Gravitas Spark CrowdFunding

Author: Gravitas

  • Ten MEGA Signs Of Not So Much Winning…

    Ten MEGA Signs Of Not So Much Winning…

    Never thought I’d say this. I think I need those Freezbrury cold water challenge days to extend into March. Well, I need some shock therapy to dull the senses and distract from a rules-based world order which is crumbling by the hour. Should I care that a former Fox & Friends host has just instructed the US military to cease all operations against Russian cyber threats? Probably, but I’m not sure it’s helpful to follow the dizzying pace of breaking news and broken alliances. We have previously written about how the financial markets can rein in autocratic megalomania both East and West. In that instance we flagged the power of bond (debt) markets. Now, it looks like a regime which promised “so much winning” is losing the confidence of more than the bond market. Here’s a list of losers….

     

    US Business Confidence: The silence or craven submission of US business leaders to the erratic ‘shake down’ of US allies and the established world order has been stunning to observe. However, as we often write, corporate actions can be more informative. Quietly removing DEI policies requires minimal leadership courage (I’m being very generous with that word). Dealmaking (M&A) on the other hand is way up there in terms of career risk for senior executives. Guess what? US M&A deal activity in January slumped to a decade low with a 30% drop year-on-year.  Uncertainty is a strategic decision killer.

    US Capital Markets: The US financial markets have dominated the world since the 2008-2009 financial crisis. US stock markets now account for more than 50% of the value of global equities after outperforming international stocks for more than 16 years. However, this year it’s a different or shifting story. At the end of February, international stocks had gained 7.3% in 2025 vs a 1.4% gain for the S&P 500.

    US Growth: Investors in US stocks appear to be concerned. They are not alone. The much-watched GDPNow forecast of the Atlanta Fed is currently projecting US GDP will CONTRACT by 1.5% in the first quarter compared to the forecast of healthy 2.3% growth a week earlier. Also, US consumer spending has just fallen for the first time in two years.

    US Technology: The “broligarchs” might have taken over the White House but the “Magnificent 7” technology stocks are experiencing slippage in 2025. Only one of Meta(+11%), Apple (-4%), Amazon (-3%), Google (-10%), Microsoft (-6%), Nvidia (-10%) or Tesla has seen its share price in positive territory this year.

    Tesla: Tesla’s share price decline this year is a whopping 23%. Apparently, Elmo Musk’s fondness for autocrats and far-right parties in Europe has been a bit of a brand-killer. Sales in Europe for the first two months of 2025 are down 46% which can’t all be explained by consumers waiting for a Model Y refresh. Don’t expect any bravery from Tesla board directors either.

    US House Sales: US existing home sales have dropped to the lowest levels since…. 1995. Yes, that’s when there were 80 million fewer people living in the US and didn’t have a President threatening a tariff war with its neighbour and construction-critical timber supplier, Canada.

    US Dollar: As the world’s reserve currency the US Dollar (USD) is a long way away from any structural impact from the waning credibility of its sovereign’s political system. However, the USD is trading at an 11-week low against 6 major rival currencies. And….one of the better macro writers out there, Barry Ritholtz of The Big Picture blog, has flagged the dangers of policy error for the USD:

     

    “Since the end of World War Two, the USD has been America’s “exorbitant privilege” as the world’s reserve currency. However, several factors threaten this privilege: wide-scale tariffs, the embrace of alternative digital currencies, the breaking of long-standing alliances, and dallying with dictators.

    Since the end of World War II in 1945, the rise of the United States as the world’s dominant economic, military, and cultural power has led to a relatively peaceful 75 years in the Western Hemisphere, Pax Americana, has greatly benefited the U.S. and its allies. Putting that at risk would be one of history’s greatest unforced errors.”

     

    US Supply Chain: The just released ISM Manufacturing survey for the US reveals the “prices paid” index for companies surged to a 32-month high as suppliers adjusted prices upwards ahead of threatened Trump tariffs. Oh, and don’t mention egg prices to the ‘Build-that-Wall’ cult – egg shortages are pushing prices up by 53% vs 2024 prices. Yep, you might remember there was some bloviating chat about inflation being fixed ‘on day one’.

    US Jobs: There’s every chance Elmo Musk could end up being the DOGE that caught the car. Musk has been tasked/appointed himself to remove unnecessary spending by the US Federal government and its 3 million employees. But… the shock being applied to the US economy is possibly underestimated. The US government spent $6.8 trillion in 2024. For context, that’s more than 10x the size of the global semiconductor industry’s annual revenues ($628 billion 2024). Firing people in climate/weather forecasting roles and shutting down foreign aid (USAID) are just headlines. The bigger picture suggests one of the US economy’s most critical components (government spend) is in contractionary territory which will impact not just government jobs but the entire government supply chain in the private sector. Yep, a $7 trillion customer of the US economy is now being  run by Elmo and his “Muskrats” with cute names like “Big Balls” and “First Buddy”. No seriously.

    Brand America: As a symbol of American global reach and brand value it’s difficult to beat McDonald’s. Some of you may even recall the opening of its first Moscow restaurant with the famed “Golden Arches” in January 1990. You just knew the geopolitical sands were shifting. Less than two years later the Soviet Union collapsed. Now, check out the IPO of a company in Hong Kong this week. McDonalds is no longer the biggest food and beverage chain in the world. That title now goes to Mixue Ice Cream & Tea which has 45,000 branches in Asia and is opening approximately 21 stores……. every single day.

    It’s a bit early to be suggesting a shift in global leadership but perhaps the competition has just shot itself in the foot. I’m thinking of Europe now and how a geopolitical crisis might just prompt real thought about making Europe great again (MEGA). Three financial data points caught the eye this week and suggested investors might be warming up to real policy action in Europe:

     

    • The Swedish Krona is appreciating fast (2.4% today) as investors recognise Sweden has the highest military equipment production per GDP in Europe.

     

    • Europe’s benchmark stock index, the Stoxx 600, has risen every week for 10 straight weeks.

     

    • Germany’s Rheinmetal (+14%), Britain’s Bae Systems (+19%) and France’s Thales (+23%) have seen their share prices rise by double-digit percentages in a matter of days.

     

    The $2.5 trillion global defence industry won’t be the only area Europe should target to compete as a “trusted partner” . Presumably, many countries and organisations seeking commercial partners in healthcare (medicine/vaccines) and financial services will have noted the risks of deal exposure to a US political leadership who ultimately might want  a “piece” of a country in exchange for “peace”.  Europe, by standing with Ukraine, could send a very powerful message on dependability to future partners as its former Washington ally works furiously to keep the KGB lieutenant colonel in the Kremlin happy.

     

  • Private Portfolios And Future Returns: Part II

    Private Portfolios And Future Returns: Part II

    Well, we promised. This is a follow-up to our last piece on expected returns for a private portfolio. This time we are going to illustrate a variety of portfolio outcomes with some numbers. However, there IS a catch. Humans are not good at forecasting the future so these returns outcomes are just a guide. A bit like a US-NATO promise to Estonia – we might send military forces to fight off an attack from Russia, but then again we might not. The good news for investors (for Estonia not so much) is that history can provide some confidence but no guarantees. History, in this instance, is the long-run return on private assets which we referenced in last week’s article. As a refresher, here is the reference table we used (Source: Pitchbook):

     

    We noted the various categories of assets and concluded that Spark investors would be mostly invested in private equity and venture capital type assets. Then we decided to use 12% as a conservative ‘base case’  annual growth hurdle (IRR) expected of a portfolio with that mix of assets and quantified that growth over 10 years:

     

    “In real terms (and compounding those rates [12%] of return) that equates to an initial investment of €10,000 growing to €31,000 over 10 years. For context, a fund with publicly listed equities would be expected (by financial planners) to generate 7% returns per annum and thus turn €10,000 into €19,600” 

     

    However, many of the Spark investment opportunities are very early-stage (higher risk) so it would be reasonable to expect something in excess of this 12% base case growth/returns scenario. Rather than use another headline number, we thought this article would be an opportunity to build a returns scenario from the bottom up. In other words, we would use illustrative portfolios of 25 investments each and explore three different mixes of outcomes. Our reasoning for using a portfolio of 25 investments is that this approximates to what many of our Private Portfolio (service) investors are currently trying to target/build as a personal portfolio over three years. The other assumptions used across the different illustrative portfolios are as follows:

     

    Total investment cost = €50,000

    Position size = €2,000 equally invested across 25 companies

    EIIS tax rebate rate = 37%* 

    Holding period = 10 years

     

    *The EIIS tax rebate rate is a ‘blend’ of the new standard rate of 35% and the higher rate of 50% applied to pre-operational businesses.

