Gravitas Spark CrowdFunding

Tag: portfolio

  • An Eastern Promise Worth Exploring…

    An Eastern Promise Worth Exploring…

    It is 23 years since I was last in Japan. I still love it. The cultural collision of ancient tradition, mass urbanisation and advanced technology is a gobsmacking experience. And, then there’s the friendly population hungry to learn while blessed with fabulous food, beautiful rural scenery, extraordinary attention to detail, safe streets and a commitment to social harmony. It is perhaps unique among the advanced economies of the world. However, Japan has its challenges. We all do these days but maybe Japan offers a fresh perspective on how to cope with change. I lived in Tokyo for three years in the ‘90s and this visit has been an eye-opener on how Japan is responding to change. So, I have decided to write a series of short articles in the coming weeks while travelling here on topics relevant to European business and investment. I’m currently on a Shinkansen (Bullet) train out of Tokyo on my way to the beautiful Gifu region and wanted to touch on a few early themes. Let’s set the scene.

    A quick glance at the daily newspapers – Yomiuri Shimbun, The Nikkei and The Japan Times – confirms that global trade disruption is the topic du jour in common with almost every other country on the planet. The Japanese economy is a trade-based one, given its relative lack of natural resources. It also had its own MAGA-type isolationist experiment from 1602 to 1863 when trade and foreign visitors were effectively shut out from Japan by its ruling Shoguns. So, it’s interesting to note the Japanese media focus on the “isolationist” aspect of the extremist Trump regime in Washington. Let’s just say the Japanese are a bit sceptical on Washington’s ability to put together a coherent trade framework. In fact, the unofficial feedback from the Japanese trade delegation sent to the White House was damning.

    There was a strong Tokyo view that the American negotiators “have no idea what they want”. Furthermore, this is a Japanese negotiating team which agreed trade deals with Trump in 2017 (TPP) and 2019 (agriculture/industrial products). As long-time Japan observers know, Japanese business and its leaders value relationship building and trust before committing slowly to any commercial deal. The mind boggles as to how Trump’s negotiating team think they will get any deal done with the Japanese while ignoring the terms agreed with Trump himself during his first presidency. Trust in the US is evaporating.

    There has been a global ‘sell America’ trade in recent weeks as the US dollar, US Treasury bonds and US stocks have been whacked by foreign sellers who have lost faith in US institutional stability. Japan is believed to have been the original foreign seller of US Treasuries (it holds $1 trillion (!) of these bonds) which spooked Trump into delaying tariffs on ‘negotiating countries” like Japan earlier in the month. Instead, Trump’s team focused its tariff tantrums on China while giving most countries a 90 day breather. As I write, the White House attempt to shift focus and possibly gather trade “allies” against China is blowing up rather embarrassingly. Indeed, Japan have just said they will not join any co-ordinated trade axis against China as it is too important as a trading counter-party. Sensible stuff. Meanwhile, the CEOs of Walmart, Target and other US retailers have apparently told Trump that store shelves “will be empty in 2 weeks”. Indeed, import activity at US ports has collapsed and the country’s 8 million truck drivers (and MAGA hats) are on stand-by for mass lay-offs. Whoops… not so sensible stuff.

    It turns out China can’t be removed from the US economy on the whim of Agent Orange. In fact, the latest word from the ‘stable genius’ is that tariffs on China will be reduced. No doubt, there will be some spurious ‘win’ claimed by Trump and his blowhard MAGA champions but the silence from China and President Xi has been deafening to all sane watchers of geopolitics. China has been prepping for this trade war for years, and has forced Trump to blink for all to see. However, the damage is already done to US credibility and increases the relevance of Japan as a trading partner for economic blocs in Asia and Europe. So, where can Europe work with Japan in a new world order? I already see a few shared pain points.

    In many ways Japan is a window into Europe’s future. Europe is already in “low growth” phase with its ageing population and high level of risk-averse savings. However, the demographic cliff facing Japan has already sparked a dramatic change in policy. For context, Japan’s working population is expected to lose more than 10 million workers (72m to 62m) in the next 15 years. Yep, ten million. So, it was immediately striking on this visit to Tokyo to see the number of non-Japanese working in the hospitality and retail sectors. So striking that I went to check the statistics. According to a Japan Times report in 2018, more than 1 in every 8 adults living in Tokyo’s 23 wards (cities) are not Japanese citizens. That is remarkable considering when I first worked in Japan there were just over 1 million foreigners living amongst a Japanese population of 126 million across a country roughly the size of Italy. Perhaps the desire to live in Japan is less surprising when you consider in the same time period (from the ‘90s to now) the annual number of tourists has rocketed from 2.7 million to 40 million. However, the true surprise is the policy shift in Japan to allow immigration in significant numbers. Bluntly, despite far right political party activity in Europe, immigration is a necessary part of its future. But…. not the only solution. Japan again is leading.

    Mario Draghi in his 2024 European Competitiveness report highlighted innovation and productivity as a necessary policy focus. In Japan, the use of robots and technology to assist in service-heavy healthcare and retail is well established. I personally witnessed robots in action in Narita airport and  a variety of Tokyo retail settings but the presence of humanoid robots in Japanese nursing homes is also well established. In fact, Japan dominates world robotics, accounting for 40% of the global market. Of course, innovation does not happen without risk capital/investment. While the financial headlines have obsessed over AI and the gyrating performances of “Mag 7” tech stocks, Japan has quietly turbo-charged its investment environment.

    Thanks to policy changes facilitating shareholder activism and takeover activity, the Japanese private equity market has exploded. We often write that the “future is private” so it is remarkable to see conservative Japanese capital markets experience 40% growth in 2024 private equity/venture capital activity. Unsurprisingly, the global private equity giants like KKR, Blackstone and Bain are all over this structural shift. Hedge funds have been racing to set up offices in Tokyo to follow the action too. Back in Europe, Draghi has highlighted the lack of innovation and investment/financial policy coherence across 27 different jurisdictions. Joined up thinking on investment could be as transformational for Europe as it appears to have been in Japan. And if you’re looking for policy endorsement, then who better than Warren Buffett.

    We will return to the Japan private investment environment in greater detail in subsequent articles but the public markets have already received the “Buffett kiss”. Over the last few years Berkshire Hathaway has built 10% equity stakes in each of 5 Japanese trading houses. These trading houses, also known as sogo shosha, are large, diversified conglomerates involved in a wide range of businesses, from trading and investment to logistics and manufacturing. Buffett has invested in the big five sogo shosha –  Mitsubishi, Mitsui, Sumitomo, Itochu, and Marubeni. We have written previously on this Buffett move but way before the Trump tariff tornado hit global markets. And, now I’m beginning to wonder. Did Buffett see an isolationist America coming and deliberately seek out the centuries-old trading relationships established across Asia by these Japanese trading giants? It wouldn’t be the first time Buffett saw a structural shift early. However, it’s not too late for Europe. A deliberate attempt to increase co-operation and relationships with Japan might be a very clever way to diversify risk away from an inward-focused US and explore Asian opportunity. Certainly, the Japanese can offer interesting perspectives and responses to deal with the four horses of Europe’s stagnation apocalypse: trade, immigration, demographics and innovation. Lots to learn, lots to write (or right).

     

  • What Signals Are You Watching?

    What Signals Are You Watching?

