Gravitas Spark CrowdFunding

Tag: risk

Are We Watching The Wrong Bear…?
I am worried now. And, I’m not talking bear markets. Not yet. I’m not even talking about the Russian bear heading for the Alaskan Trump TV-fest. Of course, Europe should be worried about the Dear Orange Leader trading Ukrainian sovereign territory with his Putin pal but this summit feels more and more like a photo op with minimal progress. Another chance for the Donald to host, and hallucinate. Even the Kennedy Centre Awards for the Performing Arts have been threatened with a Trump MC slot. Bill Kristol of The Bulwark amusingly described Trump as claiming “his aides had wept, pleaded, besought him to host the awards personally” with reluctant success.

“I’ve been asked to host—I said, ‘I’m the president of the United States! Are you folks asking me to do that?’” Trump said. “‘Sir, you’ll get much higher ratings.’ I said, ‘I don’t care, I’m the president of the United States. I won’t do it.’ They said, ‘Please.’ And then Susie Wiles said, ‘Sir, I would like you to host,’ I said, ‘OK, I’ll do it.’”

Grown men crying again. The former reality TV star can’t resist the cameras or weepy stories but he’s certainly showing a curious resistance in one aspect of his gyrating global trade war. China was the original bipartisan focus of US trade deficit ire. Now, not so much. China trade tariffs are now lower than those smacked onto many US allies. In fact, Trump has once more delayed the imposition of escalating 100% + tariffs on China by 90 days. Global trade watchers and geopolitical risk analysts have been left scratching their heads. Apart from China tariff leniency, other developments indicate a shifting Trump focus. Here are three moves which are causing most confusion:
1. Check out US Treasury Secretary Bessent describing to an incredulous Fox TV host, Larry Kudlow, the intention of the US to “appropriate” funds from allies in Europe, UAE and Japan to be invested in their trillions at the whim of the US government. Incredible stuff.
2. Pity poor Switzerland. They are, as a friendly ally nation, currently topping the global tariff league tables with draconian 39% rates, higher even than China.
3. After decades of US diplomatic efforts to woo India, the White House now seems determined to provoke the Modi government with tariffs because of their purchases of Russian oil. Never mind that China is in far bigger sanction infringement territory with its oil purchases, and weapons parts supplies.
It has not escaped the notice of most risk analysts that China must be very happy with how things are playing out. Arguably, they might even be encouraged. That’s not good news for Taiwan which sits in Beijing’s crosshairs for ultimate political annexation or military invasion. The bear to watch, in my view, is the China panda bear. We are already seeing the US and Trump caving on rare earths/critical mineral supplies and even the export of high-end AI chips in exchange for a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD Chinese revenues. Yep, if that sounds like the actions of a Politburo centrally-controlled economy, you’d be very close to the exact definition of same. However, there’s a real danger the US is slipping in the ‘imitation’ stakes of competing in many key technologies.

We already know China controls close to 90% of electric battery cell production. Its dominance of the entire battery ecosystem from raw materials to processing capacity to battery components looks unassailable. Batteries might not be the only technology of our future racing to Chinese dominance. Research from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) shows that China is now leading the way in 57 out of the 64 technologies assessed by its Critical Technology Tracker, which has been updated to cover the last 20 years. The tracker measures a country’s performance based on the high-impact research it produces, specifically looking at the number of publications its institutions released in the top ten percent of cited papers in that specific field. The data studied was from a range of fields, like AI, cyber, defence, and robotics.

Yep, even AI might not be the US lead technology you thought it was. Perhaps, looking at share prices and massive AI infrastructure spend by Big Tech might not be the best indicator of future leadership. The WIPO Patent report tracking generative AI patents filed in the period 2014-2023 showed China filed 6x more patents than the US, or 70% of the global total. This feels like a very focused busy China, not quite a playful low-energy panda. Recent visitors to China speak to warp-speed adoption of autonomous transport, delivery, digital currencies, robotics and digital services. Then consider our recent article flagging solar power capacity being built at a rate equivalent to 5 nuclear power stations…..per week! It’s all about power, political and physical. It’s a language Trump understands, and one wonders has he decided it’s a battle he won’t win? If so, there’s one more focus for the panda.

Taiwan historically has enjoyed the security protection of the US and its allies in the Asia-Pacific region. Right now, nobody is sure that will continue. China will also be hugely encouraged by the former gameshow host’s preference for transactional relationships, rather than principles or loyalty. Meanwhile, the general risk view in Asia is that we should be very concerned. We missed Ukraine. Dare we miss Taiwan….?
August 14, 2025
Are We Ready For Another Banking B-AI-L Out?
Domestic business and investing titan, Dermot Desmond, upset the orthodoxy this week. Ireland’s 500-year plan to build the Metrolink might be cut short, even ended. Desmond suggested the €12 billion urban rail project due to start in 2028 could be a white elephant project superseded by AI and autonomous-driving vehicles. Any bets on the kilometres per annum build speed on this 18 kilometre ‘monster’? Actually, don’t bother. Reflect on China’s average motor expressway construction build of circa 8,000 kilometres per year. Then think about the UK adding barely 65 miles of motorway over the past ….decade. Given the Irish public service obsession with tracking the UK National Health Service or UK Housing/Planning as benchmarks, one shudders to think what our ‘ambition’ could deliver in over-spend and century-shifting deadlines. On a more positive note, AI could be one of the tools which could dig us out of our transport infrastructure black hole. A bit early to call that one you might say, but I’m beginning to think another crucial economic sector which gets its fair share of criticism is enjoying the halo AI effect. Don’t bank on it but the banking sector is suddenly looking interesting….

The ”animal spirits” of Wall Street and record financial market highs always help the banking sector. Indeed Wall Street’s banks have just finished reporting quarterly results where trading revenues clocked a whopping $34 billion in Q2, up 17% on the previous year. Yes, the phenomenal gains in AI-focused stocks like Nvidia and Microsoft inflate bank trading revenues and drive increased investment activity but there’s more going on. You might have read about meme-stocks and unheard of companies in the US smaller cap markets (Russell 3000) tripling their share prices since April; 33 companies at the last count and only 5 actually making profits. But, banks as meme-stocks? Really? Well check out the Financial Times headline this week:

“European banks get their meme-stock moment”

Not even US banks, but European ones tracking an economic bloc getting its tummy tickled on tariffs by the Fiddler on The Roof of the White House. Can’t wait for the South Park treatment on that one, but back to the FT and European banks. When French banks like Societe Generale see their share prices increase by more than 100% year-to-date then my “spidey sense” tells me this is not about mundane cyclical banking drivers like trading revenues, interest rates or the shape of the bond yield curve. The aggregate European bank sector is up a whopping 40% in 2025 and there could be an (infra)structural driver of this story. Think back to our earlier sniping about Ireland’s struggles on transport infrastructure. Banks have struggled with unwieldy data and service infrastructures which have been a nightmare to upgrade to modern customer expectations. As we have written many times on these pages, the banks sit on some of the richest consumer data on the planet. Critical information on individual and institutional funding, spending and income patterns are in the possession of the banks. What if that data could be mobilised in a far more efficient way using AI and its agentic tools? Like Dermot Desmond’s thinking, could AI allow banks to skip an infrastructure bottleneck? It is early days but let’s take a look at a company you’ve probably never heard about before.

