

    Typically, bank analysts stick close together and move their recommendations in tandem with their competitor analysts at the other investment banks. Remember, “nobody gets fired if we are all wrong” is an established career strategy for the average analyst. This also means that share price targets set by analysts move in relatively small increments so as not to spook the herd or attract excessive attention to their analysis or models (usually flawed as with all human forecasting exercises). So, I was checking a few market analytics dashboards today and spotted the following:

    KeyBanc target price moved UP from $60 to $100

    RBC Capital  target price moved UP from $63 to $97

    Raymond James target price moved UP from $79 to $95

    Believe me, 25%-65% banking share price target upgrades are not the done thing on Wall Street when TACO Trumpolini is threatening the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank on interest rate policy.  So, this is yet another sector to add to your list where the two letter response to any share price move query can be “AI”. However, at a structural level, you don’t need a Tolkien crystal ball to know that technology can transform the commercial prospects of a country or sector saddled with a perceived long-term ‘challenge’. I’m old enough to remember the gloomsters telling us Ireland was destined to perpetual under-development because we had no energy resources and could never compete in manufacturing/building things. Who knew? Maybe, the leaders who finally gave up on Ford in 1984 after welcoming and watching Apple begin manufacturing in Cork in 1980…..