    I’m a bit lost. I can still remember as a child staring out at the Ballycotton Lighthouse as it guided battered yachts to safety during the Fastnet Race disaster of 1979. Fast forward to today and there’s another potentially calamitous “storm” brewing for the most basic concepts of accepted facts and truth. Worryingly, there’s increasing evidence that the “lighthouse” of global leadership on rules of law and common values has gone dark. Orwellian dark. I know we’ve been here before with White House Press Secretary, Sean Spicer, and bonkers claims of inauguration crowds for Trump 1.0 but the second coming of Trump is a whole new level of autocratic demands to “reject the evidence of your eyes or ears.” That’s Orwell, not the White House.

    It would appear that “their final, most essential command” this week is to NOT read the time-stamped texts of the US Secretary of Defense on the unsecured Signal mobile chat app shared with 16 other US security chiefs (plus one mistakenly added journalist) and conclude that this was the most embarrassing and dangerous self-inflicted security failure by US institutions in decades. The cover-up and spin-fest since the Atlantic magazine scoop has witnessed equally incompetent and criminal attempts to parse the meaning of “war plans” and “attack plans”. To be clear, the key “ground truth” in this intelligence near-miss is that advance information on a military mission puts US military personnel in danger. But here we are.

    Donald Trump has given a press briefing stating the US “has to have Greenland” and his Kremlin keeper, Vladimir Putin,  is dovetailing on message beautifully by saying “Trump’s plan to seize Greenland is serious”. Doesn’t that sound like two mob bosses agreeing ‘territory’?  Yes, but don’t ask the lawyers. Leading law firm, Skadden Arps, has just “agreed” to provide $100m of pro-bono work for initiatives supported by the White House in order to avoid adverse targeting by a regime irked by previous “woke” cases taken by Skadden.  So, do we all surrender as democracy dies in darkness? Well, there are other Signals to watch with possibly more impact than a Houthi-Yemen air strike mission. In fact, their potential impact could be sufficiently influential to trigger “lighthouse” leadership, even change.  I’m looking at three Signals in particular.

    First, as we head towards the Trump self-styled “Liberation Day” of trade tariffs imposed globally, we watch the money or flow of same. Some might think the enormous switch by investment institutions out of US equities (down 5% year to date) to international equities (eg. German Dax up 15% year to date) is a big deal. It is. But, equity markets could be due a “rotation” anyway after 15 years of US dominance and, frankly, more challenging valuations when economic leadership veers into cult lunacy territory. The awkward fact for the Trump crime gang is that foreigners own $16 trillion of US stocks and they are selling them even quicker than Tesla shares. However, the bigger more worrying signal is in the debt (or credit) markets. As we regularly say, debt(bond) markets can really intimidate as they can cause proper global economic damage. So, when I look  at the ‘plumbing’ of the financial system and corporate debt (credit) data, I’m seeing signs of cracking and stress. The jargon monoxide will involve terms like “spreads”, “VIX”, “call options” and “default pricing” but, take it from me, this is where the intimidation of the Trump White House is beginning.

    Second, how long will Trump’s ‘broligarchs’ go along with his trade war when there is possibly a far more consequential technology “war” exploding across our screens every day? My sense is that there could be a calculation that trade wars are a dangerous commercial distraction. Check out the latest data from Stripe. Software companies (SaaS) were always the uber-growth leaders, with Stripe analysis showing the median time for the top 100 software/SaaS start-up companies to reach $5m of recurring revenues was 37 months(data from 2018). But, there’s a new growth monster in town. Stripe data (2024) shows the top 100 AI start-ups hitting that $5m milestone in….. 24 months. You might have read that executive suites across the USA have been paralysed by indecision due to erratic Trump economic policy. Indeed, M&A deal activity has fallen to the lowest in a decade and year-to-date is down a whopping 30% on last year. However, the story in start-up world is very different. In the first quarter (Q1) of 2024 there were two start-ups acquired for more than $1 billion (unicorn status). In Q1 this year, there have been ELEVEN $1 billion plus start-up acquisitions. In fact , the total value of these deals this year has been more than $54 billion or 10x the activity value of Q1 2024. It’s all driven by AI and cloud infrastructure(including Google’s largest ever deal with Wiz) but when you see the latest text-to-image generation of OpenAI and the “Ghibli” craze you’ll definitely feel something’s up. But not the Tesla share price…

    Finally, and Elon Musk might think I’m being “mean” (while he cuts social security support for the elderly) but Tesla’s share price is worth watching. The DOGE whisperer in the Oval office says he’s leaving government ‘service’ at the end of May. However, for Tesla and its shareholders, post its $800 billion share price meltdown, the value destruction pain may not end in May. The brand damage of embracing right-wing extremism has been staggering to witness but the end-game could be no less dramatic. The recent deal to sell X/Twitter to xAI (this x stuff is tiresome isn’t it) has been seen as a way for Musk to avoid margin (debt) calls on Tesla shares he has pledged as security on cross-company loans. The trigger for those margin calls was reportedly a Tesla share price of $120 per share (vs today $263 per share) but I’m not sure the pain point has been removed. The market value of Tesla is still more than $800 billion compared to Ford at less than $40 billion. Let’s not forget it’s a car company where a balance sheet and cash flow can implode if sales/revenues go into reverse. Last year revenues had a small 1% decline… but this year? Watch revenues closely, and watch Musk.

    This might seem like a random set of signals to watch but sadly, there’s one emerging truth re US leadership. Money talks, not values nor principles. The Japanese (Nikkei) stock market has kicked off the week with a 4% wipe-out and we can only wonder when the men with the money (and the loans) pay a visit to the White House. We might have to wait a bit, but I’m hopeful the money will find that “lighthouse” moment.

  • Three Pictures Of Opportunity From A Changing World Order

    Three Pictures Of Opportunity From A Changing World Order

    It is difficult to avoid pictures of the St Patrick’s Day sex-pest parade at the White House but I can assure you it is well worth the effort. Clearly, the rule of law and the world order is enduring a seismic shakedown but it would be a mistake to assume all is lost. Hidden behind the disbelieving headlines and festive mug-shots there are a number of alternative pictures really worth thinking about. Hedge fund billionaire, Ray Dalio, wrote The Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail  as recently as 2021 and used five centuries of history to show how nation success depends on cycles much like business. So, I have been struck by three investment trends whose emergence could be attributed to these long-run cycle shifts. The first cycle journey actually starts with cars…..

     

    The mighty Volkswagen AG (VW) of Wolfsburg was founded in 1937 in the midst of another seismic geopolitical shift and 80 years later in 2017 became the world’s largest automotive manufacturer by global sales. In 2021 VW reached its peak market value of €155 billion but the Ukraine war, rocketing energy prices and electric vehicle (EV) competition has wiped almost €100 billion from that valuation since then. In fact, this week the even-older arms and military vehicle manufacturer, Rheinmetall AG, surpassed VW in market value. In reality this is a 10-year story rather than a 135-year history. As recently as 2014, Rheinmetall’s 125-years of manufacturing ammunition, missiles and military transport vehicles had built a total franchise value of just €1.3 billion. The invasion of Crimea by Russia in the same year was the “butterfly wing flap” moment as the company’s valuation over the following 10 years increased exponentially to deliver a 48x return to any far-sighted Kremlin watching investors. The picture below is a graphic reminder of the defence sector resurgence opportunity and the industrial shift away from the internal combustion engine (ICE):

     

     

     

    Of course, Germany is not the only country impacted by geopolitical change. Plenty of Trump apologist commentators seem to believe “Agent Orange” is playing 4D chess and seeking an alliance with Putin to take on the growing threat of China. Well, how’s that going? About as well as Trump’s ‘day one’ defeat of inflation or the $5 trillion evaporation of the US stock markets driven by a tech-heavy “Magnificent 7” meltdown. In contrast to US investors, the Chinese are enjoying a 40% rise year-to-date for their tech sector stocks and a healthy almost-20% gain for the broader Hang Seng Index. Ironically, it’s a Chinese AI company called Butterfly Effect which is creating possibly even greater waves than the DeepSeek cost ‘shock” back in January. Butterfly’s AI digital assistant, Manus, is more powerful than DeepSeek and has automated up to 50 tasks from buying a property in New York to editing a podcast. There have also been big Chinese breakthroughs in recent weeks in quantum computing and robotics adding to a stark picture below (Source: Bloomberg) – a whopping 40% outperformance by the Chinese tech sector over the US tech sector since Trump took office in January.