Palantir Technologies might be named after a Tolkien crystal ball but it looks like its future might be right now, thanks to AI. The Denver-based company has been around since 2003 and specializes in software to analyze or “mine” data. Its early customers were government departments seeking assistance with unwieldy datasets and looking for actionable information. In particular, it gained traction with security/police departments searching for surveillance and predictive intelligence solutions. Sound familiar, or creepy? Park that thought and think banking. Then consider Palantir only just hit quarterly revenue run rates of $1 billion in its most recent results. However, that was enough to make it one of the 20 most valuable companies in America. Stock market investors think it’s worth $440 billion which is bigger than the mighty healthcare player, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its 138,000 employees. Yes, if you were wondering if the valuation of Palantir was looking a bit punchy, you’d be correct. Annualized revenues of just over $4 billion (vs J&J’s $85 billion) means the Palantir valuation multiple is currently 110x current revenues. The excitement and valuation is driven by two recurring messages whenever Palantir is mentioned:
1. AI is accelerating the monetization of data infrastructure
2. AI is reshaping enterprise software and Palantir is uniquely positioned
Palantir is expanding beyond government into commercial sectors like healthcare, finance and energy. The first thing that should strike readers about government and these three specific sectors is that they have enormous customer/user bases. This is the banking sector clue, and possibly its infrastructure B-AI-L out. AI will very likely remove the need for “transition” projects to upgrade data infrastructure and provide banking organizations with valuable action prompts which might even be carried out by AI-agents/bots. That’s a business model ‘Hail Mary’ for the bank sector and Wall Street’s banking analysts are doing something unusual too.

Typically, bank analysts stick close together and move their recommendations in tandem with their competitor analysts at the other investment banks. Remember, “nobody gets fired if we are all wrong” is an established career strategy for the average analyst. This also means that share price targets set by analysts move in relatively small increments so as not to spook the herd or attract excessive attention to their analysis or models (usually flawed as with all human forecasting exercises). So, I was checking a few market analytics dashboards today and spotted the following:

KeyBanc target price moved UP from $60 to $100

RBC Capital target price moved UP from $63 to $97

Raymond James target price moved UP from $79 to $95

Believe me, 25%-65% banking share price target upgrades are not the done thing on Wall Street when TACO Trumpolini is threatening the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank on interest rate policy. So, this is yet another sector to add to your list where the two letter response to any share price move query can be “AI”. However, at a structural level, you don’t need a Tolkien crystal ball to know that technology can transform the commercial prospects of a country or sector saddled with a perceived long-term ‘challenge’. I’m old enough to remember the gloomsters telling us Ireland was destined to perpetual under-development because we had no energy resources and could never compete in manufacturing/building things. Who knew? Maybe, the leaders who finally gave up on Ford in 1984 after welcoming and watching Apple begin manufacturing in Cork in 1980…..
August 8, 2025
Tech Sovereignty Getting Very Real
Random thought – did music break the USSR? As I watched 40 year old re-runs of Live Aid last week, I found myself trying to recall the emotions and vibe at that moment in time. The Live Aid concert itself was a significant exhibition of global solidarity in raising awareness of famine in Ethiopia. In hindsight, the long-lasting impact of Live Aid on preventing famine might be questionable as global leadership values currently go AWOL on the Gaza and Sudan catastrophes. However, the sheer reach of that day’s broadcast to over 2 billion people in more than 150 countries was a display of communications tech power which has to be considered against the geopolitical backdrop of the time. Saigon had finally fallen to Communist North Vietnam only 10 years earlier, Afghanistan had been invaded by the USSR just 5 years before and Poland had recently come out of a period of martial law. Nobody felt like the USSR empire was faltering. But…. its “iron curtain” was failing to block the reality of better living elsewhere.

In 1981 MTV, the US music video channel, launched on cable television and was syndicated to countries around the world. Global audiences were seeing music combined with video imagery celebrating freedom, democracy and the rewards of talent and endeavour. Live Aid confirmed communications technology was moving rapidly and posed a real threat to those who needed message control to stay in power. The Chernobyl nuclear disaster happened a year after Live Aid, the Berlin Wall fell 3 years later, and the USSR imploded 2 years after that. Today’s Russia is a rogue state with a GDP of barely $2 trillion, or about half the value of one US tech company, Nvidia. This stark reversal in geopolitical and commercial leadership is a reminder to the leaders of today about “network” power. My sense is that there are three particular ‘networks’ where governments are now beginning to assert sovereignty for national security reasons. I’d flag three stories in recent weeks which illustrate the point well.

European satellite internet network company, Eutelsat, is a competitor to Elon Musk’s Starlink and is listed on the Paris and London stock exchanges. The company is raising €1.5 billion of capital funding with a sovereign twist. The French government is investing €750m and the UK is putting in €163m in exchange for shares in the company and maintaining ownership stakes of 29.65% and 10.89% respectively. However, Eutelsat’s fleet of just over 600 satellites has a lot of catch up to do. Starlink’s network has deployed more than 7,500 satellites thanks to the dizzying rocket launch timetable of sister company, SpaceX. If you were looking for one area of European urgency on tech sovereignty, then it’s probably defence. Germany is stepping up with €500 billion earmarked for defence investment, so it was no huge surprise to see Berlin-based Planet Labs win a €240m satellite services contract from the German government earlier this month. Planet Lab’s brief is to deploy its fleet of 600 next-generation Pelican satellites to deliver high-resolution SkySat imagery, and AI-enhanced surveillance tools, specifically designed for security, infrastructure monitoring, and maritime awareness. Clearly, it’s time to look up and keep an eye on a rapidly shifting space race, but don’t forget what’s under our feet.

Earlier in this piece I kinda said that communism died in the ‘90s but the idea of centrally controlled economies is making a bit of a comeback. Bizarrely, the US is leading the charge. Again, I’m going to park the politics and walk you through a few developments in recent weeks. First, the US government via the Pentagon announced it was getting into the mining business. Yep, the Pentagon (Department of Defense) invested $400m in MP Materials, a US company which extracts and processes rare earths materials. These rare earths are the essential basic materials for the high-end magnets used in technologies from mobile phones to medical equipment to ballistic missiles. Anyway, we know the world is overly dependent on China (90% market dominance) for these rare earths/magnets and is a primary reason for the Trump TACO pause on trade tariffs with China. Clearly, critical raw material supply chains/networks are a focus of all Western governments. So, the move to back a home-grown producer with a 15% ownership stake was logical enough. However, within days Apple announced a $500m deal with MP Materials to buy magnets produced in Texas. Cue the MP Materials share price doubling within hours and you can just feel it in your bones that Apple was strong-armed by Washington into doing this deal. This is the sort of government intervention you’d expect from Beijing, but ….Washington? We live in interesting times, as the Chinese might say, but arguably there’s another network of even more importance where the Washington government is happier for China to lead.