    Now, let’s consider our first portfolio. According to the US Bureau of Labour Statistics, 65% of start-ups go out of business within 10 years. So let’s use that historic 65% failure rate as a future outcome for our first portfolio. In other words, 16 of our 25 portfolio companies will end up being worth zero. With the remaining 9 companies, we are going to assume that 5 of them become unspectacularly profitable and grind out a typical equity return of doubling every ten years(7% per annum). The final 4 companies are expected to be successful exits or ‘wins’ generating returns of between 7x and 15x. The table below illustrates those outcomes with an overall portfolio rate of return (IRR) of just over 13%. This equates to a multiple of 3.4x of the initial investment cost MINUS your EIIS tax rebate.

    Portfolio 1:

     

    The above example shows how important tax is to the initial cost or valuation multiple paid for your investments ie a 50% tax rebate cuts in half the valuation multiple paid. This portfolio generates a respectable 13% return but in the next example we’d like to demonstrate the importance of “winners”. So, in Portfolio 2 we raise the failure rate to 20 companies (80%) and model the impact of two big exits of 20x and 40x. This scenario delivers a superior IRR (vs Portfolio 1) of 15.4% and a multiple of 4.2x your initial cost of investment:

    Portfolio 2:

     

    Clearly, a return of 40x on a single investment would be huge but for ‘unicorn’ followers of companies reaching billion dollar valuation status this is the equivalent of a €25m company growing to €1 billion. Rare, but increasingly possible given the research team at Dealroom estimate 100 ‘unicorns’ have entered the billion dollar club every year since 2018. However, if the mention of unicorns smacks of fantasy territory let’s look at a more ‘diversified’ mix of outcomes in a portfolio. In particular, we want to model a portfolio reflecting some of the themes (including Spark’s risk management process) we touched upon in our first article of this series. Portfolio 3 is a mix of the following themes:

     

    Recovery: Failure of ‘asset lite’ businesses could actually deliver some recovery values due to the data base built, team domain expertise, customer relationship assets etc.

     

    B2B: Almost 70% of Spark investments are business-to-business (B2B) companies in a world where corporate VCs (CVC) are increasingly active eg Google has acquired more than 200 start-ups over the years.

     

    Taxation: Due to higher capital gains (CGT) and income tax (dividend taxation) regimes in Europe and particularly Ireland the ‘hurdle’ or exit/return expected of a young company must be commensurately higher to compensate institutional investors.

     

    Quality:  Start-up funding is, bluntly, more scarce in this part of the world and Spark probably turns down 9 out of every 10 investment opportunities. In theory, we are already investing in the top quality decile of opportunity.

     

    So, in Portfolio 3 the failure rate will be lower than previous examples (60%) and will also not amount to a ZERO return but include a recovery value of 20%. However, as demonstrated above, the key swing factor is the ‘winner’ category of investments. In Portfolio 3 we ‘diversify’ the outcomes of the surviving 10 companies with 6 actual exits. The following table outlines those outcomes across the portfolio:

     

    Portfolio 3:

     

    Clearly, diversification of outcomes and a higher number of more moderate exits does move the returns (IRR) dial. Any investor with a portfolio delivering 14.7% annual returns for an almost 4 X return on initial investment cost should be happy. Of course, these are merely estimates of the future anchored to historic data. We, like all forecasters, will get it wrong. However, it is reasonable to think a portfolio of mainly B2B assets with varying levels of maturity (along the start-up to private equity buy-out spectrum) operating in busy corporate VC activity sectors will achieve some exit success. You’ve read it here many times before… the future is private. But… there’s an additional Spark Private mantra to get to know – the process is portfolio. Private investors should build a sufficient opportunity set by holding multiple investments in a portfolio. As a small aside, this writer’s personal view is that exit valuations in the private asset world will surprise on the upside compared to even the multiples used in the portfolios above. Again, no promises!

    Writer’s Note: The above is just a basis for discussion and exploring the long-run drivers of portfolio returns. I would be more than happy to talk through our investment pipeline and deal-types with anyone interested in building a diversified portfolio of private assets over the next 2-3 years.

     

     

  • What Returns Can Investors Expect In A Private World?

    What Returns Can Investors Expect In A Private World?

    Well, I can’t promise you a future with a beachfront property in “Gaza Lago”. In fact, in the world of investing there are no guaranteed returns. As promised in our recent Private Portfolio Thoughts newsletter, I wanted to address expectations as to what long-run returns a private investor should be looking for in a portfolio of private assets.  First, let’s take a look at ‘industry standard’ expectations based on global historic data compiled by research house, Pitchbook. Of course, these are just averages and no doubt are ‘skewed’ by supra-normal returns for a small number of successful funds in each asset class. However, the table below gives an approximate guide to expectations over various time horizons and types of investment.

     

    The Spark focus is probably towards the top of this table summarising 5-year and 10-year returns for private equity (PE) and early-stage investing through venture capital (VC). However, if we strip out debt and real asset products the double-digit (%) performance picture is pretty similar across the board for private assets. The annual rates of return (IRR) implied by the performance of these private assets (in aggregate) are 13.4% over 5-years and 12.5% over 10-years.

    Let’s be more conservative and suggest that portfolios of private assets after 10 years SHOULD have grown in value at a rate of 12%. In real terms (and compounding those rates of return) that equates to an initial investment of €10,000 growing to €31,000 over 10 years. For context, a fund with publicly listed equities would be expected (by financial planners) to generate 7% returns per annum and thus turn €10,000 into €19,600. Of course, the extra return earned by the private asset portfolios is the compensation required by investors for the higher risk exposure(reduced liquidity, business failure) compared to the shares of large established businesses trading every day. These return numbers (based on history) can be described as “hurdle” rates which investors are expecting to match or beat in order to justify putting their capital at risk over long periods of time. So, let’s apply some hurdles to our world of very young companies (VC) and small businesses (private equity).

    We know that the industry standard in more mature private capital investment strategies is looking to turn €10,000 into something north of €30,000 over 10 years. We might describe this as an expectation to generate 3x your initial investment amount. Arguably, for higher risk investments in our earlier-stage world, investors could expect/demand an even higher return for their portfolios. If investors wanted 4x returns or €40,000 after 10 years that equates to a 15% annual return which is what private equity strategies have achieved(see table). So, that expectation is not unreasonable. But…. how realistic is it in a high risk portfolio of mainly early-stage business failure? We should touch on the key ‘push backs’ we get from investors who are wary of investing in start-up businesses or smaller private equity deals. The following are the most common perceived wisdoms….