     

     

     

     

    If it feels like US Big Tech is in relative retreat then the latest data from VC research house, Pitchbook, makes for interesting reading. Big Tech is playing a less prominent role in the US start-up M&A market due to regulatory pressures but big corporates seem to have been replaced by start-ups themselves as acquirors. More specifically, in 2024 more than one third of start-up acquisitions were made by VC-backed start-ups. This highlights the emergence of a new buyer profile and exit route for start-ups; VC-backed ‘unicorns’ with significant cash reserves and an appetite for growth. Indeed, Pitchbook analysts put this rather well:

     

    “Amid the trend toward ‘profitability’, it is important to remember that growth remains essential and serves as a key motivating factor for these buyers…..The high number of VC-backed companies also creates numerous opportunities for consolidation. While acquisitions by VC-backed companies may not often dominate the headlines, they are becoming an important aspect of the venture capital liquidity narrative. ”

     

    The chart below (Source: Pitchbook) shows start-ups accounting for just 20% of M&A by value as recently as 2018. So, the move above 33% today seems significant…

     

     

     

    In summary, the pictures above should be viewed as opportunities happening in real time while we are distracted by tawdry turmoil and photo-ops in Washington. More importantly, we should start to think about geopolitics as the driver of not just nation cycles, but also business cycles and new long-run structural trends.

     

  • Ten MEGA Signs Of Not So Much Winning…

    Ten MEGA Signs Of Not So Much Winning…

    Never thought I’d say this. I think I need those Freezbrury cold water challenge days to extend into March. Well, I need some shock therapy to dull the senses and distract from a rules-based world order which is crumbling by the hour. Should I care that a former Fox & Friends host has just instructed the US military to cease all operations against Russian cyber threats? Probably, but I’m not sure it’s helpful to follow the dizzying pace of breaking news and broken alliances. We have previously written about how the financial markets can rein in autocratic megalomania both East and West. In that instance we flagged the power of bond (debt) markets. Now, it looks like a regime which promised “so much winning” is losing the confidence of more than the bond market. Here’s a list of losers….

     

    US Business Confidence: The silence or craven submission of US business leaders to the erratic ‘shake down’ of US allies and the established world order has been stunning to observe. However, as we often write, corporate actions can be more informative. Quietly removing DEI policies requires minimal leadership courage (I’m being very generous with that word). Dealmaking (M&A) on the other hand is way up there in terms of career risk for senior executives. Guess what? US M&A deal activity in January slumped to a decade low with a 30% drop year-on-year.  Uncertainty is a strategic decision killer.

    US Capital Markets: The US financial markets have dominated the world since the 2008-2009 financial crisis. US stock markets now account for more than 50% of the value of global equities after outperforming international stocks for more than 16 years. However, this year it’s a different or shifting story. At the end of February, international stocks had gained 7.3% in 2025 vs a 1.4% gain for the S&P 500.

    US Growth: Investors in US stocks appear to be concerned. They are not alone. The much-watched GDPNow forecast of the Atlanta Fed is currently projecting US GDP will CONTRACT by 1.5% in the first quarter compared to the forecast of healthy 2.3% growth a week earlier. Also, US consumer spending has just fallen for the first time in two years.

    US Technology: The “broligarchs” might have taken over the White House but the “Magnificent 7” technology stocks are experiencing slippage in 2025. Only one of Meta(+11%), Apple (-4%), Amazon (-3%), Google (-10%), Microsoft (-6%), Nvidia (-10%) or Tesla has seen its share price in positive territory this year.

    Tesla: Tesla’s share price decline this year is a whopping 23%. Apparently, Elmo Musk’s fondness for autocrats and far-right parties in Europe has been a bit of a brand-killer. Sales in Europe for the first two months of 2025 are down 46% which can’t all be explained by consumers waiting for a Model Y refresh. Don’t expect any bravery from Tesla board directors either.

    US House Sales: US existing home sales have dropped to the lowest levels since…. 1995. Yes, that’s when there were 80 million fewer people living in the US and didn’t have a President threatening a tariff war with its neighbour and construction-critical timber supplier, Canada.

    US Dollar: As the world’s reserve currency the US Dollar (USD) is a long way away from any structural impact from the waning credibility of its sovereign’s political system. However, the USD is trading at an 11-week low against 6 major rival currencies. And….one of the better macro writers out there, Barry Ritholtz of The Big Picture blog, has flagged the dangers of policy error for the USD:

     

    “Since the end of World War Two, the USD has been America’s “exorbitant privilege” as the world’s reserve currency. However, several factors threaten this privilege: wide-scale tariffs, the embrace of alternative digital currencies, the breaking of long-standing alliances, and dallying with dictators.

    Since the end of World War II in 1945, the rise of the United States as the world’s dominant economic, military, and cultural power has led to a relatively peaceful 75 years in the Western Hemisphere, Pax Americana, has greatly benefited the U.S. and its allies. Putting that at risk would be one of history’s greatest unforced errors.”

     

    US Supply Chain: The just released ISM Manufacturing survey for the US reveals the “prices paid” index for companies surged to a 32-month high as suppliers adjusted prices upwards ahead of threatened Trump tariffs. Oh, and don’t mention egg prices to the ‘Build-that-Wall’ cult – egg shortages are pushing prices up by 53% vs 2024 prices. Yep, you might remember there was some bloviating chat about inflation being fixed ‘on day one’.

    US Jobs: There’s every chance Elmo Musk could end up being the DOGE that caught the car. Musk has been tasked/appointed himself to remove unnecessary spending by the US Federal government and its 3 million employees. But… the shock being applied to the US economy is possibly underestimated. The US government spent $6.8 trillion in 2024. For context, that’s more than 10x the size of the global semiconductor industry’s annual revenues ($628 billion 2024). Firing people in climate/weather forecasting roles and shutting down foreign aid (USAID) are just headlines. The bigger picture suggests one of the US economy’s most critical components (government spend) is in contractionary territory which will impact not just government jobs but the entire government supply chain in the private sector. Yep, a $7 trillion customer of the US economy is now being  run by Elmo and his “Muskrats” with cute names like “Big Balls” and “First Buddy”. No seriously.

    Brand America: As a symbol of American global reach and brand value it’s difficult to beat McDonald’s. Some of you may even recall the opening of its first Moscow restaurant with the famed “Golden Arches” in January 1990. You just knew the geopolitical sands were shifting. Less than two years later the Soviet Union collapsed. Now, check out the IPO of a company in Hong Kong this week. McDonalds is no longer the biggest food and beverage chain in the world. That title now goes to Mixue Ice Cream & Tea which has 45,000 branches in Asia and is opening approximately 21 stores……. every single day.