The electrification of the global economy is very real. The advent of AI and the enormous energy appetite of cloud-supporting data centres only adds to the pressures on electrical grid networks everywhere. The race to source power is focusing the minds of Big Tech and driving deals which could be described as “outside the box” thinking. Consider these recent deals:
- Google last week agreed a $3 billion deal to modernise two hydropower plants in Pennsylvania.
- Meta said in June that it had struck a 20-year deal with a nuclear plant in Illinois to power its data centres.
- Microsoft is preparing to reopen a nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, the site of the most serious nuclear meltdown in US history.
However, the bigger energy story is elsewhere, but with a US context. The Trump administration is actively pushing investment capital away from renewable energy solutions like solar and wind. Year-to-date in the US, more than $15 billion of clean energy projects have been cancelled. In Europe, venture capital funding of cleantech companies has nosedived by 71%. Meanwhile, China is taking a longer-term view on electrical grid networks. The numbers are absolutely staggering. China controls 80% of solar panel production and leads the world in wind turbine manufacturing. This year China will account for 74% of all solar and wind energy projects…. globally. But, it’s the electricity generating capacity numbers which truly blow the mind. Last year China added 370GW of renewable energy capacity (wind, solar, hydro) of which 277GW was solar. For context 1GW (or 1000MW) is the equivalent energy capacity of the average nuclear power station. So, on solar energy alone, China is adding the equivalent electrical capacity of five nuclear power stations to its power grid….. every week.

The headlines might be dominated by $4 trillion companies driving the AI revolution, cloud-based software economics, chip manufacturing and data centre construction. But…. two of the three networks above focus on real basics. China’s raw materials supply chains and its electricity grid are critical to its future and geopolitical power. One can only hope it’s not an “MTV moment” for other countries playing catch up, or worse – blocking the signals of rapid change.
July 21, 2025
Time To Think Different

I must confess I was very jealous. My son met Mike Bloomberg on his visit to Dublin this week, not me. Bloomberg and his eponymous data/media company have always fascinated me as a former customer, and as a financial markets observer. The Bloomberg business is still the gold standard for data analytics, trading communications and news for circa 350,000 financial market professionals who each pay $27,000 per year for the service. The company has been around since 1982 and it has made Bloomberg the owner incredibly wealthy. Uniquely so, perhaps, because it was done in private. If you check the ranks of the wealthiest people on the planet the top 10 features the usual names like Musk, Arnault, Gates, Zuckerberg, Ballmer and Ellison. However, all those names are attached to publicly listed companies which underpin their wealth. Bloomberg is still a private company, and still 88% owned by its founder.

Think about a SaaS-type business doing circa $12 billion of revenues a year and 88% of the profits (probably 30% + margins) accruing to one person…..since 1982. Officially, Forbes Magazine ranks Mike Bloomberg in 18^th place on the world’s richest list with a $105 billion fortune. I’m guessing it’s WAY more than that. But, the bigger reveal is how a private company was able to create wealth over decades without a fluctuating public share price and short-term institutional shareholders demanding it respond to dotcom revolutions, search engines, mobile internet, big data, cloud-based SaaS, credit crises and AI. Privacy gave Bloomberg time and strategic room to act in a different way to the Wall Street ‘crowd’ and its emotional baggage. Indeed, there were a few other reminders this week of how the “crowd” can miss important truths when analysis is dominated by a volatile public share price and human emotions. Remember Cisco?

If you invested in Cisco this month 25 years ago you would have caught its peak dotcom bubble valuation before boom turned to bust. This week is the first time in 25 years you could sell those Cisco shares at a profit. Ouch. Patience and time is not just the preserve of investors in private illiquid assets. In fact, lack of liquidity can be an investor’s friend when markets are volatile. Fast forward to today and think about how many people sold stocks and bought oil on the weekend news that the US had bombed Iran’s hidden nuclear facilities. Well, the oil price is 15% off its peak price through the Iran-Israel conflict period (or “12 Day War” as named by the bomber-in-chief and Nobel Peace Prize wannabe) and actually below the trading price before hostilities even began. Oh, and the Nasdaq 100 just hit an all-time-high yesterday. For the faint-hearted, that’s a 36% gain for the largest tech stocks over two months of toddler tariffs, broken bromances, Gaza abandonment, WW3 fears, a Russian drone drubbing of its airforce and Love Island shocks. Rather than dodging a “risk-off” bullet, investors have been rewarded for not selling with strong stock market performances this week. It might not sound rational but there’s a very powerful lesson about the importance of “staying in the market”. For investors in publicly listed assets, there is an option every minute to sell and exit the market. But, there’s a cost.

A piece of research from JP Morgan, studying the returns of the S&P 500 between 2002 and 2022, shows annualized performance(returns) of 9.4%. That’s pretty good. But…..if you missed the 10 best days your return would almost halve to 5.21%. More strikingly, 7 of those 10 best days happened within two weeks of the 10 WORST days. So, if you opt out during the bad periods of volatility you tend to lose out on the big bounces which have a huge impact on longer term performance. The uncomfortable truth is that the best days and worst days tend to occur within weeks of each other. Further angst for many, is that human emotions take over and investors flee for the exits after market turbulence. However, for investors in private assets that emotional self-destruct button is not available given there is no natural daily exit option. There is also another public market reality which leads to misleading comparisons with private asset investing.

The accepted wisdom or orthodoxy in finance is that investing in early-stage companies has a high failure rate. The text books would suggest that failure rate is in the 70-90% range. That rightly implies that the vast majority of returns for investors in a portfolio of early-stage risky investments is delivered by a small number of investments. However, what is not mentioned in those texts or in plenty of fund investor information sheets is that portfolios of publicly listed companies have a similar story. A study conducted by Professor Hendrik Bessembinder at the Arizona State University Business School shows that just 4% of companies in the US stock markets have accounted for all of the wealth gains since 1926. Amazingly, the average cumulative return of the 29,078 common stocks listed since 1926 was a hefty 23,000% but….the median stock in that time experienced a cumulative return of NEGATIVE 7.4%. Given that’s a median number, that means more than half of all stocks have experienced negative returns. Fund manager, Bailie Gifford, has done further research on this data to identify the key performance drivers of the small number of genuine wealth creating companies. Interestingly, R&D investment was a critical driver. Now, let’s think private and different.

Clearly, public and private markets are not so different. It’s better to be in the market ALL the time and only a small number of companies in a portfolio deliver the majority of returns. However, in order to capture that opportunity one needs to build a portfolio. It also looks like R&D is important to create a big enough competitive advantage to grow rapidly. We don’t know how much money Bloomberg invested in its famous desktop terminal over the years to effectively “own” the market but we do know he didn’t have to report profit numbers like Cisco to the market on a quarterly basis. So, if we think differently, how can we act differently?

Well, you don’t need a Bloomberg terminal to tell you that high net worth investors are increasingly investing in private assets. Global giant private equity house, Blackstone, this week stated their belief that “Europe is in a unique position to capture more investment”. Blackstone themselves are going to invest $500 billion in Europe over the next decade. The other data point worth considering is that JP Morgan reckon the mass affluent investor market has just 2% of their portfolios allocated to alternative/private investments. So, this is not a dotcom/Cisco rush into peak investment cycles. There is real early opportunity in private assets and Spark Private can actually help kick start a portfolio very quickly. This summer Spark Private investors will be able to invest in a selection of up to seven R&D-rich medtechs, a few SaaS/software high-growth options, an exciting AI play and some really interesting infrastructure franchises.

