Tag: Wall Street

  • Technology Sector Serves Up Critical New Pension Risks…

    Technology Sector Serves Up Critical New Pension Risks…

    That was quick. Half the year gone already but no World War III, no AI ending humanity and no gains for all those crypto lemmings who increased the wealth of the Trump family by $1.4 billion. The Donald deftly sidestepped the crypto shake down with the reassuring deflection of a practiced mobster – “The stock market is going up…Everybody’s profiting”. Sure, Jan. Between Love Island and the upcoming weekend sports-fest one can understand people lacking a little financial focus. So, I will keep it brief today. I’d like to take a look at a number of technology sector financial milestones which have been achieved and then flag a couple of unintended consequences, and probably pension risks. First, the milestones….

     

    • Tech-heavy Nasdaq Index gained 20% in H1 vs S&P 500 up 9.5%.
    • Semiconductor/chip sector went rocketed 82% in the same 6 months (Nvidia, Broadcom, Intel etc)
    • Memory chip stocks like Sandisk, Micron, Hynix and Samsung are up a whopping 120% in H1.
    • Research house, Gartner, say AI spending will hit $2.6 TRILLION in 2026.
    • The AI hyper-scalers – Google, MSFT, Amazon and Meta – are set to spend $650 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026. 
    • The combined weight of AI-focused stocks across hyperscaling, semiconductor chips, power, hardware and software tots up to 51% of the total value of the S&P 500 index.
    • Nine major AI companies accounted for almost half of global technology borrowing, raising $122 billion in corporate bonds in a single year to fund data centres and infrastructure.

     

    So, my first observation based on these milestones is that, if your pension is tracking global/US stock markets, then there is a strong possibility you are ‘running’ a significant bet on AI without actually realising it. It’s what the pensions/wealth industry might refer to as a ‘concentration risk’. And, I think the following headlines are flagging a few other AI risks right now….

     

    • OpenAI Leans Toward waiting Until Next Year For IPO – New York Times
    • Tesla Caps Employee AI Spend At $200 Per Week After Adoption Push – The Information
    • OpenAI in early talks to give 5% stake to US government – The Guardian

     

    OpenAI, as a reminder, is attached to almost $1 trillion of AI infrastructure projects and the ‘mood music’ in the above headlines is not great. These projects have been funded by trillions of equity and debt from technology and banking partners. So, these partners must be wondering why OpenAI feels the need to grease Donald Trump’s tiny toddler fingers. I’m wondering too, but speculation gets us nowhere. Of course, the complete anti-Donald antidote is truth, numbers, facts and genuine science. So, I was intrigued to come across some excellent research by former colleagues of mine at Quant Insight. These guys use big AI computational power and principal component analysis (PCA) to strip out all the ‘noise’ attached to the pricing/trading behaviour of financial instruments in the equity, debt and FX markets. The benefit of this huge analytical undertaking is to identify the key factors/drivers of a share price or bond price in the current market environment/regime. This is what they found was driving the $10 trillion semiconductor sector ETF (SOXX) which rocketed 80% in Q2 alone….

    It turns out that the biggest external (macro) factor driving the share prices of semiconductor companies was….. lower cost of corporate borrowing. Now think about these companies involved in heavy capex manufacturing and infrastructure activities. A glance at the financial milestones above and trillions of dollars of planned investment spend means these tech companies need external funding given their own revenues and cash flow can’t keep up with the pace of investment required. This means technology companies are now borrowing which was never really a feature of these high margin/cash flow companies previously. For pension funds this ALSO means the whole AI infrastructure story is not just a stock market story. Hidden behind the headlines, there is a borrowing, credit, balance sheet story. Now, think about that 51% exposure of the S&P 500 index to AI. You think you’re getting equity and AI exposure but….. you’re also acquiring an exposure to a credit (lending) book as large as many dedicated private credit funds. Now check out the recent headlines on private credit funds.

    Actually don’t. Enjoy the weekend sport first!

  • Tales On Tour

    Tales On Tour

    Events dear boy. That was Harold Macmillan’s famous response to the query about what can cause government failure. Undoubtedly, there is significant truth attached to that guidance. However, we are currently in an era of unmatched clown-car incompetence, chronic short-termism and self-interest at the highest levels of political power. On Brexit’s 10th anniversary we are about to welcome the 7th occupant of 10 Downing Street since that embarrassing day. Who knew Ed Milliband’s scuppering of his brother David’s bid for leadership of the Labour Party would facilitate Brexit passivity and bonkers trade assumptions across the UK political spectrum? Meanwhile, the Russians are discovering Vladimir Putin is the worst military leader in Europe since Olaf the Hairy accidentally ordered 80,000 Viking helmets with the horns on the inside(thank you Blackadder). And, of course, how can we forget the failed casino, burger, vodka, sneaker, NFL, airline, crypto toddler himself….the Orange Emperor with no Hormuz close (!) babbling about reflection swamps in Washington.  Prepare for Algae-fa to be designated a single-celled terrorist organization. Despite that swampy distraction, it turns out that the Donald is going to go down in history as the worst-returning oil acquisition strategist after his Venezuela and Iran escapades (unless you have an insider trading account).  We seem to be receiving months’ worth of news in mere days so forgive me if I’m a bit event focused. But, I’m not the only one….let’s go on an events tour.

    Prediction markets are the hottest thing in the finance world right now. Regulators in the US decided companies like Kalshi and Polymarket were trading derivatives, rather than betting platforms for events from sports to elections to wars. Famously, a US Special Forces sergeant was arrested having placed a trade on Polymarket to win $400,000 on the probability of Maduro losing power in Venezuela….. just before he hopped on a Black Hawk chopper to abduct Maduro and his wife. Maduro isn’t the only one suffering right now. Sports betting companies like Paddy Power/Flutter, William Hill and Bet 365 are losing out to these new ‘events prediction’ players. Kalshi sports volumes are up 300% since the World Cup started and is now valued at $22 billion. For context, global leader Flutter/Paddy Power is currently valued at $17 billion slightly more than Polymarket’s $15 billion value underpinned by a recent $600m investment from the New York-based Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).  That’s a big bet but after a recent trip to the UK, I’m beginning to wonder about another event prediction…

    Macroeconomic strategists are currently analysing the impact of another economics-light Labour leader in Andy Burnham taking the PM reins in the UK. And lurking in the background is the crypto puppet, Nigel Farage, anticipating a general election win in a few years. At last, thanks to the excellent Sally Nugent on BBC, the ‘ordinary man’ mask is slipping off Nigel (the car crash interview is worth a watch) as are the Reform Party’s electoral hopes. However, Westminster intrigue could amount to a financial distraction. It was acutely apparent during the worst of the Iran war volatility that the UK’s sovereign debt/bonds did worse than most other major advanced economy financial assets. That’s a very worrying signal. It means the UK is considered a ‘vulnerable’ sovereign risk. So, here’s an event prediction not being discussed in the UK financial or political press right now. My personal view is that the UK’s 8th political leader (after Burnham) will be the IMF/Troika who will have to impose financial sanity on the nation. Just saying, but there’s a huge amount of evidence that the UK has failed to do very much over the last 3 decades…

    In recent weeks, both on a recent IMI panel in Dublin and at a business lunch in London, the theme of under-investment was raised as a huge factor in UK decline. It is striking that the UK has quietly lagged at the bottom of the G7 rankings by corporate spending in 24 of the last 30 years. UK investment averaged 23.7% of GDP between 1970 and 1990. But, after that it fell by a quarter, to an annual average of just 17.9%. In contrast, other major OECD economies have, on average, kept their investment levels above 20% of GDP. Back in 2024, I also had highlighted this shocking lack of long-term planning:

     

    “The Institute for Public Policy Research estimates the under-investment in business at $500 billion less than what other comparable OECD countries have invested since 2005. Public sector investment (infrastructure) was a further $200 billon below the G7 average. All in, this chronic lack of investment places the UK 27th out of 30 OECD countries.” 