    It’s a bit early to be suggesting a shift in global leadership but perhaps the competition has just shot itself in the foot. I’m thinking of Europe now and how a geopolitical crisis might just prompt real thought about making Europe great again (MEGA). Three financial data points caught the eye this week and suggested investors might be warming up to real policy action in Europe:

     

    • The Swedish Krona is appreciating fast (2.4% today) as investors recognise Sweden has the highest military equipment production per GDP in Europe.

     

    • Europe’s benchmark stock index, the Stoxx 600, has risen every week for 10 straight weeks.

     

    • Germany’s Rheinmetal (+14%), Britain’s Bae Systems (+19%) and France’s Thales (+23%) have seen their share prices rise by double-digit percentages in a matter of days.

     

    The $2.5 trillion global defence industry won’t be the only area Europe should target to compete as a “trusted partner” . Presumably, many countries and organisations seeking commercial partners in healthcare (medicine/vaccines) and financial services will have noted the risks of deal exposure to a US political leadership who ultimately might want  a “piece” of a country in exchange for “peace”.  Europe, by standing with Ukraine, could send a very powerful message on dependability to future partners as its former Washington ally works furiously to keep the KGB lieutenant colonel in the Kremlin happy.

     

  • Private Portfolios And Future Returns: Part II

    Private Portfolios And Future Returns: Part II

    Well, we promised. This is a follow-up to our last piece on expected returns for a private portfolio. This time we are going to illustrate a variety of portfolio outcomes with some numbers. However, there IS a catch. Humans are not good at forecasting the future so these returns outcomes are just a guide. A bit like a US-NATO promise to Estonia – we might send military forces to fight off an attack from Russia, but then again we might not. The good news for investors (for Estonia not so much) is that history can provide some confidence but no guarantees. History, in this instance, is the long-run return on private assets which we referenced in last week’s article. As a refresher, here is the reference table we used (Source: Pitchbook):

     

    We noted the various categories of assets and concluded that Spark investors would be mostly invested in private equity and venture capital type assets. Then we decided to use 12% as a conservative ‘base case’  annual growth hurdle (IRR) expected of a portfolio with that mix of assets and quantified that growth over 10 years:

     

    “In real terms (and compounding those rates [12%] of return) that equates to an initial investment of €10,000 growing to €31,000 over 10 years. For context, a fund with publicly listed equities would be expected (by financial planners) to generate 7% returns per annum and thus turn €10,000 into €19,600” 

     

    However, many of the Spark investment opportunities are very early-stage (higher risk) so it would be reasonable to expect something in excess of this 12% base case growth/returns scenario. Rather than use another headline number, we thought this article would be an opportunity to build a returns scenario from the bottom up. In other words, we would use illustrative portfolios of 25 investments each and explore three different mixes of outcomes. Our reasoning for using a portfolio of 25 investments is that this approximates to what many of our Private Portfolio (service) investors are currently trying to target/build as a personal portfolio over three years. The other assumptions used across the different illustrative portfolios are as follows:

     

    Total investment cost = €50,000

    Position size = €2,000 equally invested across 25 companies

    EIIS tax rebate rate = 37%* 

    Holding period = 10 years

     

    *The EIIS tax rebate rate is a ‘blend’ of the new standard rate of 35% and the higher rate of 50% applied to pre-operational businesses.

    Now, let’s consider our first portfolio. According to the US Bureau of Labour Statistics, 65% of start-ups go out of business within 10 years. So let’s use that historic 65% failure rate as a future outcome for our first portfolio. In other words, 16 of our 25 portfolio companies will end up being worth zero. With the remaining 9 companies, we are going to assume that 5 of them become unspectacularly profitable and grind out a typical equity return of doubling every ten years(7% per annum). The final 4 companies are expected to be successful exits or ‘wins’ generating returns of between 7x and 15x. The table below illustrates those outcomes with an overall portfolio rate of return (IRR) of just over 13%. This equates to a multiple of 3.4x of the initial investment cost MINUS your EIIS tax rebate.

    Portfolio 1:

     

    The above example shows how important tax is to the initial cost or valuation multiple paid for your investments ie a 50% tax rebate cuts in half the valuation multiple paid. This portfolio generates a respectable 13% return but in the next example we’d like to demonstrate the importance of “winners”. So, in Portfolio 2 we raise the failure rate to 20 companies (80%) and model the impact of two big exits of 20x and 40x. This scenario delivers a superior IRR (vs Portfolio 1) of 15.4% and a multiple of 4.2x your initial cost of investment:

    Portfolio 2:

     

    Clearly, a return of 40x on a single investment would be huge but for ‘unicorn’ followers of companies reaching billion dollar valuation status this is the equivalent of a €25m company growing to €1 billion. Rare, but increasingly possible given the research team at Dealroom estimate 100 ‘unicorns’ have entered the billion dollar club every year since 2018. However, if the mention of unicorns smacks of fantasy territory let’s look at a more ‘diversified’ mix of outcomes in a portfolio. In particular, we want to model a portfolio reflecting some of the themes (including Spark’s risk management process) we touched upon in our first article of this series. Portfolio 3 is a mix of the following themes:

     

    Recovery: Failure of ‘asset lite’ businesses could actually deliver some recovery values due to the data base built, team domain expertise, customer relationship assets etc.

     

    B2B: Almost 70% of Spark investments are business-to-business (B2B) companies in a world where corporate VCs (CVC) are increasingly active eg Google has acquired more than 200 start-ups over the years.

     

    Taxation: Due to higher capital gains (CGT) and income tax (dividend taxation) regimes in Europe and particularly Ireland the ‘hurdle’ or exit/return expected of a young company must be commensurately higher to compensate institutional investors.

     

    Quality:  Start-up funding is, bluntly, more scarce in this part of the world and Spark probably turns down 9 out of every 10 investment opportunities. In theory, we are already investing in the top quality decile of opportunity.

     

    So, in Portfolio 3 the failure rate will be lower than previous examples (60%) and will also not amount to a ZERO return but include a recovery value of 20%. However, as demonstrated above, the key swing factor is the ‘winner’ category of investments. In Portfolio 3 we ‘diversify’ the outcomes of the surviving 10 companies with 6 actual exits. The following table outlines those outcomes across the portfolio:

     

    Portfolio 3:

     

    Clearly, diversification of outcomes and a higher number of more moderate exits does move the returns (IRR) dial. Any investor with a portfolio delivering 14.7% annual returns for an almost 4 X return on initial investment cost should be happy. Of course, these are merely estimates of the future anchored to historic data. We, like all forecasters, will get it wrong. However, it is reasonable to think a portfolio of mainly B2B assets with varying levels of maturity (along the start-up to private equity buy-out spectrum) operating in busy corporate VC activity sectors will achieve some exit success. You’ve read it here many times before… the future is private. But… there’s an additional Spark Private mantra to get to know – the process is portfolio. Private investors should build a sufficient opportunity set by holding multiple investments in a portfolio. As a small aside, this writer’s personal view is that exit valuations in the private asset world will surprise on the upside compared to even the multiples used in the portfolios above. Again, no promises!

    Writer’s Note: The above is just a basis for discussion and exploring the long-run drivers of portfolio returns. I would be more than happy to talk through our investment pipeline and deal-types with anyone interested in building a diversified portfolio of private assets over the next 2-3 years.

     

     

  • What Returns Can Investors Expect In A Private World?