We now know the phrase “timing is everything” doesn’t work when trading public markets. However, we also know if you’re not in, and you’re not diversified, you can’t win. So, think different and think private. Now is an excellent time to combine private opportunity with portfolio-building deal flow.

** For further information on Ostoform, SymPhysis Medical, Social Voice, Digital Gait Labs, Tympany Medical, Liltoda, Array Patch or Quadrant Scientific contact us on www.sparkprivate.com

June 25, 2025
Three Winning Hidden Trends

I was tempted. The “buddy breakup” in Washington between the Taco Toddler and the Ketamine Kid is fabulous writing material. But, no. The real risk these days is being distracted by America’s slide towards lawless autocracy and missing something bigger. Eighty one years ago on a June 5^th morning President Roosevelt brought good news to the American people and its allies. Rome had been liberated by Allied troops – “The first of the Axis capitals is now in our hands.” Little did Roosevelt’s audience know that later that day paratroopers would be dropped into northern France ahead of 7,000 ships landing on the D-Day beaches of Normandy on June 6th. Fast forward to that anniversary today, and there are winning opportunities again being potentially obscured by Washington broadcasts. Indeed, it’s possible you may have missed some striking data updates to three huge investment trends this week. Let’s dive in.

Last month at its annual Stripe Sessions conference, CEO Patrick Collison identified the “gale-force tailwinds” of AI and stablecoins. The first tailwind trend won’t be a surprise to any readers of our AI article last week but it was intriguing to hear Collison say, “Stablecoins are the underdog everyone’s sleeping on.” He also had an interesting take on the macro “noise” and uncertainty prevalent in today’s business world – “when new technologies collide with a turbulent economy, the technology tends to win”. That seems a prescient call this week when we briefly touch on AI and reflect on its chip champion, Nvidia, revealing its latest quarterly results. Despite tariff disruption of its China business, Nvidia beat Wall Street analyst expectations and regained its status as the world’s most valuable company. Thanks to a 50% surge is its share price over the last 8 weeks, Jensen Huang’s chip behemoth is worth $3.4 trillion. The latest data point on stablecoins was also quite eye-catching.

Not long ago Circle Internet Group was saved by the US government when Washington guaranteed deposits at the collapsing Silicon Valley Bank(SVB). Circle as an issuer of dollar-backed stablecoins was the top dollar depositor customer at SVB. However, this week the newsflow was way more optimistic as Circle waited to IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. Reports suggested investor interest was massive and the listing was 25x over-subscribed. Not surprisingly, with more buyers than sellers, Circle’s share price surged 168% on its first day of trading to a valuation just shy of $17 billion. It’s difficult not to conclude that stablecoins have “arrived” and investors are excited by Collison’s own description of stablecoins’ “real world utility in regular business”. In fact Stripe confirmed stablecoin issuance has increased by 39% year-on-year while “demand for borderless financial services go through the roof….at a growth rate which eclipses anything we’ve seen before in Stripe”. Ok, that’s two winning trends. The last one won’t surprise but the numbers might.

Private equity (PE) and its billionaire leaders could be doubting their love-in with the Taco Toddler but they are not the only PE-related cohort in doubting mode. PE investors are quietly wondering how private equity houses are going to deploy the $1.2 trillion of ‘dry powder’ which is currently sitting on the side-lines and hurting overall return on investment (ROI) figures. A quarter of that massive total has been available for the last 4 years (Source: Bain &Co). However, there is no doubting our mantra “the future is private” when you consider private equity now controls a record 29,000 companies worth more than $3.6 trillion. But, there are cyclical challenges. Higher interest rates, reduced IPO activity and M&A paralysis (execs can’t Taco trade those deals) don’t help valuations or exits so it’s worth noting global PE fundraising has declined for 5 straight quarters. Global PE raises in Q1 were down 33% per Pitchbook/Bloomberg reports but that cycle might be about to shift. The Wall Street Journal this week reported that the software-focused PE giant, Thoma Bravo, has just raised a staggering $34.4 billion which is the biggest funding round since the start of 2024.

As a final thought, one must be mindful that as investment funds become bigger and bigger their opportunity pool shrinks due to size and liquidity constraints. On the other hand, as the ECB cuts interest rates, Ireland GDP growth hits almost 10%, German equities touch all-time highs and Trumpolini begs President Xi for a trade détente, it is arguably a particularly good time for investors to think small, and think private. So, if you want to build a private asset portfolio quickly, Spark Private can certainly help with a very exciting summer EIIS** pipeline of PhD-packed medtech innovations, real-time AI applications, 3-year infrastructure exits and super-growth software stories. Do not be distracted. Check out www.sparkprivate.com and, as my old boss used to say, “They ain’t door numbers, they move !!”.

** EIIS tax rebates of 35-50% on your 2025 personal income tax.

June 6, 2025
Big Beautiful Bull Breaks Bonds…
Here we go again. Toddler throws tariff tantrum again, and then some. I’d say “Happy Friday” but our screens have just puked up a headline about 50% tariffs hitting Europe within the next week. Clearly, the crypto-corruption-fest dinner last night in Virginia didn’t lighten Agent Orange’s mood. Indeed, in the past few hours we have also seen Harvard’s entire international student programme blown up by a planned White House denial of education visas and Apple have been threatened with 25% tariffs on foreign manufactured iPhones. Only a few weeks ago commentators were flagging that trade policy had already changed more than 50 times since Trump 2.0 entered office, rather than a prison cell. One could despair, or even ignore the headlines, but in the bowels of the financial system something is stirring. At first, you’ll be alarmed but there might be an optimistic twist to follow. First, let’s look at the finance stuff.

The global tail wagging the dog (or DOGE) is the bond market. Specifically, investors in US bonds (Treasuries) are worried about a now centrally-controlled economy run by a fella who almost uniquely bankrupted a casino. There were two events this week which signalled increased investor nerves about US debt and Washington’s ability to rein in its budget deficit. The catalyst was the passing of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” by one vote in the House of Representatives which was a mix of spending cuts for poorer Americans and tax cuts for the rich. Economist, Robert Reich, estimates the have-nots will lose $700-$1000 of benefits (including Medicaid) while the have-yachts in the top 0.1% of US society will pocket an extra $390,000 per year. Sounds ugly, but the bond market is clearly not buying the thesis that making oligarchs richer will benefit the nation overall. Nope, investors in US Treasuries expressed their concern in two ways:
1. US Bonds of longer maturities (20-year and 30-year Treasuries) were sold by foreign investors which resulted in the yields(rates) on those bonds rising. In simple terms, when a bond falls in price, its yield or rate of interest rises to hopefully attract new buyers.
2. A regular auction of 20-year bonds conducted by the US Treasury was received poorly and forced the Treasury to offer higher yields to attract sufficient investor interest.
The blunt impact of these events is that US bonds are becoming less attractive for investors and so they are demanding higher yields (interest rates) to compensate for the risk of policy lunacy in Washington. Think Liz Truss and lettuce economics and then put on your helmet. The undermining of the credibility of the US bond market is a far bigger deal than turbulence in the British bond markets. The critical point about US bonds is that they are the source of the primary building block in every debt or investment calculation around the world. You will see it referenced as the “risk-free rate” of interest which makes the presumption that the US would never default on its debt obligations. Did anyone say bull…..??? Well, the whole world is beginning to wonder is the next toddler tantrum going to be the stiffing of a sovereign counterparty on a debt repayment. And the casino cracker guy has form. However, it will be US citizens who suffer monetarily first.