     

    “80-90% of start-ups fail”

    “ Exits are more difficult as IPO markets for smaller companies have struggled”

    “I can just buy publicly listed equities and earn similar returns”

     

    There is an element of historic truth to all these statements but I’m going to use the most dangerous words in the investing lexicon by stating “this time it’s different”. First, the history of start-up failure should take into account the characteristics of older vintages of businesses. Let’s think about old economy businesses investing heavily in premises, equipment, overseas expansion facilities, logistics etc. These are, in most cases, “sunk costs” in capital-heavy businesses. Inevitably, if the business gets into trouble these ‘assets’ are not just worthless but can have an actual negative value due to ongoing liabilities/leases, maintenance costs, security, insurance etc. Now, think about many of today’s “asset light” businesses leveraging digital infrastructure and building value through the experience of the founders/team, the data gathered by the business and the development of relationships with clients and partners.

    These businesses don’t have the same level of sunk costs/liabilities (as old economy businesses) which can swamp the value of the operational “franchise”. Instead, the value within a business which might not be meeting growth targets can be recognised by a third party and lead to another form of exit which doesn’t involve liquidation. In the Spark portfolio we have seen a number of businesses acquired by third parties in the same sector in exchange for shares in the acquiring company. These shares clearly have a value and also change the traditional calculations around start-up failure.

    In the world of debt/credit one of the key financial terms/metrics is historic “recovery value”. In main street terms, this is the typical expected percentage of the debt which can be recovered when a business fails in a particular sector. You will see such sector recovery data displayed as a percentage of the debt ie 20 cents, 30 cents in the dollar. So, in the world of start-ups there is normally no debt and the equity in the business is a complete ZERO in the case of struggle or failure. But, now that’s not quite the case. If an acquiring business is offering a share exchange then the “recovery value” could by 20-50% of the original investment. And, the reason for ‘value’ being found in the business is the experience of the acquired team, the database and client relationships. This is happening on a far bigger scale elsewhere.

    Ever heard of the term ‘acqui-hiring”? This refers to a situation in which a company acquires another company primarily for its talented team or employees, rather than its products, technology, or other assets. In an acqui-hire, the acquiring company may not be interested in continuing the acquired company’s business or product, but rather wants to bring the talent into its own organization. Now, here’s another bit of jargon monoxide…. ever heard of CVC? Well, you know what venture capital (VC) does but there’s a subset of the VC ecosystem called Corporate Venture Capital(CVC). This form of VC funding is in reality larger corporations investing in smaller businesses whose franchises/technology could ultimately be relevant and value-creating for the parent company.

    So, you might think Sequoia, Index Ventures, Tiger Global and Andreessen Horowitz are the kings of VC investing. Now, think again. Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Nvidia are hugely active in the VC funding space. As an illustration, Nvidia deployed $1 billion in 50 VC funding rounds in 2024 alone. Furthermore, Google has acquired a whopping 222 start-ups over the years, and in 2023 the “Magnificent 7” tech stocks participated in 208 VC deals. So, the IPO market might not be as start-up friendly as in the past but Big Tech certainly is stepping up to the plate as a new and highly active exit event option.

    Of course, there will always be those investors who believe they can earn approximately similar returns to private asset strategies by choosing a selection of publicly listed companies. Yep, the likes of Domino’s Pizza, Paddy Power, Apple and Nvidia tick those boxes but there’s also an assumption investors will avoid the temptation of selling while on the multi-decade rocket ride. However, the more significant point is about business failure. Think it’s only start-ups?  Sixty years ago the average life-span of a company in the S&P 500 was over 50 years. Today, it’s less than 15 years! By 2027, almost 75% of companies who were quoted in the S&P 500 in 2016 will have disappeared (Source: McKinsey). Not for the first time, I’d suggest it’s worth a read of the excellent The Future is Faster Than You Think to grasp how fast business and technology leadership is changing.

    We can’t forecast the future. However, we should recognise that the world of start-ups today has changed dramatically. As a final illustration, start-up funding was traditionally populated by a majority of consumer-focused businesses – think retail, textiles, manufacturing, food, fashion etc.  The term “B2C” would be used to describe these business-to-consumer companies. Well, that’s changed too. Certainly, for Spark. A whopping 70% of funding deals completed by Spark have been business-to-business (B2B) opportunities. It should also be noted that our vetting process turns away approximately nine in every ten opportunities. Arguably, we are selecting the top decile of quality in the opportunity universe. No doubt we will get it wrong along the way, but this is still a robust risk starting point. And, it’s not the only starting point…

    The purpose of this article is to set the scene for a follow-up piece on how these structural shifts can impact the average private portfolio and future expectations using sample portfolios and outcomes. But always remember…. if I could truly forecast the future, “Gaza Lago” might personally have an entirely different meaning and location.

  • You’re Watching The Wrong Dictator Reality Show..

    You’re Watching The Wrong Dictator Reality Show..

    It deserves an expletive. It’s exhausting. Magic water spigots turned on in Northern California, summary dismissal of Inspectors General watchdogs and sending uninvited military planes into the airspace of your closest Latin American ally. Of course, it could be worse as an ally – you could just be asked over an introductory phone call to give up over 95% of your sovereign territory. Perhaps, there will be a Eurovision-style poll run by Fox News to decide the future of Denmark and Greenland. I can almost see it now… say hello to the voting panel in Belgrade, or Moldova…. or Transnistria. More expletives. But, no. This week we were given a trillion dollar reminder that we are watching the wrong dictator reality show.

    The trillion dollar damage to tech stock valuations inflicted by China’s unveiling of a super-cheap AI large language model, DeepSeek (with similar performance powers to ChatGPT, Gemini etc) was indeed a “wake up call” for US Big Tech according to President Trump. However, at the same time, the geopolitical machinations of China are veering into reality show territory. Thanks to the erosion of truth in the world there’s no need for James Bond-style subterfuge. Instead, it can be as brazen as hell. Chinese ships have been damaging undersea cables around Taiwan in recent months but this week marked the third severing of an undersea cable in three months…. in the Baltic Sea. The fibre-optic cable in the latest incident connected Sweden and Latvia but this time involved a China-owned ship in the sabotage operation. It would seem that Russia, as China’s “mineral colony”, has invited China to assist in infrastructure “grey-zone” conflict. Indeed, China has its own domestic reasons to ratchet up the geopolitical temperatures of distraction.

    The latest economic activity data from China is looking pretty grim. January manufacturing activity actually contracted which won’t put the cheer into the upcoming New Year celebrations for 1.4 billion Chinese. This manufacturing slowdown has surprised many given recent monetary stimulus initiatives by the Beijing regime. However, we can expect further stimulus measures given Chinese government debt/GDP ratios are closer to 60% compared to US and European governments labouring under debt burdens over the 100% mark already. This monetary firepower will have knock-on effects across international markets and global economic growth. But… there is a strategic price to be paid by the rest of the world. And, it’s not just the obvious trade deficits. DeepSeek is more likely to be a temporary shock and, despite the hysterical headlines, the emergence of a better engineered cheaper way to harness computing power is a net benefit to all, including broader equity markets. However, DeepSeek highlights the growing excellence of China across multiple technologies.

    According to a 2024 study by the Australian Strategic policy Institute (ASPI), China now dominates the US in 57 of 64 critical technologies, up from just three in 2007. The US, which led in 60 sectors in 2007, now leads in just seven. Rankings by the ASPI were based on cumulative innovative and high-impact research and patents. ASPI credits President Xi Jinping’s ‘Made in China 2025’ plan for the infusion of “massive direct state funding for R&D in key technology,” stating that existing strategic investments turned into a plan to achieve technological “supremacy”. The areas where China excels include…

     

    • advanced integrated circuit design and fabrication
    • high-specification machining processes
    • advanced aircraft engines
    • drones, swarming and collaborative robots
    • electric batteries
    • photovoltaics
    • advanced radiofrequency communication

     

    Oh, and did we mention nuclear fusion? Of course, you might have missed this if you’d been watching the fantasy Greenland invasion on the other show. In the past week, Chinese scientists broke the nuclear fusion record for sustained plasma at over 100 million degrees by maintaining a mix of electrons and ions in a fluid state for more than 1,000 seconds. As a reminder, nuclear fusion replicates the sun’s energy, offering limitless, carbon-free energy.