    What Returns Can Investors Expect In A Private World?

    Well, I can’t promise you a future with a beachfront property in “Gaza Lago”. In fact, in the world of investing there are no guaranteed returns. As promised in our recent Private Portfolio Thoughts newsletter, I wanted to address expectations as to what long-run returns a private investor should be looking for in a portfolio of private assets.  First, let’s take a look at ‘industry standard’ expectations based on global historic data compiled by research house, Pitchbook. Of course, these are just averages and no doubt are ‘skewed’ by supra-normal returns for a small number of successful funds in each asset class. However, the table below gives an approximate guide to expectations over various time horizons and types of investment.

     

    The Spark focus is probably towards the top of this table summarising 5-year and 10-year returns for private equity (PE) and early-stage investing through venture capital (VC). However, if we strip out debt and real asset products the double-digit (%) performance picture is pretty similar across the board for private assets. The annual rates of return (IRR) implied by the performance of these private assets (in aggregate) are 13.4% over 5-years and 12.5% over 10-years.

    Let’s be more conservative and suggest that portfolios of private assets after 10 years SHOULD have grown in value at a rate of 12%. In real terms (and compounding those rates of return) that equates to an initial investment of €10,000 growing to €31,000 over 10 years. For context, a fund with publicly listed equities would be expected (by financial planners) to generate 7% returns per annum and thus turn €10,000 into €19,600. Of course, the extra return earned by the private asset portfolios is the compensation required by investors for the higher risk exposure(reduced liquidity, business failure) compared to the shares of large established businesses trading every day. These return numbers (based on history) can be described as “hurdle” rates which investors are expecting to match or beat in order to justify putting their capital at risk over long periods of time. So, let’s apply some hurdles to our world of very young companies (VC) and small businesses (private equity).

    We know that the industry standard in more mature private capital investment strategies is looking to turn €10,000 into something north of €30,000 over 10 years. We might describe this as an expectation to generate 3x your initial investment amount. Arguably, for higher risk investments in our earlier-stage world, investors could expect/demand an even higher return for their portfolios. If investors wanted 4x returns or €40,000 after 10 years that equates to a 15% annual return which is what private equity strategies have achieved(see table). So, that expectation is not unreasonable. But…. how realistic is it in a high risk portfolio of mainly early-stage business failure? We should touch on the key ‘push backs’ we get from investors who are wary of investing in start-up businesses or smaller private equity deals. The following are the most common perceived wisdoms….

     

    “80-90% of start-ups fail”

    “ Exits are more difficult as IPO markets for smaller companies have struggled”

    “I can just buy publicly listed equities and earn similar returns”

     

    There is an element of historic truth to all these statements but I’m going to use the most dangerous words in the investing lexicon by stating “this time it’s different”. First, the history of start-up failure should take into account the characteristics of older vintages of businesses. Let’s think about old economy businesses investing heavily in premises, equipment, overseas expansion facilities, logistics etc. These are, in most cases, “sunk costs” in capital-heavy businesses. Inevitably, if the business gets into trouble these ‘assets’ are not just worthless but can have an actual negative value due to ongoing liabilities/leases, maintenance costs, security, insurance etc. Now, think about many of today’s “asset light” businesses leveraging digital infrastructure and building value through the experience of the founders/team, the data gathered by the business and the development of relationships with clients and partners.

    These businesses don’t have the same level of sunk costs/liabilities (as old economy businesses) which can swamp the value of the operational “franchise”. Instead, the value within a business which might not be meeting growth targets can be recognised by a third party and lead to another form of exit which doesn’t involve liquidation. In the Spark portfolio we have seen a number of businesses acquired by third parties in the same sector in exchange for shares in the acquiring company. These shares clearly have a value and also change the traditional calculations around start-up failure.

    In the world of debt/credit one of the key financial terms/metrics is historic “recovery value”. In main street terms, this is the typical expected percentage of the debt which can be recovered when a business fails in a particular sector. You will see such sector recovery data displayed as a percentage of the debt ie 20 cents, 30 cents in the dollar. So, in the world of start-ups there is normally no debt and the equity in the business is a complete ZERO in the case of struggle or failure. But, now that’s not quite the case. If an acquiring business is offering a share exchange then the “recovery value” could by 20-50% of the original investment. And, the reason for ‘value’ being found in the business is the experience of the acquired team, the database and client relationships. This is happening on a far bigger scale elsewhere.

    Ever heard of the term ‘acqui-hiring”? This refers to a situation in which a company acquires another company primarily for its talented team or employees, rather than its products, technology, or other assets. In an acqui-hire, the acquiring company may not be interested in continuing the acquired company’s business or product, but rather wants to bring the talent into its own organization. Now, here’s another bit of jargon monoxide…. ever heard of CVC? Well, you know what venture capital (VC) does but there’s a subset of the VC ecosystem called Corporate Venture Capital(CVC). This form of VC funding is in reality larger corporations investing in smaller businesses whose franchises/technology could ultimately be relevant and value-creating for the parent company.

    So, you might think Sequoia, Index Ventures, Tiger Global and Andreessen Horowitz are the kings of VC investing. Now, think again. Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Nvidia are hugely active in the VC funding space. As an illustration, Nvidia deployed $1 billion in 50 VC funding rounds in 2024 alone. Furthermore, Google has acquired a whopping 222 start-ups over the years, and in 2023 the “Magnificent 7” tech stocks participated in 208 VC deals. So, the IPO market might not be as start-up friendly as in the past but Big Tech certainly is stepping up to the plate as a new and highly active exit event option.

    Of course, there will always be those investors who believe they can earn approximately similar returns to private asset strategies by choosing a selection of publicly listed companies. Yep, the likes of Domino’s Pizza, Paddy Power, Apple and Nvidia tick those boxes but there’s also an assumption investors will avoid the temptation of selling while on the multi-decade rocket ride. However, the more significant point is about business failure. Think it’s only start-ups?  Sixty years ago the average life-span of a company in the S&P 500 was over 50 years. Today, it’s less than 15 years! By 2027, almost 75% of companies who were quoted in the S&P 500 in 2016 will have disappeared (Source: McKinsey). Not for the first time, I’d suggest it’s worth a read of the excellent The Future is Faster Than You Think to grasp how fast business and technology leadership is changing.

    We can’t forecast the future. However, we should recognise that the world of start-ups today has changed dramatically. As a final illustration, start-up funding was traditionally populated by a majority of consumer-focused businesses – think retail, textiles, manufacturing, food, fashion etc.  The term “B2C” would be used to describe these business-to-consumer companies. Well, that’s changed too. Certainly, for Spark. A whopping 70% of funding deals completed by Spark have been business-to-business (B2B) opportunities. It should also be noted that our vetting process turns away approximately nine in every ten opportunities. Arguably, we are selecting the top decile of quality in the opportunity universe. No doubt we will get it wrong along the way, but this is still a robust risk starting point. And, it’s not the only starting point…

    The purpose of this article is to set the scene for a follow-up piece on how these structural shifts can impact the average private portfolio and future expectations using sample portfolios and outcomes. But always remember…. if I could truly forecast the future, “Gaza Lago” might personally have an entirely different meaning and location.

  • You’re Watching The Wrong Dictator Reality Show..

    You’re Watching The Wrong Dictator Reality Show..