     

    Thatcherism might need to be reviewed. At least, the English football team is in better shape these days. In fact, sport is on my mind too.

    Closer to home, the return of world-class tennis to Ireland at the Dublin ATP Challenger Tour event at Elm Park opened eyes up to the possibilities of showcasing memorable sporting experiences. There is a reason why sports franchises, festival events, city-break tourism and concert tickets continue to smash valuation records. The experiential industry plays to scarcity, living in the moment and shared memories. Check out the acceleration of NBA franchise valuations from 2020 to 2025. Utah Jazz was acquired for a record $1.66 billion in 2020, but in 2025 the LA Lakers were bought for a new record franchise value of $10 billion. That’s a 6x shift in asset values. So, just as Big Tech companies have become bigger than sovereign states (and borders), it feels like sport will be a border-less global platform. Indeed, the recent reports about an ice hockey franchise coming to a Dublin home (in Cherrywood) and a brand new stadium could be flagging some very interesting long-term thinking? Follow that puck, and reach for the stars….literally.

    One can marvel or guffaw at SpaceX’s peak post-IPO valuation near $3 trillion, but there are big lessons for Europe. Global business in many communications and technology sectors is dominated by quasi-monopolies. That global monopolistic ‘north star’ for start-up founders in the US seems to be a cultural differentiator. Apple, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Netflix, Nvidia and Meta dominate their sub-sectors and have benefitted from the massive depth of US capital markets prepared to back global domination. We should, of course, celebrate the recent $3.6 billion exit by the founders of Fin/Intercom. But, at a strategic level, Europe needs to mobilize all its financial innovation and resources to plot the building of trillion dollar global champions over the coming years. So, on a positive note for both Europe and the UK, I’m looking at one huge sector still fragmented and missing the economies of scale which digital dominance can deliver. I’m thinking banking where London is still a major financial centre combining centuries of financial experience, stable common law, a concentration of necessary skillsets and….rapid  innovation.

    The UK is the second biggest fintech hub on the planet behind only the United States. In 2025 UK fintechs raised $3.6 billion across 534 separate deals, more deals than the next five European countries combined. Also, London is home to Revolut, now worth around $75 billion and  the most valuable private tech company in Europe. In fact, 8 of the top 10 fintechs in Europe come from the UK. It’s entirely possible London will produce Europe’s first trillion dollar financial services company. Ironically, with my monopoly/north star thinking cap on, the much-maligned fragmentation of Europe’s banking market could help the growth of a new trillion dollar financial franchise. Currently, Europe is home to over 9,000 banking entities. That’s not sustainable, but we might have to wait for events dear boy.

  • Watch Big Leadership Changes…

    Watch Big Leadership Changes…

    We do need heroes. As Irish rugby lost one this week (F.S. RIP), I was reminded of those dark days in the 1970s and 1980s and the importance of uplifting heroes at a time when Ireland needed leadership and inspiration. Regular readers of this weekly piece will know I have been very concerned about leadership on a global level for quite some time. The challenges of the breakdown of world order, AI, Ukraine, Gaza/Lebanon, climate change and the success of misinformation at the expense of truth, are crying out for leaders. At times, the challenges feel overwhelming. However, we can still be inspired and encouraged. Think back to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24th February 2022. The consensus view was that Ukraine would be conquered in a matter of  days. As the conflict moves into its 5th year and surpasses even the duration of WW2 for the former Soviet Union, all is utterly changed. And, Europe might have a genuine hero.

    The 82nd anniversary of the pivotal D-Day “Operation Overlord” landings of World War II were celebrated this weekend. Melvin Hurwitz, 99 years old and one of the last surviving veterans of the Omaha Beach landing, was back there again. As was Ukraine’s President Zelensky. Melvin took the opportunity to pull Zelensky close to him and the stage microphones picked up the veteran’s words – “You’re the saviour of the people. You’re my hero”. Zelensky quickly responded, “No, no. You saved Europe. You are our hero”. Classy stuff. Two men, who both know the value and ideals of defeating totalitarian aggression. Meanwhile, a criminal grifter in Washington presides over the East Wing of the White House lying in ruins and the South Lawn playing host to a UFC fighting cage. Institutional vandalism on full display. Trump is not alone in being exposed by true heroes. Vladimir Putin woke up last Friday morning for his “Davos-for-Dictators” world economic forum to see the host city, St Petersburg, 1,100 kms from Ukraine, buzzed by drones and rocked by explosions at fuel/energy and Baltic Fleet military facilities. Incredible. Four years ago, drone “technology” amounted to grenades dropped through tank turret hatches from quadcopters purchased at Circuit City. This year Ukraine will manufacture 4 million drones of dizzying long-range and short-range capabilities.

    Arguably, Friday 5th June 2026 might well have been D-Day (drone day) for Vladimir Putin. Ukraine is  ‘winning’ this war. Russian supply chains and oil refining assets are being decimated, and military casualties at more than 1,000 per day are exceeding the numbers of replacement troops being rushed to the front lines. The Ukrainians are now destroying Russian battlefield positions without using any ground troops, just unmanned ground vehicles and watchful lethal drones in the skies. At a fraction of the cost of the annual $1 trillion US defence budget, Ukraine has changed ‘war gaming’ assumptions and possibly revealed the obsolescence of large portions of modern military weaponry and delivery equipment. Ukraine is not the only European technology leader receiving attention this week.

    Nvidia might capture the financial market headlines with its AI semiconductor chip dominance. However, it is interesting to read an increasing number of stories about AI chip competition and efforts by Big Tech like Google and Microsoft to customize their own AI chips. Let’s just say monopolistic 75%-80% gross margins enjoyed by Nvidia might not be a long-term sure thing. In fact, the entire AI chip ecosystem has a number of monopoly-like players. What about the equipment essential for every leading-edge chip manufacturing facility? Well, the standout monopolistic player in extreme-ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines is a Dutch company. ASML, based in Veldhoven, was only founded in 1984, but has just become Europe’s most valuable company with a market capitalisation of more than $600 billion. Its customers are global, Chinese, TSMC, Apple suppliers, Intel, Hynix, Samsung etc. The mention of the last two companies is deliberate. Both these Korean manufacturers of memory chips for AI are considered ‘essential’ and have earned $1 trillion valuations. My sense is that ASML (and its relatively small 53% gross margins) is even more critical for the AI chip ecosystem…..so Europe might soon have its first trillion dollar 1980s ‘baby’.