    So, if you were a White House strategist you might want to curtail China’s technology advances. And, this is where things have taken a very strange turn. The Trump campaign has made lots of noise about China with tariffs being the chosen commercial weapon to rebalance US trade deficits with the Middle Kingdom. Fast forward to today and tariffs were, instead, the chosen weapon to bully Colombia. But… the US actually has a trade surplus with Colombia. More strange has been the Trump reverse-ferret on TikTok which he’d now like to see continue operating in the US (rather than enforce the ban upheld by the Supreme Court) with a US investor partner like Elon Musk or Larry Ellison. That all make sense? Now, for the really weird stuff.

    Remember when Taiwan was supposed to be protected by its US ally from the increasing threat of China? Well, while we’ve all been distracted on DeepSeek news, there were some fairly seismic developments in US-Taiwan trade relations. Check out this headline about the two ‘allies’….

     

    Trump’s 100% tariff threat on Taiwan chips raises cost, supply chain fears  –  Business Insider

     

    So much for the tough talk on China. Beijing must be thrilled and President Xi will be encouraged to keep up the ‘grey zone’ infrastructure sabotage in the Baltic Sea and Straits of Taiwan. Meanwhile, the new US Defense Secretary , Pete Hegseth, fresh off the Fox & Friends chat sofa, has got to work defending the nation. First priorities….. revoking former chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley’s security detail, removing all portraits of the general in the Pentagon and pursuing his demotion.

    Anyone get the feeling the wrong ‘enemy’ is being pursued…..?

     

  • A World Losing Control Of Truth….

    A World Losing Control Of Truth….

    You know that feeling. No control, just watching helplessly. On a personal level, I observed the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles from afar via Google Maps and X(itter) but was updated on the ground by my son dangerously close to events on the UCLA campus. Evacuation to San Diego was his fortunate escape while the estimates of fatalities and rebuild costs continue to climb. Sadly, the losses are not just in the physical world of lives and properties. Truth has also been scorched by the partisan politics of the US. Incoming President Trump and his oligarch allies have been quick to blame political incompetence for the fires and deflect from the urgency of the climate crisis. A cursory look at Xitter and other online channels reveals waves of misinformation on lack of water and firefighting resources, saving smelt fish(yep), DEI /woke policies (open season it seems) and even funding Ukraine as the ultimate source of blame. Now, for a few stubborn facts:

    No rain in Los Angeles (LA) since May 2024

    Highest summer temperatures in LA ever

    Land/vegetation is the second driest on record – UCLA research suggests 25% drier than average

    Strongest seasonal Santa Ana winds in 14 years (up to 150 kph)

    That lethal combination of extreme heat, bone-dry fuel and tornado-like winds are climate change driven. Fires are nothing new for California, but the change in wind/heat patterns has dramatically increased the intensity of the fires and the speed-of-spread when they occur. However, the extent of climate denial deflection at the highest US political leadership levels is amply demonstrated by the words of the incoming Trump nominee for Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, at his Senate confirmation hearing just this week: “I stand by my past comments…..the hype over wildfires is just hype”. Not for the first time, the world of finance will have its say too. In particular, the exit of insurance companies and house protection coverage for residents of LA, West Virginia, Florida and Texas is probably more instructive than the internet warriors in their underpants shrieking about political mismanagement, conspiracy theories or super-powered immigrant arsonists.  Credibility and truth are inextricably linked and the biggest bully of them all is flexing its truth-seeking muscles….

    We have written in recent days about debt markets constraining the actions of autocrats in the geopolitical world. However, in the financial world there are increasing words of worry from some very credible players about a credibility gap emerging. So, without bamboozling with jargon, let’s flag two financial facts.

    *Interest rates around the world are either falling or stabilising at lower levels than 18 months ago.

    *Bond yields which usually track interests rates are not falling, or even stabilising. Longer term yields in the UK, Japan and US have broken free of their relationship with interest rates and are rocketing higher.

    This divergence of trajectories for interest rates and bonds is HIGHLY unusual. So, what’s happening? Well, debt and bond markets do track interest rates set by the central banks….normally. But, in this instance, credibility or credit has come into play on two fronts. First, central banks like the Fed and Bank of England are facing increased scrutiny in their battle to tame inflation. Second, government bonds track the credibility of sovereign governments – their ability to confront or tell the truth. And that’s a problem now. Nobody believes current UK government policies are able to deliver growth and not many believe Trump’s tax cuts and tariffs menu will tame inflation. Bluntly, there are increasing fears in financial circles that the Fed has lost control of the most important financial market in the world: the US Treasury market. Again, truth and credibility (not denial) are critical to attract risk capital, insurance, investment etc.

    Finally, we should note the warning in President Joe Biden’s farewell address to the nation this week. Critics might argue his presidency wasn’t bold enough, even cruel enough, but his departing words might resonate with those who read President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell speech warnings in 1961 about the dangers of the “military-industrial complex”. Biden points to an oligarchy of “extreme, power, wealth and influence” in a “tech-industrial complex” which wields a very modern weapon to serve their own interests. The tacky million dollar Trump inauguration donations and spineless abandonment of content moderation by the tech oligarchs could be mistaken as the source of bitterness for an ousted president but I’ve a feeling the following statement will be revisited by historians as a prescient warning:

     

    “Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation, enabling the abuse of power. The free press is crumbling [or] disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact checking. The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit…. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is the most consequential technology of our time, perhaps of all time.”

     

    I’ve got some bad news. That “avalanche of misinformation” is just the start, and the reference to AI is key. It feels like every funding round at the moment is attached to “AI-agents”, bots who will carry out the mundane content generating tasks of human workers. In fact, one in every two dollars of VC funding in the US right now is going to AI. The number globally is 37% (Source: CB Insights). However, let’s think about that ‘army’ of bots to be unleashed on the future of work and communications. First, know that an estimated 50% of all online traffic right now is bot generated. Yep, that’s bot created content, bot engagement, bot dissemination….. the whole false fly-wheel effect. Now, imagine a vicious circle of billions of bots, content pieces and false engagement. Then think false content.

    You will hear more about “Dead Internet Theory” in 2025. It started out as a peripheral online conspiracy theory claiming the internet has been taken over by artificial intelligence(AI). Viral posts, engagement rankings, traffic stats etc all have a whiff of AI-bot promotion these days but there’s worse to come. The sheer volume of misinformation coming our way via AI-agency bots could kill online platforms’ utility value. Even this week, using Xitter was an exercise in dodging the underpants brigade + bots and finding real true information on the LA fires. And, now the chat is Elon Musk will be buying Tik Tok. A change of commercial control perhaps, but the reality at a higher communications level is more existential. We could lose control of not just the internet, but truth itself.

     

    “You can’t handle the truth!!”  – Colonel Jessup, A Few Good Men.