    It deserves an expletive. It’s exhausting. Magic water spigots turned on in Northern California, summary dismissal of Inspectors General watchdogs and sending uninvited military planes into the airspace of your closest Latin American ally. Of course, it could be worse as an ally – you could just be asked over an introductory phone call to give up over 95% of your sovereign territory. Perhaps, there will be a Eurovision-style poll run by Fox News to decide the future of Denmark and Greenland. I can almost see it now… say hello to the voting panel in Belgrade, or Moldova…. or Transnistria. More expletives. But, no. This week we were given a trillion dollar reminder that we are watching the wrong dictator reality show.

    The trillion dollar damage to tech stock valuations inflicted by China’s unveiling of a super-cheap AI large language model, DeepSeek (with similar performance powers to ChatGPT, Gemini etc) was indeed a “wake up call” for US Big Tech according to President Trump. However, at the same time, the geopolitical machinations of China are veering into reality show territory. Thanks to the erosion of truth in the world there’s no need for James Bond-style subterfuge. Instead, it can be as brazen as hell. Chinese ships have been damaging undersea cables around Taiwan in recent months but this week marked the third severing of an undersea cable in three months…. in the Baltic Sea. The fibre-optic cable in the latest incident connected Sweden and Latvia but this time involved a China-owned ship in the sabotage operation. It would seem that Russia, as China’s “mineral colony”, has invited China to assist in infrastructure “grey-zone” conflict. Indeed, China has its own domestic reasons to ratchet up the geopolitical temperatures of distraction.

    The latest economic activity data from China is looking pretty grim. January manufacturing activity actually contracted which won’t put the cheer into the upcoming New Year celebrations for 1.4 billion Chinese. This manufacturing slowdown has surprised many given recent monetary stimulus initiatives by the Beijing regime. However, we can expect further stimulus measures given Chinese government debt/GDP ratios are closer to 60% compared to US and European governments labouring under debt burdens over the 100% mark already. This monetary firepower will have knock-on effects across international markets and global economic growth. But… there is a strategic price to be paid by the rest of the world. And, it’s not just the obvious trade deficits. DeepSeek is more likely to be a temporary shock and, despite the hysterical headlines, the emergence of a better engineered cheaper way to harness computing power is a net benefit to all, including broader equity markets. However, DeepSeek highlights the growing excellence of China across multiple technologies.

    According to a 2024 study by the Australian Strategic policy Institute (ASPI), China now dominates the US in 57 of 64 critical technologies, up from just three in 2007. The US, which led in 60 sectors in 2007, now leads in just seven. Rankings by the ASPI were based on cumulative innovative and high-impact research and patents. ASPI credits President Xi Jinping’s ‘Made in China 2025’ plan for the infusion of “massive direct state funding for R&D in key technology,” stating that existing strategic investments turned into a plan to achieve technological “supremacy”. The areas where China excels include…

     

    • advanced integrated circuit design and fabrication
    • high-specification machining processes
    • advanced aircraft engines
    • drones, swarming and collaborative robots
    • electric batteries
    • photovoltaics
    • advanced radiofrequency communication

     

    Oh, and did we mention nuclear fusion? Of course, you might have missed this if you’d been watching the fantasy Greenland invasion on the other show. In the past week, Chinese scientists broke the nuclear fusion record for sustained plasma at over 100 million degrees by maintaining a mix of electrons and ions in a fluid state for more than 1,000 seconds. As a reminder, nuclear fusion replicates the sun’s energy, offering limitless, carbon-free energy.

    So, if you were a White House strategist you might want to curtail China’s technology advances. And, this is where things have taken a very strange turn. The Trump campaign has made lots of noise about China with tariffs being the chosen commercial weapon to rebalance US trade deficits with the Middle Kingdom. Fast forward to today and tariffs were, instead, the chosen weapon to bully Colombia. But… the US actually has a trade surplus with Colombia. More strange has been the Trump reverse-ferret on TikTok which he’d now like to see continue operating in the US (rather than enforce the ban upheld by the Supreme Court) with a US investor partner like Elon Musk or Larry Ellison. That all make sense? Now, for the really weird stuff.

    Remember when Taiwan was supposed to be protected by its US ally from the increasing threat of China? Well, while we’ve all been distracted on DeepSeek news, there were some fairly seismic developments in US-Taiwan trade relations. Check out this headline about the two ‘allies’….

     

    Trump’s 100% tariff threat on Taiwan chips raises cost, supply chain fears  –  Business Insider

     

    So much for the tough talk on China. Beijing must be thrilled and President Xi will be encouraged to keep up the ‘grey zone’ infrastructure sabotage in the Baltic Sea and Straits of Taiwan. Meanwhile, the new US Defense Secretary , Pete Hegseth, fresh off the Fox & Friends chat sofa, has got to work defending the nation. First priorities….. revoking former chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley’s security detail, removing all portraits of the general in the Pentagon and pursuing his demotion.

    Anyone get the feeling the wrong ‘enemy’ is being pursued…..?

     

  • A World Losing Control Of Truth….

    A World Losing Control Of Truth….

    You know that feeling. No control, just watching helplessly. On a personal level, I observed the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles from afar via Google Maps and X(itter) but was updated on the ground by my son dangerously close to events on the UCLA campus. Evacuation to San Diego was his fortunate escape while the estimates of fatalities and rebuild costs continue to climb. Sadly, the losses are not just in the physical world of lives and properties. Truth has also been scorched by the partisan politics of the US. Incoming President Trump and his oligarch allies have been quick to blame political incompetence for the fires and deflect from the urgency of the climate crisis. A cursory look at Xitter and other online channels reveals waves of misinformation on lack of water and firefighting resources, saving smelt fish(yep), DEI /woke policies (open season it seems) and even funding Ukraine as the ultimate source of blame. Now, for a few stubborn facts:

    No rain in Los Angeles (LA) since May 2024

    Highest summer temperatures in LA ever

    Land/vegetation is the second driest on record – UCLA research suggests 25% drier than average

    Strongest seasonal Santa Ana winds in 14 years (up to 150 kph)

    That lethal combination of extreme heat, bone-dry fuel and tornado-like winds are climate change driven. Fires are nothing new for California, but the change in wind/heat patterns has dramatically increased the intensity of the fires and the speed-of-spread when they occur. However, the extent of climate denial deflection at the highest US political leadership levels is amply demonstrated by the words of the incoming Trump nominee for Energy Secretary, Chris Wright, at his Senate confirmation hearing just this week: “I stand by my past comments…..the hype over wildfires is just hype”. Not for the first time, the world of finance will have its say too. In particular, the exit of insurance companies and house protection coverage for residents of LA, West Virginia, Florida and Texas is probably more instructive than the internet warriors in their underpants shrieking about political mismanagement, conspiracy theories or super-powered immigrant arsonists.  Credibility and truth are inextricably linked and the biggest bully of them all is flexing its truth-seeking muscles….

    We have written in recent days about debt markets constraining the actions of autocrats in the geopolitical world. However, in the financial world there are increasing words of worry from some very credible players about a credibility gap emerging. So, without bamboozling with jargon, let’s flag two financial facts.

    *Interest rates around the world are either falling or stabilising at lower levels than 18 months ago.

    *Bond yields which usually track interests rates are not falling, or even stabilising. Longer term yields in the UK, Japan and US have broken free of their relationship with interest rates and are rocketing higher.