    Sticking with European leadership, but at a sovereign level, Germany is fast losing stature. The failure to secure the ‘slam dunk’ certainty of a rotating seat on the UN Security Council reflects Germany’s abdication of leadership on anything from Ukraine to Gaza to China. The fact that relatively small European powers like Austria and Portugal were trusted more by voting nations to bring leadership to the UN has caused national introspection, and fury. And, the next European piece of leadership news won’t ease Teutonic tantrums. Germany’s perennial European rival, France, has just secured a whopping €75 billion investment commitment from Japan’s Softbank to focus its European data centre building efforts in the Gallic nation. Despite Macron’s domestic unpopularity, it does feel like France, with AI wonder-kid Mistral in the innovation vanguard, is stealing a European march in the global AI race.  Of course, not all wonder-kids grow up to deliver.

    My final thought on leadership change is in the crypto world. Bitcoin is now off 50% from its all-time highs, and one recent development hints at further trouble ahead. One of the key cheerleaders of the Bitcoin revolution has been Michael Saylor and his publicly listed MicroStrategy vehicle. Saylor’s vehicle has been a perma-buyer of Bitcoin since 2020. This dogged purchasing strategy has accumulated almost 850,000 Bitcoins which equates to 4% of total Bitcoin supply. But, last week the MicroStrategy vehicle tried to sell ….. 32 Bitcoins. Yes, thirty two at a value of just $2.5 million (circa $75,000 price). And the crypto market puked. Bitcoin has dropped below $60,000 and MicroStrategy’s share price is 78% off its all-time highs. Saylor’s strategy is now sitting on nearly $12 billion of unrealized losses. And, I’ve seen him explain and try to give comfort to investors in US TV interviews. It wasn’t pretty, or in any way financially logical. As the Strait of Hormuz continues to be strangled in non-negotiation by the “Art of The Deal” self-promoter, we should be wary of cheerleaders. They usually don’t turn out to be heroes.

  • Google Growth, Giddiness and Gullibility…

    Google Growth, Giddiness and Gullibility…

    Deep breaths…I’m searching for expletives. Google has not only become briefly the most valuable company on the planet last week, it also has its own eponymous verb. Now I’m wondering will there one day be a verb “Farage”? Could someone ‘farage’ a nation? Not quite damage or ravage, more like persuade a country to screw itself repeatedly. I’m staring at the screens over the last few days and gasping at the fact that millions of UK voters are trusting dear Nigel (again) and his Thai-based crypto billionaire backers to lead them to the “sunlit uplands” which escaped them on Brexit. Anyway, back to Google and another prediction which has ended up going horribly wrong. Remember how the commentariat gurus confidently predicted AI was going to destroy Google because of its dependence on search? Well, the reality today is far sunnier…

    Google’s AI focused cloud business delivered $20 billion of revenues in its last quarter. That number is astonishingly growing at 63% year-on-year and surpassed the expectations of all herd-like analysts on Wall Street. As mentioned earlier, Google last week briefly passed Nvidia as the world’s most valuable company at almost $5 trillion. Incredibly, 38% of that value, or $1.3 trillion, was added in April alone. Growth is still being rewarded, despite the simultaneous chaos caused by the strangulation of the global economy’s critical energy supply route in the Persian Gulf. This tug-of-war between positive and negative macro drivers is both scary and fascinating to long-time market watchers. Clearly, as stock markets hit all-time highs, the AI growth story is winning the battle for investors’ mindset. Indeed, the S&P 500 in the midst of strategic White House chaos has managed to add $10 TRILLION in value in the past month. It’s not just sentiment and valuations on the rise. The fundamentals look pretty good too.

    The year-on-year earnings growth (yep, that income thing after sales) for the median S&P 500 company in Q1 hit a double-digit 12% pace (Source: Deutsche Bank). The average across all 500 companies actually reached a monster 25% growth rate. That pace of fundamental profit growth hasn’t been seen in at least 4 years and has nothing to do with a pandemic recovery or other macro rebound. Fundamentals like income and earnings matter for the more risk-averse investors. So, it was encouraging to see US high-yield bonds perform strongly in April, European M&A volume at its highest since 2007 and the European bond market just had its busiest day ever.  Yes, people are concerned about supply/demand imbalances in the AI infrastructure world but, if anything, demand is running ahead of capacity. Check out the deal just done by Anthropic and SpaceX. This is all about Anthropic’s urgent need for compute power to meet demand. For illustration, Anthropic had planned for 10x revenue and usage growth in the first quarter of this year. In fact, the growth has been closer to 80x……. yep 80x, not 8x. Euphoric stuff, but it’s time for a word of caution.

    Confidence and rising expectations are great for driving valuations higher. However, this also brings over-confidence and speculation. Arguably, the gullible are in danger of being sucked into the wrong ‘opportunities’. Two outstanding examples of over-confidence and gullibility working in tandem appeared on my screens this week. First, the original meme-stock, GameStop, which gathered a huge retail investor following from online communities like Reddit and Mashable, announced a $56 billion bid for the much larger company, eBay. However, no matter how many times GameStop CEO, Ryan Cohen, awkwardly told his CNBC interviewers the financing was “half cash, half stock”, nobody sane could make the numbers add up. At best, GameStop equity valued at $11 billion, plus $9 billion cash in the bank, plus an offer of $20 billion of financing from Toronto Dominion was still going to be $15-20 billion short of the asking price. Nuts stuff which probably won’t end well. However, you don’t have to wait to find out with Fermi Inc.

    Fermi Inc listed publicly (IPO) as recently as October 2025 with a valuation of about $19 billion. Fermi was riding the coat tails of the AI infrastructure-chasing-energy theme. Its solution was a promise to supply 17 gigawatts of nuclear-powered AI infrastructure….with zero revenues and zero clients. In the subsequent months the CEO and CFO have both departed, and the company still has not signed a single customer. Unsurprisingly, gullible investors have taken serious pain. The Fermi Inc share price has imploded by 85% wiping $16 billion from the IPO valuation. Customers and market traction remain a critical consideration for sensible investors and thankfully there are investment themes out there which are showing encouraging form. Here’s two worth watching.

    Amazon’s cloud business, AWS, was built around its first, best customer, Amazon’s e-commerce business. Now Amazon is launching Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS). And guess what? Amazon itself will be this logistics business’s first and best customer again. This allows Amazon to invest massively in infrastructure to challenge the incumbents, UPS, FedEx etc.  Regular readers will know we have strong positive views on the logistics infrastructure space and have recently raised money for OOHPod. Now, think how Amazon invented cloud computing before it was “hot”. This writer believes logistics infrastructure in the coming years will attract lots of investment capital and… customers. Check out Bloomberg’s view:

     

    “The world’s largest online retailer on Monday announced Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS), offering other companies access to its “full portfolio” of supply-chain and distribution offerings. The service largely consolidates a package of existing products — air and ocean freight, trucking and last-mile delivery — into a new suite it says companies like Procter & Gamble Co. and 3M Co. are already using.”