The price of mortgages, auto financing, insurance, credit cards, BNPL rates will all rise as ‘risk-free’ interest rates rise. The scary thing is that the concept of “risk-free” returns on dollar denominated debt being trashed will impact the entire financial system and the calculations of everything from M&A deals to commodity prices. Hopefully, this might spook the right people in Washington, including the 100 Senators who must vote on the “Big Beautiful Bill” too. There are potentially a few other things that might catch their eye.

Firstly, credit default swaps (CDS) which this country became familiar with prior to Troika/IMF intervention can measure a sovereign state’s risk of default. Right now, the financial markets (through these CDS instruments) are pricing US default risk higher than…. Greece. Second, somebody might spot a little flaw in the MAGA make- everything-in-America dogma. Sure, the US has trade deficits on goods. But, what about services surpluses? More importantly, and a critical input into all GDP calculations, is foreign investment in US assets. We have written recently on Japan’s position as the world’s biggest creditor/investor in foreign assets. But, do you know the country which has the world’s worst, or most negative, net international investment position…? According to research by Deutsche Bank, that would be the good ol’ USA in the chart at the end of this article.

Finally, as institutional vandalism is in full swing in Washington, the rest of the world is hoping the independence of the Federal Reserve (the Fed), and its Chairman Jay Powell, can be preserved. Again, there is breaking news and it’s not so good. The US Supreme Court overnight has decided that it is comfortable with the idea of independent government agencies (like the FTC, FCC, EPA etc) being abandoned. Instead, the right-wing constructed court has embraced the idea of a “unitary executive” which means Trump gains control over these agencies. However, the majority decision of the court stated that the Fed was not covered by this judgment. For now. There is perhaps a wider perspective than Fed independence. If US rule of law is under threat, that will ultimately feed into US bond market weakness. Bonds are, in effect, a legal contract between the USA and investors. And, I’m quietly hopeful international bond market investors are going to be bullying quite a few US Senators before they vote…..and understand the impact of the chart below.
May 23, 2025
Japan’s Secret Private Power….
Thirty three years ago I was slightly ahead of George Soros in battering Sterling (GBP) out of the European exchange rate mechanism (ERM). In time terms only. I left the trading bit to the Japanese banks who I witnessed on the Tokyo trading floor of broker, Meitan Tradition, wield financial power like the world had never seen. Sound a bit Trumpy? Yes, but unlike the Orange trade toddler, this was all attached to financial reality. In fact, nine of the ten biggest banks in the world at the time (September 1992) were Japanese. And, that night those banks tried to buy every German Deutschmark (DEM) on the planet, sharing the view of Soros that the British government would give up defending Sterling (against the DEM link) and pull their currency from the ERM. They were right.

Soros and the hedge funds got the headlines but traders in every global trading centre knew who really moved the markets and broke Sterling. Fast forward to today, another financial sage, the greatest of them all, Warren Buffett is retiring and rightfully grabbing the headlines. However, one of Buffett’s final significant trades was to build 10% stakes in five of Japan’s biggest trading conglomerates. We referenced this in the first of our Japan series of articles and promised more on the investment environment and why the smart money is quietly returning to Tokyo trading floors. So let’s start with the public markets.

Japan’s stock market has suffered infamous ‘lost decades’, and it was only last year that the benchmark Nikkei index recovered to previous peaks and marked a new all-time-high. It took 34 years. However, the recovery of Japan’s stock markets has been accelerating in recent years and Buffett first started building equity positions in 2019. Change in corporate behaviour has been slow, but the following initiatives have been considered the key catalysts:

*Japan Corporate Governance Code: Introduced in 2015 by the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) as a set of principles to improve long-run value creation and encourage engagement with shareholders. Previously, Japan Inc had a notorious reputation for rejecting any strategic/governance or ownership challenges through “poison pill” defensive tactics.

*TSE “name and shame” pressure: In early 2023 the TSE asked companies with poor ratings (valuations with a price-to-book ratio (PBR) of below 1x) to disclose initiatives they were making to improve ratings. In main street terms, a PBR of less than 1x is effectively the investment market saying the company is destroying value and therefore the book value is in decline, rather than creating wealth. In financial terms, returns running below the cost of capital destroys wealth.

So, did it work? Yes, slowly but surely, Japanese companies started to address return on capital, shareholder dividends and non-core holdings dragging performance. For example, Toyota started to offload cross-shareholdings in companies like Denso and KDDI. Then Obayashi, one of the biggest construction companies increased its dividend. Finally, share buybacks, which were extremely rare in Japan’s corporate world, have exploded. In 2024 more than $100 billion of buybacks (from existing shareholders) were committed to by companies publicly listed in Tokyo. That’s a 75% increase in this shareholder-friendly activity on 2023. And, there’s lots more to come. Consider the following:

*The price-to-book (PBR) of Japan’s entire stock market is barely 1.3x. That compares to the US market on 3.9x.

*There are at least six sectors in Japan where average PBR is below 1x: banking, insurance, utilities, basic materials, autos, and auto parts.

Please note these companies can remain cheap forever if investors believe there is no possibility of improved returns and strategies. So, there needs to be confidence in the ability to influence change. Of course, the ultimate barometer of change appetite is the willingness to accept new owners of a business. And, that’s where private equity activity and the buying out of publicly listed (cheap) companies is the pulse check on CHANGE actually happening. Let’s just say things are quite giddy. Activity really picked up with the 2023 buyout of the iconic blue chip firm, Toshiba, by local private equity house, Japan Industrial Partners(JIP) for $14 billion. That set the tone for M&A activity in Japan to grow by 44% to $230 billion in 2024(Source: Nikkei Asia), and the involvement of private equity houses has been striking.

In previous times Japanese corporates would have considered it “a loss of face” to be seen meeting and exploring investment from “the barbarians at the gate”. Now, it’s very much game on and Japan Inc is increasingly open to private equity investment. The big buyout battles have featured the usual global giants like Blackstone, Bain, Carlyle, Elliott etc but the acquisition targets in recent months have been a fascinating mix of $60 billion convenience stores (7-Eleven), $4 billion software (Fuji Soft), $8.5 billion cybersecurity (Trend Micro) and $42 billion auto parts (Toyota Industries). The last deal does not actually involve private equity but is in fact a potential acquisition by Toyota Motor Corp. It’s the sheer size of this deal which caught the eye and also a reminder of the cash firepower in Japanese listed companies. Two things to consider:

*Cash held on Japanese corporate balance sheets is estimated to be more than $2 trillion, or almost 50% of Japan’s GDP.