    This divergence of trajectories for interest rates and bonds is HIGHLY unusual. So, what’s happening? Well, debt and bond markets do track interest rates set by the central banks….normally. But, in this instance, credibility or credit has come into play on two fronts. First, central banks like the Fed and Bank of England are facing increased scrutiny in their battle to tame inflation. Second, government bonds track the credibility of sovereign governments – their ability to confront or tell the truth. And that’s a problem now. Nobody believes current UK government policies are able to deliver growth and not many believe Trump’s tax cuts and tariffs menu will tame inflation. Bluntly, there are increasing fears in financial circles that the Fed has lost control of the most important financial market in the world: the US Treasury market. Again, truth and credibility (not denial) are critical to attract risk capital, insurance, investment etc.

    Finally, we should note the warning in President Joe Biden’s farewell address to the nation this week. Critics might argue his presidency wasn’t bold enough, even cruel enough, but his departing words might resonate with those who read President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell speech warnings in 1961 about the dangers of the “military-industrial complex”. Biden points to an oligarchy of “extreme, power, wealth and influence” in a “tech-industrial complex” which wields a very modern weapon to serve their own interests. The tacky million dollar Trump inauguration donations and spineless abandonment of content moderation by the tech oligarchs could be mistaken as the source of bitterness for an ousted president but I’ve a feeling the following statement will be revisited by historians as a prescient warning:

     

    “Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation, enabling the abuse of power. The free press is crumbling [or] disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact checking. The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit…. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is the most consequential technology of our time, perhaps of all time.”

     

    I’ve got some bad news. That “avalanche of misinformation” is just the start, and the reference to AI is key. It feels like every funding round at the moment is attached to “AI-agents”, bots who will carry out the mundane content generating tasks of human workers. In fact, one in every two dollars of VC funding in the US right now is going to AI. The number globally is 37% (Source: CB Insights). However, let’s think about that ‘army’ of bots to be unleashed on the future of work and communications. First, know that an estimated 50% of all online traffic right now is bot generated. Yep, that’s bot created content, bot engagement, bot dissemination….. the whole false fly-wheel effect. Now, imagine a vicious circle of billions of bots, content pieces and false engagement. Then think false content.

    You will hear more about “Dead Internet Theory” in 2025. It started out as a peripheral online conspiracy theory claiming the internet has been taken over by artificial intelligence(AI). Viral posts, engagement rankings, traffic stats etc all have a whiff of AI-bot promotion these days but there’s worse to come. The sheer volume of misinformation coming our way via AI-agency bots could kill online platforms’ utility value. Even this week, using Xitter was an exercise in dodging the underpants brigade + bots and finding real true information on the LA fires. And, now the chat is Elon Musk will be buying Tik Tok. A change of commercial control perhaps, but the reality at a higher communications level is more existential. We could lose control of not just the internet, but truth itself.

     

    “You can’t handle the truth!!”  – Colonel Jessup, A Few Good Men.

     

     

  • Trump Words Scare But Bonds Are The Real Bully Boys

    Trump Words Scare But Bonds Are The Real Bully Boys

    The flashbacks are coming on strong. Who thought myself and Donald Trump would be ratified for new office in the same week? Not me. Anyway, enough about me… said the Donald never. Seriously, do we really have another four years of these whining streams of consciousness, aka press conferences. As Los Angeles burns and Gaza starves, the world is still digesting The Accused’s quasi-declaration of war on Panama, Mexico, Canada and…… Denmark. Clearly, the Orange Toddler is emboldened, as Putin’s number one fan boy, to threaten the invasion of both Panama and Greenland for “national security” reasons. One could be dismissive of these attention-seeking words of intimidation but this feels different, and probably Putin derived. Hamlet this is not, but Act I of this tragedy was Ukraine. Who knows what Act II could be in a new world order of misinformation, security over-reach and sovereign destruction?  Taiwan would top most risk lists. However, Estonia or Finland might disagree, as the Baltic plays host to “infra-destructure” warfare. I might disagree too. There’s a bigger bully boy out there and possibly a reason for hope.

    We have written many times before about the perils of depending on “other people’s money”. In most cases, the most catastrophic financial implosions have involved high levels of debt or leverage. However, in certain cases catastrophe has been avoided. The phrase “my word is my bond” speaks to credibility but I’m thinking of a more threatening type of bond today. Recall the famous words of Clinton White House strategist, James Carville….

     

    “I used to think that if there was reincarnation, I wanted to come back as the President or the Pope or as a .400 baseball hitter. But now I would want to come back as the bond market. You can intimidate everybody.”

     

    Liz Truss might attest to that intimidatory power. Her lettuce-life UK premiership was ended by the UK government debt markets (Gilts) going into freefall after her mini-budget ignored all rational advance warnings and almost blew up the UK pension fund system. The Bank of England saved pension funds with a swift monetary/funding intervention but there was no saving Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng or his delusional prime minister. Fast forward to 2025, and bond markets for me are the big start-of-year story. And, it’s not looking good for the UK….again. In fact, things have deteriorated since the Truss budget debacle. It appears that an election pitch along the lines of “the other lot are awful, vote for us” is failing to convince the all-powerful debt markets that the new government of Sir Keir Starmer has any credible grip on the economy. Try these bond market data points for starters…

     

    UK government long-term borrowing costs – priced in the 30-year Gilt/bond markets) – are at their highest levels since…. 1998.

     

    UK government medium-term borrowing costs – priced in the 10-year Gilt markets – are at their highest since 2008.

     

    In real terms, this means that the UK government is going to spend more on interest costs than on national education this year. Meanwhile, the politics of the country is consumed by “grooming gang” criminality which has been widely known about since at least 2015 (Jay Report). Oh, and UK Treasury Minister, Darren Jones, has just soothed House of Commons members’ fears saying “it is normal for the price of gilts to fluctuate”. Fluctuate? I can think of other “F” words being used on City financial trading floors right now. However, the ‘reality bite’ of bond markets might not be confined to the UK.

    The US government has been racking up monster debts too – just the $34 trillion at the last count. So, for those believing Trump is either going to buy Greenland for trillions of dollars or spend similar amounts on military invasions of US allies (I know, genius stuff), there’s a tiny bond detail which merits some attention. At this week’s US government monthly auction of 10-year bonds/debt instruments traders pushed the yields/costs to be paid by the US government to an 18-year high of 4.68%. It might not look like a particularly big cost but this is the foundation of all pricing in the US house mortgage and car finance markets. So, if the bond markets are threatening mortgage or car financing costs to rise to levels not seen in almost two decades, then be assured that the bond bully boy will trump the fantasy words of Agent Orange. This is an example of debt markets warning about spending inflation and unsustainable government budget deficits. But, there’s another type of warning which the bond markets can deliver.

    Ultra-low interest rates(bond yields) can also point to multi-year stagnation caused by a national (including government) debt crisis. Japan is the classic multi-decade example of minimal GDP growth or inflation and super-low interest rates. But, there’s a new contender for zombie debt stagnation: China. The Middle Kingdom’s $11 trillion government debt market is sending some very strong signals. The gap in costs/yields between the US and Chinese government bond markets is the highest in history. Chinese 10-year bonds are yielding just 1.6%, but the bigger story is in the long-term 30-year bond markets. Japanese 30-year bond yields are now higher than China’s which starkly signals a “Japanification” of the Chinese economy. The credibility of China’s economy is at stake but critically that of President Xi too. Interestingly, Xi’s new nickname on the Chinese internet is “the elementary school student”. Of course, an invasion of Taiwan could distract the Chinese population but there’s also a real possibility bond markets could signal Xi being toppled from power.