     

    Not bad, P&G and 3M on the customer roster already. Of course, our angle in logistics infrastructure is more deals and more M&A. So, it was interesting to catch another positive signal on M&A activity in recent days. It looks like Chicago’s boutique investment bank, Lincoln International, is looking to go for IPO in 2026. This will be the first boutique investment bank to go public since Perella Weinberg in 2021, and is enjoying a 31% income growth tailwind from 2025. Of course, the perkier M&A environment has helped. Data from Pitchbook would seem to confirm same…

     

    “2025 was a record-setting year for global M&A activity, with both deal value and volume shattering the previous highs set in 2021. PitchBook data tracked 50,810 transactions last year—the first time deal count has ever surpassed 50,000; and combined deal value hit nearly $5 trillion, up 37% from the prior year. In its filing, Lincoln contends that the growth of private capital will create a “larger and more durable M&A fee pool,” particularly for sponsor-led deals.”

     

    Again, we have written frequently about the structural shifts in finance and fintech investment. The opportunities to leverage technology in financial services are enormous, and particularly for small disruptors. The standout number for me in April was the trading revenue achieved by a firm unknown to most. Jane Street is a financial trading firm with 3,500 personnel and a lot of technology. In the last 12 months Jane Street generated $39.6 billion in trading revenues. JP Morgan with 316,000 employees did $35.8 billion; Goldman Sachs and its 46,000 superstars did $31.1 billion. The average revenue per employee at Jane Street was an incredible $11 million. Technology and trillions of dollars of investment capital flows can be a phenomenal combination. So, it is timely that Spark Private investors in the coming weeks will be shown two excellent fintech platform prospects. The beach can wait….

  • The Truth Can Hurt ….. Investment

    The Truth Can Hurt ….. Investment

    Forty years ago this week, reactor 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant exploded. The human and monetary costs were in the thousands and hundreds of billions respectively. More difficult to quantify was Chernobyl’s contribution to the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, I did re-watch the excellent HBO series Chernobyl in recent days and was struck by a non-monetary factor which might resonate for those currently enduring daily White House appeals to ignore our eyes and ears. The words of Professor Valery Legasov of Moscow State University in the opening scene of Chernobyl seem almost prescient  –  “What is the cost of lies? It’s not that we’ll mistake them for the truth. The real danger is that if we hear enough lies, then we no longer recognize the truth at all.”  For the USSR, the truth of technological decline, an obsolete economic model, and the inability of centralised power to deal with the complexity of a more connected global economy was easy to see. But fatally, not recognized. Fast forward to today, and we could be in similar TRUTH territory….

    Don’t worry, we won’t go down any conspiracy theory rabbit holes. So, no need to wonder why a would-be assassin might gain access without security challenge to the Washington Hilton and within one floor of almost the entire Trump regime senior leadership at Saturday’s annual White House Correspondents dinner. If the current head of the FBI is nicknamed “J. Edgar Boozer” then the truth is closer to incompetence than conspiracy. Similarly, but with far greater global economic impact, if Germany’s normally cautious Chancellor Merz is saying that the US has “no clear exit strategy” and is being “humiliated” by Iran, then the truth is that the US does not really “hold all the cards” or the keys to “Schrödinger’s Strait” of Hormuz. The consequences are plain to see as oil prices soar past $110 per barrel again and OPEC’s number 3 producer, UAE, just left the cartel after 59 years of membership.

    Clearly, the old world order alliances from NATO to OPEC are fragmenting. And, that’s before anyone dares to mention the eye-catching new Pew (March 2026) poll showing 60% of Americans now view Israel unfavourably — up from 42% in 2022. That’s almost as bad a swing as Trump’s voter approval on dealing with inflation shifting to a net MINUS 40, and national Consumer Sentiment surveys (Michigan/Ipsos) diving to the lowest levels seen since 1978. And yet….

    There’s a danger we have been distracted and miss other truths. Watch what people do, not what they feel. For example US consumer sentiment might be plummeting but US retail sales are running ‘hot’ at 7.7% year-on-year growth, the fastest growth pace seen since 2022. Meanwhile, fossil fuels and Strait of Hormuz blockades (unless you’re a Russian oligarch’s yacht – I know…Russia, Russia, Russia) might be dominating the gloomy headlines but there’s more positive long-term developments accelerating at speed. If you have been unable to copy or track Baron Trump’s oil trading strategies or share the Fox Business congratulations of Maria Bartiromo on Eric Trump’s new $24 million contract with the Pentagon(yup), then there’s good news and bad news. The bad news is you’re not making millions on risk-free trading or commerce, but the good news is you won’t need a fitting for an orange jump suit. However, away from the fossil fuel supply crisis, check out the following quiet developments which could hurt your investment portfolio if you miss them…

     

    • In 2025, for the first time in history, clean power met every single unit of new global electricity demand.
    • Renewable energy sources (33.8%) officially crushed coal (33.0%) for the first time in 100 years.
    • Electric vehicle (EV) sales in emerging markets have surged 80%.
    • In Europe, EV sales soared 51% in March while EV sales smash through 25% of the total global market.
    • Chinese company, CATL, just unveiled a battery with a 1,500km range that charges in 6 minutes
    • China exports of batteries, EVs and solar cells were up 34%, 53%, 80% respectively last month.

     

    A quick glance at the last two developments might suggest another uncomfortable truth; China is winning this global electrification ‘war’ and arguably is the winner of the Persian Gulf one too. However, there’s clearly only one country, USA, winning the global race for AI investment capital right now. The AI chip superstar stock, Nvidia, has just clocked up another $1.25 trillion increase in market value in less than 4 weeks. Nvidia’s current market capitalisation of $5.25 TRILLION is just shy of the entire value of Germany’s GDP and surpassed by only those of China and the USA itself. Google and Nvidia’s combined market value is now over $10 trillion.

    AI is acting like a ‘death star’ for other investment sectors as it sucks up huge amounts of investment dollars. In Q1 of this year software stocks collapsed 29% from their highs while 81% of all venture capital funding ($265 billion out of $330 billion) went to AI start-ups, with 65% of that going to just 4 companies (Source: Pitchbook). You’ll keep hearing and reading that word “concentration” and how investment capital is racing into ever narrower niches within technology. However, it might be worth keeping a mix of old and new names on the investment radar. Here’s two to watch:

    NEW: Anthropic, the parent of my new best work friend this week, Claude, is apparently trading in private markets right now at a $1 trillion valuation. Of course, it does help valuations if your annualised revenue jumps from $9 billion to $30 billion….in just 3 months.

    OLD: Samsung, the unwieldy Korean conglomerate of TV, phone and memory chip manufacture, is going to be the most profitable company in the world by 2027. Bloomberg reckon Samsung will edge out Nvidia for top spot with a whopping operating profit of $330 billion. Yep, good old memory chips (DRAM, NAND etc) are needed by Claude, Gemini and all the other agentic chatbots to remember you (and your prompts).