     

     

  • Trump Words Scare But Bonds Are The Real Bully Boys

    Trump Words Scare But Bonds Are The Real Bully Boys

    The flashbacks are coming on strong. Who thought myself and Donald Trump would be ratified for new office in the same week? Not me. Anyway, enough about me… said the Donald never. Seriously, do we really have another four years of these whining streams of consciousness, aka press conferences. As Los Angeles burns and Gaza starves, the world is still digesting The Accused’s quasi-declaration of war on Panama, Mexico, Canada and…… Denmark. Clearly, the Orange Toddler is emboldened, as Putin’s number one fan boy, to threaten the invasion of both Panama and Greenland for “national security” reasons. One could be dismissive of these attention-seeking words of intimidation but this feels different, and probably Putin derived. Hamlet this is not, but Act I of this tragedy was Ukraine. Who knows what Act II could be in a new world order of misinformation, security over-reach and sovereign destruction?  Taiwan would top most risk lists. However, Estonia or Finland might disagree, as the Baltic plays host to “infra-destructure” warfare. I might disagree too. There’s a bigger bully boy out there and possibly a reason for hope.

    We have written many times before about the perils of depending on “other people’s money”. In most cases, the most catastrophic financial implosions have involved high levels of debt or leverage. However, in certain cases catastrophe has been avoided. The phrase “my word is my bond” speaks to credibility but I’m thinking of a more threatening type of bond today. Recall the famous words of Clinton White House strategist, James Carville….

     

    “I used to think that if there was reincarnation, I wanted to come back as the President or the Pope or as a .400 baseball hitter. But now I would want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody.”

     

    Liz Truss might attest to that intimidatory power. Her lettuce-life UK premiership was ended by the UK government debt markets (Gilts) going into freefall after her mini-budget ignored all rational advance warnings and almost blew up the UK pension fund system. The Bank of England saved pension funds with a swift monetary/funding intervention but there was no saving Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng or his delusional prime minister. Fast forward to 2025, and bond markets for me are the big start-of-year story. And, it’s not looking good for the UK….again. In fact, things have deteriorated since the Truss budget debacle. It appears that an election pitch along the lines of “the other lot are awful, vote for us” is failing to convince the all-powerful debt markets that the new government of Sir Keir Starmer has any credible grip on the economy. Try these bond market data points for starters…

     

    UK government long-term borrowing costs – priced in the 30-year Gilt/bond markets) – are at their highest levels since…. 1998.

     

    UK government medium-term borrowing costs – priced in the 10-year Gilt markets – are at their highest since 2008.

     

    In real terms, this means that the UK government is going to spend more on interest costs than on national education this year. Meanwhile, the politics of the country is consumed by “grooming gang” criminality which has been widely known about since at least 2015 (Jay Report). Oh, and UK Treasury Minister, Darren Jones, has just soothed House of Commons members’ fears saying “it is normal for the price of gilts to fluctuate”. Fluctuate? I can think of other “F” words being used on City financial trading floors right now. However, the ‘reality bite’ of bond markets might not be confined to the UK.

    The US government has been racking up monster debts too – just the $34 trillion at the last count. So, for those believing Trump is either going to buy Greenland for trillions of dollars or spend similar amounts on military invasions of US allies (I know, genius stuff), there’s a tiny bond detail which merits some attention. At this week’s US government monthly auction of 10-year bonds/debt instruments traders pushed the yields/costs to be paid by the US government to an 18-year high of 4.68%. It might not look like a particularly big cost but this is the foundation of all pricing in the US house mortgage and car finance markets. So, if the bond markets are threatening mortgage or car financing costs to rise to levels not seen in almost two decades, then be assured that the bond bully boy will trump the fantasy words of Agent Orange. This is an example of debt markets warning about spending inflation and unsustainable government budget deficits. But, there’s another type of warning which the bond markets can deliver.

    Ultra-low interest rates(bond yields) can also point to multi-year stagnation caused by a national (including government) debt crisis. Japan is the classic multi-decade example of minimal GDP growth or inflation and super-low interest rates. But, there’s a new contender for zombie debt stagnation: China. The Middle Kingdom’s $11 trillion government debt market is sending some very strong signals. The gap in costs/yields between the US and Chinese government bond markets is the highest in history. Chinese 10-year bonds are yielding just 1.6%, but the bigger story is in the long-term 30-year bond markets. Japanese 30-year bond yields are now higher than China’s which starkly signals a “Japanification” of the Chinese economy. The credibility of China’s economy is at stake but critically that of President Xi too. Interestingly, Xi’s new nickname on the Chinese internet is “the elementary school student”. Of course, an invasion of Taiwan could distract the Chinese population but there’s also a real possibility bond markets could signal Xi being toppled from power.

    As a final thought and one recently raised by David McWilliams in an excellent podcast there could also be a reality check around the tariff threats of the incoming Trump administration. Maybe it’s not quite as bad as invading your allies, but imposing tariffs on your biggest trading partners could prompt a painful bond bite-back. McWilliams makes the very good point that the Chinese and Japanese own/hold trillions of US government bonds. If these trading counterparties sell them as part of a bigger trade tariff war then US government interest costs and US consumer finance costs will painfully spike. US government interest costs already exceed $1 trillion annually which, if it were a standalone government department, would actually outspend the US Defense Department’s annual budget. My money is on financial pragmatism watering down most of the actual tariff outcomes. In fact, another part of the financial world is hinting at Trump threats not quite happening in a different market. Despite the threats to roll back cleantech and renewable initiatives of the Biden administration, it would seem the markets are not quite convinced. Indeed the latest data from Wall Street might surprise; apparently the share price performances of clean energy stocks and fossil fuel  stocks are in a statistical dead heat since Election Day (Source: Callaway Climate Insights).

    Perhaps there’s a new lesson soon to be learned in geopolitics….

    Your words are only as strong as your bonds.

     

  • Still Some Golden Theme Tickets Left…

    Still Some Golden Theme Tickets Left…

    I’m going to save you some time. Forget about calendar-driven commentariat reviews and 2025 forecasts for investment or geopolitical risk. Sorry to be the “Grinch of Guru”, but calendars and structural investment themes have zero correlation. Opinion is cheap and even the betting markets are displaying their patchy predictive powers in recent weeks. Yip, just a 6% chance of the Ba’athist beast, President Assad, being toppled in Syria. About as much chance as a Chinese spy in Buckingham Palace… oh wait. Sadly, Prince Andrew is a multi-year clown car journey in particularly poor company but there’s a lesson there too. Almost all significant investment themes – risks and opportunities – are multi-year stories whose plots twist and turn but keep a very clear direction of travel. So, let’s take a look at some of the major themes we have previously visited and a few more developing ones; all with interesting plot twists.

    Europe Crisis or Opportunity: Nothing good in the headlines…..German government falls, UK in second month of GDP contraction, France on its 4th premiership in a year. But, but here’s a few twists on the negatives. The lists of where Europe lags the US is a long one, from labour productivity, to AI and innovation, to stock market performance. And yet, if you strip out the performance of AI hardware star, Nvidia, from the S&P 500 then Europe’s stock market (MSCI EMU) has actually earned better returns for investors than the US benchmark since the most recent bull market started in October 2022. That suggests there are lots of European companies doing very well despite ‘core’ European economies struggling. Check out also in recent days Spotify becoming only the second European tech company since SAP to crack the $100 billion market cap mark. The headlines do not lie but the narrative on Europe is more nuanced than you think.