    As a final thought and one recently raised by David McWilliams in an excellent podcast there could also be a reality check around the tariff threats of the incoming Trump administration. Maybe it’s not quite as bad as invading your allies, but imposing tariffs on your biggest trading partners could prompt a painful bond bite-back. McWilliams makes the very good point that the Chinese and Japanese own/hold trillions of US government bonds. If these trading counterparties sell them as part of a bigger trade tariff war then US government interest costs and US consumer finance costs will painfully spike. US government interest costs already exceed $1 trillion annually which, if it were a standalone government department, would actually outspend the US Defense Department’s annual budget. My money is on financial pragmatism watering down most of the actual tariff outcomes. In fact, another part of the financial world is hinting at Trump threats not quite happening in a different market. Despite the threats to roll back cleantech and renewable initiatives of the Biden administration, it would seem the markets are not quite convinced. Indeed the latest data from Wall Street might surprise; apparently the share price performances of clean energy stocks and fossil fuel  stocks are in a statistical dead heat since Election Day (Source: Callaway Climate Insights).

    Perhaps there’s a new lesson soon to be learned in geopolitics….

    Your words are only as strong as your bonds.

     

  • Still Some Golden Theme Tickets Left…

    Still Some Golden Theme Tickets Left…

    I’m going to save you some time. Forget about calendar-driven commentariat reviews and 2025 forecasts for investment or geopolitical risk. Sorry to be the “Grinch of Guru”, but calendars and structural investment themes have zero correlation. Opinion is cheap and even the betting markets are displaying their patchy predictive powers in recent weeks. Yip, just a 6% chance of the Ba’athist beast, President Assad, being toppled in Syria. About as much chance as a Chinese spy in Buckingham Palace… oh wait. Sadly, Prince Andrew is a multi-year clown car journey in particularly poor company but there’s a lesson there too. Almost all significant investment themes – risks and opportunities – are multi-year stories whose plots twist and turn but keep a very clear direction of travel. So, let’s take a look at some of the major themes we have previously visited and a few more developing ones; all with interesting plot twists.

    Europe Crisis or Opportunity: Nothing good in the headlines…..German government falls, UK in second month of GDP contraction, France on its 4th premiership in a year. But, but here’s a few twists on the negatives. The lists of where Europe lags the US is a long one, from labour productivity, to AI and innovation, to stock market performance. And yet, if you strip out the performance of AI hardware star, Nvidia, from the S&P 500 then Europe’s stock market (MSCI EMU) has actually earned better returns for investors than the US benchmark since the most recent bull market started in October 2022. That suggests there are lots of European companies doing very well despite ‘core’ European economies struggling. Check out also in recent days Spotify becoming only the second European tech company since SAP to crack the $100 billion market cap mark. The headlines do not lie but the narrative on Europe is more nuanced than you think.

    Healthcare: Another structural theme from previous years’ writings, healthcare has actually been a winning area for Europe thanks to the miracle weight-loss drugs, Ozempic and Wegovy. Their Danish owner, Novo Nordisk, became Europe’s most valuable company in 2024. However, we might be about to enter an accelerated era of therapy/drug discovery for all types of medical illness. The clue is in the Nobel Prizes awarded in both Physics and Chemistry in 2024 to pioneers of AI usage in research. Now, for those already struggling with how AI large language models (LLM) work and the warp-speed calculations of the almost-monthly iterations of these technologies, get ready for the ultimate head wrecker. Google has just developed a quantum computing chip, “Willow”, which performed a computation in less than 5 minutes that would have taken today’s fastest computers 10 septillion years to complete. Yeah, that’s 25 zeros which exceeds known timescales in physics and vastly exceeds the age of the universe. Think about that. This chip created by quantum physics “used” time which theoretically can’t exist unless…… there are other parallel universes. Google Quantum AI founder, Hartman Neven, calmly wrote that the stunning performance of this chip indicates that “we live in a multiverse”.  Maybe Willy Wonka wasn’t so wrong to say “Come with me and you’ll be, In a world of pure imagination”.

    Artificial Intelligence (AI): Arguably, the world of AI has moved in a completely different direction. The shift of investment capital away from bits (software) to atoms (hardware) has been spectacular. Another company nobody ever heard of until recently, Broadcom, has become the latest technology hardware company to join the trillion dollar market capitalisation club. The US chip maker is now one of FOUR tech hardware companies in the list of the 10 most valuable companies on the planet. Clearly, investors see AI infrastructure as the early ‘win’ in the AI arms race. However, do NOT ignore software. Interestingly, the Clouded Judgment software newsletter has flagged a 20% expansion in median software valuation multiples since mid-November (from 5.6x to 6.7x revenues). Also, Nvidia has dropped in value by 11% in recent weeks. Yes, rotation from hardware to software and back again will be a feature of the multi-year AI revolution but the venture capital data from CB Insights confirms the direction of AI travel. Global venture capital (VC) deals in AI jumped 24% in Q3 to the highest levels seen since the Q1 2022 peak. In fact, one in every three dollars of VC investments went to AI start-ups.

    Banking and Fintechs: Closer to home, Revolut has just confirmed it has more than 3 million customers in Ireland. A staggering 75% of all Ireland-based adults now use the UK fintech platform for banking and payments. Meanwhile, the US bank sector has rocketed 30% higher this year, Europe is seeing Italian banking M&A deals and the largest asset manager in the world, Blackrock, has embarked on a private asset acquisition frenzy. We have written before that the future is private and I’m wondering are big corporates thinking the same? Sticking with the fintech sector, it was striking in the past week to see the shipping/logistics giant AP Moller lead an €80m investment round for UK fintech, Zopa Bank. In the same week, we note another globally significant name, Walmart, was the lead investor in a $300m round for fintech platform, One. Hmmm….Private banking/fintech, private opportunity.

    Climate & Electrical Vehicles (EV): Apparently, 11 out of 16 EV battery manufacturing projects in Europe have been canned or delayed. Of course, the $15 billion investment in Northvolt was the highest profile casualty in 2024 but there will be other twists and turns in the electrification journey. And, possibly a lesson in long-term planning. China 20 years ago had almost zero car production capacity. Now, it is on track to manufacturing 30 million cars a year and has surpassed Japan as the biggest exporter in the world with 5.17m units sent overseas. In fact, Chinese built EVs now account for 76% of the global EV market. So, if one were to be thinking 20 years ahead again what is most likely to drive investment returns in the transport world? Well, how about not driving. More specifically, self-driving. So, I’m quietly stunned that Google’s Waymo self-driving cars are clocking up 175,000 rides per week compared to 50,000 rides 6 months ago. That’s actually more than 1 million miles of autonomous transport delivered with an almost flawless safety record. I sense 2025 could see self-driving transport go mainstream and, as I write, Waymo have announced they are about to trial robo-taxis in their first non-US city, Tokyo, next year.

    The list of themes above is not exhaustive but they are structural themes measured in decades rather than calendar years. These are the most likely golden tickets to deliver standout returns like Nvidia’s 27,000 % return over the last 10 years. But, as always, we should keep an eye out for reversals of long standing narratives too. Argentina might be the prompt for contrarian thought while on track to deliver the best stock market returns of 2024. Who knew! So here’s two thoughts to chew over for the festive season: i) A European refugee reversal as Syrian and Ukrainian citizens potentially return home in 2025 and ii) A renewed embrace of nuclear power/investment to drive the electrification of the global economy.

    “Oh you should never, never doubt what nobody is sure about”         –   Willy Wonka