    So, that’s all good for now. But, let’s get back to the Truth thing. And, we’re not talking about AI chatbot hallucinations, or even Trumpolini’s Jesus delusions. It’s much more basic than that. In the middle of all this AI euphoria sits the company who kicked things off with ChatGPT, Open AI, and its CEO, Sam Altman. This week we heard OpenAI are behind on planned revenues and new subscriber growth targets. These things happen in fast growing tech stories, but OpenAI is attached to $1.2 trillion of AI infrastructure deals where OpenAI’s commitment is $600 billion despite current annual cash burn of…… $17 billion. Furthermore, OpenAI does not have a huge balance sheet like Google, Microsoft or Amazon. So, credibility and confidence matters. And, I’m concerned.

    Altman’s career history per various in-depth media articles (the New Yorker one is best) is littered with massive commercial relationship breakdowns and a common theme. Loss of trust. Phrases like “profound mistrust”, “lack of candour”, “consistent pattern of lying” and “deceptive and chaotic behaviour” are used to describe the CEO of a company seeking to publicly list (IPO) in New York this year with a valuation of more than $800 billion. This week Altman faces Elon Musk in court for a $150 billion lawsuit brought by the latter regarding governance at OpenAI. Let’s just say the potential damage to Altman’s credibility could have ‘nuclear’ consequences for the AI financial ecosystem. Watch carefully and remember the fragility of the Open AI balance sheet in the context of its trillion dollar commitments. Then think of Chernobyl and Valery Legasov’s most powerful words which we have cited before on these pages…

    “Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later that debt is paid”

  • Summer Looking Hot….

    Summer Looking Hot….

    Last week was biblical. Firstly, President Trump became Jesus online, before dodging to “doctor” retreat on evangelical outrage. Secondly, Vice President, JD Vance, fresh from blowing up Viktor Orban’s election chances in Hungary, told the Pope to tread carefully on….theology. And then, Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, presented a biblical verse, Ezekiel 25:17, at a Pentagon prayer service which turned out to be more fiction than truth. In fact, it was Pulp Fiction and the words delivered by Samuel L. Jackson’s character in Quentin Tarantino’s cult classic. Who needs The Gimp character with these White House slaves to ignorance?? Sadly, there’s little chance of ball gags for the Trump crime gang just yet as they ‘flood the zone’ with reality-defying nonsense. Meanwhile, our job in the macro risk world is to look behind the eye-rolling headlines connected to the on/off blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, and make sense of real events and numbers. Coincidence or not, I was about to write a rather upbeat piece before any Persian Gulf news broke. Here’s the real stuff which caught my eye away from the Oval Office clown show…

     

    Big Tech stocks leading a $4 trillion market rebound – Bloomberg

     

    Systematic hedge funds bought stocks at a record pace last week – Reuters

     

    Global Venture Capital (VC) investment surged to a record $330 billion in Q1 –   KPMG

     

    Emerging Market bond sales are soaring again as investors dive back into risk  – Bloomberg

     

    It feels like markets and investors have moved on, and confidence is building rapidly. Goldman Sachs research reported that March was the best month in a decade for long/short trading hedge funds. The actual average return in one month for these type of funds was 7.7%, and will be music to the ears of investment banks who need these huge institutional generators of commissions, M&A fees and securities lending to be “feeling good” and chasing opportunity/risk. Indeed, quarterly updates from all the US investment banks showed Goldman Sachs delivering a best-ever quarter for their equities trading operation, and the Guardian has reported almost $50 billion of profits (Q1) generated by just 6 banks – Goldman, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Bank of America. It’s all about confidence and we’ve been waiting a while for the IPO market to come to life. In the private equity world, and the Spark world, this public listing channel (IPOs) is critical in providing the much needed ‘exits’ while pumping liquidity flows (and confidence) through the financial ecosystem. The latest numbers look encouraging.

    In Q1 there were 22 IPOs in the US with a combined stock sale value of $9.4 billion compared to just 15 exits the year before and $7.9 billion of liquidity generated (Source: PwC). So, the pace is picking up but we must brace ourselves for the ‘galactico’ listings promised later in the year. Elon Musk’s SpaceX alone could raise $75 billion on a $2 trillion valuation and the listings of OpenAI and Anthropic will be massive conduits of capital back into the AI ecosystem. War or no war, there seems to be no end to investor demand for a slice of AI action. CB Insights research showed that global venture capital (VC) markets invested $226 billion in AI in Q1 of this year. That compares to the $217 billion raised by private AI companies in ALL of 2025. Note that the ‘concentration’ effect familiar to many observers of the ‘Magnificent 7′ tech dominance of public markets can also be seen in private markets; more than 94% of the value of Q1’s VC funding was funnelled into deals worth more than $100m. But it’s not all AI giddiness…

    The biggest industrial IPO this century was just completed last week. Madison Air Solutions, in the ‘hot’ HVAC sub-sector critical to hi-tech construction, officially claimed the title of the largest industrial IPO since UPS in 1999, pricing its $2.23 billion offering at the top of its range and surging 18.5% in its Thursday debut. Madison Air delivers the cooling systems for servers in the data centre space but one can’t help feeling things are generally hotting up, and could make for a very interesting summer. Of course, there are big ‘IFs” on the macro geopolitical front but the longer-term picture is beginning to reveal some emerging trends. In particular, I’m watching Jeff Bezos going BIG into physical robotics and manufacturing automation with a planned  $100 billion fund named Project Prometheus. It is noteworthy how often the AI chip king, Jensen Huang of Nvidia, refers to robotics as the next multi-trillion dollar wave of the AI economy after agentic services (eg Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT etc). However, there’s another agency service which is quietly picking up speed and needs watching.

    We have written before about Waymo and autonomous driving passenger miles growing rapidly. So, the most recent data from start-up funding database, Crunchbase, is striking. Autonomous vehicle start-ups have already raised a record $21.4B across just 34 deals in 2026 year-to-date, versus $5.9B across 99 deals in all of 2025. Waymo led with a $16 billion round at a $126 billion valuation, while Shield AI raised $2 billion and Wayve raised $1.3 billion. Again, automation and human-collaboration are very much our future, and are driving (!) investor animal spirits. This also confirms the theme of a book I cite often, The Future Is Faster Than You Think, and highlights how technologies are converging – think battery power, AI, and robotics in combination. Feel free to follow the ridiculous Trump headlines, but there’s a danger you’ll miss the bigger picture. It’s hotting up out there….

  • Short Prompts, Longer Impacts….

    Short Prompts, Longer Impacts….