*Despite market reforms and 80% compliance with TSE “name and shame” pressures, almost 50% of Japanese listed companies (TOPIX) are trading at PBR valuations of less than 1x.

This mix of cheap underperforming companies and enormous “dry powder” of cash on balance sheets is incredible fuel for both corporate and private equity buyout activity. The US since 1996 has seen the number of publicly listed companies decline from 7,300 listings to just 4,300. In Japan, the opposite has happened with 3,900 companies now listed and adding about 100 companies per year. I could see that trend reverse as private equity and corporates increase acquisition activity (and take public companies private) but there’s also another potentially massive driver of public assets moving into private hands. We have written about demographics before, but we haven’t considered the seismic and more rapid financial transfer going on in Japan right now.

According to a Japan Times article written back in 2020, the country was about to embark on a wealth transfer never experienced by any other country in history. Between the years of 2020 and 2030 it was forecast that $5 trillion would transfer to Japan’s “Millennial” generation via inheritance. That’s $500 billion per annum or more than 10% of GDP every year for ten years. We have previously written about the $14 trillion of savings by Japan’s households (50% of it in passive cash) but this active $5 trillion wealth transfer is highly likely to lead to changed financial behaviours and riskier investment targets. The local millennial generation watching private equity activity take off must be tempted to get involved. Indeed , local capital (JIP) has shown what’s possible with the Toshiba take-out. Europe might be tempted to get involved too. Not necessarily with a Japan focus. But, recall Mario Draghi’s EU Competitiveness Report last year and its recommended financial policy changes for the following:
- Infrastructure project funding
- Innovation investment of €884 billion, mostly from venture capital.
- Strengthening the Capital Markets Union (CMU) across the 27 jurisdictions
- Revitalizing the securitization market to improve the financing capacity of the banking sector.
Bluntly, Europe has been poor at putting risk capital to work. However, the experience of Japan and financial market reform has been extremely positive in driving domestic and foreign investment capital into its corporate assets. So, there is recent precedent. But, is there the money? Well, try this for starters – a 2021 report from X-Wealth forecasts a wealth inheritance transfer of $3.6 trillion across all of Europe by 2030. Maybe the demographic “Japanification” of Europe won’t be as scary as some think. In fact, the future is looking increasingly private.
May 6, 2025
An Eastern Promise Worth Exploring…

It is 23 years since I was last in Japan. I still love it. The cultural collision of ancient tradition, mass urbanisation and advanced technology is a gobsmacking experience. And, then there’s the friendly population hungry to learn while blessed with fabulous food, beautiful rural scenery, extraordinary attention to detail, safe streets and a commitment to social harmony. It is perhaps unique among the advanced economies of the world. However, Japan has its challenges. We all do these days but maybe Japan offers a fresh perspective on how to cope with change. I lived in Tokyo for three years in the ‘90s and this visit has been an eye-opener on how Japan is responding to change. So, I have decided to write a series of short articles in the coming weeks while travelling here on topics relevant to European business and investment. I’m currently on a Shinkansen (Bullet) train out of Tokyo on my way to the beautiful Gifu region and wanted to touch on a few early themes. Let’s set the scene.

A quick glance at the daily newspapers – Yomiuri Shimbun, The Nikkei and The Japan Times – confirms that global trade disruption is the topic du jour in common with almost every other country on the planet. The Japanese economy is a trade-based one, given its relative lack of natural resources. It also had its own MAGA-type isolationist experiment from 1602 to 1863 when trade and foreign visitors were effectively shut out from Japan by its ruling Shoguns. So, it’s interesting to note the Japanese media focus on the “isolationist” aspect of the extremist Trump regime in Washington. Let’s just say the Japanese are a bit sceptical on Washington’s ability to put together a coherent trade framework. In fact, the unofficial feedback from the Japanese trade delegation sent to the White House was damning.

There was a strong Tokyo view that the American negotiators “have no idea what they want”. Furthermore, this is a Japanese negotiating team which agreed trade deals with Trump in 2017 (TPP) and 2019 (agriculture/industrial products). As long-time Japan observers know, Japanese business and its leaders value relationship building and trust before committing slowly to any commercial deal. The mind boggles as to how Trump’s negotiating team think they will get any deal done with the Japanese while ignoring the terms agreed with Trump himself during his first presidency. Trust in the US is evaporating.

There has been a global ‘sell America’ trade in recent weeks as the US dollar, US Treasury bonds and US stocks have been whacked by foreign sellers who have lost faith in US institutional stability. Japan is believed to have been the original foreign seller of US Treasuries (it holds $1 trillion (!) of these bonds) which spooked Trump into delaying tariffs on ‘negotiating countries” like Japan earlier in the month. Instead, Trump’s team focused its tariff tantrums on China while giving most countries a 90 day breather. As I write, the White House attempt to shift focus and possibly gather trade “allies” against China is blowing up rather embarrassingly. Indeed, Japan have just said they will not join any co-ordinated trade axis against China as it is too important as a trading counter-party. Sensible stuff. Meanwhile, the CEOs of Walmart, Target and other US retailers have apparently told Trump that store shelves “will be empty in 2 weeks”. Indeed, import activity at US ports has collapsed and the country’s 8 million truck drivers (and MAGA hats) are on stand-by for mass lay-offs. Whoops… not so sensible stuff.

It turns out China can’t be removed from the US economy on the whim of Agent Orange. In fact, the latest word from the ‘stable genius’ is that tariffs on China will be reduced. No doubt, there will be some spurious ‘win’ claimed by Trump and his blowhard MAGA champions but the silence from China and President Xi has been deafening to all sane watchers of geopolitics. China has been prepping for this trade war for years, and has forced Trump to blink for all to see. However, the damage is already done to US credibility and increases the relevance of Japan as a trading partner for economic blocs in Asia and Europe. So, where can Europe work with Japan in a new world order? I already see a few shared pain points.

In many ways Japan is a window into Europe’s future. Europe is already in “low growth” phase with its ageing population and high level of risk-averse savings. However, the demographic cliff facing Japan has already sparked a dramatic change in policy. For context, Japan’s working population is expected to lose more than 10 million workers (72m to 62m) in the next 15 years. Yep, ten million. So, it was immediately striking on this visit to Tokyo to see the number of non-Japanese working in the hospitality and retail sectors. So striking that I went to check the statistics. According to a Japan Times report in 2018, more than 1 in every 8 adults living in Tokyo’s 23 wards (cities) are not Japanese citizens. That is remarkable considering when I first worked in Japan there were just over 1 million foreigners living amongst a Japanese population of 126 million across a country roughly the size of Italy. Perhaps the desire to live in Japan is less surprising when you consider in the same time period (from the ‘90s to now) the annual number of tourists has rocketed from 2.7 million to 40 million. However, the true surprise is the policy shift in Japan to allow immigration in significant numbers. Bluntly, despite far right political party activity in Europe, immigration is a necessary part of its future. But…. not the only solution. Japan again is leading.