    Healthcare: Another structural theme from previous years’ writings, healthcare has actually been a winning area for Europe thanks to the miracle weight-loss drugs, Ozempic and Wegovy. Their Danish owner, Novo Nordisk, became Europe’s most valuable company in 2024. However, we might be about to enter an accelerated era of therapy/drug discovery for all types of medical illness. The clue is in the Nobel Prizes awarded in both Physics and Chemistry in 2024 to pioneers of AI usage in research. Now, for those already struggling with how AI large language models (LLM) work and the warp-speed calculations of the almost-monthly iterations of these technologies, get ready for the ultimate head wrecker. Google has just developed a quantum computing chip, “Willow”, which performed a computation in less than 5 minutes that would have taken today’s fastest computers 10 septillion years to complete. Yeah, that’s 25 zeros which exceeds known timescales in physics and vastly exceeds the age of the universe. Think about that. This chip created by quantum physics “used” time which theoretically can’t exist unless…… there are other parallel universes. Google Quantum AI founder, Hartman Neven, calmly wrote that the stunning performance of this chip indicates that “we live in a multiverse”.  Maybe Willy Wonka wasn’t so wrong to say “Come with me and you’ll be, In a world of pure imagination”.

    Artificial Intelligence (AI): Arguably, the world of AI has moved in a completely different direction. The shift of investment capital away from bits (software) to atoms (hardware) has been spectacular. Another company nobody ever heard of until recently, Broadcom, has become the latest technology hardware company to join the trillion dollar market capitalisation club. The US chip maker is now one of FOUR tech hardware companies in the list of the 10 most valuable companies on the planet. Clearly, investors see AI infrastructure as the early ‘win’ in the AI arms race. However, do NOT ignore software. Interestingly, the Clouded Judgment software newsletter has flagged a 20% expansion in median software valuation multiples since mid-November (from 5.6x to 6.7x revenues). Also, Nvidia has dropped in value by 11% in recent weeks. Yes, rotation from hardware to software and back again will be a feature of the multi-year AI revolution but the venture capital data from CB Insights confirms the direction of AI travel. Global venture capital (VC) deals in AI jumped 24% in Q3 to the highest levels seen since the Q1 2022 peak. In fact, one in every three dollars of VC investments went to AI start-ups.

    Banking and Fintechs: Closer to home, Revolut has just confirmed it has more than 3 million customers in Ireland. A staggering 75% of all Ireland-based adults now use the UK fintech platform for banking and payments. Meanwhile, the US bank sector has rocketed 30% higher this year, Europe is seeing Italian banking M&A deals and the largest asset manager in the world, Blackrock, has embarked on a private asset acquisition frenzy. We have written before that the future is private and I’m wondering are big corporates thinking the same? Sticking with the fintech sector, it was striking in the past week to see the shipping/logistics giant AP Moller lead an €80m investment round for UK fintech, Zopa Bank. In the same week, we note another globally significant name, Walmart, was the lead investor in a $300m round for fintech platform, One. Hmmm….Private banking/fintech, private opportunity.

    Climate & Electrical Vehicles (EV): Apparently, 11 out of 16 EV battery manufacturing projects in Europe have been canned or delayed. Of course, the $15 billion investment in Northvolt was the highest profile casualty in 2024 but there will be other twists and turns in the electrification journey. And, possibly a lesson in long-term planning. China 20 years ago had almost zero car production capacity. Now, it is on track to manufacturing 30 million cars a year and has surpassed Japan as the biggest exporter in the world with 5.17m units sent overseas. In fact, Chinese built EVs now account for 76% of the global EV market. So, if one were to be thinking 20 years ahead again what is most likely to drive investment returns in the transport world? Well, how about not driving. More specifically, self-driving. So, I’m quietly stunned that Google’s Waymo self-driving cars are clocking up 175,000 rides per week compared to 50,000 rides 6 months ago. That’s actually more than 1 million miles of autonomous transport delivered with an almost flawless safety record. I sense 2025 could see self-driving transport go mainstream and, as I write, Waymo have announced they are about to trial robo-taxis in their first non-US city, Tokyo, next year.

    The list of themes above is not exhaustive but they are structural themes measured in decades rather than calendar years. These are the most likely golden tickets to deliver standout returns like Nvidia’s 27,000 % return over the last 10 years. But, as always, we should keep an eye out for reversals of long standing narratives too. Argentina might be the prompt for contrarian thought while on track to deliver the best stock market returns of 2024. Who knew! So here’s two thoughts to chew over for the festive season: i) A European refugee reversal as Syrian and Ukrainian citizens potentially return home in 2025 and ii) A renewed embrace of nuclear power/investment to drive the electrification of the global economy.

    “Oh you should never, never doubt what nobody is sure about”         –   Willy Wonka

     

  • Does Europe Have Whatever It Takes?

    Does Europe Have Whatever It Takes?

    This is tricky. Here goes… I’m going to sound like Boris Johnson for a moment. Relax. No Greg Wallace, Master Chef or “middle-class women of a certain age”. More like the Middle Ages, and a stunning personal discovery this week that, before counterparties sign off a private investment in Germany, a public notary must read every single word out loud. Yip, not a banana-straightener but for a venture capital investor this week that meant “12 hours and counting” for a Series A investment document to be read out loud in front of founders and investors. In person. It sort of feels like Germany has missed out on a few productivity hacks since the Gutenberg printing press arrived in 1439. Meanwhile, European leadership is in disarray as the French government collapses, Germany’s industrial base struggles and the UK paddles alone in its own faeces-filled waters. It is difficult to ignore the “Europe is Donald Ducked” chorus growing louder by the day. And yet, I believe Europe can change course for the better. First, let’s identify a few key problems…

    Actually, why don’t we turn to the man who rescued Europe once before. Back in 2012 Mario Draghi as President of the European Central Bank (ECB) declared that “the ECB is ready to do whatever it takes to preserve the euro”. Remember the “PIIGS” who struggled in the crosshairs of European debt crisis traders for weeks? Well, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain have more than survived that credit (or credibility) crisis. In fact, this week Greece was able to borrow at cheaper rates than France. Stunning. And perhaps, that should be Europe’s inspiration. Greece was a mess. Not now. However, the same Mario Draghi in his 400 page EU Competitiveness report is telling us Europe is in a mess and that “without action, we will have to either compromise our welfare, our environment or our freedom”.  Draghi sees the following challenges:

     

    1. Productivity: European GDP growth has lagged the US by 0.5% every year since 2000. Interestingly, demographics (population growth) has played its part in that too. How about building that wall? Maybe not.
    2. Innovation: There are no leading technology companies in Europe. Draghi identifies a “middle tech” trap where Europe seems happy to be in “the peloton” rather than lead. Indeed, outside the information and communications technology sector, European productivity growth matches and often beats US competition.
    3. Finance: Draghi bemoans the lack of joined-up thinking and fragmentation in the area of debt financing and regulation. Think about those hoarse notaries and the 1,330 banks servicing Germany. Then know that Canada has just 93 banks.
    4. Security: Draghi deals with a number of distinct challenges in his report but I have lumped them together as almost existential threats: defence(war), climate crisis (decarbonisation) and industrial dependence(China).

     

    There’s a danger these challenges are perceived as nothing new. Arguably, the outbreak of a full scale European war is the only really new challenge of recent years. The other challenges have been slow-moving train wrecks over a decade or more. However, the point to be made is, like our climate crisis, Europe is running out of time. As always, I try to use data to tell a story and here are a few standout numbers which have crossed my desk in recent weeks:

     

    *In the 1950s to 1970s period European investment in innovation equated to 4% of GDP. That percentage is now 0.5%.

     

    *Venture capital investment in Europe is 6 times lower than the US.

     

    *71% of all current funding for AI globally is in the US. Europe accounts for just 14% of global AI investment.

     

    *The performance gap between US and European stock markets this year is over 21%. That’s the biggest performance divergence since 1976. In fact, US stock markets now account for 65% of global stock market capitalisation but with just 26% of global GDP.

     

    *According to Bank of America research, US to European equity valuations have risen to 3.6x in November, an all-time record. This ratio has DOUBLED in 8 years, and is 3 times the historic average.

     

    *The US stock market has outperformed Europe in 12 out of the last 15 years.