    That was exhausting. And it was only a short week. Iranian civilization and the White House insider trading desk were given a bit more time to exist under autocratic regimes while Schrödinger’s ceasefire broke out everywhere but in the Strait of Hormuz and Lebanon. This paradox seemed to inspire Melania Trump who went to the Presidential podium to assure the world’s press that Epstein criminality was not a hoax, but at the same time that she “never had a relationship” with dear Jeffrey.  I’m thinking that’s a “relations” denial but that’s the Clinton nostalgia in me. Anyway, this very strange First Lady intervention has prompted some very short-term thinking about what exact Epstein bombshell is about to drop. The longer term implications might take a bit longer to decipher but, at the bare minimum, Melania appears to be keeping an eye on the catastrophic GOP polling for the mid-term elections this November. In fact, there were a few other developments this week which prompted relatively light commentary levels but could have far weightier longer term impact. Let’s start with a prompt, but one of the AI variety…

    Anthropic is the parent of the chat bot Claude which recently fell out with the Pentagon. Well, it looks like Anthropic might have prompted one of their LLM chat bots (large language models) rather too well. The latest reports suggest a cousin of Claude (certainly not Greg), Mythos, could be a bigger threat to the planet than Agent Orange in the Oval Office. Yeah, seriously. Apparently, and this is the really simple language version….Mythos was tasked/prompted to find vulnerabilities in software and systems deployed by the world’s biggest institutions, banks, utilities and blue chip companies. Mythos didn’t come back with one or two “exploits” or ways to hack software, it came back with hundreds even thousands of ways to hack into software systems. Mythos was SO good, Anthropic has taken the immediate decision not to release the model to the public. That’s not all. Some very senior people have been spooked by Mythos. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell called the CEOs of America’s biggest and most important banks into a closed-door meeting this week at the Treasury building in Washington, D.C. Expect to hear a lot more about Mythos and wonder how long before Polymarket or Kalshi start running betting books on the probability of world destruction being at the hands of digital weapons rather than nuclear weapons. But if we stick with the nuclear threat…..

    Earlier in the week, CNBC’s Trump-cheering anchor, Joe Kernen, was destroyed by former Transport Secretary, Pete Buttigieg in a toe-curling TV clip which has gone viral. Kernen tried desperately to amplify Tehran’s imminent nuclear capabilities but struggled to deflect from the strategically disastrous consequences of the Iran war including the shutting down of the Strait of Hormuz. “Whataboutism” is about to hit peak volume in MAGA land to drown out the inevitable rise in prices, inflation and voter discontent in the “golden age” of the USA. Peace talks begin at the weekend in Islamabad but the longer term consequences of world fuel supplies being cut by 10-20% will be felt for months to come. As each day passes, the global economy will pay the price of minimal shipping traffic passing the Strait of Hormuz. Before the war, daily shipping traffic averaged 130 vessels. Currently, Schrödinger’s ceasefire is delivering a daily traffic total of…… 6-7 vessels. Not 67, six…or seven. No wonder Trump is panicking, and that’s before he even checks the latest polls and actual votes.

    Amid all the ceasefire headlines, US voters are beginning to shift sharply. In Georgia, former Trump lovey, Marjorie Taylor Green’s seat witnessed a 25 point voter move towards the Democrats. In another swing state, Wisconsin, politicised Supreme Court elections saw a 20 point shift to the Democrats. According to the election analysis publication, the Downballot, Democrats have improved upon their 2024 presidential election margins by an average of 11% in special elections so far in 2026 and roughly 13% since the start of 2025. Prediction markets, Kalshi and Polymarket, are giving Democrats 88% odds of House control and 53% for the Senate in November 2026. Meanwhile, closer to home, Hungary goes to the polls this weekend with the real possibility of Trump and Putin fanboy, Viktor Orban, being ousted from power. A particularly eye-rolling moment during the last week of the campaign was the the arrival of US Vice-President JD Vance to complain about EU interference in the election……while on a trip to Hungary to interfere in their election. The EU-US relationship has never looked so broken, and will take years to repair. Indeed, it’s increasingly clear from a European perspective that no senior US leader gets a pass for staying quiet during this insanity. It’s not the only upside-down shift in the world we used to know…

    The downturn in the performance of software stocks like SAP, Salesforce and Microsoft has been a feature of financial market commentary in recent months, spawning multiple SaaSpocalypse headlines. I’m not convinced the valuation meltdown of software under the threat of AI is fully merited. Current valuation multiples, price/earnings below 20x, are back at pre-Covid levels and below those of lower growth consumer staples stocks like Walmart. In fact, Walmart is currently trading at higher valuation multiples than Amazon. Clearly, longer-term prospects for software have currently shifted in investors’ minds but perhaps the bigger story is in hardware. The semiconductor sector (ETF $SOXX) has risen by 108% over the past year while the software sector (ETF $IGV) has declined by 14% over the same period. This scale of market performance divergence is unprecedented and is a reminder (if the Strait of Hormuz isn’t already) that the securing of the supply of physical assets (atoms, molecules) is becoming THE strategic business edge in the global tech race, and not digital code (bits).

    A final thought on performance, as Ireland’s government considers new tax frameworks and savings products to encourage households and businesses to take risk with circa €340 billion sitting in bank deposits. Of course, Spark (and our 60-strong stable of companies we have funded) have skin in this game so one hopes the government is mindful of the benefits of diversification across the entire investing spectrum. A narrow solution steering monies into already publicly listed (and funded) companies would be a missed opportunity to drive investment into our capital starved start-up and SME sectors. Oh, and the investment returns in private assets are certainly worth investigation. Our own EIIS Private Portfolio service launched just over two years ago has funded 24 companies to date. Current valuations and funding milestones/marks indicate an estimated (average) performance by the entire portfolio of somewhere near 25%. Steady stuff, and early yet as these companies are just 2 years into their scaling up journey. However, there is one other BIG factor to consider. The EIIS tax rebate scheme does work, and all Spark investors have been receiving their tax rebates. Now, here’s the interesting twist. That return of cash completely changes the returns profile of the portfolio above. The average return  to investors (if you had invested in all 24 companies) is actually over 100%. In just 2 years, and that’s mostly cash, not just paper. Expect us to write lots more on this very soon.

    Let’s call that a little prompt, with a very big long-term impact.

  • Time To Look At The Big Savings Picture

    Time To Look At The Big Savings Picture

    As Artemis II hurtles towards a lunar orbit we are reminded of how distance can give us new perspectives on our little planet. So too for time and our savings habits. Funnily enough, those perspectives are more reminders than new lessons. And, it’s definitely a good week for reminders. Top prize for memory-jogging was the Reform UK’s housing spokesperson, Simon Dudley, whose outstanding contribution to post-Grenfell safety debate was that “everyone dies in the end” while attacking current safety regulations. Thus ended Dudley’s 23-day reign as Reform housing guru –  even Igor Tudor’s stint at Spurs was 44 days. Of course, on a bigger stage, Pam Bondi learned a very old lesson this week that in a lawless society, the shelf-life of an Attorney General is limited no matter how good the cosmetic surgery. Let’s not go there with ex “ICE Barbie”, Kirsti Noem, except to say that these evangelical-political types really do have the most astonishing fetishes hidden in those bible-stacked closets. Poor Cricket clearly knew too much. Now, let’s take a look at areas of investment where we might need to know a bit more.