Mario Draghi in his 2024 European Competitiveness report highlighted innovation and productivity as a necessary policy focus. In Japan, the use of robots and technology to assist in service-heavy healthcare and retail is well established. I personally witnessed robots in action in Narita airport and a variety of Tokyo retail settings but the presence of humanoid robots in Japanese nursing homes is also well established. In fact, Japan dominates world robotics, accounting for 40% of the global market. Of course, innovation does not happen without risk capital/investment. While the financial headlines have obsessed over AI and the gyrating performances of “Mag 7” tech stocks, Japan has quietly turbo-charged its investment environment.

Thanks to policy changes facilitating shareholder activism and takeover activity, the Japanese private equity market has exploded. We often write that the “future is private” so it is remarkable to see conservative Japanese capital markets experience 40% growth in 2024 private equity/venture capital activity. Unsurprisingly, the global private equity giants like KKR, Blackstone and Bain are all over this structural shift. Hedge funds have been racing to set up offices in Tokyo to follow the action too. Back in Europe, Draghi has highlighted the lack of innovation and investment/financial policy coherence across 27 different jurisdictions. Joined up thinking on investment could be as transformational for Europe as it appears to have been in Japan. And if you’re looking for policy endorsement, then who better than Warren Buffett.

We will return to the Japan private investment environment in greater detail in subsequent articles but the public markets have already received the “Buffett kiss”. Over the last few years Berkshire Hathaway has built 10% equity stakes in each of 5 Japanese trading houses. These trading houses, also known as sogo shosha, are large, diversified conglomerates involved in a wide range of businesses, from trading and investment to logistics and manufacturing. Buffett has invested in the big five sogo shosha – Mitsubishi, Mitsui, Sumitomo, Itochu, and Marubeni. We have written previously on this Buffett move but way before the Trump tariff tornado hit global markets. And, now I’m beginning to wonder. Did Buffett see an isolationist America coming and deliberately seek out the centuries-old trading relationships established across Asia by these Japanese trading giants? It wouldn’t be the first time Buffett saw a structural shift early. However, it’s not too late for Europe. A deliberate attempt to increase co-operation and relationships with Japan might be a very clever way to diversify risk away from an inward-focused US and explore Asian opportunity. Certainly, the Japanese can offer interesting perspectives and responses to deal with the four horses of Europe’s stagnation apocalypse: trade, immigration, demographics and innovation. Lots to learn, lots to write (or right).

April 25, 2025
Beautiful Minds Will Prevail

The late Peter Sutherland would smile. Sutherland’s stellar career took in stints as Ireland’s youngest ever Attorney General, youngest ever EU Commissioner, father of the student Erasmus Programme, Director General of GATT and its successor, the World Trade Organisation, topped off with Chairman roles at Goldman Sachs and BP. He was a pretty decent rugby prop forward too. Sutherland’s appreciation of equilibrium at scrum time, laser-like attention to detail and powerful negotiation skills were critical to his success in securing 123 sovereign signatories to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1993 when the highly complex Uruguay Round of global trade talks were in danger of collapse. He might always have been “Suds” to his friends, but in the international business world Sutherland was the “father of globalism”. And, he truly understood the complexity of global trade agreements. So, what would he make of the Trump regime’s shakedown of the global trading system? Well, as all students devouring legal judgments in the UCD Sutherland School of Law will know, precedent is key. And…..we have Brexit as our stare decisis case study.

Recall the Brexiteer mantra of “Global Britain” and those fantasy soundbites like “we hold all the cards”, “they need us more than we need them”, or best of all “Britannia Unchained”. Sound familiar? In hindsight, the freedom to pursue new trade deals featured far more chains and ridicule than expected. Britain is still to create the promised bi-lateral free trade deals with the likes of the US and India, while Truss-trumpeted deals done in Pacific Rim countries have had no more impact than if these faraway agreements had been signed by penguins. We mentioned “equilibrium” earlier and this really isn’t just a scrummaging thing. The brilliant Nobel Prize winning research by John Nash, featured in Hollywood’s “A Beautiful Mind”, are the foundation of all game theory analysis applied to trade deals. The Nash Equilibrium is a key concept in game theory where knowledge of other players’ strategies (politics) gives no players incentives for deviating from their own strategy. Hence, we experienced a “hard” Brexit. Now, think about China and the US currently engaged in escalating tariff retaliations. Also, remember the Pacific penguins.

The Trump trade team seem to believe they have 70 nations queuing up to sign trade deals with the US. Let’s be very clear, and Britain can attest to same, the signing of bilateral trade agreements (two countries in isolation) is extremely difficult to execute. Peter Sutherland would quickly point out that a change in trade terms with one country automatically opens up the possibility of trade being diverted through more favourably disposed countries eg China production switching to Vietnam during the Trump 1.0 administration. Trade is by definition MULTI-LATERAL and requires Nash-like understanding of game theory and trade negotiation. Britain’s trade delegations can sheepishly tell you all about how their Japan deal negotiations went. The short version is that Japan told Britain any new trading terms would be inferior to the EU because the EU was a far bigger and more important trading partner. Now, cast your minds back to Trump 1.0 and his renegotiation of an existing trade agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada. This “straightforward” renegotiation took TWO YEARS to complete. The current Trump trade advisory team are delusional about their ability to close out a series of bilateral trade deals in 90 days. Also, there is no Nash or Sutherland on the US team. In fact, it’s far worse than that…

*Trump’s White House Counsel on Trade, Peter Navarro, and his alter false ego Ron Vara, went on TV last night to claim bond yields (which “didn’t intimidate” his mobster boss) were going down while the rest of the sane world saw them continue their worrying climb higher.

*US Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, continues to laugh hysterically in his media appearances and reassured all viewers on Fox yesterday that the US economy would “explode”. Yes, Howard, that’s what we all fear.

*If you were hoping AI was going to help frame a complex trade agreement then think again. US Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, was outside her WWE wrestling comfort zone but still managed to stun a panel discussion this week with her comments on how “A1” would impact teaching. Yep, Linda hasn’t really heard the “AI” term in conversation before, and her reading to date on the topic picked up the AI term as “A1” which is a steak sauce apparently.

Not only will trade deals not get done there is now a US institutional credibility issue. As I write, the US dollar, US Treasuries and US stock markets are being sold by investors all over the world. Typically, the US dollar and Treasuries would strengthen in a period of stock market volatility so this is HIGHLY unusual erosion of trust in US governance. There is perhaps worse to come. Lost in the crazy headlines this week was a decision by the US Supreme Court to allow Donald Trump to fire officials leading two independent agencies. Again, the critical point is precedent. These officials have the same legal status as that of Federal Reserve governors. Already, Trump is whining about the Fed not cutting interest rates so the possibility of Federal Reserve Chair, Jay Powell, being removed by Trump can’t be ruled out. We should also be aware that the trade war with China could go financial and some commentators are speculating about the US government reneging on US Treasury interest(coupon) payments. A hint of either of these actions would make this week’s market gyrations look like jelly ripples in comparison. And yet, it’s possible we could have an “Orange Swan” event in the global financial system. Also, if it’s black swans you’re looking for, keep an eye on Chinese internal politics.