     

    *There are more than 270 regulatory bodies involved in digital networks in the EU today.

     

    *The EU has 34 mobile network operators. China has four, and the US three.

     

    If the list above feels a bit “money” oriented there is good reason. If investment, performance, valuations and growth gravitate to one economic region the knock-on effect is significant for competing regions like the EU. Stripe didn’t even bother starting out in Ireland. The Collison brothers went straight to California. It’s not just start-ups. One of Europe’s homegrown fintech stars, Revolut, is about to IPO but co-founder and CEO, Nikolay Storonsky, has said the US will be their public listing home as London “can’t compete”. Not surprisingly, CB Insights are saying 40% of the world’s AI companies (and talent) are located in the US.

    It’s not just a money tale – those stats above about regulators and network fragmentation are massive hurdles to companies competing for investment capital based on growth. You don’t need a notary to grow GDP. However, like Greece and Ireland in the recent past, it is possible to be ‘forced’ into survival strategies which may require pain. As an illustration, the decision of VW to close manufacturing plants in Germany for the first time in 87 years might only be the start of bad news for the 100,000 VW workers striking in protest. Now for some better news, and a bit of European inspiration…

    Europe has proven already it has whatever it takes to win the battle of the skies. In a truly pan-European collaboration project, Airbus has emphatically emerged as the dominant aircraft manufacturer on this planet. Even before Boeing’s troubles, Airbus was racing towards 60% global market share and currently is winning the market for large single-aisle planes on an 80/20 basis. The European champion of the skies has been beating Boeing for 5 consecutive years and has an order backlog of 8,600 planes. This is the inspiration and illustration of European collaboration. Now look to the skies again.

    War is a tragic European fact of life in Ukraine. However, battles for survival can bring innovation. WW2 was the catalyst for Europe to invent radar, penicillin and jet engines. Today, you might consider the 200 Ukrainian companies currently manufacturing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Yep, drones are the future and Elon Musk has had the temerity to suggest US F-35 jet fighters are “already obsolete”. If Musk is right and “Future wars will be drone wars” then Europe is the epicentre of UAV innovation. Interestingly, Germany’s start-up AI software company, Helsing, has focused on drones and jet-fighters and is now manufacturing its own attack weapons. These drones are armed and don’t need pilots or GPS, it’s all AI. And, Helsing is already valued at $5 billion.

    Our other survival battle is climate. And Europe can lead. One of the key drivers of productivity and valuation divergences over the years has been energy costs. An auto factory or chemical plant in Europe can typically pay $500m to $1 billion more for its power supply…. each year. Electrification is not just the decarbonised future, it is European industrial survival. While Europe might be stuck in a “middle-technology” trap it might be the US and China who remain wedded to cheaper fossil fuel options. Draghi’s analysis envisages Europe spending €3-4 trillion on electrification, or about 25% (!) of EU GDP over the next 10 years.

    Investment/spend is critical to innovation, and Europe right now looks like it is losing out in the energy race. So, we must hope a power crisis breeds innovation opportunity in electrification and perhaps gives Europe a head start over more complacent rivals. In fact, one of my favourite stats this week emerged in the decarbonisation space. A research paper from University of Chicago and Wharton estimates the total carbon burden of US corporates is $87 trillion. That’s 1.3 x the market capitalisation of US companies in 2023, and starkly demonstrates payment for damages caused by greenhouse emissions would bankrupt corporate America.

    Adversity forcing dramatic shifts in industrial policy and investment capital could ultimately be Europe’s saviour. Furthermore, we should look east to see how countries and cultures free themselves from government and regulatory over-reach. Poland is now, per capita, as rich as Japan or Spain. Its military is arguably the strongest in Europe, and its GDP has grown by 3.5x since 1990. Quietly Poland is becoming a tech and innovation hub. And, behind that drive is a STEM graduate pipeline ranked 4th in Europe between 2013 and 2019. That will only accelerate as Microsoft invests $1 billion, Google builds an R&D centre and a talent brain drain now moves into reverse. Inspiring stuff.

    It can be done. However, it might need a further crisis to prompt Europe’s leaders to commit to ‘whatever it takes’ to survive and lift itself out of decades of decline. And… the data and vibes suggest we are close to that moment.

     

     

  • Big Numbers That Can’t Be Missed

    Big Numbers That Can’t Be Missed

    Now, it’s my turn. I get to vote this week. For lots of busy good reasons, I haven’t read a huge amount on our own election but there’s no doubt it is important. However, I’m conscious I’m just one of 4 billion people voting in the current 12 month period. This also prompts another nagging feeling that it is external events over the lifetime of the next government which will define it. From Ukraine, to Utah, to even Mars, our planet is at an inflection point. The ‘world order’ is dangerously shifting as North Korean troops enter a European conflict zone for the first time, and yet, it would be ill-advised to down tools and just wait. There are other themes and trajectories already established and unlikely to change. Simply put, the numbers are now too big. And, we will continue to watch SIX in particular.

    Artificial Intelligence: It is striking to see various commentaries question the real ‘value’ of AI. During the summer, Goldman Sachs estimated that tech companies were about to spend $1 trillion on AI but queried whether they would ever earn a return on this capital expenditure. Fair question, but there’s another point to be made. The ‘winner takes all’ nature of this tech arms race is existential. The poster child of the AI revolution is Nvidia. Yet again, it smashed analyst forecasts this week in its latest quarterly results. My takeaway is that, of course, there will be misallocation of capital in this existential race but tech companies are going to continue to spend to stay in the race. ‘Exhibit A’ must be Nvidia’s own revenues in its data centre chip division. A whopping $30.8 billion revenues generated in the last quarter revealed a growth rate of 112% vs a year ago. Also, for context, this division has increased its quarterly revenue 7-fold since the early quarters of last year. Note, data centres are the battle ground where AI models are tested and trained, and this trend is set to continue.

    Cleantech: European cleantech suffered a blow this week as Northvolt sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection from its creditors. It’s a significant blow to Europe’s efforts to decouple from its dependency on China for electrical vehicle (EV) battery materials, chemistry, design and manufacture. Northvolt tried to deliver in all four process functions and received $15 billion of investment backing to do so. This has been a very expensive way to experience execution risk; both Goldman Sachs and VW have written off investments in Northvolt of $1 billion each. However, just like AI, loss is a recurring feature in any new technology area. So, keep an eye on the big numbers. In this instance, the EU is outspending the US with a $125 billion spend in 2023 (vs $86 billion). But….. China is really the cleantech benchmark. The Middle Kingdom spent $390 billion in 2023 across renewables, carbon capture, utilization and storage, hydrogen, batteries and nuclear power.

    Space: Elon Musk’s SpaceX is the most valuable private company on the planet with a recent funding mark indicating a $250 billion valuation, ahead of ByteDance (parent company of TikTok) on $225 billion. At current pace, it is launching its Starlink satellites (via Falcon 5 rockets) every 2.8 days. If you’re just about getting your head around that launch frequency think about Space X’s massive re-usable Starship which completed its 7th test flight last week. Its payload capacity is 150 tonnes and the plan is for Starship to do two launches…. daily. Now, what if the entire tonnage launched into space in history has been just shy of 40,000 tonnes? That means in the very very near future, Starship alone would be capable of repeating the entire payload history of space in just over 4 months. I’m not sure we have grasped the enormity of this feat and the implications for industries like telecommunications, mining, military defence, tourism, manufacturing or even housing (on Mars?).