    In the week of Ireland’s first Savings & Investment Forum, we must applaud any efforts to put our savings capital to better use. The critical impetus is to move from a ‘savings’ no-risk culture to an investment wealth-creation culture. However, I’m personally concerned the investment options in new tax and incentive frameworks might be quite narrow. So, as luck would have it, the most striking thing I read this week highlights the dangers of a relatively ‘narrow’ approach to investment. Credit to Ben Carlson of A Wealth of Common Sense for highlighting the updated findings of Hendrick Bessembinder’s work. If that name sounds familiar it’s because we quote Bessembinder’s work extensively in our EIIS Private Portfolio brochure and newsletters. The Professor of Finance at Arizona State University in a 2018 research paper made a very powerful case for diversification, or a ‘portfolio approach’ to investing. His view, and mine, is that ‘picking winners’ is beyond the capability of all but a handful of people on the planet. Hence, my encouragement to build multi-year portfolios. His research covering S&P 500 stock returns since 1926 flagged two key features of investing:

     

    **60% of all stocks underperform risk-free government bonds(Treasuries).

    **Only a tiny 4% of the entire stock market’s securities (company shares) account for the vast majority of investor gains.

     

    The enormous concentration of performance in just a few stocks is strong justification for just buying ‘the market’ or indexing. Think about the Magnificent 7 or MANGO stocks these days and the ‘cost’ of not being invested in a single name like Nvidia (350,000 % outperformance since 1999). Now, let’s take a look at Bessembinder’s latest updated research with a full 100 years of data in the analysis. The inclusion of an extra 10 years of data shows that concentration of performance has accelerated into an even smaller pool of stocks:

     

    “Over the 1926 to 2016 period studied in Bessembinder (2018), 89 firms accounted for half of the $43 trillion in net wealth creation. After including outcomes for the most recent nine years, just 46 firms account for half of the $91 trillion in net wealth creation over the full century.”

     

    Wowzers! $45 trillion of wealth generated by just 46 companies accounts for more than half of ALL returns over time. However, I want to concentrate on the almost 60% of stocks who don’t even beat cash/Treaury bonds. That’s not a figure which helps the marketing departments of private client stockbrokers or active fund managers. But….. it does help those of us who are trying to increase investment in private assets including venture capital, private equity and infrastructure projects. You might wonder why, given it seems to ‘prove’ that investing can result in many companies failing to beat cash – at last count there’s more than €340 billion in Irish bank accounts. Well, one of the most common rebuttal arguments of investing in young venture capital type opportunities is that “most companies fail”.  Now check out that figure from the PUBLIC markets. Yes, 60% of those publicly listed companies fail to beat cash in performance terms. So, here’s the mindset change required for investing in private markets – many of the investments won’t better cash but it’s worth it if you can just find a few winners in your portfolio. Furthermore, that should not merit a guffaw from a professional advisor that those winners are too rare to justify investing in the asset class. Repeat slowly back to him/her that 46 companies over 100 years delivered half of ALL returns in the S&P 500. This week we also received a reminder of what private markets can deliver for early stage investors.

    SpaceX has filed paperwork to IPO in June. The plan is to raise $75 billion of new money at a valuation of….. $2 trillion. For historical context, please note that the previous global record IPO was Saudi Aramco which raised $29 billion in 2019. In 2025 the entire US capital markets raised a total of $44 billion across 202 IPO listings. For the valuation curious, SpaceX looks like it’s hoping to raise money at circa 100x this year’s revenues. I think the big picture pointer here is that private asset ‘winners’ can generate an outsized proportion of your overall investment returns while the majority will destroy wealth/purchasing power. However, the big learning reminder today is that this outcome is not much different to what happens in those orderly, liquid, mature public markets.

    Hopefully, Europe and Ireland will grasp that lesson and understand that diversification should not stop at publicly listed investments. Each asset class has its own risks but the bigger picture doesn’t look too different, be it public or private assets. FORTY SIX companies tell that 100 year old story. Now, Europe must think about how it can fund its own SpaceX and mobilise the €14 trillion of European household savings sitting in wealth destructive low-yield bank accounts. Yep, FOURTEEN TRILLION. It seems apt as we look to the skies and the possible this week, that Artemis is both the Greek goddess of hunting….and transitions.

  • The War Of Unintended Consequences…

    The War Of Unintended Consequences…

    I know. The headline should read “LAW” but where’s the law these days? Certainly, it’s nowhere near Washington as the new Trump fund raising “squeeze” is an emailed request for cash donations in exchange for “private national security briefings” straight from the desk of The Don himself. I kid you not. Anyway, let’s get back to the war, or ‘excursion’ per the Orwellian Oval Office. Clearly, things on the Iran war front are not going to plan. My particular favourite summary of the moment is a delicious one from The Economist: “Although Donald Trump claims to have destroyed 100% of Iran’s military capabilities, the remaining 0% is wreaking havoc on the global economy.” Now, the purpose of this article is not to re-hash all the negative first-order global impacts of the war ranging from higher fuel prices, to supply chain disruption, to inflation, to reduced growth….to interest rate hikes. Yuk! None of this helps financial markets or business in the near term but I’m intrigued by some of the second-order possibilities which could emerge from an extended period of uncertainty. I’m thinking of three areas in particular:

    AI Infrastructure: The simple math of a shock to the global economy is that financial flows dramatically shift. Quickly. Extra money will be needed to meet higher energy bills, economic stress etc. That money must come from somewhere else in the system. So, one thing to consider is that the hundreds of billions Saudi Arabia , UAE, and Qatar committed to the funding of AI infrastructure projects might just be needed to rebuild energy infrastructure closer to home. Current estimates of the cost of the attack on Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG hub is up to $20 billion per annum . And the worst bit, the rebuild could take 5 years – so let’s call that $100 billion. There is a teeny weeny bit of irony here given the US tech broligarchs’ man in the big house (and ballroom) has screwed up royally. Current estimates suggest $4 trillion is needed to build data centres, processing chips, training models, memory chips and storage by 2030. A squeeze on access to that investment capital will favour the biggest balance sheets and cash flows like Google, Microsoft and Amazon. Not for the first time, I worry about OpenAI’s positioning in the middle of all this AI excitement (remember the famous FT graphic) and being attached to more than $1 trillion of AI projects. So might its bankers worry, watching its tiny balance sheet.

    Electric Revolution: There was a theory for years that Saudi Arabia was deliberately keeping the oil price lower in order to delay the electric/renewable revolution. Their thinking apparently was that if energy was cheap it would remove the urgency to seek alternatives to fossil fuels. So, with Asian buyers already paying over $170 per barrel of oil we are beginning to see some interesting developments. In a little more than 2 weeks, Chinese EV player, BYD Co, is seeing its showrooms packed with customers wanting to switch to EV models. From Bloomberg….”At a BYD Co car dealership in Manila’s financial district, demand for the Chinese company’s electric vehicles is so high that Matthew Dominique Poh said he’s seen a month’s worth of orders in just the past two weeks.”  This feels similar to the Covid-19 acceleration of remote working. Also, spare a thought for US auto manufacturers who have scaled back their EV ambitions to keep the Dearest Leader happy and have written off $55 billion of EV projects. Timing is everything they say…..Get ready for some pretty interesting EV headlines in the coming months.