President Xi looks like he’s in for the long haul in this trade war with the US, but he’s not sure about his comrades. Latest reports suggest that the second ranking general in the People’s Liberation Army(PLA), He Weidong, has been purged. That level of rank in the PLA being purged has not happened since 1968 during Mao’s Cultural Revolution, and signals some dissent within the Politburo. Regime change in Beijing is a long-shot but most of the action in the near term will be in Washington.

Business decision-making is paralysed and the charts showing US Economic Policy Uncertainty Index in this week’s Financial Times were unprecedented, surpassing even Global Pandemic levels of confusion. Consumers aren’t feeling much better. The results of the University of Michigan consumer survey has just hit the screens and the commentary is ugly:

“Consumer sentiment PLUNGED 11% this month to a preliminary reading of 50.8, the second-lowest reading on records going back to 1952. April’s reading was lower than anything seen during the Great Recession”

This all reads as gloomy stuff but there’s a potentially “beautiful” outcome not quite in Trump’s strategic vocabulary. Financial markets, business and voters are all aligning in rapid fashion and beginning to smell incompetence. Was it only a few weeks ago that Trump’s security team shared military operational details with the outside world in real time via mobile phone chat groups? This week, team Trump stands credibly accused of almost blowing up the world’s financial markets. Whether you’re a Fox News viewer, or an oil worker in Galveston, or a farmer in Idaho you know something’s up and it isn’t pensions, savings or 401ks. Global trade needs great thinkers not spoofers, and the world is calling this ugly trade bluff quickly.

April 11, 2025
What Signals Are You Watching?

I’m a bit lost. I can still remember as a child staring out at the Ballycotton Lighthouse as it guided battered yachts to safety during the Fastnet Race disaster of 1979. Fast forward to today and there’s another potentially calamitous “storm” brewing for the most basic concepts of accepted facts and truth. Worryingly, there’s increasing evidence that the “lighthouse” of global leadership on rules of law and common values has gone dark. Orwellian dark. I know we’ve been here before with White House Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, and bonkers claims of inauguration crowds for Trump 1.0 but the second coming of Trump is a whole new level of autocratic demands to “reject the evidence of your eyes or ears.” That’s Orwell, not the White House.

It would appear that “their final, most essential command” this week is to NOT read the time-stamped texts of the US Secretary of Defense on the unsecured Signal mobile chat app shared with 16 other US security chiefs (plus one mistakenly added journalist) and conclude that this was the most embarrassing and dangerous self-inflicted security failure by US institutions in decades. The cover-up and spin-fest since the Atlantic magazine scoop has witnessed equally incompetent and criminal attempts to parse the meaning of “war plans” and “attack plans”. To be clear, the key “ground truth” in this intelligence near-miss is that advance information on a military mission puts US military personnel in danger. But here we are.

Donald Trump has given a press briefing stating the US “has to have Greenland” and his Kremlin keeper, Vladimir Putin, is dovetailing on message beautifully by saying “Trump’s plan to seize Greenland is serious”. Doesn’t that sound like two mob bosses agreeing ‘territory’? Yes, but don’t ask the lawyers. Leading law firm, Skadden Arps, has just “agreed” to provide $100m of pro-bono work for initiatives supported by the White House in order to avoid adverse targeting by a regime irked by previous “woke” cases taken by Skadden. So, do we all surrender as democracy dies in darkness? Well, there are other Signals to watch with possibly more impact than a Houthi-Yemen air strike mission. In fact, their potential impact could be sufficiently influential to trigger “lighthouse” leadership, even change. I’m looking at three Signals in particular.

First, as we head towards the Trump self-styled “Liberation Day” of trade tariffs imposed globally, we watch the money or flow of same. Some might think the enormous switch by investment institutions out of US equities (down 5% year to date) to international equities (eg. German Dax up 15% year to date) is a big deal. It is. But, equity markets could be due a “rotation” anyway after 15 years of US dominance and, frankly, more challenging valuations when economic leadership veers into cult lunacy territory. The awkward fact for the Trump crime gang is that foreigners own $16 trillion of US stocks and they are selling them even quicker than Tesla shares. However, the bigger more worrying signal is in the debt (or credit) markets. As we regularly say, debt(bond) markets can really intimidate as they can cause proper global economic damage. So, when I look at the ‘plumbing’ of the financial system and corporate debt (credit) data, I’m seeing signs of cracking and stress. The jargon monoxide will involve terms like “spreads”, “VIX”, “call options” and “default pricing” but, take it from me, this is where the intimidation of the Trump White House is beginning.

Second, how long will Trump’s ‘broligarchs’ go along with his trade war when there is possibly a far more consequential technology “war” exploding across our screens every day? My sense is that there could be a calculation that trade wars are a dangerous commercial distraction. Check out the latest data from Stripe. Software companies (SaaS) were always the uber-growth leaders, with Stripe analysis showing the median time for the top 100 software/SaaS start-up companies to reach $5m of recurring revenues was 37 months(data from 2018). But, there’s a new growth monster in town. Stripe data (2024) shows the top 100 AI start-ups hitting that $5m milestone in….. 24 months. You might have read that executive suites across the USA have been paralysed by indecision due to erratic Trump economic policy. Indeed, M&A deal activity has fallen to the lowest in a decade and year-to-date is down a whopping 30% on last year. However, the story in start-up world is very different. In the first quarter (Q1) of 2024 there were two start-ups acquired for more than $1 billion (unicorn status). In Q1 this year, there have been ELEVEN $1 billion plus start-up acquisitions. In fact , the total value of these deals this year has been more than $54 billion or 10x the activity value of Q1 2024. It’s all driven by AI and cloud infrastructure(including Google’s largest ever deal with Wiz) but when you see the latest text-to-image generation of OpenAI and the “Ghibli” craze you’ll definitely feel something’s up. But not the Tesla share price…

Finally, and Elon Musk might think I’m being “mean” (while he cuts social security support for the elderly) but Tesla’s share price is worth watching. The DOGE whisperer in the Oval office says he’s leaving government ‘service’ at the end of May. However, for Tesla and its shareholders, post its $800 billion share price meltdown, the value destruction pain may not end in May. The brand damage of embracing right-wing extremism has been staggering to witness but the end-game could be no less dramatic. The recent deal to sell X/Twitter to xAI (this x stuff is tiresome isn’t it) has been seen as a way for Musk to avoid margin (debt) calls on Tesla shares he has pledged as security on cross-company loans. The trigger for those margin calls was reportedly a Tesla share price of $120 per share (vs today $263 per share) but I’m not sure the pain point has been removed. The market value of Tesla is still more than $800 billion compared to Ford at less than $40 billion. Let’s not forget it’s a car company where a balance sheet and cash flow can implode if sales/revenues go into reverse. Last year revenues had a small 1% decline… but this year? Watch revenues closely, and watch Musk.

This might seem like a random set of signals to watch but sadly, there’s one emerging truth re US leadership. Money talks, not values nor principles. The Japanese (Nikkei) stock market has kicked off the week with a 4% wipe-out and we can only wonder when the men with the money (and the loans) pay a visit to the White House. We might have to wait a bit, but I’m hopeful the money will find that “lighthouse” moment.

March 31, 2025