    Crypto/Blockchain: Bitcoin is on the cusp of breaking the $100,000 mark. However, we need to start thinking about the entire crypto/blockchain ecosystem. Check out MicroStrategy which on the face of it is a loss-making software business but since 2020 has been investing in Bitcoin. If you thought Nvidia was the best performing share price in the world you’d be nearly correct – it has delivered 2660% returns to shareholders in the last 7 years. But….. MicroStrategy has rocketed by 3420%. Its current market value is $117 billion, making it more valuable than Nike, UPS or Starbucks. Of course, MicroStrategy is a leveraged play on Bitcoin but there are other ways to ‘leverage’ the rapid expansion of stablecoins, crypto funds, tokenisation, blockchain etc. The crypto asset ecosystem has just passed the $3 trillion valuation mark which exceeds the asset value of most countries’ stock markets. These numbers, and the opportunities to plug into this investment pool, are too big to miss…or ignore.

    Banks: It would be easy to move on to the ‘next shiny thing’ in the space or crypto universe but the banking sector is worth watching right now. Governments are finally getting good selling prices (even premia) for rescued bank shares as the UK (Nat West), Germany (Commerzbank), Ireland(AIB), Greece (Piraeus Bank), the Netherlands (ABN-AMRO) and Italy (Monte dei Paschi) all reduce sovereign shareholdings or exit altogether. As an aside, and interesting contrast to ‘shiny new things’  Monte dei Paschi began commercially lending 20 years before Christopher Columbus’s trip to America was financed. Anyway, old or not, the bank sector is hotting up. Breaking news over the weekend suggests Italy’s Unicredito will make a €10 billion + bid for rival BPM, and note Unicredito is already circling Germany’s Commerzbank. Also, it is worth noting that the tax/accounting professional services arm of UK wealth player, Evelyn Partners, has just been bought by private equity (Apax) for £700m. That is significantly more than the £500 million price tag suggested by City analysts.

    Technology Rotation: We have written previously about the particularly strong comeback for technology hardware thanks to AI, semiconductors, EVs and iPhones. The world has become very used to these themes powering the “Magnificent Seven” – Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Google, Meta, Amazon and Tesla – to all-time-highs but this analysis of last week’s technology price action in the newsletter, Clouded Judgment, caught the eye:

     

    This week saw the rapid acceleration of an interesting trend that started not too long ago – Magnificent 7 underperformance and software outperformance. Might this be the start of a rotation into software and growth (ie more risky assets)? Meta was down 3% over the last week. Amazon was down 7%. Microsoft down 3%. Google down 6%. Nvidia flat. Apple / Tesla were slightly up. QQQ was down 1.5%. Meanwhile, the WCLD index was up 6% over the last week! In addition to that, there were some really big moves in individual names. Snowflake was up >30% on Thursday after reporting earnings on Wednesday, which lifted the rest of the software market. Also just on Thursday Mongo was up 14%, Confluent / Datadog / Cloudflare were each up 7%.

     

    As a reminder, the Magnificent 7 have an aggregate value of $13.5 trillion which is more than the GDPs of India, Germany and Japan combined. The potential risk of an investor rotation OUT of the Magnificent 7 is a multi-trillion dollar consideration, and also can’t be missed.

    Clearly, my vote can’t change any of the big numbers above. However, these are the numbers which are far more likely to define our investing and business futures on this island.

     

  • Banking On A Deal Frenzy

    Banking On A Deal Frenzy

    This hurts a bit. It kills me to potentially reward poor behaviour, but hey, I’m not nominated to be the Attorney General of the United States of America. The financial giants of Wall Street kept their heads down in the lead up to the US election. We didn’t hear too much commentary on the rule of law, inflationary tariffs or accelerating budget deficits. I mean…who needs property rights (law) or a functioning national balance sheet? Possibly, the infamous Leona Hemsley’s “little people” because they pay taxes, aka the price, in time. But, for now, there’s a very clear short-term calculation being made by Wall Street. A Trump administration determined to slash regulation and speed up commercial transactions is a godsend for bankers. Of course, Elon Musk, Tesla and Bitcoin are perceived as the early big ‘winners’ of a transactional incoming President. However, at a broader level the clear winner in the week since election is the enormous financial sector.

    US Financials are the best performing sector in the markets over the last week (+1.5%) while tech, telecoms, healthcare and materials all have actually booked negative returns for investors(Source: Finviz). That big picture split is interesting and highlights the very essence of what financials are about. It’s all about deals. More deals, more commissions, more fees, more revenues, more bonuses. What deals you ask? Let’s start with the biggies like massive M&A deals. In recent years, the broligarchs have been frustrated by FTC Commissioner, Lina Khan, who has blocked more than 30 corporate mergers/acquisitions on grounds of reduced competition. High-profile deals attracting government(FTC) scrutiny included Microsoft/Activision and Kroger/Albertsons. Only this week, the parent companies of luxury brands Coach and Michael Kors abandoned their merger due to FTC competition-based objections. No deal, no fees. Hence, a more lenient transaction-friendly FTC under Trump is expected to increase deal flow. And, not just in M&A.

    How do I put this delicately? Well, if the incoming Attorney General is already under investigation by his House of Representatives colleagues for sex trafficking, let’s just say the whole area of compliance could be significantly relaxed. We can expect more financial products to be launched and faster in a more relaxed regulatory environment. One area already due to increase activity levels is the IPO sector. Interestingly, Sweden’s Klarna has just announced its plans to list publicly (IPO). However, despite its Swedish home, Klarna is going to list in the US, not Europe. Oh, and Klarna is a financial company. It’s also a great comeback story – the buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) platform and its 85 million customers is heading for a $20 billion valuation. That’s a tripling of value since the fintech ‘winter’ of 2022. Note fintech is not the only survivor of the investor ‘winter’ of 2022…

    The cryptocurrency universe has already been perceived as a Trump regulatory relaxation winner. Bitcoin has rocketed to all-time-highs of $93,000 with an individual asset value of $1.7 trillion exceeding that of Facebook/Meta. The wider cryptocurrency ecosystem has achieved a market value of $3.2 trillion but the bigger story is possibly stablecoins (cryptocurrencies backed by liquid financial assets ). Again, I’d highlight ‘transactions’ as the opportunity for financial services platforms. Stablecoins were used in $8.5 trillion of transactions in the second quarter of this year. That’s more than double Visa’s transaction volume of $3.9 trillion. It also provides a pretty good clue as to why Stripe acquired stablecoin platform, Bridge, for $1.1 billion.

    For the avoidance of doubt, more transactions and deals is an overall positive. More exits, more funding, more deals… the circle of start-up life. At Spark we know more deals, exits and IPOs eventually feeds into the smaller regions of financial markets. We also know there’s a hefty €150 billion sitting in Irish bank accounts earning almost zero returns. It’s not just an Irish phenomenon. There is currently a record $7 trillion of cash sitting in US money-market funds. That’s not a huge surprise when one can earn 4-5% interest in these US deposit accounts for relatively minimal risk. However, watch out for lower US interest rates and increased mega deal headlines in the coming months. Then watch that cash move. And, not just in the USA.

    The EU economy is 99% driven by 26 million private small and medium sized businesses (SME) who account for €5.4 trillion of economic activity. The headlines will almost exclusively focus on the impact of a Trump regime on US multinationals, corporation tax, homeshoring etc. Rather like the trading evidence in markets of the past week, probably not much will really change for the “broligarchs” and the big tech multinationals. However, the markets are telling you financial services will enjoy greater deal activity which will feed through the global funding ecosystem. Indeed, right now there’s an all-time-high number of investment campaigns on the Spark platform (8) with interesting additional private asset/deal opportunities in the 2025 pipeline. We’ve written it before; the future is private.

    So, it seems like a good time to launch Spark Private, the personalised service to grow your private asset portfolio. More details on that next week, after you’ve finished gasping at AG Gaetz.