    Defence: Ukraine was the wake-up call when the world’s second most powerful military power turned the Kremlin’s “3 day operation” into a battlefield quagmire which has decimated its stores of equipment and weaponry, incurred more than 1 million of its own military casualties and incredibly has now lasted longer than the Soviet Union’s WW2 conflict with Nazi Germany. Fast forward to today and we are witnessing the world’s most powerful military gain almost total superiority over Iran but now staring down the barrel (!) of a strategic disaster that “nobody ever expected” per the stable genius hurling ketchup against the walls of Mar-a-Lago. The trapping of 20% of the world’s fuel supplies in the Strait of Hormuz and the destruction of critical energy infrastructure in UAE, Saudi Arabia and Qatar has been achieved with drones which cost as little as $20,000 but require the US to quickly run through their stores of $2m missile air defence weapons. Astonishingly, the Pentagon is looking for an additional $200 billion of budget to fund this “excursion”. However, the bigger picture is that military strategy and economics have utterly changed. Drone warfare developed on the battlefields of Ukraine is the scary future. For some it will be opportunity. Check out the IPO this week of the Ukrainian drone software company, Swarmer, on the Nasdaq. The IPO price was $5 per share but by the close of its first day of trading the share price was $55. Just the 950% gain in one day of trading. Oh, and last year Swarmer had generated just $300,000 of revenues. The US military-industrial complex is having its “ChatGPT” moment and will soon embark on a massive drone warfare investment programme.

    Clearly, not all of the above is cheery stuff but it does feel like some ‘leaders’ in business, technology and investment are now facing very different prospects than they planned for just a few short weeks ago. And, there doesn’t seem to be a “TACO” option this time.

  • What’s The Crack…?

    What’s The Crack…?

    God bless the Taoiseach, Micheál Martin’s script writers for his St Patrick Day’s trip to Generalissimo Trump’s Oval Office. The Taoiseach might succeed in avoiding eye contact with Secretary of State, Marco Rubio’s over-sized shiny shoes chosen by the Boss (no seriously), but the usual exchange of pleasantries laced with some colloquial Irish banter could scupper the whole event. As the non-strategic ‘genius’ of trapping 20% of the planet’s oil supplies in the Strait of Hormuz begins to hurt the entire global economy, it would probably be best to avoid slipping “That’s gas!” into the chat, or “Now we’re suckin’ diesel!” or even “What’s the craic?”.  Zero craic for the Taoiseach’s advisors anyway. But, on a broader level, the Trump regime bluster is beginning to crack. Current commentariat thinking is that Trump will avoid an Iran quagmire by declaring ‘victory’ soon and flooding the media with the usual deflections and outright lies. Bizarrely, this time I wish that messaging strategy would work. However, there’s a tiny flaw in this plan. Or, as Captain Blackadder used to say to Private Baldrick, “It’s bollocks”.

    The opening of the Strait of Hormuz is in the gift of the new hardline regime in Tehran, not Washington.  Yep, that regime change thing isn’t going so well. Unless the US puts boots on the ground, there won’t be much need to crack hydrocarbons in the Persian Gulf for the foreseeable future. Oil production volumes in the region are already being wound down but the bottom line is that the global economy is ‘missing’ circa 8 million barrels of oil per day (out of approx. 100m global demand). This doesn’t sound like an earth-shattering proportion of overall demand but …..welcome to the world of commodities. Any supply/demand imbalance can lead to outsized price movements as the marginal price (most expensive barrel) sets the price for the entire market. The International Energy Agency is already describing the situation as “the largest supply disruption in history” and has released 400 million barrels from reserves. However, despite this announcement (delivery times vary) the price of oil continued to rise to over $100. That doesn’t feel like price control. And, Trumpolini can go on Fox News every night and bluster but the gas prices at the pump are the only truth for voters. It’s not the only crack in the victory messaging….

    There are other critical products which travel through the Strait of Hormuz. Seaborne diesel disruption could cause global supply to fall by up to 12%. To be clear, diesel is the most macro-sensitive oil derivative product in the global economy. Think freight, agriculture, mining and industrial activity. Then think of all those ‘always winning’ MAGA voters employed in those sectors. Also, keep an eye on headlines from India and Indonesia who are both frantically seeking new supplies of urea, ammonia and other fertilizer feedstocks. Bangladesh has already closed its universities to save fuel and now we’re talking about the guts of 2 billion people impacted by the basics of food production, education and power. However, if you thought this was just a developing world problem, let’s take a look at the very highest echelon of the financial food chain.

    I’ve always been conscious that financial fragilities and leverage can exist in the global economy for extended periods of time but ultimately something cracks. And, that crack can be far removed from the specific vulnerable market. We frequently write about the perils of depending on “other people’s money”. We have also written about the massive growth in a market known as ‘private credit’. In other words, private loans to private companies which do not come from banks. This market has grown five-fold since 2010 to $2.5 trillion globally. Remember these are loans from institutions (not banks) like Blackstone, Apollo, Ares, HPOS, Carlyle, Blue Owl etc. Of course, the explosion of AI investment spend on infrastructure has accelerated the growth of this asset class (private credit) but, as always with fast-growth lending, due diligence standards slip, risk management gets sloppy, and bang….. there’s a problem. Well, this multi-trillion dollar asset class already had two problems:

     

    1. In October 2025, two companies in the US in quick succession suddenly collapsed. Private credit instruments backing auto-parts supplier First Brands and car dealership Tricolour suffered catastrophic losses. Suddenly, risk entered the private credit equation.
    2. In January “SaaS-pocalypse” became a market driver as investors began to fear for the growth and security of once-robust software (SaaS) business models under threat from AI. This, in turn, affected perceptions of the security of loans extended to software companies. Companies like SAP and Oracle saw their share prices fall up to 50% from their highs.

     

    In recent months we have been reading smallish headlines about private credit funds experiencing “difficulties”. Guess what? Depending on “other people’s money” can be tricky when headlines cause anxiety. Yep, people who invested in these private credit funds and vehicles (SPVs) wanted to get their money back. Blue Owl was the first high profile name to suspend redemptions. Then it was Blackstone limiting investor withdrawals, followed by the Big Daddy of them all, Blackrock/HPS. Now, Morgan Stanley and Cliffwater are doing the same this week. So, that’s 6 ‘financial gates’ closing as fast as the Strait of Hormuz. You don’t need to guess what other investors in other funds are thinking. Now consider the impact of a disrupted global economy and how the traditional providers of capital to the global economy are reacting. Clearly, deal conversations with Tokyo banks, UAE sovereign wealth funds and European family offices are going to be of a very different tone to those held just a few short weeks ago.

    Listen carefully…that sucking sound is not Kash Patel, JD Vance (how quiet is he!) or Howard Lutnick simpering to the Dearest Leader’s latest delusions. Nope, that’s the sound of the global financial system experiencing geopolitical and leverage cracks simultaneously, and the beginnings of capital flows going into ‘flight to safety’ mode. Hopefully, stability will return to the Middle-East soon. We have stared down the barrel of threatened global chaos before. In fact, for 47 years senior US strategic security personnel gamed out the theory that the Iranians would never shut down the 2-mile wide Strait of Hormuz knowing that the US and their allies’ response would be too damaging. That theory is now dead because the White House moved first and apparently (based on this week’s Truth Social outbursts) had no coherent plan for after…..

    Now, that would be gas if it wasn’t so serious.